

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

"We are surprised by the recent acts by officials of your government against our colleagues at the Guardian and deeply concerned that a stout defender of democracy and free debate such as the United Kingdom uses antiterror legislation in order to legalise what amounts to harassment of both the paper and individuals associated with it," the editors of Denmark's Politiken, Sweden's Dagens Nyheter, Norway's Aftenposten, and Finland's Helsingin Sanomat wrote in an open letter that appeared in the Guardian's Observer Saturday.
"Moreover, it is deeply disturbing that the police have now announced a criminal investigation. We hope this is not to be seen as a step against journalists doing journalism," they declared.
Miranda, a Brazilian citizen, was detained for 9 hours last Sunday as he passed through London's Heathrow Airport on his way home from a visit with film-maker Laura Poitras, who helped break the spying revelations stories. The police invoked the UK's Schedule 7, part of the country's Terrorism Act 2000, to hold Miranda.
The incident, in which Miranda says he was subject to "frightening, stressful and intimidating" interrogation and threats of imprisonment, has sparked global outrage over the UK's abuse of so-called anti-terrorism laws to intimidate journalists and shut down debate.
Miranda publicly spoke out about the incident and filed a lawsuit against the police, resulting in his limited court victory last week, in which the High Court issued a ruling Thursday that prohibits the government and police from "inspecting, copying or sharing" the data that was forcefully taken from him while he was passing through Heathrow airport on Sunday, except for where it is used to 'protect' national security and/or determine whether the claimant is connected with terrorism.
Miranda apparently is not the only person who has been detained and interrogated unjustly by UK anti-terrorism laws. Independent Police Complaints Commission, a watchdog group, told the Guardian that it is investigating 18 cases of unlawful use of Schedule 7 laws by metropolitan police to detain passengers for 9 hours with no reasonable cause. After the police department's repeated refusal to participate in the investigations, in the IPCC is threatening legal action.
_____________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |

"We are surprised by the recent acts by officials of your government against our colleagues at the Guardian and deeply concerned that a stout defender of democracy and free debate such as the United Kingdom uses antiterror legislation in order to legalise what amounts to harassment of both the paper and individuals associated with it," the editors of Denmark's Politiken, Sweden's Dagens Nyheter, Norway's Aftenposten, and Finland's Helsingin Sanomat wrote in an open letter that appeared in the Guardian's Observer Saturday.
"Moreover, it is deeply disturbing that the police have now announced a criminal investigation. We hope this is not to be seen as a step against journalists doing journalism," they declared.
Miranda, a Brazilian citizen, was detained for 9 hours last Sunday as he passed through London's Heathrow Airport on his way home from a visit with film-maker Laura Poitras, who helped break the spying revelations stories. The police invoked the UK's Schedule 7, part of the country's Terrorism Act 2000, to hold Miranda.
The incident, in which Miranda says he was subject to "frightening, stressful and intimidating" interrogation and threats of imprisonment, has sparked global outrage over the UK's abuse of so-called anti-terrorism laws to intimidate journalists and shut down debate.
Miranda publicly spoke out about the incident and filed a lawsuit against the police, resulting in his limited court victory last week, in which the High Court issued a ruling Thursday that prohibits the government and police from "inspecting, copying or sharing" the data that was forcefully taken from him while he was passing through Heathrow airport on Sunday, except for where it is used to 'protect' national security and/or determine whether the claimant is connected with terrorism.
Miranda apparently is not the only person who has been detained and interrogated unjustly by UK anti-terrorism laws. Independent Police Complaints Commission, a watchdog group, told the Guardian that it is investigating 18 cases of unlawful use of Schedule 7 laws by metropolitan police to detain passengers for 9 hours with no reasonable cause. After the police department's repeated refusal to participate in the investigations, in the IPCC is threatening legal action.
_____________________

"We are surprised by the recent acts by officials of your government against our colleagues at the Guardian and deeply concerned that a stout defender of democracy and free debate such as the United Kingdom uses antiterror legislation in order to legalise what amounts to harassment of both the paper and individuals associated with it," the editors of Denmark's Politiken, Sweden's Dagens Nyheter, Norway's Aftenposten, and Finland's Helsingin Sanomat wrote in an open letter that appeared in the Guardian's Observer Saturday.
"Moreover, it is deeply disturbing that the police have now announced a criminal investigation. We hope this is not to be seen as a step against journalists doing journalism," they declared.
Miranda, a Brazilian citizen, was detained for 9 hours last Sunday as he passed through London's Heathrow Airport on his way home from a visit with film-maker Laura Poitras, who helped break the spying revelations stories. The police invoked the UK's Schedule 7, part of the country's Terrorism Act 2000, to hold Miranda.
The incident, in which Miranda says he was subject to "frightening, stressful and intimidating" interrogation and threats of imprisonment, has sparked global outrage over the UK's abuse of so-called anti-terrorism laws to intimidate journalists and shut down debate.
Miranda publicly spoke out about the incident and filed a lawsuit against the police, resulting in his limited court victory last week, in which the High Court issued a ruling Thursday that prohibits the government and police from "inspecting, copying or sharing" the data that was forcefully taken from him while he was passing through Heathrow airport on Sunday, except for where it is used to 'protect' national security and/or determine whether the claimant is connected with terrorism.
Miranda apparently is not the only person who has been detained and interrogated unjustly by UK anti-terrorism laws. Independent Police Complaints Commission, a watchdog group, told the Guardian that it is investigating 18 cases of unlawful use of Schedule 7 laws by metropolitan police to detain passengers for 9 hours with no reasonable cause. After the police department's repeated refusal to participate in the investigations, in the IPCC is threatening legal action.
_____________________