

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
This post may be updated.
With a line that extended around the block, a packed hearing, and hundreds of thousands of signatures delivered, it was made clear on Tuesday that the people want answers regarding President Donald Trump's conflicts of interest and potential ties to Russia, and are demanding that Congress pave the way.
The House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday will vote on the resolution of inquiry introduced earlier this month by Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), who, ahead of the hearing, delivered 850,000 petition signatures demanding an investigation into Trump's potential conflicts of interest.
While progressive organizations and others shared pictures of people lining the halls and sidewalks outside Tuesday's hearing, reports from inside indicated that the Republican-dominated committee was stalling on the scheduled vote.
The obscure measure would force Attorney General Jeff Sessions to release documents to the U.S. House "relating to the financial practices" of the president, including "any criminal or counterintelligence investigation" targeting him or any employment of the executive office, foreign government investment in any of Trump's holdings, the specific "proposal to maintain an interest in his business holdings," the Foreign Emoluments Clause, and any other documents relating to potential conflicts of interest, as Common Dreams previously reported.
Nadler and his 130 House colleagues co-sponsoring the resolution of inquiry see Tuesday's committee hearing as a moment of truth for Trump as well as congressional Republicans who thus far have shielded the president from disclosure and are likely to continue doing so.
"We are here today to demand answers. We are here today in search of the truth," Nadler said during a press conference before Tuesday's hearing. "We are here today to find out where our Republican colleagues stand on these issues. Will they stand with the American people who demand answers? Or will they bow down to the Trump Administration and refuse to hold them accountable for their actions?"
"The American people have many, many questions about Donald Trump--about his connections with Russia, about his business ties, and about his potential conflicts of interest," Nadler continued. "Now, many of these questions are not new. We have been asking them for months. But so far we have heard nothing. Nothing from the Trump Administration. Nothing from the Attorney General. And nothing from the Republicans in Congress. Despite our repeated efforts to seek out the truth, our calls have fallen on deaf ears."
"Well, not anymore," he added. "They can't avoid us any longer."
Earlier this week, MoveOn.org released a video with Nadler explaining how his strategic resolution will "force the Republicans to vote whether they want to participate in the cover up of what went on or whether they want to do their job of proper oversight."
Anna Galland, executive director MoveOn.org Civic Action, said pointedly, "If Republican members of the House Judiciary Committee kill Rep. Nadler's resolution in committee, Republicans will be on record against finding out the truth."
Pointing to the recent flood of civic engagement and protests at congressional town hall events, Joe Dinkin, national communications director for the Working Families Party, said: "Americans just turned out in droves at town halls to demand that their members of Congress resist Trump's attacks on working families and investigate his corruption and ethical violations. The only proper response from Congress is to demand a full and independent investigation."
Updates on the hearing are being shared with the hashtag #ResolutionofInquiry while live feeds are available on Facebook live or the committee's website.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This post may be updated.
With a line that extended around the block, a packed hearing, and hundreds of thousands of signatures delivered, it was made clear on Tuesday that the people want answers regarding President Donald Trump's conflicts of interest and potential ties to Russia, and are demanding that Congress pave the way.
The House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday will vote on the resolution of inquiry introduced earlier this month by Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), who, ahead of the hearing, delivered 850,000 petition signatures demanding an investigation into Trump's potential conflicts of interest.
While progressive organizations and others shared pictures of people lining the halls and sidewalks outside Tuesday's hearing, reports from inside indicated that the Republican-dominated committee was stalling on the scheduled vote.
The obscure measure would force Attorney General Jeff Sessions to release documents to the U.S. House "relating to the financial practices" of the president, including "any criminal or counterintelligence investigation" targeting him or any employment of the executive office, foreign government investment in any of Trump's holdings, the specific "proposal to maintain an interest in his business holdings," the Foreign Emoluments Clause, and any other documents relating to potential conflicts of interest, as Common Dreams previously reported.
Nadler and his 130 House colleagues co-sponsoring the resolution of inquiry see Tuesday's committee hearing as a moment of truth for Trump as well as congressional Republicans who thus far have shielded the president from disclosure and are likely to continue doing so.
"We are here today to demand answers. We are here today in search of the truth," Nadler said during a press conference before Tuesday's hearing. "We are here today to find out where our Republican colleagues stand on these issues. Will they stand with the American people who demand answers? Or will they bow down to the Trump Administration and refuse to hold them accountable for their actions?"
