Exxon Waiver to Drill in Russia Rejected by Treasury Department
'If the Trump administration had allowed Exxon to drill for oil in Russia, people from around the country and from both sides of the aisle in Congress would have unleashed widespread resistance'
Exxon has not been granted a waiver to bypass U.S. sanctions and partner with a Russian oil company to drill in the Baltic Sea.
In a one-page statement Friday, the Treasury Department announced that the decision was made in consultation with President Donald Trump.
"We will remain vigilant to make sure this egregious subversion of diplomacy for profit won't happen through any other channels."
--Cassady Craighill, Greenpeace USA"In consultation with President Donald J. Trump, the Treasury Department will not be issuing waivers to U.S. companies, including Exxon, authorizing drilling prohibited by current Russian sanctions," the statement read.
Exxon released a statement saying it "understand[s] the statement today by Secretary Mnuchin in consultation with President Trump," according to The Hill.
The State Department, which had a say in granting the waiver, is overseen by former Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson, and it is possible the decision to reject Exxon's request was a response to widespread and bipartisan outrage over the waiver application.
The Hill reported:
Exxon's waiver request was met with resistance from key lawmakers this week. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), a leading Russia hawk, responded to news of Exxon's request with a Wednesday tweet reading, "Are you crazy?" Other lawmakers, including Sens. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Bob Menendez (D-N.J.), criticized the request as well.
In response to the Treasury Department decision, Greenpeace USA spokesperson Cassady Craighill said:
The presumption by Exxon that it could get a pass and undermine United States foreign policy was ridiculous from the start, but not surprising given their old boss is now our chief diplomat. If the Trump administration had allowed Exxon to drill for oil in Russia, people from around the country and from both sides of the aisle in Congress would have unleashed widespread resistance.
"We will remain vigilant to make sure this egregious subversion of diplomacy for profit won't happen through any other channels," Craighill concluded.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Exxon has not been granted a waiver to bypass U.S. sanctions and partner with a Russian oil company to drill in the Baltic Sea.
In a one-page statement Friday, the Treasury Department announced that the decision was made in consultation with President Donald Trump.
"We will remain vigilant to make sure this egregious subversion of diplomacy for profit won't happen through any other channels."
--Cassady Craighill, Greenpeace USA"In consultation with President Donald J. Trump, the Treasury Department will not be issuing waivers to U.S. companies, including Exxon, authorizing drilling prohibited by current Russian sanctions," the statement read.
Exxon released a statement saying it "understand[s] the statement today by Secretary Mnuchin in consultation with President Trump," according to The Hill.
The State Department, which had a say in granting the waiver, is overseen by former Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson, and it is possible the decision to reject Exxon's request was a response to widespread and bipartisan outrage over the waiver application.
The Hill reported:
Exxon's waiver request was met with resistance from key lawmakers this week. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), a leading Russia hawk, responded to news of Exxon's request with a Wednesday tweet reading, "Are you crazy?" Other lawmakers, including Sens. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Bob Menendez (D-N.J.), criticized the request as well.
In response to the Treasury Department decision, Greenpeace USA spokesperson Cassady Craighill said:
The presumption by Exxon that it could get a pass and undermine United States foreign policy was ridiculous from the start, but not surprising given their old boss is now our chief diplomat. If the Trump administration had allowed Exxon to drill for oil in Russia, people from around the country and from both sides of the aisle in Congress would have unleashed widespread resistance.
"We will remain vigilant to make sure this egregious subversion of diplomacy for profit won't happen through any other channels," Craighill concluded.
Exxon has not been granted a waiver to bypass U.S. sanctions and partner with a Russian oil company to drill in the Baltic Sea.
In a one-page statement Friday, the Treasury Department announced that the decision was made in consultation with President Donald Trump.
"We will remain vigilant to make sure this egregious subversion of diplomacy for profit won't happen through any other channels."
--Cassady Craighill, Greenpeace USA"In consultation with President Donald J. Trump, the Treasury Department will not be issuing waivers to U.S. companies, including Exxon, authorizing drilling prohibited by current Russian sanctions," the statement read.
Exxon released a statement saying it "understand[s] the statement today by Secretary Mnuchin in consultation with President Trump," according to The Hill.
The State Department, which had a say in granting the waiver, is overseen by former Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson, and it is possible the decision to reject Exxon's request was a response to widespread and bipartisan outrage over the waiver application.
The Hill reported:
Exxon's waiver request was met with resistance from key lawmakers this week. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), a leading Russia hawk, responded to news of Exxon's request with a Wednesday tweet reading, "Are you crazy?" Other lawmakers, including Sens. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Bob Menendez (D-N.J.), criticized the request as well.
In response to the Treasury Department decision, Greenpeace USA spokesperson Cassady Craighill said:
The presumption by Exxon that it could get a pass and undermine United States foreign policy was ridiculous from the start, but not surprising given their old boss is now our chief diplomat. If the Trump administration had allowed Exxon to drill for oil in Russia, people from around the country and from both sides of the aisle in Congress would have unleashed widespread resistance.
"We will remain vigilant to make sure this egregious subversion of diplomacy for profit won't happen through any other channels," Craighill concluded.