Big Pharma-Backed Dems Join GOP to Block Sanders Effort to End Drug Price Gouging
Sen. Cory Booker and others draw sharp rebuke from observers, who pointed out that many who voted "no" receive substantial contributions from the pharmaceutical industry
While the Republican Party is publicly dismantling millions of Americans' health safety net, more than a dozen Democrats late Wednesday quietly threw their weight behind Big Pharma and voted down an amendment that would have allowed pharmacists to import identical--but much less expensive--drugs from Canada and other countries.
The "power and wealth of the pharmaceutical industry and their 1,300 lobbyists and unlimited sums of money have bought the United States Congress," Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) declared in a speech on the Senate floor while introducing the amendment, co-sponsored by Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), which would have been attached to the chamber's budget resolution. It came amid a flurry of legislative activity during Wednesday evening's "vote-a-rama."
"Year after year the same old takes place: the pharmaceutical industry makes more and more money and the American people pay higher ad higher prices," Sanders continued, asking his colleagues if they "have the guts finally to stand up to the pharmaceutical industry and their lobbyists and their campaign contributions and fight for the American consumer?"
It turns out, no.
In fact, 13 Democrats voted against the measure (roll call here), siding with the Republican majority and drawing sharp rebuke from observers, who pointed out that many who voted "no" receive substantial contributions from the pharmaceutical industry.
@Lauren_Steiner @davidsirota Donnelly (absurd history of bad votes of this issue), Heinrich (HillaryMan), Heitkamp (anti-ACA)...
-- Siobhan Rampling (@Mayafacetico) January 12, 2017
@Lauren_Steiner @davidsirota Menendez (pharma money), Murray (pharma money), Tiller (???), Warner (VIRGINIA DEMOCRATS!), & Our Dear Cory
-- Siobhan Rampling (@Mayafacetico) January 12, 2017
Many were particularly dismayed that Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) had sided with Big Pharma after winning liberal praise for his unprecedented testimony against Attorney General nominee Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.). Notably, 12 Republicans and two Independents, including Sanders, voted for the measure.
Seventy-two percent of Americans support such a rule, according to Sanders, who noted that the price differences between the U.S. and Canada are "dramatic."
"EpiPen, for example, costs more than $600 in the United States compared to $290 in Canada for the exact same allergy treatment," a press statement from Sanders' office observed. "A popular drug for high cholesterol, Crestor, costs $730 in the U.S. but $160 across the northern border. Abilify, a drug to treat depression, is more than $2,636 for a 90-day supply in the U.S. but only $436 in Canada."
Sanders' attempt to attach such a provision to the 21st Century Cures Act last month was similarly blocked.
Should the import rule have passed, it would have been a step towards ending "the epidemic of price gouging," Sanders said, which has become a hot-button issue for many Americans who are unable to afford their prescription drugs--a point the former presidential candidate hammered home on Twitter ahead of the vote.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
While the Republican Party is publicly dismantling millions of Americans' health safety net, more than a dozen Democrats late Wednesday quietly threw their weight behind Big Pharma and voted down an amendment that would have allowed pharmacists to import identical--but much less expensive--drugs from Canada and other countries.
The "power and wealth of the pharmaceutical industry and their 1,300 lobbyists and unlimited sums of money have bought the United States Congress," Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) declared in a speech on the Senate floor while introducing the amendment, co-sponsored by Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), which would have been attached to the chamber's budget resolution. It came amid a flurry of legislative activity during Wednesday evening's "vote-a-rama."
"Year after year the same old takes place: the pharmaceutical industry makes more and more money and the American people pay higher ad higher prices," Sanders continued, asking his colleagues if they "have the guts finally to stand up to the pharmaceutical industry and their lobbyists and their campaign contributions and fight for the American consumer?"
It turns out, no.
In fact, 13 Democrats voted against the measure (roll call here), siding with the Republican majority and drawing sharp rebuke from observers, who pointed out that many who voted "no" receive substantial contributions from the pharmaceutical industry.
@Lauren_Steiner @davidsirota Donnelly (absurd history of bad votes of this issue), Heinrich (HillaryMan), Heitkamp (anti-ACA)...
