Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

"The decision by Campbell’s sends a clear message to Monsanto and the Grocery Manufacturers Association which have spent hundreds of millions of dollars to defeat GMO labeling laws," said Ronnie Cummins, the international director for the advocacy group Organic Consumers Association. (Photo: Reuters)

"The decision by Campbell’s sends a clear message to Monsanto and the Grocery Manufacturers Association which have spent hundreds of millions of dollars to defeat GMO labeling laws," said Ronnie Cummins, the international director for the advocacy group Organic Consumers Association. (Photo: Reuters)

'No GMO Soup for You'? Consumer Victory as Campbell Announces New Labels

'Knowing what's in our food is a basic right'

Sarah Lazare

Campbell Soup's announcement that it will become the first U.S. company to begin labeling genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in its products garnered accolades on Friday from food and safety groups, who heralded the development as a "significant win" for transparency.

"The decision by Campbell’s sends a clear message to Monsanto and the Grocery Manufacturers Association which have spent hundreds of millions of dollars to defeat GMO labeling laws," Ronnie Cummins, the international director for advocacy group Organic Consumers Association, said in a statement.

Campbell made the announcement on Thursday, declaring its support for "mandatory national GMO labeling." In addition to disclosing GMOs—from corn to soy—the company said it will also "advocate for federal legislation that would require all foods and beverages regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to be clearly and simply labeled for GMOs."

"As a result of its decision to support mandatory national GMO labeling, Campbell will withdraw from all efforts led by coalitions and groups opposing such measures," the company said.

Campbell did, however, state that GMOs are safe, raising objections from some.

"Ultimately we would like to see Campbell's source only organic ingredients, from suppliers that use organic, regenerative farming practices," said Cummins. "And we disagree with the company's claims that GMOs are safe, especially given that about 85 percent of GMO crops are grown with Monsanto’s Roundup, which contains glyphosate, a probable carcinogen, according to the World Health Organization.

"But," Cummins added, "we congratulate the company for being the first major brand to provide transparency around GMO ingredients."

The company's announcement marks a shift from its former policy. Campbell, in fact, was previously targeted by a boycott after brands under its umbrella donated large sums of money to defeat GMO labeling initiatives in different states.

Campaigners say that the nationwide, grassroots push for GMO labeling played a critical role in pressing Campbell to shift its policy. And indeed, polling consistently shows overwhelming support for transparency measures.

According to a poll released in June 2015 by ABC News, 92 percent of people in the U.S. believe that the "federal government should require labels on food saying whether it's been genetically modified, or 'bio-engineered' (this poll used both phrases)."

"Such near-unanimity in public opinion is rare," noted ABC reporter Gary Langer.

What's more, the company's announcement comes ahead of a GMO labeling fight in Congress later this month.

Gary Ruskin of the watchdog group U.S. Right to Know told Common Dreams that the soup company's recent announcement comes at "a time when we're winning."

"This is a crack in the wall, the first major food company that has broken with the industry opposition to GMO labeling," Ruskin added. "It's going to make every other major food company look stupid and put pressure on them to follow suit. Knowing what's in our food is a basic right."


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.

Experts Warn 'Doomsday Scenario' for Colorado River Basin Possible in 2023

"The problem with massive projects like Lake Powell and the Glen Canyon Dam," said one climate journalist, "is they were engineered for a climate that no longer exists."

Julia Conley ·


Starbucks Violated Law and Must Bargain With Union in Seattle: NLRB

The coffee giant, which plans to appeal, "is continuing its aggressive anti-union campaign against workers by delaying, confusing, and flat-out refusing to bargain with them," said Starbucks Workers United.

Jessica Corbett ·


Three UK Universities Ban Fossil Fuel Industry Recruiters From Campus

"It is vital that our universities show with actions, not words, that they are taking the side of climate justice, and not of the industries driving us deeper into a climate crisis," said one campaigner.

Julia Conley ·


Lula Aims to Create New Federal Police Unit to Curb Environmental Crimes in Brazil

"Reverting the destruction from the past administration and taking meaningful action to protect the Amazon and the climate must be a priority of the new government," said one advocate.

Kenny Stancil ·


Merkley Bill Aims to Dismantle Hedge Fund Stranglehold on Housing Market

Senate Democrat accuses Wall Street of "pouring fuel on the fire of the affordable housing crisis."

Jessica Corbett ·

Common Dreams Logo