SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Chocolate Chip Cookie Dough was one of 10 flavors in which researchers detected traces of the active ingredient used in Monsanto's Roundup herbicide. (Photo: Qfamily/Flickr/cc)
Ten out of 11 samples of Ben & Jerry's ice cream tested positive for glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto's Roundup herbicide, the nonprofit Organic Consumers Association revealed on Tuesday.
Although the amount of glyphosate detected was below the safety limit set by the Environmental Protection Agency, as well as stricter European regulators, the discovery stands out from a slew of other food producers with Roundup-ridden products--from honey and baby food to Cheerios and Ritz Crackers--in part because of the ice cream maker's branding.
Ben & Jerry's stated mission is to produce "the finest quality all natural ice cream...with a continued commitment to incorporating wholesome, natural ingredients, and promoting business practices that respect the Earth and the environment."
OCA's international director Ronnie Cummins accused the company of "rampant greenwashing," writing Tuesday:
The proliferation of $90 billion worth of fraudulently labeled or advertised "natural" and "socially responsible" food products in the U.S. confuses even the most well-intentioned of consumers and lures them away from purchasing genuine organic or grass-fed products. Perhaps no company personifies greenwashing more than Vermont-based Ben & Jerry's. Ben & Jerry's history--a start-up launched by two affable hippies, from a renovated gas station in Burlington, Vt.--is legendary.
While acknowledging the amounts detected in Ben & Jerry's did not exceed federal limits, Cummins said, "Not everyone agrees with the acceptable levels governments have set...And, anyway, would you want to be eating this stuff at all?"
Glyphosate is the most heavily-used agricultural chemical in history, according to a study published last year. Since it was introduced in 1974, more than 2,300 Olympic-size swimming pools of the popular weed-killer have been sprayed on farm fields worldwide. Its widespread use is tied to Monsanto's production of "Roundup Ready" crops--crops genetically modified to resist the chemical. Because it's so widely used, traces of herbicide residue are often found in foods.
This has raised concerns among environmentalists and food safety advocates alike, because glyphosate has been linked hormone disruption, and there is a contentious debate over whether it causes cancer. Last month, California made headlines, and was lauded by environmentalists, when it voted to add glyphosate to its list of cancer-causing chemicals, as Common Dreams reported. In 2015, the World Health Organization designated the chemical a "probable human carcinogen."
Although the federal government tests foods for pesticides, it does not regularly test for glyphosate--so groups such as OCA have taken matters into their own hands. At OCA's request, an independent lab tested two samples of Ben & Jerry's Vanilla ice cream, as well as samples of Peanut Butter Cup, Peanut Butter Cookie, Phish Food, The Tonight Dough, Half Baked, Chocolate Fudge Brownie, Americone Dream, Chocolate Chip Cookie Dough, and Cherry Garcia. Traces of glyphosate, Roundup's key ingredient, were found in all but Cherry Garcia.
In light of the results, OCA has called for Ben & Jerry's "to begin an immediate transition to using only organic ingredients, including milk, in its products or face a national and international consumer boycott." The consumer group also demanded food stores drop the brand unless it commits to transitioning to organic.
"Ben & Jerry's profits are built on the back of an industrial dairy system that poisons the environment and produces pesticide-contaminated food products," said Cummins. "Ben & Jerry's sales, driven in large part by its deceitful claims, damage the organic industry by cutting into the sales of authentic natural, grass-fed and organic producers."
To emphasize the difference that a shift to organic could make, OCA also asked the lab to test the vanilla flavors from three organic brands: Alden's, Julie's, Three Twins, and the Whole Foods Market brand 365. Of those, only the Whole Foods 365 brand was contaminated with trace amounts of glyphosate.
Rob Michalak, global director of social mission at Ben & Jerry's, told the Times that the company is committed to using ingredients from sources that do not include genetically modified organisms (GMOs). As the Times reported:
None of its plant-based ingredients, for instance, come from a genetically engineered crop like corn or soy, where glyphosate is used in production. The company is also trying to figure out a cost-effective way for the dairy farms that supply its milk to use non-GMO feed.
"We're working to transition away from GMO, as far away as we can get," Mr. Michalak said. "But then these tests come along, and we need to better understand where the glyphosate they're finding is coming from. Maybe it's from something that's not even in our supply chain, and so we're missing it."
