A U.S. Coast Guard vessel in the Arctic in Barrow, Alaska. (Photo: U.S. Coast Guard/Petty Officer Prentice Danner)
Apr 24, 2014
A warming Arctic and the clamor for more unconventional energy resources bring increased interest by fossil fuel giants in exploiting the fragile region's potential vast resources.
Yet a new report warns that the the United States is inadequately prepared to deal with an oil spill in the Arctic.
The nearly 200-page report issued Wednesday by the National Research Council follows years of warnings from environmental groups that there is no way to safely drill for oil in the Arctic.
The new report was sponsored by the U.S. Arctic Research Commission, American Petroleum Institute, U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, Marine Mammal Commission, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Oil Spill Recovery Institute and the National Academy of Sciences.
"If we do not stop this Arctic oil rush we risk not only the environment but our ability to shake off the power structures of the last century."
--Kumi Naidoo, Grenpeace InternationalFrom a changing climate to lack of infrastructure, lack of data about cleaning up oil in such a harsh environment, gaps of vessel traffic monitoring, the remote location, low Coast Guard presence, and shortfalls in scientific information on deterring wildlife from spills, the nation is not prepared to deal with the risks that will accompany drilling for oil in the Arctic, the report states.
"The lack of infrastructure in the Arctic would be a significant liability in the event of a large oil spill," the report notes.
It offers "a sobering look at our lack of preparedness," adds Chris Krenz, senior scientist with the ocean conservation group Oceana, and "confirms that we are woefully unprepared for a disaster like the Exxon Valdez or the Deepwater Horizon in the U.S. Arctic," he stated.
Despite these dangers, Russia announced last week that it had sent its first shipment of Arctic oil from its Gazprom rig Prirazlomnaya in the Pechora sea -- the same rig scaled last year by members of Greenpeace's so-called Arctic 30 as part of a peaceful protest.
That shipment marked "a defining moment both for the Arctic and the rest of the world," stated Greenpeace International Executive Director Kumi Naidoo.
"If we do not stop this Arctic oil rush we risk not only the environment but our ability to shake off the power structures of the last century. This is not about turning from one source of fossil fuels to another. It is about speeding up the inevitable switch to clean technology while reducing the amount of energy we use overall. Never has the situation been so urgent or the solution so clear," Naidoo stated.
____________________
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A warming Arctic and the clamor for more unconventional energy resources bring increased interest by fossil fuel giants in exploiting the fragile region's potential vast resources.
Yet a new report warns that the the United States is inadequately prepared to deal with an oil spill in the Arctic.
The nearly 200-page report issued Wednesday by the National Research Council follows years of warnings from environmental groups that there is no way to safely drill for oil in the Arctic.
The new report was sponsored by the U.S. Arctic Research Commission, American Petroleum Institute, U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, Marine Mammal Commission, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Oil Spill Recovery Institute and the National Academy of Sciences.
"If we do not stop this Arctic oil rush we risk not only the environment but our ability to shake off the power structures of the last century."
--Kumi Naidoo, Grenpeace InternationalFrom a changing climate to lack of infrastructure, lack of data about cleaning up oil in such a harsh environment, gaps of vessel traffic monitoring, the remote location, low Coast Guard presence, and shortfalls in scientific information on deterring wildlife from spills, the nation is not prepared to deal with the risks that will accompany drilling for oil in the Arctic, the report states.
"The lack of infrastructure in the Arctic would be a significant liability in the event of a large oil spill," the report notes.
It offers "a sobering look at our lack of preparedness," adds Chris Krenz, senior scientist with the ocean conservation group Oceana, and "confirms that we are woefully unprepared for a disaster like the Exxon Valdez or the Deepwater Horizon in the U.S. Arctic," he stated.
Despite these dangers, Russia announced last week that it had sent its first shipment of Arctic oil from its Gazprom rig Prirazlomnaya in the Pechora sea -- the same rig scaled last year by members of Greenpeace's so-called Arctic 30 as part of a peaceful protest.
That shipment marked "a defining moment both for the Arctic and the rest of the world," stated Greenpeace International Executive Director Kumi Naidoo.
"If we do not stop this Arctic oil rush we risk not only the environment but our ability to shake off the power structures of the last century. This is not about turning from one source of fossil fuels to another. It is about speeding up the inevitable switch to clean technology while reducing the amount of energy we use overall. Never has the situation been so urgent or the solution so clear," Naidoo stated.
____________________
A warming Arctic and the clamor for more unconventional energy resources bring increased interest by fossil fuel giants in exploiting the fragile region's potential vast resources.
Yet a new report warns that the the United States is inadequately prepared to deal with an oil spill in the Arctic.
The nearly 200-page report issued Wednesday by the National Research Council follows years of warnings from environmental groups that there is no way to safely drill for oil in the Arctic.
The new report was sponsored by the U.S. Arctic Research Commission, American Petroleum Institute, U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, Marine Mammal Commission, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Oil Spill Recovery Institute and the National Academy of Sciences.
"If we do not stop this Arctic oil rush we risk not only the environment but our ability to shake off the power structures of the last century."
--Kumi Naidoo, Grenpeace InternationalFrom a changing climate to lack of infrastructure, lack of data about cleaning up oil in such a harsh environment, gaps of vessel traffic monitoring, the remote location, low Coast Guard presence, and shortfalls in scientific information on deterring wildlife from spills, the nation is not prepared to deal with the risks that will accompany drilling for oil in the Arctic, the report states.
"The lack of infrastructure in the Arctic would be a significant liability in the event of a large oil spill," the report notes.
It offers "a sobering look at our lack of preparedness," adds Chris Krenz, senior scientist with the ocean conservation group Oceana, and "confirms that we are woefully unprepared for a disaster like the Exxon Valdez or the Deepwater Horizon in the U.S. Arctic," he stated.
Despite these dangers, Russia announced last week that it had sent its first shipment of Arctic oil from its Gazprom rig Prirazlomnaya in the Pechora sea -- the same rig scaled last year by members of Greenpeace's so-called Arctic 30 as part of a peaceful protest.
That shipment marked "a defining moment both for the Arctic and the rest of the world," stated Greenpeace International Executive Director Kumi Naidoo.
"If we do not stop this Arctic oil rush we risk not only the environment but our ability to shake off the power structures of the last century. This is not about turning from one source of fossil fuels to another. It is about speeding up the inevitable switch to clean technology while reducing the amount of energy we use overall. Never has the situation been so urgent or the solution so clear," Naidoo stated.
____________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.