Paging Public Editor! Rightwing Billionaire Revealed as Influential Newspaper's New Owner
After GOP mega-donor outed for purchase, watchdogs raise concerns over public implications
Now that casino magnate and billionaire rightwinger Sheldon Adelson has been outed as the mystery buyer of an influential Nevada newspaper; a watchdog group is demanding that the publication appoint an independent public editor to monitor conflicts of interest and ethical breaches.
"Vigorous, independent journalism is vital to the health of democracy," Todd O'Boyle, director of Common Cause's Media and Democracy Reform Initiative, said Tuesday, responding to Adelson's purchase of the Las Vegas Review-Journal. "While the First Amendment protects Mr. Adelson's right to buy the paper and direct its operations, citizens should exercise their right to demand that he operate it in the public interest or openly declare that the reporting from his publication will be slanted."
"Mr. Adelson is perhaps the most deep-pocketed political donor in the country," O'Boyle added. "He is expected to spend tens of millions of dollars--and maybe more--to secure the Republican presidential nomination and then the presidency itself for his preferred candidate."
Jim Naureckas, the editor of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting's watchdog journal Extra!, explained how the purchase could also impact people locally.
"Local newspapers are the main vehicle for the public to get a glimpse of what's going on at the level of government that most impacts their lives," Naureckas told Common Dreams. "Las Vegas is a one-industry town, and Adelson is a casino billionaire who is part of that industry. This will not be good for the people of Las Vegas."
The warnings are the latest twist to a saga that started shrouded in secrecy.
Earlier this month, staffers at the Las Vegas paper announced on Twitter that a buyer had purchased the publication for $140 million on the condition of anonymity, including from the outlet's workers. In demanding information about their new owner, journalists cited ethical requirements for journalistic transparency, and according to the New York Times, some were actively investigating the sale for a potential article.
But late last week, Fortune published the explosive revelation that Adelson—a controversial figure—had orchestrated the sale and structured it through his son-in-law, Patrick Dumont, the current senior vice president of finance and strategy at Adelson's Las Vegas Sands Corp.
Adelson's family soon confirmed the purchase, claiming they kept the sale secret because they "did not want an announcement to distract from the important role Nevada continues to play in the 2016 presidential elections."
Earlier this week, the Review-Journal ran an editorial reflecting on the potential implications for the paper, which they say has a "conservative/libertarian tilt," concluding that the publication could see some major editorial shifts, from a "complete reversal" on its drug policy positions to a noticeable shift on defense spending.
Looking to another Adelson purchase, the editorial also noted that the magnate "isn't shy about using his free Tel Aviv newspaper, Israel Hayom, to support Mr. Netanyahu and their shared positions. Whether any of this newspaper's editorial page positions change will go a long way toward further explaining why Mr. Adelson purchased the Review-Journal."
However, separate Review-Journal reporting from four days ago indicates that the Adelson purchase may have already impacted its journalistic coverage.
"Just over a month before Sheldon Adelson's family was revealed as the new owner of the Las Vegas Review-Journal, three reporters at the newspaper received an unusual assignment passed down from the newspaper's corporate management: Drop everything and spend two weeks monitoring all activity of three Clark County judges," journalists James DeHaven, Jennifer Robison, and Eric Hartley wrote.
One of the people closely observed was District Judge Elizabeth Gonzalez, whose "current caseload includes Jacobs v. Sands, a long-running wrongful termination lawsuit filed against Adelson and his company, Las Vegas Sands Corp.," the journalists noted.
Naureckas emphasized that Adelson's latest purchase is "part of a trend of rich individuals buying papers as a hobby or a vehicle to promulgate their points of view."
"It puts a tremendous amount of information power in the hands of a tiny number of people," said Naureckas. "Invariably, they're extremely wealthy because only the wealthy have enough money to buy a newspaper as a personal possession."
FINAL DAY! This is urgent.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just hours left in our Spring Campaign, we're still falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Now that casino magnate and billionaire rightwinger Sheldon Adelson has been outed as the mystery buyer of an influential Nevada newspaper; a watchdog group is demanding that the publication appoint an independent public editor to monitor conflicts of interest and ethical breaches.
"Vigorous, independent journalism is vital to the health of democracy," Todd O'Boyle, director of Common Cause's Media and Democracy Reform Initiative, said Tuesday, responding to Adelson's purchase of the Las Vegas Review-Journal. "While the First Amendment protects Mr. Adelson's right to buy the paper and direct its operations, citizens should exercise their right to demand that he operate it in the public interest or openly declare that the reporting from his publication will be slanted."
"Mr. Adelson is perhaps the most deep-pocketed political donor in the country," O'Boyle added. "He is expected to spend tens of millions of dollars--and maybe more--to secure the Republican presidential nomination and then the presidency itself for his preferred candidate."
Jim Naureckas, the editor of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting's watchdog journal Extra!, explained how the purchase could also impact people locally.
"Local newspapers are the main vehicle for the public to get a glimpse of what's going on at the level of government that most impacts their lives," Naureckas told Common Dreams. "Las Vegas is a one-industry town, and Adelson is a casino billionaire who is part of that industry. This will not be good for the people of Las Vegas."
The warnings are the latest twist to a saga that started shrouded in secrecy.
Earlier this month, staffers at the Las Vegas paper announced on Twitter that a buyer had purchased the publication for $140 million on the condition of anonymity, including from the outlet's workers. In demanding information about their new owner, journalists cited ethical requirements for journalistic transparency, and according to the New York Times, some were actively investigating the sale for a potential article.
