SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
(Photo: Caelie_Frampton/cc/flickr)
Coalition to Congress: Don't Fast-Track the TPP
'Given the administration's complete lack of transparency in negotiating the TPP, it is vitally important that democratically elected representatives are at least given the opportunity to conduct a review and push for fixes,' write groups
Oct 23, 2013
Slamming the Obama administration's "complete lack of transparency in negotiating the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP)" trade agreement, a coalition of public interest groups urged members of Congress to reject the president's request for the ability to fast-track the deal.
Last month, Obama said he would be pushing for Trade Promotion Authority--legislation that would allow him to fast-track trade agreements by giving Congress a yes or no vote but taking away powers to amend, and which Jim Hightower once referred to as "a legislative laxative that's bad for the Constitution."
The authority would prevent congressional ability to push for fixes to what Politico described as "the biggest free-trade deal in history -- a pact involving 12 countries in the Asia-Pacific region, dwarfing NAFTA -- and remaking global trade policy for a generation," and what Public Citizen's Lori Wallach described bluntly as "NAFTA on steroids."
In their letter to Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, Ranking Member Orrin Hatch, House Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp, Ranking Member Sander Levin, and Congressional advisors on trade policy and negotiation sent Wednesday, 14 groups, including Public Citizen, Amnesty International, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and Global Exchange, write that
Since TPP trade delegates have kept all draft texts secret and have excluded public input from the process, our deep concerns about the agreement have been marginalized.
Among the concerns they cite, based on leaked portions of the agreement's text, are an "Intellectual Property" chapter that
appears to encourage the sort of speech restricting provisions that the public protested loudly when they appeared in the Anti Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) and the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA).
Echoing the call of dozens of other groups that have warned that the negotiations thus far have favored corporations over the public interest, the letter continues:
The American public has a right to know the contents of the international agreements its government is crafting. Corporations cannot be the only interests represented in this agreement, since they do not advocate for policies that safeguard or even represent the interests of the public at large. Given the administration's complete lack of transparency in negotiating the TPP, it is vitally important that democratically elected representatives are at least given the opportunity to conduct a review and push for fixes.
To that end, we request that you oppose any legislation that would renew fast track or trade pro motion authority.
Read the full letter (provided by EFF) below:
_________________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
amnesty internationalbarack obamaelectronic frontier foundationjim hightowernaftapublic citizentechnologytpp
Slamming the Obama administration's "complete lack of transparency in negotiating the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP)" trade agreement, a coalition of public interest groups urged members of Congress to reject the president's request for the ability to fast-track the deal.
Last month, Obama said he would be pushing for Trade Promotion Authority--legislation that would allow him to fast-track trade agreements by giving Congress a yes or no vote but taking away powers to amend, and which Jim Hightower once referred to as "a legislative laxative that's bad for the Constitution."
The authority would prevent congressional ability to push for fixes to what Politico described as "the biggest free-trade deal in history -- a pact involving 12 countries in the Asia-Pacific region, dwarfing NAFTA -- and remaking global trade policy for a generation," and what Public Citizen's Lori Wallach described bluntly as "NAFTA on steroids."
In their letter to Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, Ranking Member Orrin Hatch, House Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp, Ranking Member Sander Levin, and Congressional advisors on trade policy and negotiation sent Wednesday, 14 groups, including Public Citizen, Amnesty International, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and Global Exchange, write that
Since TPP trade delegates have kept all draft texts secret and have excluded public input from the process, our deep concerns about the agreement have been marginalized.
Among the concerns they cite, based on leaked portions of the agreement's text, are an "Intellectual Property" chapter that
appears to encourage the sort of speech restricting provisions that the public protested loudly when they appeared in the Anti Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) and the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA).
Echoing the call of dozens of other groups that have warned that the negotiations thus far have favored corporations over the public interest, the letter continues:
The American public has a right to know the contents of the international agreements its government is crafting. Corporations cannot be the only interests represented in this agreement, since they do not advocate for policies that safeguard or even represent the interests of the public at large. Given the administration's complete lack of transparency in negotiating the TPP, it is vitally important that democratically elected representatives are at least given the opportunity to conduct a review and push for fixes.
To that end, we request that you oppose any legislation that would renew fast track or trade pro motion authority.
Read the full letter (provided by EFF) below:
_________________________
Slamming the Obama administration's "complete lack of transparency in negotiating the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP)" trade agreement, a coalition of public interest groups urged members of Congress to reject the president's request for the ability to fast-track the deal.
Last month, Obama said he would be pushing for Trade Promotion Authority--legislation that would allow him to fast-track trade agreements by giving Congress a yes or no vote but taking away powers to amend, and which Jim Hightower once referred to as "a legislative laxative that's bad for the Constitution."
The authority would prevent congressional ability to push for fixes to what Politico described as "the biggest free-trade deal in history -- a pact involving 12 countries in the Asia-Pacific region, dwarfing NAFTA -- and remaking global trade policy for a generation," and what Public Citizen's Lori Wallach described bluntly as "NAFTA on steroids."
In their letter to Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, Ranking Member Orrin Hatch, House Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp, Ranking Member Sander Levin, and Congressional advisors on trade policy and negotiation sent Wednesday, 14 groups, including Public Citizen, Amnesty International, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and Global Exchange, write that
Since TPP trade delegates have kept all draft texts secret and have excluded public input from the process, our deep concerns about the agreement have been marginalized.
Among the concerns they cite, based on leaked portions of the agreement's text, are an "Intellectual Property" chapter that
appears to encourage the sort of speech restricting provisions that the public protested loudly when they appeared in the Anti Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) and the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA).
Echoing the call of dozens of other groups that have warned that the negotiations thus far have favored corporations over the public interest, the letter continues:
The American public has a right to know the contents of the international agreements its government is crafting. Corporations cannot be the only interests represented in this agreement, since they do not advocate for policies that safeguard or even represent the interests of the public at large. Given the administration's complete lack of transparency in negotiating the TPP, it is vitally important that democratically elected representatives are at least given the opportunity to conduct a review and push for fixes.
To that end, we request that you oppose any legislation that would renew fast track or trade pro motion authority.
Read the full letter (provided by EFF) below:
_________________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.