SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
At the American Museum of Natural History in New York City. "Fossils belong in museums," says the new campaign, "not in their investment funds."
If museums are meant to preserve natural history, why do they invest in companies whose activities are making nature history?
So asks a new campaign launched Friday. It singles out five influential U.S. science and natural history institutions and calls on them to demonstrate their leadership by divesting from fossil fuels and disassociating with climate deniers.
"In the face of climate catastrophe, there is no more neutral ground."
--Jenny Marienau, 350.org
"The climate crisis calls for leaders who are willing to do more than observe and represent history--it calls for leaders who are ready to help make it," said Beka Economopoulos, co-founder of the Natural History Museum, a new mobile museum that champions bold climate action and a partner with 350.org in the 'Keep it in the Museum' campaign. "Museums of science and natural history can be those leaders."
"Museums are key institutions where the general public, especially young people, learn about science and the natural world," she continued. "Museums understand the urgent threat of disruptive climate change--so why do they invest in an industry whose activities virtually guarantee it?"
The divestment call builds on an open letter signed by about 150 of the world's top scientists and released in March by the Natural History Museum. The letter decried "the links between museums of science and natural history with those who profit from fossil fuels or fund lobby groups that misrepresent climate science."
Citing the American Alliance of Museums' Code of Ethics--which states that museums "must take affirmative steps to maintain their integrity to warrant public confidence"--that letter expressed concern "that the integrity of these institutions is compromised by association with special interests who obfuscate climate science, fight environmental regulation, oppose clean energy legislation, and seek to ease limits on industrial pollution."
It continued:
When some of the biggest contributors to climate change and funders of misinformation on climate science sponsor exhibitions in museums of science and natural history, they undermine public confidence in the validity of the institutions responsible for transmitting scientific knowledge. This corporate philanthropy comes at too high a cost.
Drawing on both our scientific expertise and personal care for our planet and people, we believe that the only ethical way forward for our museums is to cut all ties with the fossil fuel industry and funders of climate science obfuscation.
Now, inspired by that call, 350.org is lending its voice and grassroots momentum to the effort.
"In the face of climate catastrophe, there is no more neutral ground," Jenny Marienau, U.S. divestment manager at 350.org, declared on Friday. "Inaction is a choice."
"The passivity and self-imposed neutrality of museums are inadvertently abetting environmental destruction."
--Robert Janes, Museum Management and Curatorship
"It would seem the museum community is sleepwalking into the future," charged Robert R. Janes, an archaeologist and editor-in-chief emeritus of Museum Management and Curatorship. "The climate crisis is a dire wake-up call."
Janes, who formerly served as president and CEO of Glenbow Museum in Calgary, Alberta, added, " Museums' passivity and self-imposed neutrality are inadvertently abetting environmental destruction. Museums are grounded in a sense of place, committed to a sense of stewardship, and universally respected as social institutions. They have a role as agents of change and forces for good. Museums must chart a path to sustainability that will preserve and use our irreplaceable cultural legacy."
To that end, the Keep it in the Museum campaign focuses on five specific institutions: the American Museum of Natural History, the Field Museum in Chicago, the California Academy of Sciences, the North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, and the Natural History Museum of Utah.
"Each of these institutions has made statements, or signed accords, or otherwise demonstrated their concern about anthropogenic climate change," Economopoulos told Common Dreams. "In this way, they have shown some level of leadership that we believe is undermined by their investments in the very industry that is driving the climate crisis."
More than 250 universities, cities, faith communities, and other institutions have already joined the growing divestment movement, and this campaign hopes to start a new wave.
"We chose these institutions because we believe few of our big, iconic, and environmentally committed museums were to divest, it would set a powerful precedent for a whole new sector of institutions worldwide to step up and divest too," Economopoulos said. "This isn't a 'villain' campaign--we're looking for heroes."
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
If museums are meant to preserve natural history, why do they invest in companies whose activities are making nature history?
So asks a new campaign launched Friday. It singles out five influential U.S. science and natural history institutions and calls on them to demonstrate their leadership by divesting from fossil fuels and disassociating with climate deniers.
"In the face of climate catastrophe, there is no more neutral ground."
--Jenny Marienau, 350.org
"The climate crisis calls for leaders who are willing to do more than observe and represent history--it calls for leaders who are ready to help make it," said Beka Economopoulos, co-founder of the Natural History Museum, a new mobile museum that champions bold climate action and a partner with 350.org in the 'Keep it in the Museum' campaign. "Museums of science and natural history can be those leaders."
"Museums are key institutions where the general public, especially young people, learn about science and the natural world," she continued. "Museums understand the urgent threat of disruptive climate change--so why do they invest in an industry whose activities virtually guarantee it?"
The divestment call builds on an open letter signed by about 150 of the world's top scientists and released in March by the Natural History Museum. The letter decried "the links between museums of science and natural history with those who profit from fossil fuels or fund lobby groups that misrepresent climate science."