But late last week, Fortune published the explosive revelation that Adelson—a controversial figure—had orchestrated the sale and structured it through his son-in-law, Patrick Dumont, the current senior vice president of finance and strategy at Adelson's Las Vegas Sands Corp.
Adelson's family soon confirmed the purchase, claiming they kept the sale secret because they "did not want an announcement to distract from the important role Nevada continues to play in the 2016 presidential elections."
Earlier this week, the Review-Journal ran an editorial reflecting on the potential implications for the paper, which they say has a "conservative/libertarian tilt," concluding that the publication could see some major editorial shifts, from a "complete reversal" on its drug policy positions to a noticeable shift on defense spending.
Looking to another Adelson purchase, the editorial also noted that the magnate "isn't shy about using his free Tel Aviv newspaper, Israel Hayom, to support Mr. Netanyahu and their shared positions. Whether any of this newspaper's editorial page positions change will go a long way toward further explaining why Mr. Adelson purchased the Review-Journal."
However, separate Review-Journal reporting from four days ago indicates that the Adelson purchase may have already impacted its journalistic coverage.
"Just over a month before Sheldon Adelson's family was revealed as the new owner of the Las Vegas Review-Journal, three reporters at the newspaper received an unusual assignment passed down from the newspaper's corporate management: Drop everything and spend two weeks monitoring all activity of three Clark County judges," journalists James DeHaven, Jennifer Robison, and Eric Hartley wrote.
One of the people closely observed was District Judge Elizabeth Gonzalez, whose "current caseload includes Jacobs v. Sands, a long-running wrongful termination lawsuit filed against Adelson and his company, Las Vegas Sands Corp.," the journalists noted.
Naureckas emphasized that Adelson's latest purchase is "part of a trend of rich individuals buying papers as a hobby or a vehicle to promulgate their points of view."
"It puts a tremendous amount of information power in the hands of a tiny number of people," said Naureckas. "Invariably, they're extremely wealthy because only the wealthy have enough money to buy a newspaper as a personal possession."
Now that casino magnate and billionaire rightwinger Sheldon Adelson has been outed as the mystery buyer of an influential Nevada newspaper; a watchdog group is demanding that the publication appoint an independent public editor to monitor conflicts of interest and ethical breaches.
"Vigorous, independent journalism is vital to the health of democracy," Todd O'Boyle, director of Common Cause's Media and Democracy Reform Initiative, said Tuesday, responding to Adelson's purchase of the Las Vegas Review-Journal. "While the First Amendment protects Mr. Adelson's right to buy the paper and direct its operations, citizens should exercise their right to demand that he operate it in the public interest or openly declare that the reporting from his publication will be slanted."
"Mr. Adelson is perhaps the most deep-pocketed political donor in the country," O'Boyle added. "He is expected to spend tens of millions of dollars--and maybe more--to secure the Republican presidential nomination and then the presidency itself for his preferred candidate."
Jim Naureckas, the editor of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting's watchdog journal Extra!, explained how the purchase could also impact people locally.
"Local newspapers are the main vehicle for the public to get a glimpse of what's going on at the level of government that most impacts their lives," Naureckas told Common Dreams. "Las Vegas is a one-industry town, and Adelson is a casino billionaire who is part of that industry. This will not be good for the people of Las Vegas."
The warnings are the latest twist to a saga that started shrouded in secrecy.
Earlier this month, staffers at the Las Vegas paper announced on Twitter that a buyer had purchased the publication for $140 million on the condition of anonymity, including from the outlet's workers. In demanding information about their new owner, journalists cited ethical requirements for journalistic transparency, and according to the New York Times, some were actively investigating the sale for a potential article.
But late last week, Fortune published the explosive revelation that Adelson—a controversial figure—had orchestrated the sale and structured it through his son-in-law, Patrick Dumont, the current senior vice president of finance and strategy at Adelson's Las Vegas Sands Corp.
Adelson's family soon confirmed the purchase, claiming they kept the sale secret because they "did not want an announcement to distract from the important role Nevada continues to play in the 2016 presidential elections."
Earlier this week, the Review-Journal ran an editorial reflecting on the potential implications for the paper, which they say has a "conservative/libertarian tilt," concluding that the publication could see some major editorial shifts, from a "complete reversal" on its drug policy positions to a noticeable shift on defense spending.
Looking to another Adelson purchase, the editorial also noted that the magnate "isn't shy about using his free Tel Aviv newspaper, Israel Hayom, to support Mr. Netanyahu and their shared positions. Whether any of this newspaper's editorial page positions change will go a long way toward further explaining why Mr. Adelson purchased the Review-Journal."
However, separate Review-Journal reporting from four days ago indicates that the Adelson purchase may have already impacted its journalistic coverage.
"Just over a month before Sheldon Adelson's family was revealed as the new owner of the Las Vegas Review-Journal, three reporters at the newspaper received an unusual assignment passed down from the newspaper's corporate management: Drop everything and spend two weeks monitoring all activity of three Clark County judges," journalists James DeHaven, Jennifer Robison, and Eric Hartley wrote.
One of the people closely observed was District Judge Elizabeth Gonzalez, whose "current caseload includes Jacobs v. Sands, a long-running wrongful termination lawsuit filed against Adelson and his company, Las Vegas Sands Corp.," the journalists noted.
Naureckas emphasized that Adelson's latest purchase is "part of a trend of rich individuals buying papers as a hobby or a vehicle to promulgate their points of view."
"It puts a tremendous amount of information power in the hands of a tiny number of people," said Naureckas. "Invariably, they're extremely wealthy because only the wealthy have enough money to buy a newspaper as a personal possession."