SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
With Wall Street Holding the Strings, Republican-Controlled Congress Moves to Deregulate Big Banks
'The financial industry has been methodical, drafting technically complicated legislation that can pass the heavily Republican House with a few Democratic votes,' notes the New York Times.
Jan 13, 2015
Just weeks after taking over both houses of Congress, the Republican party is already aggressively moving to weaken legislation aimed at reining in big banks and protecting the public.
According to the New York Times, Wall Street is holding the strings.
"The financial industry has been methodical, drafting technically complicated legislation that can pass the heavily Republican House with a few Democratic votes," write Jonathan Weisman and Eric Lipton. "And then, once approved, Wall Street has pushed to tack such measures on to larger bills considered too important for the White House to block."
Tucked inside of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act that President Obama signed into law on Monday is a provision that weakens the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform, aimed at regulating Wall Street's risky business in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.
The measure, opposed by progressives, "scraps a number of Dodd-Frank financial regulations on several financial services industry sectors, dubbed 'end users' in Washington speak," explains The Hill.
This development follows the passage in December of the Omnibus Spending Bill that, among other Wall Street friendly measures, included a repeal of a key Dodd-Frank derivatives rule. As Josh Silver, director of of Represent.us, explained, this provision was "literally written by big bank lobbyists."
On Tuesday of this week, the House passed the "Regulatory Accountability Act," which would impose stringent requirements that would tie the hands of regulators on issues ranging from safety in the workplace to living wages to environmental protections.
"This legislation represents nothing more than a backdoor effort to undermine public protections without having to be on the record opposing implementation of laws the American people support, like the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act," warns Katie Weatherford at The Center for Effective Government.
While the White House has vowed to veto the Regulatory Accountability Act, another congressional attack on regulations is already underway.
On Wednesday the U.S. House is taking a second stab at passing a bill that, in the words of Public Citizen, "would enable more Wall Street gambling and deliver other treats for the biggest financial institutions in the capital markets." Aimed at weakening Dodd-Frank, H.R. 37 would delay until 2019 a key requirement that banks sell some of their riskiest hedge-fund investments, known as collateralized loan obligations.
The bill, which Obama has vowed to veto, was halted last week, due to a rule suspension which required a two-thirds majority that was not reached. This week, the bill is being brought up under normal rules requiring a simple majority.
As the Times points out, these Wall Street friendly measures do not come cheap. "The current efforts to undermine Dodd-Frank have been textbook lobbying. In the first three quarters of last year, the securities and investment industry spent nearly $74 million on lobbying -- on 704 registered lobbyists -- according to the Center for Responsive Politics. That was on track to easily beat out the $99 million spent in 2013."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
Just weeks after taking over both houses of Congress, the Republican party is already aggressively moving to weaken legislation aimed at reining in big banks and protecting the public.
According to the New York Times, Wall Street is holding the strings.
"The financial industry has been methodical, drafting technically complicated legislation that can pass the heavily Republican House with a few Democratic votes," write Jonathan Weisman and Eric Lipton. "And then, once approved, Wall Street has pushed to tack such measures on to larger bills considered too important for the White House to block."
Tucked inside of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act that President Obama signed into law on Monday is a provision that weakens the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform, aimed at regulating Wall Street's risky business in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.
The measure, opposed by progressives, "scraps a number of Dodd-Frank financial regulations on several financial services industry sectors, dubbed 'end users' in Washington speak," explains The Hill.
This development follows the passage in December of the Omnibus Spending Bill that, among other Wall Street friendly measures, included a repeal of a key Dodd-Frank derivatives rule. As Josh Silver, director of of Represent.us, explained, this provision was "literally written by big bank lobbyists."
On Tuesday of this week, the House passed the "Regulatory Accountability Act," which would impose stringent requirements that would tie the hands of regulators on issues ranging from safety in the workplace to living wages to environmental protections.
"This legislation represents nothing more than a backdoor effort to undermine public protections without having to be on the record opposing implementation of laws the American people support, like the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act," warns Katie Weatherford at The Center for Effective Government.
While the White House has vowed to veto the Regulatory Accountability Act, another congressional attack on regulations is already underway.
On Wednesday the U.S. House is taking a second stab at passing a bill that, in the words of Public Citizen, "would enable more Wall Street gambling and deliver other treats for the biggest financial institutions in the capital markets." Aimed at weakening Dodd-Frank, H.R. 37 would delay until 2019 a key requirement that banks sell some of their riskiest hedge-fund investments, known as collateralized loan obligations.
The bill, which Obama has vowed to veto, was halted last week, due to a rule suspension which required a two-thirds majority that was not reached. This week, the bill is being brought up under normal rules requiring a simple majority.
As the Times points out, these Wall Street friendly measures do not come cheap. "The current efforts to undermine Dodd-Frank have been textbook lobbying. In the first three quarters of last year, the securities and investment industry spent nearly $74 million on lobbying -- on 704 registered lobbyists -- according to the Center for Responsive Politics. That was on track to easily beat out the $99 million spent in 2013."
From Your Site Articles
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
Just weeks after taking over both houses of Congress, the Republican party is already aggressively moving to weaken legislation aimed at reining in big banks and protecting the public.
According to the New York Times, Wall Street is holding the strings.
"The financial industry has been methodical, drafting technically complicated legislation that can pass the heavily Republican House with a few Democratic votes," write Jonathan Weisman and Eric Lipton. "And then, once approved, Wall Street has pushed to tack such measures on to larger bills considered too important for the White House to block."
Tucked inside of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act that President Obama signed into law on Monday is a provision that weakens the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform, aimed at regulating Wall Street's risky business in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.
The measure, opposed by progressives, "scraps a number of Dodd-Frank financial regulations on several financial services industry sectors, dubbed 'end users' in Washington speak," explains The Hill.
This development follows the passage in December of the Omnibus Spending Bill that, among other Wall Street friendly measures, included a repeal of a key Dodd-Frank derivatives rule. As Josh Silver, director of of Represent.us, explained, this provision was "literally written by big bank lobbyists."
On Tuesday of this week, the House passed the "Regulatory Accountability Act," which would impose stringent requirements that would tie the hands of regulators on issues ranging from safety in the workplace to living wages to environmental protections.
"This legislation represents nothing more than a backdoor effort to undermine public protections without having to be on the record opposing implementation of laws the American people support, like the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act," warns Katie Weatherford at The Center for Effective Government.
While the White House has vowed to veto the Regulatory Accountability Act, another congressional attack on regulations is already underway.
On Wednesday the U.S. House is taking a second stab at passing a bill that, in the words of Public Citizen, "would enable more Wall Street gambling and deliver other treats for the biggest financial institutions in the capital markets." Aimed at weakening Dodd-Frank, H.R. 37 would delay until 2019 a key requirement that banks sell some of their riskiest hedge-fund investments, known as collateralized loan obligations.
The bill, which Obama has vowed to veto, was halted last week, due to a rule suspension which required a two-thirds majority that was not reached. This week, the bill is being brought up under normal rules requiring a simple majority.
As the Times points out, these Wall Street friendly measures do not come cheap. "The current efforts to undermine Dodd-Frank have been textbook lobbying. In the first three quarters of last year, the securities and investment industry spent nearly $74 million on lobbying -- on 704 registered lobbyists -- according to the Center for Responsive Politics. That was on track to easily beat out the $99 million spent in 2013."
From Your Site Articles
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.