Calling the GOP's Nuclear Bluff, Dems Secure 41 Votes Against Gorsuch

Democratic voters say that, come the 2018 primary election, they will abandon those lawmakers who have bucked party leadership and say they will support President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee. (Photo: Alex Wong/ Getty Images)

Calling the GOP's Nuclear Bluff, Dems Secure 41 Votes Against Gorsuch

Forces on opposing sides of the political spectrum laser-focused on lawmakers who have not yet committed to voting for or against the Supreme Court nominee

Updated 1:15pm EDT:

Sen. Chris Coons (Del.) said Monday that he would not be supporting the nomination of Neil Gorsuch, handing the Democratic opposition the 41 votes needed for a filibuster and thus raising the question of whether the Republican Party will go so far as to use the "nuclear option" to force the Supreme Court confirmation.

During his announcement, Coons called on his Republican colleagues to come together to find an alternate option.


With the Senate Judiciary committee voting Monday to advance the confirmation of judge Neil Gorsuch, forces on opposing sides of the political spectrum are laser-focused on the handful of lawmakers who have not yet committed publicly to voting for or against the Supreme Court nominee.

Monday's committee vote was expected to fall along party lines, allowing the GOP to move the nominee forward with an 11 to 9 advantage. Watch the hearing here.

In what has essentially become a game of chicken between the two dominant political factions, the Democratic Party is reportedly closing in on the 41 votes needed to filibuster Gorsuch's nomination during the floor vote, currently scheduled for Friday. But Republican Majority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell has hinted that he is willing to use the so-called "nuclear option," which would change the rules to allow the reigning party to confirm Gorsuch with a simple majority, or 51 votes.

Sen. Patrick Leahy on Monday announced he would not be supporting Gorsuch because of the judge's refusal during his confirmation hearing to answer "basic questions about the principles underlying our Constitution." This means that the opposition needs to gain just one more vote to block the nominee, challenging Republicans to proceed with the nuclear threat.

The Indivisible movement said Monday that it is "confident Democrats will stand strong" against President Donald Trump's nominee with a 60-vote threshold, and went so far as to question if Republicans could even rally enough support to go nuclear.

This is despite the fact that three Democrats have now bucked party leadership in backing Trump's nominee. On Sunday, Sen. Joe Donnelly (Ind.) announced he would join Sens. Joe Manchin (W.Va.) and Heidi Heitkamp (N.D.) in voting for Gorsuch, prompting calls from Democrats to abandon the "traitors" come the 2018 primary election.

According to the latest whip count, four senators have not yet announced how they are voting: Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Sen. Chris Coons (Del.), Sen. Angus King (I-Maine), and Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.). At the same time, Sen. Ben Cardin (Md.) continues to fall under what Huffington Post describes as "squishy" in his support, meaning that he has "hinted that [he'll] vote with Republicans to end the filibuster, but then vote against Gorsuch's confirmation."

Meanwhile, an outside conservative group comprised of secret donors has been targeting the districts of those lawmakers with a multi-million dollar advertising campaign claiming that Gorsuch is a "fair-minded," middle-of-the-road nominee. Last week, the Judicial Crisis Network announced it would contribute another $1 million in a last-minute ad blitz on top of the $10 million already spent in support of his confirmation.

But progressive groups have repeatedly warned that the judge's record of pro-corporate, anti-women, and anti-worker opinions makes him far more extreme than his supporters claim, pointing to Gorsuch's Senate confirmation hearing when he refused to articulate his stance on critical Supreme Court decisions, such as Roe v. Wade, that are certain to face challenges in upcoming years.

Rebuking the argument that Democrats should save their "firepower" for future Supreme Court battles, The Nation's Ari Berman on Monday outlined the numerous reasons the party has for blocking Gorsuch, arguing that even if they are ultimately unsuccessful, "they need to try."

"Put pressure on moderate Republicans like Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowsk. Energize the Democratic base. Shine a spotlight on the importance of the courts. Show the public they stand for something," Berman wrote, adding: "Caving on Gorsuch will make it harder, not easier, to wage future battles."

Join Us: News for people demanding a better world

Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place.

We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference.

Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today!

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.