SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
(Photo: Nicolas Poblete/cc/flickr)
Argentina: Case Study in Perils of Pesticide-Heavy GMO-Crop Boom
New reporting by the Associated Press highlights the health problems afflicting Argentinians since the rise of biotech farming and becoming the world's third largest soybean producer.
Oct 20, 2013
New reporting by the Associated Press highlights the health problems afflicting Argentinians since the rise of biotech farming and becoming the world's third largest soybean producer.
According to AP's investigation, farmers in the Latin American country use twice as much pesticide per acre as farmers in the US, and those agrotoxins may be applied by farmers not wearing protective gear and may drift into homes and schools. The pesticide containers may also end up resold, posing a public health threat.
Doctors warn that the rise in cancer and birth defects may be attributable to the growing use of these pesticides, AP reports.
This summer the non-profit organization GRAIN highlighted the "neocolonialist fervor" with which transnational agribusinesses were transforming parts of Latin America, including Argentina, into "The United Republic of Soybeans," pushing genetically modified crops and sparking "a social and environmental catastrophe settling like a plague over the entire region."
GRAIN wrote:
There has been no official concern about the problems caused by the widespread planting of transgenic soybeans and the high levels of agrotoxins this requires. On the contrary, this model continues to be consolidated and defended by all of the region's governments, which have adopted it as government policy in every case. At best - and only when societal pressure becomes too great - they have given slapdash consideration to the problems of agrotoxin poisoning, displacement of peasants and first peoples, land concentration, and loss of local production. But these are considered "collateral impacts."
___________________
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
New reporting by the Associated Press highlights the health problems afflicting Argentinians since the rise of biotech farming and becoming the world's third largest soybean producer.
According to AP's investigation, farmers in the Latin American country use twice as much pesticide per acre as farmers in the US, and those agrotoxins may be applied by farmers not wearing protective gear and may drift into homes and schools. The pesticide containers may also end up resold, posing a public health threat.
Doctors warn that the rise in cancer and birth defects may be attributable to the growing use of these pesticides, AP reports.
This summer the non-profit organization GRAIN highlighted the "neocolonialist fervor" with which transnational agribusinesses were transforming parts of Latin America, including Argentina, into "The United Republic of Soybeans," pushing genetically modified crops and sparking "a social and environmental catastrophe settling like a plague over the entire region."
GRAIN wrote:
There has been no official concern about the problems caused by the widespread planting of transgenic soybeans and the high levels of agrotoxins this requires. On the contrary, this model continues to be consolidated and defended by all of the region's governments, which have adopted it as government policy in every case. At best - and only when societal pressure becomes too great - they have given slapdash consideration to the problems of agrotoxin poisoning, displacement of peasants and first peoples, land concentration, and loss of local production. But these are considered "collateral impacts."
___________________
New reporting by the Associated Press highlights the health problems afflicting Argentinians since the rise of biotech farming and becoming the world's third largest soybean producer.
According to AP's investigation, farmers in the Latin American country use twice as much pesticide per acre as farmers in the US, and those agrotoxins may be applied by farmers not wearing protective gear and may drift into homes and schools. The pesticide containers may also end up resold, posing a public health threat.
Doctors warn that the rise in cancer and birth defects may be attributable to the growing use of these pesticides, AP reports.
This summer the non-profit organization GRAIN highlighted the "neocolonialist fervor" with which transnational agribusinesses were transforming parts of Latin America, including Argentina, into "The United Republic of Soybeans," pushing genetically modified crops and sparking "a social and environmental catastrophe settling like a plague over the entire region."
GRAIN wrote:
There has been no official concern about the problems caused by the widespread planting of transgenic soybeans and the high levels of agrotoxins this requires. On the contrary, this model continues to be consolidated and defended by all of the region's governments, which have adopted it as government policy in every case. At best - and only when societal pressure becomes too great - they have given slapdash consideration to the problems of agrotoxin poisoning, displacement of peasants and first peoples, land concentration, and loss of local production. But these are considered "collateral impacts."
___________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.