SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
New Oil-By-Rail Rules 'Leave Communities at Risk of Catastrophe'
Obama administration announces mandate for safer cars, brakes on oil trains, but climate groups decry regulations as too lax
May 01, 2015
Environmental groups reiterated their call for a total ban on hazardous oil trains on Friday, saying the U.S. Department of Transportation's newly released safety standards for tank cars "virtually guarantee more explosive derailments, putting people and the environment at great risk."
The final rules come two years after an unattended oil train derailed and exploded in Lac Megantic, Quebec, killing 47 people, and in the wake of a series of fiery derailments that took place in West Virginia, Illinois, and Ontario this year.
The mandates include thicker steel walls on rail cars, tougher valves, and in some cases, electronically controlled brakes.
"[T]he DOT shouldn't need a higher body count before we ban these defective cars from carrying explosive fuel through our towns and cities."
--Patti Goldman, EarthjusticeThey will also phase out over the next 10 years DOT-111 and CPC-1232 tank cars, which transport crude oil and were involved in the most disastrous derailments in recent history, including the Lac Megantic.
But a coalition of environmental organizations say the rules are not strong enough, are industry-friendly, and "leave communities at risk of catastrophe"--particularly as the DOT itself admits that derailments on main lines are likely to occur 15 times a year.
Without an immediate ban on those cars and only a few new speed limit impositions, the new rules are "yet another indication of how dangerous energy policies written by and for Big Oil are for our communities and our climate. These weak regulations allow the industry to continue endangering communities with bomb trains that facilitate hazardous expansion of the oil industry," said David Turnbull, campaigns director of Oil Change International, one of the groups in the coalition, in a press release on Friday.
"Allowing hazardous tank cars to remain in crude service for 5 more years is disgraceful," added Patti Goldman, managing attorney for environmental legal nonprofit Earthjustice, declaring: "[T]he DOT shouldn't need a higher body count before we ban these defective cars from carrying explosive fuel through our towns and cities."
The National Transportation Safety Board has made official recommendations to stop shipping crude oil in the DOT-111 and CPC-1232 tank cars, which have been found to puncture on impact. Newer tank cars, known as CPC-1232s, are not significantly safer, the board has said.
Indeed, following the West Virginia derailment in February, it was confirmed that all of the oil tank cars on the derailed train were CPC-1232 models.
"It's time for the federal government to defend and protect our communities and waterways with the same vigor they have shown in promoting the fossil fuel and transportation industries."
--Marc Yaggi, Waterkeeper Alliance
In a statement to Common Dreams at the time, Center for Biological Diversity senior scientist Mollie Matteson explained that the CPC-1232 is "little better" than its predecessor in incidents involving any speed and also "has proven to be highly vulnerable on impact." Further, its the model that ruptured in the derailment on the very same rail line in Lynchburg, Virginia in April 2014.
"Oil trains derail, spill, and explode with frightening regularity, all while passing along and over our waterways," said Marc Yaggi, executive director of Waterkeeper Alliance. "It's time for the federal government to defend and protect our communities and waterways with the same vigor they have shown in promoting the fossil fuel and transportation industries."
Their comments echo those of Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), whose state has seen a number of protests against oil train shipments, Politico reports.
On Friday, Cantwell criticized the new rules, which she said are "just like saying let the oil trains roll...It does nothing to address explosive volatility, very little to reduce the threat of rail car punctures, and is too slow on the removal of the most dangerous cars."
And Anthony Swift, Deputy Director of the Natural Resources Defense Council's Canada Project, added, "While it's important that the Department of Transportation is recognizing this serious and growing problem, its proposed rules do not do nearly enough to protect millions of Americans at risk of catastrophic oil train derailments."
The recent growth in oil production in Canada and the U.S. has led to a more than 4,000 percent increase in crude oil shipped by rail since 2005, the coalition points out.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Environmental groups reiterated their call for a total ban on hazardous oil trains on Friday, saying the U.S. Department of Transportation's newly released safety standards for tank cars "virtually guarantee more explosive derailments, putting people and the environment at great risk."
The final rules come two years after an unattended oil train derailed and exploded in Lac Megantic, Quebec, killing 47 people, and in the wake of a series of fiery derailments that took place in West Virginia, Illinois, and Ontario this year.
The mandates include thicker steel walls on rail cars, tougher valves, and in some cases, electronically controlled brakes.
"[T]he DOT shouldn't need a higher body count before we ban these defective cars from carrying explosive fuel through our towns and cities."
--Patti Goldman, EarthjusticeThey will also phase out over the next 10 years DOT-111 and CPC-1232 tank cars, which transport crude oil and were involved in the most disastrous derailments in recent history, including the Lac Megantic.
But a coalition of environmental organizations say the rules are not strong enough, are industry-friendly, and "leave communities at risk of catastrophe"--particularly as the DOT itself admits that derailments on main lines are likely to occur 15 times a year.
Without an immediate ban on those cars and only a few new speed limit impositions, the new rules are "yet another indication of how dangerous energy policies written by and for Big Oil are for our communities and our climate. These weak regulations allow the industry to continue endangering communities with bomb trains that facilitate hazardous expansion of the oil industry," said David Turnbull, campaigns director of Oil Change International, one of the groups in the coalition, in a press release on Friday.
"Allowing hazardous tank cars to remain in crude service for 5 more years is disgraceful," added Patti Goldman, managing attorney for environmental legal nonprofit Earthjustice, declaring: "[T]he DOT shouldn't need a higher body count before we ban these defective cars from carrying explosive fuel through our towns and cities."