"The American people have many, many questions about Donald Trump--about his connections with Russia, about his business ties, and about his potential conflicts of interest," Nadler continued. "Now, many of these questions are not new. We have been asking them for months. But so far we have heard nothing. Nothing from the Trump Administration. Nothing from the Attorney General. And nothing from the Republicans in Congress. Despite our repeated efforts to seek out the truth, our calls have fallen on deaf ears."
"Well, not anymore," he added. "They can't avoid us any longer."
Earlier this week, MoveOn.org released a video with Nadler explaining how his strategic resolution will "force the Republicans to vote whether they want to participate in the cover up of what went on or whether they want to do their job of proper oversight."
Anna Galland, executive director MoveOn.org Civic Action, said pointedly, "If Republican members of the House Judiciary Committee kill Rep. Nadler's resolution in committee, Republicans will be on record against finding out the truth."
Pointing to the recent flood of civic engagement and protests at congressional town hall events, Joe Dinkin, national communications director for the Working Families Party, said: "Americans just turned out in droves at town halls to demand that their members of Congress resist Trump's attacks on working families and investigate his corruption and ethical violations. The only proper response from Congress is to demand a full and independent investigation."
Updates on the hearing are being shared with the hashtag #ResolutionofInquiry while live feeds are available on Facebook live or the committee's website.
This post may be updated.
With a line that extended around the block, a packed hearing, and hundreds of thousands of signatures delivered, it was made clear on Tuesday that the people want answers regarding President Donald Trump's conflicts of interest and potential ties to Russia, and are demanding that Congress pave the way.
The House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday will vote on the resolution of inquiry introduced earlier this month by Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), who, ahead of the hearing, delivered 850,000 petition signatures demanding an investigation into Trump's potential conflicts of interest.
While progressive organizations and others shared pictures of people lining the halls and sidewalks outside Tuesday's hearing, reports from inside indicated that the Republican-dominated committee was stalling on the scheduled vote.
The obscure measure would force Attorney General Jeff Sessions to release documents to the U.S. House "relating to the financial practices" of the president, including "any criminal or counterintelligence investigation" targeting him or any employment of the executive office, foreign government investment in any of Trump's holdings, the specific "proposal to maintain an interest in his business holdings," the Foreign Emoluments Clause, and any other documents relating to potential conflicts of interest, as Common Dreams previously reported.
Nadler and his 130 House colleagues co-sponsoring the resolution of inquiry see Tuesday's committee hearing as a moment of truth for Trump as well as congressional Republicans who thus far have shielded the president from disclosure and are likely to continue doing so.
"We are here today to demand answers. We are here today in search of the truth," Nadler said during a press conference before Tuesday's hearing. "We are here today to find out where our Republican colleagues stand on these issues. Will they stand with the American people who demand answers? Or will they bow down to the Trump Administration and refuse to hold them accountable for their actions?"
"The American people have many, many questions about Donald Trump--about his connections with Russia, about his business ties, and about his potential conflicts of interest," Nadler continued. "Now, many of these questions are not new. We have been asking them for months. But so far we have heard nothing. Nothing from the Trump Administration. Nothing from the Attorney General. And nothing from the Republicans in Congress. Despite our repeated efforts to seek out the truth, our calls have fallen on deaf ears."
"Well, not anymore," he added. "They can't avoid us any longer."
Earlier this week, MoveOn.org released a video with Nadler explaining how his strategic resolution will "force the Republicans to vote whether they want to participate in the cover up of what went on or whether they want to do their job of proper oversight."
Anna Galland, executive director MoveOn.org Civic Action, said pointedly, "If Republican members of the House Judiciary Committee kill Rep. Nadler's resolution in committee, Republicans will be on record against finding out the truth."
Pointing to the recent flood of civic engagement and protests at congressional town hall events, Joe Dinkin, national communications director for the Working Families Party, said: "Americans just turned out in droves at town halls to demand that their members of Congress resist Trump's attacks on working families and investigate his corruption and ethical violations. The only proper response from Congress is to demand a full and independent investigation."
Updates on the hearing are being shared with the hashtag #ResolutionofInquiry while live feeds are available on Facebook live or the committee's website.