Citing the American Alliance of Museums' Code of Ethics--which states that museums "must take affirmative steps to maintain their integrity to warrant public confidence"--that letter expressed concern "that the integrity of these institutions is compromised by association with special interests who obfuscate climate science, fight environmental regulation, oppose clean energy legislation, and seek to ease limits on industrial pollution."
It continued:
When some of the biggest contributors to climate change and funders of misinformation on climate science sponsor exhibitions in museums of science and natural history, they undermine public confidence in the validity of the institutions responsible for transmitting scientific knowledge. This corporate philanthropy comes at too high a cost.
Drawing on both our scientific expertise and personal care for our planet and people, we believe that the only ethical way forward for our museums is to cut all ties with the fossil fuel industry and funders of climate science obfuscation.
Now, inspired by that call, 350.org is lending its voice and grassroots momentum to the effort.
"In the face of climate catastrophe, there is no more neutral ground," Jenny Marienau, U.S. divestment manager at 350.org, declared on Friday. "Inaction is a choice."
"The passivity and self-imposed neutrality of museums are inadvertently abetting environmental destruction."
--Robert Janes, Museum Management and Curatorship
"It would seem the museum community is sleepwalking into the future," charged Robert R. Janes, an archaeologist and editor-in-chief emeritus of Museum Management and Curatorship. "The climate crisis is a dire wake-up call."
Janes, who formerly served as president and CEO of Glenbow Museum in Calgary, Alberta, added, " Museums' passivity and self-imposed neutrality are inadvertently abetting environmental destruction. Museums are grounded in a sense of place, committed to a sense of stewardship, and universally respected as social institutions. They have a role as agents of change and forces for good. Museums must chart a path to sustainability that will preserve and use our irreplaceable cultural legacy."
To that end, the Keep it in the Museum campaign focuses on five specific institutions: the American Museum of Natural History, the Field Museum in Chicago, the California Academy of Sciences, the North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, and the Natural History Museum of Utah.
"Each of these institutions has made statements, or signed accords, or otherwise demonstrated their concern about anthropogenic climate change," Economopoulos told Common Dreams. "In this way, they have shown some level of leadership that we believe is undermined by their investments in the very industry that is driving the climate crisis."
More than 250 universities, cities, faith communities, and other institutions have already joined the growing divestment movement, and this campaign hopes to start a new wave.
"We chose these institutions because we believe few of our big, iconic, and environmentally committed museums were to divest, it would set a powerful precedent for a whole new sector of institutions worldwide to step up and divest too," Economopoulos said. "This isn't a 'villain' campaign--we're looking for heroes."
If museums are meant to preserve natural history, why do they invest in companies whose activities are making nature history?
So asks a new campaign launched Friday. It singles out five influential U.S. science and natural history institutions and calls on them to demonstrate their leadership by divesting from fossil fuels and disassociating with climate deniers.
"In the face of climate catastrophe, there is no more neutral ground."
--Jenny Marienau, 350.org
"The climate crisis calls for leaders who are willing to do more than observe and represent history--it calls for leaders who are ready to help make it," said Beka Economopoulos, co-founder of the Natural History Museum, a new mobile museum that champions bold climate action and a partner with 350.org in the 'Keep it in the Museum' campaign. "Museums of science and natural history can be those leaders."
"Museums are key institutions where the general public, especially young people, learn about science and the natural world," she continued. "Museums understand the urgent threat of disruptive climate change--so why do they invest in an industry whose activities virtually guarantee it?"
The divestment call builds on an open letter signed by about 150 of the world's top scientists and released in March by the Natural History Museum. The letter decried "the links between museums of science and natural history with those who profit from fossil fuels or fund lobby groups that misrepresent climate science."
Citing the American Alliance of Museums' Code of Ethics--which states that museums "must take affirmative steps to maintain their integrity to warrant public confidence"--that letter expressed concern "that the integrity of these institutions is compromised by association with special interests who obfuscate climate science, fight environmental regulation, oppose clean energy legislation, and seek to ease limits on industrial pollution."
It continued:
When some of the biggest contributors to climate change and funders of misinformation on climate science sponsor exhibitions in museums of science and natural history, they undermine public confidence in the validity of the institutions responsible for transmitting scientific knowledge. This corporate philanthropy comes at too high a cost.
Drawing on both our scientific expertise and personal care for our planet and people, we believe that the only ethical way forward for our museums is to cut all ties with the fossil fuel industry and funders of climate science obfuscation.
Now, inspired by that call, 350.org is lending its voice and grassroots momentum to the effort.
"In the face of climate catastrophe, there is no more neutral ground," Jenny Marienau, U.S. divestment manager at 350.org, declared on Friday. "Inaction is a choice."