Cummins and Michalak both said the traces of glyphosate found in these samples were likely from added ingredients such as peanut butter and cookie dough.
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Ten out of 11 samples of Ben & Jerry's ice cream tested positive for glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto's Roundup herbicide, the nonprofit Organic Consumers Association revealed on Tuesday.
Although the amount of glyphosate detected was below the safety limit set by the Environmental Protection Agency, as well as stricter European regulators, the discovery stands out from a slew of other food producers with Roundup-ridden products--from honey and baby food to Cheerios and Ritz Crackers--in part because of the ice cream maker's branding.
Ben & Jerry's stated mission is to produce "the finest quality all natural ice cream...with a continued commitment to incorporating wholesome, natural ingredients, and promoting business practices that respect the Earth and the environment."
OCA's international director Ronnie Cummins accused the company of "rampant greenwashing," writing Tuesday:
The proliferation of $90 billion worth of fraudulently labeled or advertised "natural" and "socially responsible" food products in the U.S. confuses even the most well-intentioned of consumers and lures them away from purchasing genuine organic or grass-fed products. Perhaps no company personifies greenwashing more than Vermont-based Ben & Jerry's. Ben & Jerry's history--a start-up launched by two affable hippies, from a renovated gas station in Burlington, Vt.--is legendary.
While acknowledging the amounts detected in Ben & Jerry's did not exceed federal limits, Cummins said, "Not everyone agrees with the acceptable levels governments have set...And, anyway, would you want to be eating this stuff at all?"
Glyphosate is the most heavily-used agricultural chemical in history, according to a study published last year. Since it was introduced in 1974, more than 2,300 Olympic-size swimming pools of the popular weed-killer have been sprayed on farm fields worldwide. Its widespread use is tied to Monsanto's production of "Roundup Ready" crops--crops genetically modified to resist the chemical. Because it's so widely used, traces of herbicide residue are often found in foods.
This has raised concerns among environmentalists and food safety advocates alike, because glyphosate has been linked hormone disruption, and there is a contentious debate over whether it causes cancer. Last month, California made headlines, and was lauded by environmentalists, when it voted to add glyphosate to its list of cancer-causing chemicals, as Common Dreams reported. In 2015, the World Health Organization designated the chemical a "probable human carcinogen."
Although the federal government tests foods for pesticides, it does not regularly test for glyphosate--so groups such as OCA have taken matters into their own hands. At OCA's request, an independent lab tested two samples of Ben & Jerry's Vanilla ice cream, as well as samples of Peanut Butter Cup, Peanut Butter Cookie, Phish Food, The Tonight Dough, Half Baked, Chocolate Fudge Brownie, Americone Dream, Chocolate Chip Cookie Dough, and Cherry Garcia. Traces of glyphosate, Roundup's key ingredient, were found in all but Cherry Garcia.
In light of the results, OCA has called for Ben & Jerry's "to begin an immediate transition to using only organic ingredients, including milk, in its products or face a national and international consumer boycott." The consumer group also demanded food stores drop the brand unless it commits to transitioning to organic.
"Ben & Jerry's profits are built on the back of an industrial dairy system that poisons the environment and produces pesticide-contaminated food products," said Cummins. "Ben & Jerry's sales, driven in large part by its deceitful claims, damage the organic industry by cutting into the sales of authentic natural, grass-fed and organic producers."
To emphasize the difference that a shift to organic could make, OCA also asked the lab to test the vanilla flavors from three organic brands: Alden's, Julie's, Three Twins, and the Whole Foods Market brand 365. Of those, only the Whole Foods 365 brand was contaminated with trace amounts of glyphosate.
Rob Michalak, global director of social mission at Ben & Jerry's, told the Times that the company is committed to using ingredients from sources that do not include genetically modified organisms (GMOs). As the Times reported:
None of its plant-based ingredients, for instance, come from a genetically engineered crop like corn or soy, where glyphosate is used in production. The company is also trying to figure out a cost-effective way for the dairy farms that supply its milk to use non-GMO feed.
"We're working to transition away from GMO, as far away as we can get," Mr. Michalak said. "But then these tests come along, and we need to better understand where the glyphosate they're finding is coming from. Maybe it's from something that's not even in our supply chain, and so we're missing it."
