SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"Pro-choice supporters." (Photo: Brianne)
Federal Judge Rules Alabama Abortion Law Unconstitutional
Law requiring abortion providers to have hospital admitting privileges "would have the striking result of closing three of Alabama's five abortion clinics," judge rules.
Aug 04, 2014
A federal court on Monday ruled that Alabama's law requiring abortion-providing doctors to have admitting privileges at local hospitals is unconstitutional.
The law was originally passed in 2013 and was promptly challenged by the American Civil Liberties Union and Planned Parenthood. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the American Medical Association (AMA) have also expressed opposition to admitting privilege restrictions, charging: "There is no medical basis to require abortion providers to have local hospital admitting privileges."
In his ruling, U.S. District Judge Myron Thompson wrote, "A significant number of the women would be prevented from obtaining an abortion; others would be delayed in obtaining abortions, exposing them to greater risks of complications; and even the women who are able to obtain abortions would suffer significant harms in terms of time, financial cost, and invasion of privacy."
"The evidence compellingly demonstrates that the requirement would have the striking result of closing three of Alabama's five abortion clinics," Thompson wrote.
Thompson also cited a history of violence against abortion clinics and providers, noting that "abortion providers and women seeking abortions in Alabama today live and work in a climate of extreme hostility to the practice of abortion."
Reproductive rights advocates, including Planned Parenthood Southeast, which was a plaintiff in the case, cheered the ruling as a victory.
"We all want to protect patient safety--this law doesn't do that. Politicians passed this law in order to make it impossible for women in Alabama to get abortions, plain and simple," Planned Parenthood Southeast President/CEO Staci Fox said in a statement.
"This victory ensures that women in Alabama can make their own private healthcare decisions without the interference from politicians," Fox stated.
As RHRealitycheck reported, Thompson's ruling doesn't block the law; it extends a temporary injunction, "which allows the court to solicit input from both attorneys for Planned Parenthood and the state as to what an appropriate final resolution in the case would look like."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A federal court on Monday ruled that Alabama's law requiring abortion-providing doctors to have admitting privileges at local hospitals is unconstitutional.
The law was originally passed in 2013 and was promptly challenged by the American Civil Liberties Union and Planned Parenthood. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the American Medical Association (AMA) have also expressed opposition to admitting privilege restrictions, charging: "There is no medical basis to require abortion providers to have local hospital admitting privileges."
In his ruling, U.S. District Judge Myron Thompson wrote, "A significant number of the women would be prevented from obtaining an abortion; others would be delayed in obtaining abortions, exposing them to greater risks of complications; and even the women who are able to obtain abortions would suffer significant harms in terms of time, financial cost, and invasion of privacy."
"The evidence compellingly demonstrates that the requirement would have the striking result of closing three of Alabama's five abortion clinics," Thompson wrote.
Thompson also cited a history of violence against abortion clinics and providers, noting that "abortion providers and women seeking abortions in Alabama today live and work in a climate of extreme hostility to the practice of abortion."
Reproductive rights advocates, including Planned Parenthood Southeast, which was a plaintiff in the case, cheered the ruling as a victory.
"We all want to protect patient safety--this law doesn't do that. Politicians passed this law in order to make it impossible for women in Alabama to get abortions, plain and simple," Planned Parenthood Southeast President/CEO Staci Fox said in a statement.
"This victory ensures that women in Alabama can make their own private healthcare decisions without the interference from politicians," Fox stated.
As RHRealitycheck reported, Thompson's ruling doesn't block the law; it extends a temporary injunction, "which allows the court to solicit input from both attorneys for Planned Parenthood and the state as to what an appropriate final resolution in the case would look like."
A federal court on Monday ruled that Alabama's law requiring abortion-providing doctors to have admitting privileges at local hospitals is unconstitutional.
The law was originally passed in 2013 and was promptly challenged by the American Civil Liberties Union and Planned Parenthood. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the American Medical Association (AMA) have also expressed opposition to admitting privilege restrictions, charging: "There is no medical basis to require abortion providers to have local hospital admitting privileges."
In his ruling, U.S. District Judge Myron Thompson wrote, "A significant number of the women would be prevented from obtaining an abortion; others would be delayed in obtaining abortions, exposing them to greater risks of complications; and even the women who are able to obtain abortions would suffer significant harms in terms of time, financial cost, and invasion of privacy."
"The evidence compellingly demonstrates that the requirement would have the striking result of closing three of Alabama's five abortion clinics," Thompson wrote.
Thompson also cited a history of violence against abortion clinics and providers, noting that "abortion providers and women seeking abortions in Alabama today live and work in a climate of extreme hostility to the practice of abortion."
Reproductive rights advocates, including Planned Parenthood Southeast, which was a plaintiff in the case, cheered the ruling as a victory.
"We all want to protect patient safety--this law doesn't do that. Politicians passed this law in order to make it impossible for women in Alabama to get abortions, plain and simple," Planned Parenthood Southeast President/CEO Staci Fox said in a statement.
"This victory ensures that women in Alabama can make their own private healthcare decisions without the interference from politicians," Fox stated.
As RHRealitycheck reported, Thompson's ruling doesn't block the law; it extends a temporary injunction, "which allows the court to solicit input from both attorneys for Planned Parenthood and the state as to what an appropriate final resolution in the case would look like."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.