House Intel Report Is 'Accidentally Exonerating,' Says Snowden
'After three years of investigation and millions of dollars, they can present no evidence of harmful intent, foreign influence, or harm. Wow.'
The House Intelligence Committee on Thursday released a heavily redacted, declassified version of its report on National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower Edward Snowden, and Snowden charges that the "parade of falsity" contained in the report is "accidentally exonerating."
The report was several years in the making. A summary of it was published in September of this year just as Oliver Stone's sympathetic biopic of Snowden was released in theaters--part of a growing campaign that seeks a presidential pardon for the whistleblower.
At the time, Snowden slammed the summary of the report--and he wasn't alone. "The report is not only one-sided, not only incurious, not only contemptuous of fact," wrote journalist and author Barton Gellman after it was it published. "It is trifling."
In the full report (pdf), the intelligence committee neglects to mention Snowden's well-documented critique of the Russian government at the same time that it charges--with no evidence--that the whistleblower is in contact with Russian spy agencies.
The committee also seems to characterize Snowden as a bad employee for his repeated efforts to report concerns to higher-ups, but then goes on to argue that Snowden should have reported the NSA's mass surveillance practices to the NSA inspector general (despite documented retaliation against whistleblowers at multiple government agencies, including the NSA).
"Bottom line: this report's core claims are made without evidence, and are often contrary to both common sense and the public record," Snowden tweeted.
In a statement, Snowden's lawyer Ben Wizner, who also directs the ACLU's Speech, Privacy & Technology Project, dismissed the report as he defended his client's motivation for leaking the information to journalists.
"The House committee spent three years and millions of dollars in a failed attempt to discredit Edward Snowden, whose actions led to the most significant intelligence reforms in a generation," Wizner said. "The report wholly ignores Snowden's repeated and courageous criticism of Russian surveillance and censorship laws. It combines demonstrable falsehoods with deceptive inferences to paint an entirely fictional portrait of an American whistleblower."
Read the whistleblower's full takedown of the report on Twitter here:
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The House Intelligence Committee on Thursday released a heavily redacted, declassified version of its report on National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower Edward Snowden, and Snowden charges that the "parade of falsity" contained in the report is "accidentally exonerating."
The report was several years in the making. A summary of it was published in September of this year just as Oliver Stone's sympathetic biopic of Snowden was released in theaters--part of a growing campaign that seeks a presidential pardon for the whistleblower.
At the time, Snowden slammed the summary of the report--and he wasn't alone. "The report is not only one-sided, not only incurious, not only contemptuous of fact," wrote journalist and author Barton Gellman after it was it published. "It is trifling."
In the full report (pdf), the intelligence committee neglects to mention Snowden's well-documented critique of the Russian government at the same time that it charges--with no evidence--that the whistleblower is in contact with Russian spy agencies.
The committee also seems to characterize Snowden as a bad employee for his repeated efforts to report concerns to higher-ups, but then goes on to argue that Snowden should have reported the NSA's mass surveillance practices to the NSA inspector general (despite documented retaliation against whistleblowers at multiple government agencies, including the NSA).
"Bottom line: this report's core claims are made without evidence, and are often contrary to both common sense and the public record," Snowden tweeted.
In a statement, Snowden's lawyer Ben Wizner, who also directs the ACLU's Speech, Privacy & Technology Project, dismissed the report as he defended his client's motivation for leaking the information to journalists.
"The House committee spent three years and millions of dollars in a failed attempt to discredit Edward Snowden, whose actions led to the most significant intelligence reforms in a generation," Wizner said. "The report wholly ignores Snowden's repeated and courageous criticism of Russian surveillance and censorship laws. It combines demonstrable falsehoods with deceptive inferences to paint an entirely fictional portrait of an American whistleblower."
Read the whistleblower's full takedown of the report on Twitter here:
The House Intelligence Committee on Thursday released a heavily redacted, declassified version of its report on National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower Edward Snowden, and Snowden charges that the "parade of falsity" contained in the report is "accidentally exonerating."
The report was several years in the making. A summary of it was published in September of this year just as Oliver Stone's sympathetic biopic of Snowden was released in theaters--part of a growing campaign that seeks a presidential pardon for the whistleblower.
At the time, Snowden slammed the summary of the report--and he wasn't alone. "The report is not only one-sided, not only incurious, not only contemptuous of fact," wrote journalist and author Barton Gellman after it was it published. "It is trifling."
In the full report (pdf), the intelligence committee neglects to mention Snowden's well-documented critique of the Russian government at the same time that it charges--with no evidence--that the whistleblower is in contact with Russian spy agencies.
The committee also seems to characterize Snowden as a bad employee for his repeated efforts to report concerns to higher-ups, but then goes on to argue that Snowden should have reported the NSA's mass surveillance practices to the NSA inspector general (despite documented retaliation against whistleblowers at multiple government agencies, including the NSA).
"Bottom line: this report's core claims are made without evidence, and are often contrary to both common sense and the public record," Snowden tweeted.
In a statement, Snowden's lawyer Ben Wizner, who also directs the ACLU's Speech, Privacy & Technology Project, dismissed the report as he defended his client's motivation for leaking the information to journalists.
"The House committee spent three years and millions of dollars in a failed attempt to discredit Edward Snowden, whose actions led to the most significant intelligence reforms in a generation," Wizner said. "The report wholly ignores Snowden's repeated and courageous criticism of Russian surveillance and censorship laws. It combines demonstrable falsehoods with deceptive inferences to paint an entirely fictional portrait of an American whistleblower."
Read the whistleblower's full takedown of the report on Twitter here: