

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
An effort to put a moratorium on fracking in the state of California failed to pass the state Senate on Wednesday following a spending blitz by the energy industry.
With an 18-16 vote, the bill, brought forth by Senator Holly Mitchell (D-Los Angeles), was three votes shy of what it needed to move forward. The Sacramento Bee's Capital Alert blog reports that that "four business-friendly Democrats voted against" the moratorium and three other Democrats abstained.
A poll released last week showed that 68 percent of Californians supported the moratorium, but big oil has been pouring money into the state to counter that sentiment. ThinkProgress reported:
The bill's defeat was widely seen as a win for the state's large oil lobby, led by the Western States Petroleum Association (WSPA). The group, according to Truth Out, spent $4.6 million in 2013 on lobbying in California, and has so far spent $1.4 million in just the first 3 months of 2014. Altogether, the oil industry -- including WSPA, Chevron, and BP -- spent more than $56 million lobbying the California Legislature from 2009 through 2013.
The coalition Californians Against Fracking made the same observation, saying in a statement that the result was "disappointing but not completely unexpected given that the oil industry has spent a whopping $15 million on lobbying activities to defeat the bill and buy influence in Sacramento."
Sen. Mitchell had stressed that the stopping fracking was a matter of environmental justice, a point echoed by Latino advocacy organization Presente.org.
"It's disappointing to see our leaders in Sacramento fail to pass a moratorium on fracking, siding with the powerful oil and gas industry at the expense of the health of our families and climate," the organization's Executive Director Arturo Carmona stated. "Latinos will bear the brunt of the worst effects of fracking in California -- from poisoned water to asthma, and are in the areas worst affected by climate change across the nation."
"We will remember who stood with us, and who chose to poison our families for the sake of corporate profits. Shame on every member of the California Senate today who voted to throw Latino families under the bus," Carmona stated.
Mitchell added, "People's neighborhoods aren't fodder for fracking. Environmental justice must come, and one day soon the vote to refrain from polluting for profit will prevail!"
_____________________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
An effort to put a moratorium on fracking in the state of California failed to pass the state Senate on Wednesday following a spending blitz by the energy industry.
With an 18-16 vote, the bill, brought forth by Senator Holly Mitchell (D-Los Angeles), was three votes shy of what it needed to move forward. The Sacramento Bee's Capital Alert blog reports that that "four business-friendly Democrats voted against" the moratorium and three other Democrats abstained.
A poll released last week showed that 68 percent of Californians supported the moratorium, but big oil has been pouring money into the state to counter that sentiment. ThinkProgress reported:
The bill's defeat was widely seen as a win for the state's large oil lobby, led by the Western States Petroleum Association (WSPA). The group, according to Truth Out, spent $4.6 million in 2013 on lobbying in California, and has so far spent $1.4 million in just the first 3 months of 2014. Altogether, the oil industry -- including WSPA, Chevron, and BP -- spent more than $56 million lobbying the California Legislature from 2009 through 2013.
The coalition Californians Against Fracking made the same observation, saying in a statement that the result was "disappointing but not completely unexpected given that the oil industry has spent a whopping $15 million on lobbying activities to defeat the bill and buy influence in Sacramento."
Sen. Mitchell had stressed that the stopping fracking was a matter of environmental justice, a point echoed by Latino advocacy organization Presente.org.
"It's disappointing to see our leaders in Sacramento fail to pass a moratorium on fracking, siding with the powerful oil and gas industry at the expense of the health of our families and climate," the organization's Executive Director Arturo Carmona stated. "Latinos will bear the brunt of the worst effects of fracking in California -- from poisoned water to asthma, and are in the areas worst affected by climate change across the nation."
"We will remember who stood with us, and who chose to poison our families for the sake of corporate profits. Shame on every member of the California Senate today who voted to throw Latino families under the bus," Carmona stated.
Mitchell added, "People's neighborhoods aren't fodder for fracking. Environmental justice must come, and one day soon the vote to refrain from polluting for profit will prevail!"
_____________________________
An effort to put a moratorium on fracking in the state of California failed to pass the state Senate on Wednesday following a spending blitz by the energy industry.
With an 18-16 vote, the bill, brought forth by Senator Holly Mitchell (D-Los Angeles), was three votes shy of what it needed to move forward. The Sacramento Bee's Capital Alert blog reports that that "four business-friendly Democrats voted against" the moratorium and three other Democrats abstained.
A poll released last week showed that 68 percent of Californians supported the moratorium, but big oil has been pouring money into the state to counter that sentiment. ThinkProgress reported:
The bill's defeat was widely seen as a win for the state's large oil lobby, led by the Western States Petroleum Association (WSPA). The group, according to Truth Out, spent $4.6 million in 2013 on lobbying in California, and has so far spent $1.4 million in just the first 3 months of 2014. Altogether, the oil industry -- including WSPA, Chevron, and BP -- spent more than $56 million lobbying the California Legislature from 2009 through 2013.
The coalition Californians Against Fracking made the same observation, saying in a statement that the result was "disappointing but not completely unexpected given that the oil industry has spent a whopping $15 million on lobbying activities to defeat the bill and buy influence in Sacramento."
Sen. Mitchell had stressed that the stopping fracking was a matter of environmental justice, a point echoed by Latino advocacy organization Presente.org.
"It's disappointing to see our leaders in Sacramento fail to pass a moratorium on fracking, siding with the powerful oil and gas industry at the expense of the health of our families and climate," the organization's Executive Director Arturo Carmona stated. "Latinos will bear the brunt of the worst effects of fracking in California -- from poisoned water to asthma, and are in the areas worst affected by climate change across the nation."
"We will remember who stood with us, and who chose to poison our families for the sake of corporate profits. Shame on every member of the California Senate today who voted to throw Latino families under the bus," Carmona stated.
Mitchell added, "People's neighborhoods aren't fodder for fracking. Environmental justice must come, and one day soon the vote to refrain from polluting for profit will prevail!"
_____________________________