SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Protesters with New Yorkers Against Fracking picketing Governor Andrew Cuomo in November, one month before he announced a landmark fracking ban. (Photo: New Yorkers Against Fracking)
Just one month after New York's landmark fracking ban was announced, amid ongoing celebrations and calls for other states to follow suit, Republican lawmakers are already scheming on how best to override the decision.
The Poughkeepsie Journal reported Sunday that at least one Republican congressman is considering ways to make it easier for landowners to sue the state.
Fracking advocate and U.S. Rep. Chris Collins (R-NY), who was recently named to the House Energy and Commerce Committee, told the Journal that he has "engaged in a series of discussions on the next steps needed to help restore the individual property rights of New Yorkers."
Landowners already have a recourse, known as a "takings claim," through which they can argue that they have "no reasonable use for their property as a result of the government's action" and that the government is obliged to compensate for their losses. At issue is whether the fracking ban would apply in this context.
Tom West, an attorney who has represented oil and gas companies in fracking cases, told the Journal that lawmakers are "potentially" considering legislation that would make it easier for landowners to bring such a claim and, further, make their case in federal court, as opposed to state court--where a takings claim would face stronger opposition.
Though such action may not challenge the fracking ban outright, West notes, "if you have the prospect of having to pay out hundreds of millions--or billions--of dollars to landowners as a result of your regulatory action, you might rethink your strategy."
The attack is not unexpected. When announcing the ban, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo said that decision would likely face "tons" of lawsuits.
Supporters of the fracking ban are planning a rally in Albany this Wednesday to celebrate what they say is an "incredible victory for science, public health, the environment, and our movement." Over one hundred local and national organizations are sponsoring the event.
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Just one month after New York's landmark fracking ban was announced, amid ongoing celebrations and calls for other states to follow suit, Republican lawmakers are already scheming on how best to override the decision.
The Poughkeepsie Journal reported Sunday that at least one Republican congressman is considering ways to make it easier for landowners to sue the state.
Fracking advocate and U.S. Rep. Chris Collins (R-NY), who was recently named to the House Energy and Commerce Committee, told the Journal that he has "engaged in a series of discussions on the next steps needed to help restore the individual property rights of New Yorkers."
Landowners already have a recourse, known as a "takings claim," through which they can argue that they have "no reasonable use for their property as a result of the government's action" and that the government is obliged to compensate for their losses. At issue is whether the fracking ban would apply in this context.
Tom West, an attorney who has represented oil and gas companies in fracking cases, told the Journal that lawmakers are "potentially" considering legislation that would make it easier for landowners to bring such a claim and, further, make their case in federal court, as opposed to state court--where a takings claim would face stronger opposition.
Though such action may not challenge the fracking ban outright, West notes, "if you have the prospect of having to pay out hundreds of millions--or billions--of dollars to landowners as a result of your regulatory action, you might rethink your strategy."
The attack is not unexpected. When announcing the ban, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo said that decision would likely face "tons" of lawsuits.
Supporters of the fracking ban are planning a rally in Albany this Wednesday to celebrate what they say is an "incredible victory for science, public health, the environment, and our movement." Over one hundred local and national organizations are sponsoring the event.
Just one month after New York's landmark fracking ban was announced, amid ongoing celebrations and calls for other states to follow suit, Republican lawmakers are already scheming on how best to override the decision.
The Poughkeepsie Journal reported Sunday that at least one Republican congressman is considering ways to make it easier for landowners to sue the state.
Fracking advocate and U.S. Rep. Chris Collins (R-NY), who was recently named to the House Energy and Commerce Committee, told the Journal that he has "engaged in a series of discussions on the next steps needed to help restore the individual property rights of New Yorkers."
Landowners already have a recourse, known as a "takings claim," through which they can argue that they have "no reasonable use for their property as a result of the government's action" and that the government is obliged to compensate for their losses. At issue is whether the fracking ban would apply in this context.
Tom West, an attorney who has represented oil and gas companies in fracking cases, told the Journal that lawmakers are "potentially" considering legislation that would make it easier for landowners to bring such a claim and, further, make their case in federal court, as opposed to state court--where a takings claim would face stronger opposition.
Though such action may not challenge the fracking ban outright, West notes, "if you have the prospect of having to pay out hundreds of millions--or billions--of dollars to landowners as a result of your regulatory action, you might rethink your strategy."
The attack is not unexpected. When announcing the ban, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo said that decision would likely face "tons" of lawsuits.
Supporters of the fracking ban are planning a rally in Albany this Wednesday to celebrate what they say is an "incredible victory for science, public health, the environment, and our movement." Over one hundred local and national organizations are sponsoring the event.