Cummins and Michalak both said the traces of glyphosate found in these samples were likely from added ingredients such as peanut butter and cookie dough.
Ten out of 11 samples of Ben & Jerry's ice cream tested positive for glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto's Roundup herbicide, the nonprofit Organic Consumers Association revealed on Tuesday.
Although the amount of glyphosate detected was below the safety limit set by the Environmental Protection Agency, as well as stricter European regulators, the discovery stands out from a slew of other food producers with Roundup-ridden products--from honey and baby food to Cheerios and Ritz Crackers--in part because of the ice cream maker's branding.
Ben & Jerry's stated mission is to produce "the finest quality all natural ice cream...with a continued commitment to incorporating wholesome, natural ingredients, and promoting business practices that respect the Earth and the environment."
OCA's international director Ronnie Cummins accused the company of "rampant greenwashing," writing Tuesday:
The proliferation of $90 billion worth of fraudulently labeled or advertised "natural" and "socially responsible" food products in the U.S. confuses even the most well-intentioned of consumers and lures them away from purchasing genuine organic or grass-fed products. Perhaps no company personifies greenwashing more than Vermont-based Ben & Jerry's. Ben & Jerry's history--a start-up launched by two affable hippies, from a renovated gas station in Burlington, Vt.--is legendary.
While acknowledging the amounts detected in Ben & Jerry's did not exceed federal limits, Cummins said, "Not everyone agrees with the acceptable levels governments have set...And, anyway, would you want to be eating this stuff at all?"
Glyphosate is the most heavily-used agricultural chemical in history, according to a study published last year. Since it was introduced in 1974, more than 2,300 Olympic-size swimming pools of the popular weed-killer have been sprayed on farm fields worldwide. Its widespread use is tied to Monsanto's production of "Roundup Ready" crops--crops genetically modified to resist the chemical. Because it's so widely used, traces of herbicide residue are often found in foods.
This has raised concerns among environmentalists and food safety advocates alike, because glyphosate has been linked hormone disruption, and there is a contentious debate over whether it causes cancer. Last month, California made headlines, and was lauded by environmentalists, when it voted to add glyphosate to its list of cancer-causing chemicals, as Common Dreams reported. In 2015, the World Health Organization designated the chemical a "probable human carcinogen."
Although the federal government tests foods for pesticides, it does not regularly test for glyphosate--so groups such as OCA have taken matters into their own hands. At OCA's request, an independent lab tested two samples of Ben & Jerry's Vanilla ice cream, as well as samples of Peanut Butter Cup, Peanut Butter Cookie, Phish Food, The Tonight Dough, Half Baked, Chocolate Fudge Brownie, Americone Dream, Chocolate Chip Cookie Dough, and Cherry Garcia. Traces of glyphosate, Roundup's key ingredient, were found in all but Cherry Garcia.
In light of the results, OCA has called for Ben & Jerry's "to begin an immediate transition to using only organic ingredients, including milk, in its products or face a national and international consumer boycott." The consumer group also demanded food stores drop the brand unless it commits to transitioning to organic.
"Ben & Jerry's profits are built on the back of an industrial dairy system that poisons the environment and produces pesticide-contaminated food products," said Cummins. "Ben & Jerry's sales, driven in large part by its deceitful claims, damage the organic industry by cutting into the sales of authentic natural, grass-fed and organic producers."
To emphasize the difference that a shift to organic could make, OCA also asked the lab to test the vanilla flavors from three organic brands: Alden's, Julie's, Three Twins, and the Whole Foods Market brand 365. Of those, only the Whole Foods 365 brand was contaminated with trace amounts of glyphosate.
Rob Michalak, global director of social mission at Ben & Jerry's, told the Times that the company is committed to using ingredients from sources that do not include genetically modified organisms (GMOs). As the Times reported:
None of its plant-based ingredients, for instance, come from a genetically engineered crop like corn or soy, where glyphosate is used in production. The company is also trying to figure out a cost-effective way for the dairy farms that supply its milk to use non-GMO feed.
"We're working to transition away from GMO, as far away as we can get," Mr. Michalak said. "But then these tests come along, and we need to better understand where the glyphosate they're finding is coming from. Maybe it's from something that's not even in our supply chain, and so we're missing it."
