The Washington Post reported that the Pentagon buried a study which uncovered $125 billion in bureaucratic waste, fearing that Congress would cut defense funding if lawmakers found out. (Photo: David B. Gleason/flickr/cc)
Dec 05, 2016
President-elect Donald Trump on Tuesday suggested that he would cancel what he claimed was a $4 billion Boeing contract to build a new fleet of Air Force One planes, saying he wanted the manufacturer to "make a lot of money, but not that much money."
Trump's comments came just after the Washington Post published a bombshell investigation showing the Pentagon had hidden a study which uncovered $125 billion in bureaucratic waste, fearing that Congress would cut defense funding if lawmakers found out.
The Post's Craig Whitlock and Bob Woodward reported:
Pentagon leaders had requested the study to help make their enormous back-office bureaucracy more efficient and reinvest any savings in combat power. But after the project documented far more wasteful spending than expected, senior defense officials moved swiftly to kill it by discrediting and suppressing the results.
The report, issued in January 2015, identified "a clear path" for the Defense Department to save $125 billion over five years. The plan would not have required layoffs of civil servants or reductions in military personnel. Instead, it would have streamlined the bureaucracy through attrition and early retirements, curtailed high-priced contractors and made better use of information technology.
"The cost-cutting study could find a receptive audience with President-elect Donald Trump," Whitlock and Woodward write. "He has promised a major military buildup and said he would pay for it by 'eliminating government waste and budget gimmicks.'"
But Trump's unpredictable temperament means it may be impossible to know if he will heed his own call. As the Guardian's Trevor Timm noted in an op-ed Tuesday, cutting government waste, including at the Pentagon, was Trump's "go-to cliche whenever someone asked him how he was going to pay for something he proposed...In fact, it's been the Republican party's mantra for years anytime they bring up the debt or the deficit."
"So Trump and his Republican colleagues want to get rid of 'waste,' there's literally never been a more giant and obvious example. Here's their time to act!" Timm wrote.
But, he continued, "It's unlikely that the Republicans will hold the Pentagon accountable for its free-spending ways even as they try to nickel and dime social programs. In the Republicans' fantasy world, the Pentagon's enormous budget is never a problem," adding:
Defense conglomerates and weapons makers fill the coffers of Republicans (and a lot of Democrats) each year, and spread large construction projects across virtually every state in the country, so lawmakers are loathe to cut funding for jobs in their respective districts. Add to that a hawkish tendency to support multiple wars around the world, and the Pentagon budget becomes virtually untouchable.
"Next time you hear Republicans complaining about food stamps for poor people, or calling for a reduction of social security benefits, or proposing to privatize Medicare, make sure to throw this report back in their face," Timm concluded. "Because whatever the waste problems in one government program or another, they pale in comparison to this."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
President-elect Donald Trump on Tuesday suggested that he would cancel what he claimed was a $4 billion Boeing contract to build a new fleet of Air Force One planes, saying he wanted the manufacturer to "make a lot of money, but not that much money."
Trump's comments came just after the Washington Post published a bombshell investigation showing the Pentagon had hidden a study which uncovered $125 billion in bureaucratic waste, fearing that Congress would cut defense funding if lawmakers found out.
The Post's Craig Whitlock and Bob Woodward reported:
Pentagon leaders had requested the study to help make their enormous back-office bureaucracy more efficient and reinvest any savings in combat power. But after the project documented far more wasteful spending than expected, senior defense officials moved swiftly to kill it by discrediting and suppressing the results.
The report, issued in January 2015, identified "a clear path" for the Defense Department to save $125 billion over five years. The plan would not have required layoffs of civil servants or reductions in military personnel. Instead, it would have streamlined the bureaucracy through attrition and early retirements, curtailed high-priced contractors and made better use of information technology.
"The cost-cutting study could find a receptive audience with President-elect Donald Trump," Whitlock and Woodward write. "He has promised a major military buildup and said he would pay for it by 'eliminating government waste and budget gimmicks.'"