-- Siobhan Rampling (@Mayafacetico) January 12, 2017
@Lauren_Steiner @davidsirota Menendez (pharma money), Murray (pharma money), Tiller (???), Warner (VIRGINIA DEMOCRATS!), & Our Dear Cory
-- Siobhan Rampling (@Mayafacetico) January 12, 2017
Many were particularly dismayed that Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) had sided with Big Pharma after winning liberal praise for his unprecedented testimony against Attorney General nominee Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.). Notably, 12 Republicans and two Independents, including Sanders, voted for the measure.
Seventy-two percent of Americans support such a rule, according to Sanders, who noted that the price differences between the U.S. and Canada are "dramatic."
"EpiPen, for example, costs more than $600 in the United States compared to $290 in Canada for the exact same allergy treatment," a press statement from Sanders' office observed. "A popular drug for high cholesterol, Crestor, costs $730 in the U.S. but $160 across the northern border. Abilify, a drug to treat depression, is more than $2,636 for a 90-day supply in the U.S. but only $436 in Canada."
Sanders' attempt to attach such a provision to the 21st Century Cures Act last month was similarly blocked.
Should the import rule have passed, it would have been a step towards ending "the epidemic of price gouging," Sanders said, which has become a hot-button issue for many Americans who are unable to afford their prescription drugs--a point the former presidential candidate hammered home on Twitter ahead of the vote.
While the Republican Party is publicly dismantling millions of Americans' health safety net, more than a dozen Democrats late Wednesday quietly threw their weight behind Big Pharma and voted down an amendment that would have allowed pharmacists to import identical--but much less expensive--drugs from Canada and other countries.
The "power and wealth of the pharmaceutical industry and their 1,300 lobbyists and unlimited sums of money have bought the United States Congress," Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) declared in a speech on the Senate floor while introducing the amendment, co-sponsored by Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), which would have been attached to the chamber's budget resolution. It came amid a flurry of legislative activity during Wednesday evening's "vote-a-rama."
"Year after year the same old takes place: the pharmaceutical industry makes more and more money and the American people pay higher ad higher prices," Sanders continued, asking his colleagues if they "have the guts finally to stand up to the pharmaceutical industry and their lobbyists and their campaign contributions and fight for the American consumer?"
It turns out, no.
In fact, 13 Democrats voted against the measure (roll call here), siding with the Republican majority and drawing sharp rebuke from observers, who pointed out that many who voted "no" receive substantial contributions from the pharmaceutical industry.
@Lauren_Steiner @davidsirota Donnelly (absurd history of bad votes of this issue), Heinrich (HillaryMan), Heitkamp (anti-ACA)...
-- Siobhan Rampling (@Mayafacetico) January 12, 2017
@Lauren_Steiner @davidsirota Menendez (pharma money), Murray (pharma money), Tiller (???), Warner (VIRGINIA DEMOCRATS!), & Our Dear Cory
-- Siobhan Rampling (@Mayafacetico) January 12, 2017
Many were particularly dismayed that Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) had sided with Big Pharma after winning liberal praise for his unprecedented testimony against Attorney General nominee Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.). Notably, 12 Republicans and two Independents, including Sanders, voted for the measure.
Seventy-two percent of Americans support such a rule, according to Sanders, who noted that the price differences between the U.S. and Canada are "dramatic."
"EpiPen, for example, costs more than $600 in the United States compared to $290 in Canada for the exact same allergy treatment," a press statement from Sanders' office observed. "A popular drug for high cholesterol, Crestor, costs $730 in the U.S. but $160 across the northern border. Abilify, a drug to treat depression, is more than $2,636 for a 90-day supply in the U.S. but only $436 in Canada."
Sanders' attempt to attach such a provision to the 21st Century Cures Act last month was similarly blocked.
Should the import rule have passed, it would have been a step towards ending "the epidemic of price gouging," Sanders said, which has become a hot-button issue for many Americans who are unable to afford their prescription drugs--a point the former presidential candidate hammered home on Twitter ahead of the vote.