"The passivity and self-imposed neutrality of museums are inadvertently abetting environmental destruction."
--Robert Janes, Museum Management and Curatorship
"It would seem the museum community is sleepwalking into the future," charged Robert R. Janes, an archaeologist and editor-in-chief emeritus of Museum Management and Curatorship. "The climate crisis is a dire wake-up call."
Janes, who formerly served as president and CEO of Glenbow Museum in Calgary, Alberta, added, " Museums' passivity and self-imposed neutrality are inadvertently abetting environmental destruction. Museums are grounded in a sense of place, committed to a sense of stewardship, and universally respected as social institutions. They have a role as agents of change and forces for good. Museums must chart a path to sustainability that will preserve and use our irreplaceable cultural legacy."
To that end, the Keep it in the Museum campaign focuses on five specific institutions: the American Museum of Natural History, the Field Museum in Chicago, the California Academy of Sciences, the North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, and the Natural History Museum of Utah.
"Each of these institutions has made statements, or signed accords, or otherwise demonstrated their concern about anthropogenic climate change," Economopoulos told Common Dreams. "In this way, they have shown some level of leadership that we believe is undermined by their investments in the very industry that is driving the climate crisis."
More than 250 universities, cities, faith communities, and other institutions have already joined the growing divestment movement, and this campaign hopes to start a new wave.
"We chose these institutions because we believe few of our big, iconic, and environmentally committed museums were to divest, it would set a powerful precedent for a whole new sector of institutions worldwide to step up and divest too," Economopoulos said. "This isn't a 'villain' campaign--we're looking for heroes."
"Trump's back-to-school message to America's families is crystal clear: Don't expect help, just expect less," said one expert.
Families of students across the United States are facing significantly higher prices for basic supplies as the new school year begins, a cost burden that a new analysis blames on President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs and the massive Republican budget package he signed into law last month.
The analysis, conducted by The Century Foundation (TCF) and Groundwork Collaborative, estimates that prices for supplies such as index cards have surged by more than 40% this year.
Lunch staples have also gotten more expensive, with U.S. families set to pay roughly $163 more on average for juice boxes, strawberries, and other such items this year, according to the new analysis, which characterized the higher costs as a "back-to-school tax" imposed by the president.
"President Trump's policies are forcing families to foot higher bills for back-to-school essentials from binders and lunch-box staples to clothes, shoes, and even laptops," said TCF senior fellow Rachel West. "From his reckless tariffs to his budget law slashing food assistance and federal student loans, Trump's back-to-school message to America's families is crystal clear: Don't expect help, just expect less."
The analysis was released just as new economic data further underscored the impact of Trump's tariffs on prices across the economy, with wholesale prices registering their largest monthly gain since June 2022.
TCF and Groundwork's findings align with a recent survey by the research firm Deloitte, which found that nearly half of U.S. parents and caregivers believe lunch costs on school days will be higher this year than in 2024.
Liz Pancotti, Groundwork's managing director of policy and advocacy, said Thursday that "President Trump's tax and tariff policies have turned the back-to-school season into a budgeting nightmare for hardworking American families."
"From lunch boxes and notebooks to juice boxes and pencils, parents are being squeezed at every turn—paying more for the school supplies and meals their kids need to succeed," said Pancotti. "No family should have to struggle to afford the basics while the wealthy and well-connected cash in on massive tax breaks they do not need."
"Trump's tax and tariff policies have turned the back-to-school season into a budgeting nightmare for hardworking American families."
The budget law that Trump signed last month is set to deliver trillions of dollars in tax breaks largely to the wealthiest Americans and biggest corporations while making unprecedented cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and Medicaid.
Those programs are used in states across the country to determine eligibility for free or reduced-cost school meals, and cuts inflicted by the Trump-GOP law are expected to leave more than 18 million children across the U.S. without access to free school meals in the coming years.
"President Trump's policies—including his erratic, punitive tariffs—are squeezing families' budgets as they prepare to return to school," TCF and Groundwork said Thursday. "Not only has Trump failed to keep his promises to tackle high prices, but his massive budget law will soon drive costs even higher for back-to-school essentials as its cuts to programs that children, families, and college students depend on take hold."
"The inmates are not only running the asylum. They're bringing in more inmates to help," said one observer.
EJ Antoni, President Donald Trump's controversial nominee to head the Bureau of Labor Statistics, was among the insurrectionist mob that stormed the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, NBC News revealed Wednesday.
Video footage archived from the right-wing social media site Parler and posted online by a Republican-led congressional subcommittee shows Antoni among the crowd about half an hour before the MAGA mob began breaching barricades, attacking police, and swarming the Capitol. He is also seen walking away from the crowd.
The White House attempted to downplay the news, with spokesperson Taylor Rogers saying that "these pictures show E.J. Antoni, a bystander to the events of January 6th, observing and then leaving the Capitol area."
