SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Congresswoman Barbara Lee speaks during the 2015 amfAR Capitol Hill Conference at U.S. Capitol Visitor Center on March 24, 2015 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Leigh Vogel/Getty Images)
Barbara Lee Slams Paul Ryan for Killing Endless War Repeal 'In Dead of Night'
"This is underhanded and undemocratic," says congresswoman from California. "The people deserve a debate!"
Jul 19, 2017
Just over two weeks after Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) succeeded in adding an amendment to the 2018 Defense Appropriations Bill that would have repealed the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) reportedly killed the amendment late Tuesday night with no debate or discussion.
Lee took to Twitter to denounce Ryan's move as "underhanded" and "undemocratic."
"Ryan should be ashamed of himself for forcing Republicans to strip out my bipartisan AUMF amendment in the dead of night," Lee wrote. "What is he afraid of?"
In 2001, Lee was the only member of Congress to vote against the AUMF, which provided authorization (pdf) for the administration of George W. Bush to take military action against "those nations, organizations, or persons he determine[d] planned, authorized, committed, or aided" the September 11 attacks.
The measure has since been used expansively to authorize military actions throughout the Middle East by the Obama and Trump administrations.
Lee has for years called for the measure's repeal. Following her momentary victory last month, when Democrats and Republicans in the House Appropriations Committee voted overwhelmingly to include her AUMF repeal amendment in the 2018 Defense Appropriations Bill, Lee celebrated the step toward "put[ting] an end to the overly broad blank check for war that is the 2001 AUMF."
"Congress has been missing in action on matters of war and peace for nearly sixteen years."
--Rep. Barbara Lee"If passed into law as part of the DoD bill, it would repeal the 2001 AUMF eight months after enactment of this legislation. That would allow plenty of time for Congress to finally live up to its constitutional obligation to debate and vote on any new AUMF," Lee added. "It is far past time for Congress to do its job and for the Speaker to allow a debate and vote on this vital national security issue."
The specifics surrounding Ryan's quiet, late-night move to kill Lee's amendment are unclear.
"Getting to the bottom of this as we speak," Lee's office told Buzzfeed reporter Emma Loop Tuesday night.
In a statement on Wednesday, Lee said the effort to stifle debate on America's wars is "autocratic" and "may be a new low from Speaker Ryan."
"Congress has been missing in action on matters of war and peace for nearly sixteen years. Republican leadership showed last night that they will do anything to maintain this status quo," Lee said. "Refusing to debate and vote on our ongoing wars is an abdication of our constitutional responsibility. Our men and women in uniform deserve better."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Just over two weeks after Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) succeeded in adding an amendment to the 2018 Defense Appropriations Bill that would have repealed the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) reportedly killed the amendment late Tuesday night with no debate or discussion.
Lee took to Twitter to denounce Ryan's move as "underhanded" and "undemocratic."
"Ryan should be ashamed of himself for forcing Republicans to strip out my bipartisan AUMF amendment in the dead of night," Lee wrote. "What is he afraid of?"
In 2001, Lee was the only member of Congress to vote against the AUMF, which provided authorization (pdf) for the administration of George W. Bush to take military action against "those nations, organizations, or persons he determine[d] planned, authorized, committed, or aided" the September 11 attacks.
The measure has since been used expansively to authorize military actions throughout the Middle East by the Obama and Trump administrations.
Lee has for years called for the measure's repeal. Following her momentary victory last month, when Democrats and Republicans in the House Appropriations Committee voted overwhelmingly to include her AUMF repeal amendment in the 2018 Defense Appropriations Bill, Lee celebrated the step toward "put[ting] an end to the overly broad blank check for war that is the 2001 AUMF."
"Congress has been missing in action on matters of war and peace for nearly sixteen years."
--Rep. Barbara Lee"If passed into law as part of the DoD bill, it would repeal the 2001 AUMF eight months after enactment of this legislation. That would allow plenty of time for Congress to finally live up to its constitutional obligation to debate and vote on any new AUMF," Lee added. "It is far past time for Congress to do its job and for the Speaker to allow a debate and vote on this vital national security issue."
The specifics surrounding Ryan's quiet, late-night move to kill Lee's amendment are unclear.
"Getting to the bottom of this as we speak," Lee's office told Buzzfeed reporter Emma Loop Tuesday night.
In a statement on Wednesday, Lee said the effort to stifle debate on America's wars is "autocratic" and "may be a new low from Speaker Ryan."
"Congress has been missing in action on matters of war and peace for nearly sixteen years. Republican leadership showed last night that they will do anything to maintain this status quo," Lee said. "Refusing to debate and vote on our ongoing wars is an abdication of our constitutional responsibility. Our men and women in uniform deserve better."
Just over two weeks after Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) succeeded in adding an amendment to the 2018 Defense Appropriations Bill that would have repealed the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) reportedly killed the amendment late Tuesday night with no debate or discussion.
Lee took to Twitter to denounce Ryan's move as "underhanded" and "undemocratic."
"Ryan should be ashamed of himself for forcing Republicans to strip out my bipartisan AUMF amendment in the dead of night," Lee wrote. "What is he afraid of?"
In 2001, Lee was the only member of Congress to vote against the AUMF, which provided authorization (pdf) for the administration of George W. Bush to take military action against "those nations, organizations, or persons he determine[d] planned, authorized, committed, or aided" the September 11 attacks.
The measure has since been used expansively to authorize military actions throughout the Middle East by the Obama and Trump administrations.
Lee has for years called for the measure's repeal. Following her momentary victory last month, when Democrats and Republicans in the House Appropriations Committee voted overwhelmingly to include her AUMF repeal amendment in the 2018 Defense Appropriations Bill, Lee celebrated the step toward "put[ting] an end to the overly broad blank check for war that is the 2001 AUMF."
"Congress has been missing in action on matters of war and peace for nearly sixteen years."
--Rep. Barbara Lee"If passed into law as part of the DoD bill, it would repeal the 2001 AUMF eight months after enactment of this legislation. That would allow plenty of time for Congress to finally live up to its constitutional obligation to debate and vote on any new AUMF," Lee added. "It is far past time for Congress to do its job and for the Speaker to allow a debate and vote on this vital national security issue."
The specifics surrounding Ryan's quiet, late-night move to kill Lee's amendment are unclear.
"Getting to the bottom of this as we speak," Lee's office told Buzzfeed reporter Emma Loop Tuesday night.
In a statement on Wednesday, Lee said the effort to stifle debate on America's wars is "autocratic" and "may be a new low from Speaker Ryan."
"Congress has been missing in action on matters of war and peace for nearly sixteen years. Republican leadership showed last night that they will do anything to maintain this status quo," Lee said. "Refusing to debate and vote on our ongoing wars is an abdication of our constitutional responsibility. Our men and women in uniform deserve better."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.