But Trump's unpredictable temperament means it may be impossible to know if he will heed his own call. As the Guardian's Trevor Timm noted in an op-ed Tuesday, cutting government waste, including at the Pentagon, was Trump's "go-to cliche whenever someone asked him how he was going to pay for something he proposed...In fact, it's been the Republican party's mantra for years anytime they bring up the debt or the deficit."
"So Trump and his Republican colleagues want to get rid of 'waste,' there's literally never been a more giant and obvious example. Here's their time to act!" Timm wrote.
But, he continued, "It's unlikely that the Republicans will hold the Pentagon accountable for its free-spending ways even as they try to nickel and dime social programs. In the Republicans' fantasy world, the Pentagon's enormous budget is never a problem," adding:
Defense conglomerates and weapons makers fill the coffers of Republicans (and a lot of Democrats) each year, and spread large construction projects across virtually every state in the country, so lawmakers are loathe to cut funding for jobs in their respective districts. Add to that a hawkish tendency to support multiple wars around the world, and the Pentagon budget becomes virtually untouchable.
"Next time you hear Republicans complaining about food stamps for poor people, or calling for a reduction of social security benefits, or proposing to privatize Medicare, make sure to throw this report back in their face," Timm concluded. "Because whatever the waste problems in one government program or another, they pale in comparison to this."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
President-elect Donald Trump on Tuesday suggested that he would cancel what he claimed was a $4 billion Boeing contract to build a new fleet of Air Force One planes, saying he wanted the manufacturer to "make a lot of money, but not that much money."
Trump's comments came just after the Washington Post published a bombshell investigation showing the Pentagon had hidden a study which uncovered $125 billion in bureaucratic waste, fearing that Congress would cut defense funding if lawmakers found out.
The Post's Craig Whitlock and Bob Woodward reported:
Pentagon leaders had requested the study to help make their enormous back-office bureaucracy more efficient and reinvest any savings in combat power. But after the project documented far more wasteful spending than expected, senior defense officials moved swiftly to kill it by discrediting and suppressing the results.
The report, issued in January 2015, identified "a clear path" for the Defense Department to save $125 billion over five years. The plan would not have required layoffs of civil servants or reductions in military personnel. Instead, it would have streamlined the bureaucracy through attrition and early retirements, curtailed high-priced contractors and made better use of information technology.
"The cost-cutting study could find a receptive audience with President-elect Donald Trump," Whitlock and Woodward write. "He has promised a major military buildup and said he would pay for it by 'eliminating government waste and budget gimmicks.'"
But Trump's unpredictable temperament means it may be impossible to know if he will heed his own call. As the Guardian's Trevor Timm noted in an op-ed Tuesday, cutting government waste, including at the Pentagon, was Trump's "go-to cliche whenever someone asked him how he was going to pay for something he proposed...In fact, it's been the Republican party's mantra for years anytime they bring up the debt or the deficit."
"So Trump and his Republican colleagues want to get rid of 'waste,' there's literally never been a more giant and obvious example. Here's their time to act!" Timm wrote.
But, he continued, "It's unlikely that the Republicans will hold the Pentagon accountable for its free-spending ways even as they try to nickel and dime social programs. In the Republicans' fantasy world, the Pentagon's enormous budget is never a problem," adding:
Defense conglomerates and weapons makers fill the coffers of Republicans (and a lot of Democrats) each year, and spread large construction projects across virtually every state in the country, so lawmakers are loathe to cut funding for jobs in their respective districts. Add to that a hawkish tendency to support multiple wars around the world, and the Pentagon budget becomes virtually untouchable.
"Next time you hear Republicans complaining about food stamps for poor people, or calling for a reduction of social security benefits, or proposing to privatize Medicare, make sure to throw this report back in their face," Timm concluded. "Because whatever the waste problems in one government program or another, they pale in comparison to this."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.