SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
"We are surprised by the recent acts by officials of your government against our colleagues at the Guardian and deeply concerned that a stout defender of democracy and free debate such as the United Kingdom uses antiterror legislation in order to legalise what amounts to harassment of both the paper and individuals associated with it," the editors of Denmark's Politiken, Sweden's Dagens Nyheter, Norway's Aftenposten, and Finland's Helsingin Sanomat wrote in an open letter that appeared in the Guardian's Observer Saturday.
"Moreover, it is deeply disturbing that the police have now announced a criminal investigation. We hope this is not to be seen as a step against journalists doing journalism," they declared.
Miranda, a Brazilian citizen, was detained for 9 hours last Sunday as he passed through London's Heathrow Airport on his way home from a visit with film-maker Laura Poitras, who helped break the spying revelations stories. The police invoked the UK's Schedule 7, part of the country's Terrorism Act 2000, to hold Miranda.
The incident, in which Miranda says he was subject to "frightening, stressful and intimidating" interrogation and threats of imprisonment, has sparked global outrage over the UK's abuse of so-called anti-terrorism laws to intimidate journalists and shut down debate.
Miranda publicly spoke out about the incident and filed a lawsuit against the police, resulting in his limited court victory last week, in which the High Court issued a ruling Thursday that prohibits the government and police from "inspecting, copying or sharing" the data that was forcefully taken from him while he was passing through Heathrow airport on Sunday, except for where it is used to 'protect' national security and/or determine whether the claimant is connected with terrorism.
Miranda apparently is not the only person who has been detained and interrogated unjustly by UK anti-terrorism laws. Independent Police Complaints Commission, a watchdog group, toldthe Guardian that it is investigating 18 cases of unlawful use of Schedule 7 laws by metropolitan police to detain passengers for 9 hours with no reasonable cause. After the police department's repeated refusal to participate in the investigations, in the IPCC is threatening legal action.
_____________________
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
"We are surprised by the recent acts by officials of your government against our colleagues at the Guardian and deeply concerned that a stout defender of democracy and free debate such as the United Kingdom uses antiterror legislation in order to legalise what amounts to harassment of both the paper and individuals associated with it," the editors of Denmark's Politiken, Sweden's Dagens Nyheter, Norway's Aftenposten, and Finland's Helsingin Sanomat wrote in an open letter that appeared in the Guardian's Observer Saturday.
"Moreover, it is deeply disturbing that the police have now announced a criminal investigation. We hope this is not to be seen as a step against journalists doing journalism," they declared.
Miranda, a Brazilian citizen, was detained for 9 hours last Sunday as he passed through London's Heathrow Airport on his way home from a visit with film-maker Laura Poitras, who helped break the spying revelations stories. The police invoked the UK's Schedule 7, part of the country's Terrorism Act 2000, to hold Miranda.
The incident, in which Miranda says he was subject to "frightening, stressful and intimidating" interrogation and threats of imprisonment, has sparked global outrage over the UK's abuse of so-called anti-terrorism laws to intimidate journalists and shut down debate.
Miranda publicly spoke out about the incident and filed a lawsuit against the police, resulting in his limited court victory last week, in which the High Court issued a ruling Thursday that prohibits the government and police from "inspecting, copying or sharing" the data that was forcefully taken from him while he was passing through Heathrow airport on Sunday, except for where it is used to 'protect' national security and/or determine whether the claimant is connected with terrorism.
Miranda apparently is not the only person who has been detained and interrogated unjustly by UK anti-terrorism laws. Independent Police Complaints Commission, a watchdog group, toldthe Guardian that it is investigating 18 cases of unlawful use of Schedule 7 laws by metropolitan police to detain passengers for 9 hours with no reasonable cause. After the police department's repeated refusal to participate in the investigations, in the IPCC is threatening legal action.
_____________________
"We are surprised by the recent acts by officials of your government against our colleagues at the Guardian and deeply concerned that a stout defender of democracy and free debate such as the United Kingdom uses antiterror legislation in order to legalise what amounts to harassment of both the paper and individuals associated with it," the editors of Denmark's Politiken, Sweden's Dagens Nyheter, Norway's Aftenposten, and Finland's Helsingin Sanomat wrote in an open letter that appeared in the Guardian's Observer Saturday.
"Moreover, it is deeply disturbing that the police have now announced a criminal investigation. We hope this is not to be seen as a step against journalists doing journalism," they declared.
Miranda, a Brazilian citizen, was detained for 9 hours last Sunday as he passed through London's Heathrow Airport on his way home from a visit with film-maker Laura Poitras, who helped break the spying revelations stories. The police invoked the UK's Schedule 7, part of the country's Terrorism Act 2000, to hold Miranda.
The incident, in which Miranda says he was subject to "frightening, stressful and intimidating" interrogation and threats of imprisonment, has sparked global outrage over the UK's abuse of so-called anti-terrorism laws to intimidate journalists and shut down debate.
Miranda publicly spoke out about the incident and filed a lawsuit against the police, resulting in his limited court victory last week, in which the High Court issued a ruling Thursday that prohibits the government and police from "inspecting, copying or sharing" the data that was forcefully taken from him while he was passing through Heathrow airport on Sunday, except for where it is used to 'protect' national security and/or determine whether the claimant is connected with terrorism.
Miranda apparently is not the only person who has been detained and interrogated unjustly by UK anti-terrorism laws. Independent Police Complaints Commission, a watchdog group, toldthe Guardian that it is investigating 18 cases of unlawful use of Schedule 7 laws by metropolitan police to detain passengers for 9 hours with no reasonable cause. After the police department's repeated refusal to participate in the investigations, in the IPCC is threatening legal action.
_____________________