"E.J. was in town for meetings, and it is wrong and defamatory to suggest E.J. engaged in anything inappropriate or illegal," Rogers added.
See the man circled here? That's E.J. Antoni, Trump's Bureau of Labor Statistics nominee, walking through a crowd of Capitol rioters.#ICYMI, we've got an archive of 500+ Parler videos taken during Jan. 6. You can spot Antoni starting at around 1:41 here: projects.propublica.org/parler-capit...
[image or embed]
— ProPublica (@propublica.org) August 14, 2025 at 9:06 AM
Other MAGA figures also defended Antoni. Felonious fraudster Steve Bannon, who pleaded guilty in a border wall fundraising fraud case this year, said Thursday on his War Room podcast: "They came up with a photo of E.J. Antoni in the crowd outside the Capitol on January 6, and NBC went absolutely nuts over it. I think it makes E.J. even more based. I didn't know that about E.J.—makes us want him even more."
Critics, however, expressed alarm, given the important post to which Antoni was nominated.
"We just discovered a Trump [Department of Justice] official was at January 6, telling other traitors to 'kill' police," journalist and attorney Adam Cohen wrote on the social media site Bluesky, referring to Jared Wise, who was pardoned by Trump.
"Now we learn Trump's BLS nominee, E.J. Antoni—apart from being totally unqualified—was ALSO part of the insurrection," Cohen added. "The inmates are not only running the asylum. They're bringing in MORE inmates to help."
The West Virginia Federation of Democratic Women noted on the social media site X that "Trump fired the vetted woman who reported honest stats on job losses. His new guy was in the mob on January 6 and wrote Project 2025."
Journalist Ahmed Baba wrote on X: "So, E.J. Antoni is the chief economist at the Heritage Foundation, a contributor to Project 2025, and was literally outside the Capitol on January 6. This is who Trump wants to be in charge of the BLS data that shapes global decisions and moves markets—an extremist sycophant."
Trump nominated Antoni after firing former BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer, whom the president accused without evidence of manipulating employment statistics to discredit him and other Republicans.
"These reductions may cause some providers to stop accepting Medicaid patients," said a spokesperson for the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services.
The cuts to Medicaid contained in the recently passed Republican budget law are already having a damaging impact in multiple states, as both local hospitals and state governments struggle financially to make up funding gaps.
As NC Newsline reported on Wednesday, the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (NCDHHS) has announced plans to cut Medicaid spending by $319 million starting on October 1, which the publication said "means the state will reduce rates by 3% to all medical providers, as well as cuts of 8-10% for inpatient and residential services and 10% for behavioral therapy and analysis for patients with autism."
NCDHHS spokesperson Summer Tonizzo did not sugarcoat the impact that the cuts would have on services for Medicaid patients in her state. She said that services including hospice care, behavioral health long-term care, and nursing home services could see reimbursement cuts significantly steeper than 3%.
"These reductions may cause some providers to stop accepting Medicaid patients, as the lowered rates could make it financially unsustainable to continue offering care," she said.
The Tar Heel State isn't the only one reeling from Medicaid cuts, as Colorado Public Radio reported that the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing, which manages the state's Medicaid program, held a webinar this week in which it outlined plans to, in the words of department director Kim Bimestefer, "mitigate the loss of coverage and its catastrophic consequences to Coloradans, providers, and the economy."
This will be easier said than done, however, as Colorado Public Radio noted that numbers reviewed by the department estimate that "hundreds of thousands" of residents in the state could lose healthcare access thanks to cuts from the GOP budget package.
In addition to people who will lose coverage thanks to the work requirements passed in the legislation, an estimated 112,000 people who buy health insurance policies from state exchanges could lose it after the expected expiration of enhanced tax credits passed by Democrats during former President Joe Biden's term.
Taking a look at the broader nationwide picture, Stateline reported that even some Republicans attending the National Conference of State Legislatures summit in Boston this week expressed anxiety about the impact the cuts will have on the people whom they represent.
The publication quoted Oklahoma state Sen. John Haste, who said during the summit that he was particularly concerned about the impact the cuts would have on rural communities. Among other things, he pointed to a provision in the law that will deliver a $209 million cut in Medicaid funds to Oklahoma, as well as the fact that complying with work requirement verifications will cost an estimated $30 million.
"All of those things added together come up to a really big number," said Haste. "We don't know exactly what that is."
Hawaii Democratic state Sen. Ronald Kouchi said during the summit that the impact of the Medicaid cuts would be absolutely brutal, but added that the only thing Democrats can do for now is make sure their voters know whom to blame for what's happening.
"Who's going to be blamed when people are left out, when people are hungry and they lose out on educational opportunities?" he asked during a panel discussion. "If we as state legislators do not convey that it is a result of the decisionmakers in Washington, D.C., they will be at our doorstep as the place of last resort."