The National Transportation Safety Board has made official recommendations to stop shipping crude oil in the DOT-111 and CPC-1232 tank cars, which have been found to puncture on impact. Newer tank cars, known as CPC-1232s, are not significantly safer, the board has said.
Indeed, following the West Virginia derailment in February, it was confirmed that all of the oil tank cars on the derailed train were CPC-1232 models.
"It's time for the federal government to defend and protect our communities and waterways with the same vigor they have shown in promoting the fossil fuel and transportation industries."
--Marc Yaggi, Waterkeeper Alliance
In a statement to Common Dreams at the time, Center for Biological Diversity senior scientist Mollie Matteson explained that the CPC-1232 is "little better" than its predecessor in incidents involving any speed and also "has proven to be highly vulnerable on impact." Further, its the model that ruptured in the derailment on the very same rail line in Lynchburg, Virginia in April 2014.
"Oil trains derail, spill, and explode with frightening regularity, all while passing along and over our waterways," said Marc Yaggi, executive director of Waterkeeper Alliance. "It's time for the federal government to defend and protect our communities and waterways with the same vigor they have shown in promoting the fossil fuel and transportation industries."
Their comments echo those of Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), whose state has seen a number of protests against oil train shipments, Politico reports.
On Friday, Cantwell criticized the new rules, which she said are "just like saying let the oil trains roll...It does nothing to address explosive volatility, very little to reduce the threat of rail car punctures, and is too slow on the removal of the most dangerous cars."
And Anthony Swift, Deputy Director of the Natural Resources Defense Council's Canada Project, added, "While it's important that the Department of Transportation is recognizing this serious and growing problem, its proposed rules do not do nearly enough to protect millions of Americans at risk of catastrophic oil train derailments."
The recent growth in oil production in Canada and the U.S. has led to a more than 4,000 percent increase in crude oil shipped by rail since 2005, the coalition points out.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Environmental groups reiterated their call for a total ban on hazardous oil trains on Friday, saying the U.S. Department of Transportation's newly released safety standards for tank cars "virtually guarantee more explosive derailments, putting people and the environment at great risk."
The final rules come two years after an unattended oil train derailed and exploded in Lac Megantic, Quebec, killing 47 people, and in the wake of a series of fiery derailments that took place in West Virginia, Illinois, and Ontario this year.
The mandates include thicker steel walls on rail cars, tougher valves, and in some cases, electronically controlled brakes.
"[T]he DOT shouldn't need a higher body count before we ban these defective cars from carrying explosive fuel through our towns and cities."
--Patti Goldman, EarthjusticeThey will also phase out over the next 10 years DOT-111 and CPC-1232 tank cars, which transport crude oil and were involved in the most disastrous derailments in recent history, including the Lac Megantic.
But a coalition of environmental organizations say the rules are not strong enough, are industry-friendly, and "leave communities at risk of catastrophe"--particularly as the DOT itself admits that derailments on main lines are likely to occur 15 times a year.
Without an immediate ban on those cars and only a few new speed limit impositions, the new rules are "yet another indication of how dangerous energy policies written by and for Big Oil are for our communities and our climate. These weak regulations allow the industry to continue endangering communities with bomb trains that facilitate hazardous expansion of the oil industry," said David Turnbull, campaigns director of Oil Change International, one of the groups in the coalition, in a press release on Friday.
"Allowing hazardous tank cars to remain in crude service for 5 more years is disgraceful," added Patti Goldman, managing attorney for environmental legal nonprofit Earthjustice, declaring: "[T]he DOT shouldn't need a higher body count before we ban these defective cars from carrying explosive fuel through our towns and cities."
The National Transportation Safety Board has made official recommendations to stop shipping crude oil in the DOT-111 and CPC-1232 tank cars, which have been found to puncture on impact. Newer tank cars, known as CPC-1232s, are not significantly safer, the board has said.
Indeed, following the West Virginia derailment in February, it was confirmed that all of the oil tank cars on the derailed train were CPC-1232 models.
"It's time for the federal government to defend and protect our communities and waterways with the same vigor they have shown in promoting the fossil fuel and transportation industries."
--Marc Yaggi, Waterkeeper Alliance
In a statement to Common Dreams at the time, Center for Biological Diversity senior scientist Mollie Matteson explained that the CPC-1232 is "little better" than its predecessor in incidents involving any speed and also "has proven to be highly vulnerable on impact." Further, its the model that ruptured in the derailment on the very same rail line in Lynchburg, Virginia in April 2014.
"Oil trains derail, spill, and explode with frightening regularity, all while passing along and over our waterways," said Marc Yaggi, executive director of Waterkeeper Alliance. "It's time for the federal government to defend and protect our communities and waterways with the same vigor they have shown in promoting the fossil fuel and transportation industries."
Their comments echo those of Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), whose state has seen a number of protests against oil train shipments, Politico reports.
On Friday, Cantwell criticized the new rules, which she said are "just like saying let the oil trains roll...It does nothing to address explosive volatility, very little to reduce the threat of rail car punctures, and is too slow on the removal of the most dangerous cars."
And Anthony Swift, Deputy Director of the Natural Resources Defense Council's Canada Project, added, "While it's important that the Department of Transportation is recognizing this serious and growing problem, its proposed rules do not do nearly enough to protect millions of Americans at risk of catastrophic oil train derailments."
The recent growth in oil production in Canada and the U.S. has led to a more than 4,000 percent increase in crude oil shipped by rail since 2005, the coalition points out.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.