As Free Press, an Open Internet advocacy group, noted last month, "The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) docket for public comments on the existing net neutrality rules has already surpassed all records." (Photo: Free Press/Flickr/cc)
With FCC Now at Full Staff, Groups Warn That Net Neutrality Is Under Threat Once More
"The FCC is moving to end net neutrality—which could mean giving big cable companies room to charge extra fees, block, and censor users."
The Senate on Thursday confirmed two nominees for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)-- Jessica Rosenworcel, a Democrat, and Brendan Carr, a Republican--bringing the agency back to full staff and sparking fears among Open Internet activists and lawmakers that net neutrality will soon be under threat once more.
As Politico reports, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai now "has the votes he needs to roll back" the 2015 Open Internet Order, which prevents large telecommunications companies from controlling online content and requires that all traffic be treated equally. He also has an ally in Carr, who was a lawyer for large telecom companies.
Activists and Democratic lawmakers also raised alarm on Thursday as Rep. Greg Walden (R-Ore.) met with some of the nation's largest Internet service providers (ISPs)--including Verizon, Comcast, and AT&T--to discuss scrapping net neutrality, which some have labeled "the First Amendment of the Internet."
Writing for Mashable, Dipayan Ghosh and Joshua Stager summarized why Open Internet advocates should be concerned about the meeting:
Walden says he wants to bring an end to the "ping-pong games of regulation and litigation." But that ping-pong game only exists because the big ISPs insist on endlessly relitigating this settled law. Walden also wants to examine legislation on net neutrality, citing a dangerous and misguided draft bill from 2015. That bill would gut net neutrality and the FCC's authority to address future problems. It would have been a disaster for the open internet and an unnecessary government intrusion into an online marketplace that is functioning well under current law. It does not need to be resurrected in 2017, and it is not the starting point for negotiation that Walden seems to think it is.
The meeting came in the midst of an unprecedented surge in support for net neutrality at the grassroots. As Free Press, an Open Internet advocacy group, noted last month: "The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) docket for public comments on the existing net neutrality rules has already surpassed all records."
Sens. Tom Udall (D-N.M.), Al Franken (D-Minn.), and several other prominent senators highlighted the growing support behind net neutrality in a letter asking Pai to "extend the comment period for its proposal to undo the Open Internet Order and net neutrality protections."
In addition to the lawmakers' effort, Change.org is circulating a petition warning of the consequences of the FCC's proposed net neutrality rollback, and urging the public to resist.
"The [FCC] is moving to end net neutrality--which could mean giving big cable companies room to charge extra fees, block, and censor users," the petition reads. "This decision could have global implications for the way the world shares and receives information from journalists, newsrooms, and NGOs."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
The Senate on Thursday confirmed two nominees for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)-- Jessica Rosenworcel, a Democrat, and Brendan Carr, a Republican--bringing the agency back to full staff and sparking fears among Open Internet activists and lawmakers that net neutrality will soon be under threat once more.
As Politico reports, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai now "has the votes he needs to roll back" the 2015 Open Internet Order, which prevents large telecommunications companies from controlling online content and requires that all traffic be treated equally. He also has an ally in Carr, who was a lawyer for large telecom companies.
Activists and Democratic lawmakers also raised alarm on Thursday as Rep. Greg Walden (R-Ore.) met with some of the nation's largest Internet service providers (ISPs)--including Verizon, Comcast, and AT&T--to discuss scrapping net neutrality, which some have labeled "the First Amendment of the Internet."
Writing for Mashable, Dipayan Ghosh and Joshua Stager summarized why Open Internet advocates should be concerned about the meeting:
Walden says he wants to bring an end to the "ping-pong games of regulation and litigation." But that ping-pong game only exists because the big ISPs insist on endlessly relitigating this settled law. Walden also wants to examine legislation on net neutrality, citing a dangerous and misguided draft bill from 2015. That bill would gut net neutrality and the FCC's authority to address future problems. It would have been a disaster for the open internet and an unnecessary government intrusion into an online marketplace that is functioning well under current law. It does not need to be resurrected in 2017, and it is not the starting point for negotiation that Walden seems to think it is.
The meeting came in the midst of an unprecedented surge in support for net neutrality at the grassroots. As Free Press, an Open Internet advocacy group, noted last month: "The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) docket for public comments on the existing net neutrality rules has already surpassed all records."
Sens. Tom Udall (D-N.M.), Al Franken (D-Minn.), and several other prominent senators highlighted the growing support behind net neutrality in a letter asking Pai to "extend the comment period for its proposal to undo the Open Internet Order and net neutrality protections."
In addition to the lawmakers' effort, Change.org is circulating a petition warning of the consequences of the FCC's proposed net neutrality rollback, and urging the public to resist.
"The [FCC] is moving to end net neutrality--which could mean giving big cable companies room to charge extra fees, block, and censor users," the petition reads. "This decision could have global implications for the way the world shares and receives information from journalists, newsrooms, and NGOs."
The Senate on Thursday confirmed two nominees for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)-- Jessica Rosenworcel, a Democrat, and Brendan Carr, a Republican--bringing the agency back to full staff and sparking fears among Open Internet activists and lawmakers that net neutrality will soon be under threat once more.
As Politico reports, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai now "has the votes he needs to roll back" the 2015 Open Internet Order, which prevents large telecommunications companies from controlling online content and requires that all traffic be treated equally. He also has an ally in Carr, who was a lawyer for large telecom companies.
Activists and Democratic lawmakers also raised alarm on Thursday as Rep. Greg Walden (R-Ore.) met with some of the nation's largest Internet service providers (ISPs)--including Verizon, Comcast, and AT&T--to discuss scrapping net neutrality, which some have labeled "the First Amendment of the Internet."
Writing for Mashable, Dipayan Ghosh and Joshua Stager summarized why Open Internet advocates should be concerned about the meeting:
Walden says he wants to bring an end to the "ping-pong games of regulation and litigation." But that ping-pong game only exists because the big ISPs insist on endlessly relitigating this settled law. Walden also wants to examine legislation on net neutrality, citing a dangerous and misguided draft bill from 2015. That bill would gut net neutrality and the FCC's authority to address future problems. It would have been a disaster for the open internet and an unnecessary government intrusion into an online marketplace that is functioning well under current law. It does not need to be resurrected in 2017, and it is not the starting point for negotiation that Walden seems to think it is.
The meeting came in the midst of an unprecedented surge in support for net neutrality at the grassroots. As Free Press, an Open Internet advocacy group, noted last month: "The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) docket for public comments on the existing net neutrality rules has already surpassed all records."
Sens. Tom Udall (D-N.M.), Al Franken (D-Minn.), and several other prominent senators highlighted the growing support behind net neutrality in a letter asking Pai to "extend the comment period for its proposal to undo the Open Internet Order and net neutrality protections."
In addition to the lawmakers' effort, Change.org is circulating a petition warning of the consequences of the FCC's proposed net neutrality rollback, and urging the public to resist.
"The [FCC] is moving to end net neutrality--which could mean giving big cable companies room to charge extra fees, block, and censor users," the petition reads. "This decision could have global implications for the way the world shares and receives information from journalists, newsrooms, and NGOs."