Cummins and Michalak both said the traces of glyphosate found in these samples were likely from added ingredients such as peanut butter and cookie dough.
Any such effort, said one democracy watchdog, "would violate the Constitution and is a major step to prevent free and fair elections."
In his latest full-frontal assault on democratic access and voting rights, President Donald Trump early Monday said he will lead an effort to ban both mail-in ballots and voting machines for next year's mid-term elections—a vow met with immediate rebuke from progressive critics.
"I am going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS, and also, while we’re at it, Highly 'Inaccurate,' Very Expensive, and Seriously Controversial VOTING MACHINES, which cost Ten Times more than accurate and sophisticated Watermark Paper, which is faster, and leaves NO DOUBT, at the end of the evening, as to who WON, and who LOST, the Election," Trump wrote in a social media post infested with lies and falsehoods.
Trump falsely claimed that no other country in the world uses mail-in voting—a blatant lie, according to International IDEA, which monitors democratic trends worldwide, at least 34 nations allow for in-country postal voting of some kind. The group notes that over 100 countries allow out-of-country postal voting for citizens living or stationed overseas during an election.
Trump has repeated his false claim—over and over again—that he won the 2020 election, which he actually lost, in part due to fraud related to mail-in ballots, though the lie has been debunked ad nauseam. He also fails to note that mail-in ballots were very much in use nationwide in 2024, with an estimated 30% of voters casting a mail-in ballot as opposed to in-person during the election in which Trump returned to the White House and Republicans took back the US Senate and retained the US House of Representatives.
Monday's rant by Trump came just days after his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, who Trump claimed commented personally on the 2020 election and mail-in ballots. In a Friday night interview with Fox News, Trump claimed "one of the most interesting" things Putin said during their talks about ending the war in Ukraine was about mail-in voting in the United States and how Trump would have won the election were it not for voter fraud, echoing Trump's own disproven claims.
Trump: Vladimir Putin said your election was rigged because you have mail-in voting… he talked about 2020 and he said you won that election by so much.. it was a rigged election. pic.twitter.com/m8v0tXuiDQ
— Acyn (@Acyn) August 16, 2025
Trump said Monday he would sign an executive order on election processes, suggesting that it would forbid mail-in ballots as well as the automatic tabulation machines used in states nationwide. He also said that states, which are in charge of administering their elections at the local level, "must do what the Federal Government, as represented by the President of the United States, tells them, FOR THE GOOD OF OUR COUNTRY, to do."
Marc Elias, founder of Democracy Docket, which tracks voting rights and issues related to ballot access, said any executive order by Trump to end mail-in voting or forbid provenly safe and accurate voting machines ahead of the midterms would be "unconstitutional and illegal."
Such an effort, said Elias, "would violate the Constitution and is a major step to prevent free and fair elections."
"We've got the FBI patrolling the streets." said one protester. "We've got National Guard set up as a show of force. What's scarier is if we allow this."
Residents of Washington, DC over the weekend demonstrated against US President Donald Trump's deployment of the National Guard in their city.
As reported by NBC Washington, demonstrators gathered on Saturday at DuPont Circle and then marched to the White House to direct their anger at Trump for sending the National Guard to Washington DC, and for his efforts to take over the Metropolitan Police Department.
In an interview with NBC Washington, one protester said that it was important for the administration to see that residents weren't intimidated by the presence of military personnel roaming their streets.
"I know a lot of people are scared," the protester said. "We've got the FBI patrolling the streets. We've got National Guard set up as a show of force. What's scarier is if we allow this."
Saturday protests against the presence of the National Guard are expected to be a weekly occurrence, organizers told NBC Washington.
Hours after the march to the White House, other demonstrators began to gather at Union Station to protest the presence of the National Guard units there. Audio obtained by freelance journalist Andrew Leyden reveals that the National Guard decided to move their forces out of the area in reaction to what dispatchers called "growing demonstrations."
Even residents who didn't take part in formal demonstrations over the weekend managed to express their displeasure with the National Guard patrolling the city. According to The Washington Post, locals who spent a night on the town in the U Street neighborhood on Friday night made their unhappiness with law enforcement in the city very well known.
"At the sight of local and federal law enforcement throughout the night, people pooled on the sidewalk—watching, filming, booing," wrote the Post. "Such interactions played out again and again as the night drew on. Onlookers heckled the police as they did their job and applauded as officers left."
