SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
German foreign minister Guido Westerwelle, US senator Chris Murphy, left, and congressman Gregory Meeks, right, before a meeting in Berlin on the NSA. (Photo: Imago/Barcroft Media)
Diluted by US and Allies, Anti-Spying Bill Advances in UN
Lobbying by United States, Britain, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand diluted anti-spying provision
Nov 26, 2013
The human rights committee of the United Nations General Assembly advanced a resolution on Tuesday initially aimed at reigning in unlawful spying.
Yet the language that passed was significantly weakened at the behest of the United States, Britain, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand--the so-called "Five Eyes" intelligence alliance.
Drafted by the Brazil and Germany, the provision is a non-binding, symbolic affirmation of privacy rights following high-profile scandals that have rippled through the international community, including U.S. spying on Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, the Associated Press explains.
The Guardian reports:
The main sticking point was over language stating that foreign nationals should have the same rights to privacy as the citizens of countries carrying out mass surveillance. US law currently gives citizens far greater protection than foreigners from NSA operations.
The Five-Eyes members argued that the legal right to privacy was an internal matter for states alone.
At the same time, countries including Cuba and Venezuela had pushed for more explicit language on alleged extraterritorial human rights violations during the negotiations.
After its successful bid to weaken the resolution, the United States consented to its passage through the human rights committee.
It is next headed to the 193-member General Assembly, which will put it to a vote next month.
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The human rights committee of the United Nations General Assembly advanced a resolution on Tuesday initially aimed at reigning in unlawful spying.
Yet the language that passed was significantly weakened at the behest of the United States, Britain, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand--the so-called "Five Eyes" intelligence alliance.
Drafted by the Brazil and Germany, the provision is a non-binding, symbolic affirmation of privacy rights following high-profile scandals that have rippled through the international community, including U.S. spying on Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, the Associated Press explains.
The Guardian reports:
The main sticking point was over language stating that foreign nationals should have the same rights to privacy as the citizens of countries carrying out mass surveillance. US law currently gives citizens far greater protection than foreigners from NSA operations.
The Five-Eyes members argued that the legal right to privacy was an internal matter for states alone.
At the same time, countries including Cuba and Venezuela had pushed for more explicit language on alleged extraterritorial human rights violations during the negotiations.
After its successful bid to weaken the resolution, the United States consented to its passage through the human rights committee.
It is next headed to the 193-member General Assembly, which will put it to a vote next month.
The human rights committee of the United Nations General Assembly advanced a resolution on Tuesday initially aimed at reigning in unlawful spying.
Yet the language that passed was significantly weakened at the behest of the United States, Britain, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand--the so-called "Five Eyes" intelligence alliance.
Drafted by the Brazil and Germany, the provision is a non-binding, symbolic affirmation of privacy rights following high-profile scandals that have rippled through the international community, including U.S. spying on Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, the Associated Press explains.
The Guardian reports:
The main sticking point was over language stating that foreign nationals should have the same rights to privacy as the citizens of countries carrying out mass surveillance. US law currently gives citizens far greater protection than foreigners from NSA operations.
The Five-Eyes members argued that the legal right to privacy was an internal matter for states alone.
At the same time, countries including Cuba and Venezuela had pushed for more explicit language on alleged extraterritorial human rights violations during the negotiations.
After its successful bid to weaken the resolution, the United States consented to its passage through the human rights committee.
It is next headed to the 193-member General Assembly, which will put it to a vote next month.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.