Trump last week ordered the National Guard into Washington, DC and tried to take control the Metropolitan Police, purportedly in order to reduce crime in the city. Statistics released earlier this year, however, showed a significant drop in crime in the nation's capital.
"Why not impose more sanctions on [Russia] and force them to agree to a cease-fire, instead of accepting that Putin won't agree to one?" asked NBC's Kristen Welker.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Sunday was repeatedly put on the spot over the failure of US President Donald Trump to secure a cease-fire deal between Russia and Ukraine.
Rubio appeared on news programs across all major networks on Sunday morning and he was asked on all of them about Trump's summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin ending without any kind of agreement to end the conflict with Ukraine, which has now lasted for more than three years.
During an interview on ABC's "This Week," Rubio was grilled by Martha Raddatz about the purported "progress" being made toward bringing the war to a close. She also zeroed in on Trump's own statements saying that he wanted to see Russia agree to a cease-fire by the end of last week's summit.
"The president went in to that meeting saying he wanted a ceasefire, and there would be consequences if they didn't agree on a ceasefire in that meeting, and they didn't agree to a ceasefire," she said. "So where are the consequences?"
"That's not the aim of this," Rubio replied. "First of all..."
"The president said that was the aim!" Raddatz interjected.
"Yeah, but you're not going to reach a cease-fire or a peace agreement in a meeting in which only one side is represented," Rubio replied. "That's why it's important to bring both leaders together, that's the goal here."
RADDATZ: The president went in to that meeting saying he wanted a ceasefire and there would be consequences if they didn't agree on a ceasefire in that meeting, and they didn't agree to a ceasefire. So where are the consequences?
RUBIO: That's not the aim
RADDATZ: The president… pic.twitter.com/fuO9q1Y5ze
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) August 17, 2025
Rubio also made an appearance on CBS' "Face the Nation," where host Margaret Brennan similarly pressed him about the expectations Trump had set going into the summit.
"The president told those European leaders last week he wanted a ceasefire," she pointed out. "He went on television and said he would walk out of the meeting if Putin didn't agree to one, he said there would be severe consequences if he didn't agree to one. He said he'd walk out in two minutes—he spent three hours talking to Vladimir Putin and he did not get one. So there's mixed messages here."
"Our goal is not to stage some production for the world to say, 'Oh, how dramatic, he walked out,'" Rubio shot back. "Our goal is to have a peace agreement to end this war, OK? And obviously we felt, and I agreed, that there was enough progress, not a lot of progress, but enough progress made in those talks to allow us to move to the next phase."
Rubio then insisted that now was not the time to hit Russia with new sanctions, despite Trump's recent threats to do so, because it would end talks all together.
Brennan: The president told those European leaders last week he wanted a ceasefire. He went on television and said he would walk out of the meeting if Putin didn't agree to one, he said there would be severe consequences if he didn’t agree to one. He spent three hours talking to… pic.twitter.com/2WtuDH5Oii
— Acyn (@Acyn) August 17, 2025
During an appearance on NBC's "Meet the Press," host Kristen Welker asked Rubio about the "severe consequences" Trump had promised for Russia if it did not agree to a cease-fire.
"Why not impose more sanctions on [Russia] and force them to agree to a cease-fire, instead of accepting that Putin won't agree to one?" Welker asked.
"Well, first, that's something that I think a lot of people go around saying that I don't necessarily think is true," he replied. "I don't think new sanctions on Russia are going to force them to accept a cease-fire. They are already under severe sanctions... you can argue that could be a consequence of refusing to agree to a cease-fire or the end of hostilities."
He went on to say that he hoped the US would not be forced to put more sanctions on Russia "because that means peace talks failed."
WELKER: Why not impose more sanctions on Russia and force them to agree to a ceasefire, instead of accepting that Putin won't agree to one?
RUBIO: Well, I think that's something people go around saying that I don't necessarily think is true. I don't think new sanctions on Russia… pic.twitter.com/GoIucsrDmA
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) August 17, 2025
During the 2024 presidential campaign, Trump said that he could end the war between Russian and Ukraine within the span of a single day. In the seven months since his inauguration, the war has only gotten more intense as Russia has stepped up its daily attacks on Ukrainian cities and infrastructure.