SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
CIA drone operators, who do not wear the uniforms of conventional soldiers, could theoretically be considered war criminals and subject to prosecution in Pakistani courts. (Air Force photo by Senior Airman Julianne Showalter)
UN 'to Seek' End to CIA Drone Raids
May 28, 2010
A senior United Nations official is planning to
call on the US to end aerial drone attacks by the Central Intelligence
Agency against alleged al-Qaeda targets in Pakistan, according to the New
York Times.
The call is expected to come next week, a report in the US
newspaper's website said on Friday.
Philip Alston, the UN special rapporteur on
extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, said on Thursday that he
will deliver a report to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, arguing
that the "life and death power" of drones should be executed by regular
armed forces rather than intelligence agencies.
Alston's recommendations, which are expected to be delivered in a
June 3 report, are not legally binding.
He argues that conventional military forces are
more accountable than intelligence agencies for investigating civilian
casualties.
"With the defence department you've got maybe not perfect but quite
abundant accountability as demonstrated by what happens when a bombing
goes wrong in Afghanistan," Alston said.
"The whole process that follows is very open. Whereas if the CIA is
doing it, by definition they are not going to answer questions, not
provide any information, and not do any follow-up that we know about."
Under international law, soldiers representing conventional
militaries are allowed to kill enemy troops in war zones.
'Lawful combatancy'
The government of George Bush, the previous US president, issued a
policy manual in 2007 which defined "murder in violation of the laws of
war" as killing someone who did not meet "the requirements for lawful
combatancy".
These requirements include being part of a regular army or otherwise
wearing a uniform.
According
to this definition of murder, CIA drone operators, who do not wear the
uniforms of conventional soldiers, could theoretically be considered war
criminals and subject to prosecution in Pakistani courts.
Paul Weiss, a CIA spokeswoman, said that the "agency's operations
take place in a framework of both law and government oversite".
"It would be wrong to suggest the CIA is not accountable," he said,
although she refused to discuss or confirm specific activities.
By some accounts, drone attacks - which reportedly commence at CIA
headquarters in Langley, Virginia - have increased during president
Barack Obama's time in office.
The Long War Journal, a blog that uses open-source information to
track US operations in the Middle East, tallied five US aerial attacks
in Pakistan in 2007 and 36 in 2008.
In 2009, Obama's first year in office, aerial attacks increased 47
per cent to 53, with unmanned drones responsible for most strikes.
Source:
Agencies
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A senior United Nations official is planning to
call on the US to end aerial drone attacks by the Central Intelligence
Agency against alleged al-Qaeda targets in Pakistan, according to the New
York Times.
The call is expected to come next week, a report in the US
newspaper's website said on Friday.
Philip Alston, the UN special rapporteur on
extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, said on Thursday that he
will deliver a report to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, arguing
that the "life and death power" of drones should be executed by regular
armed forces rather than intelligence agencies.
Alston's recommendations, which are expected to be delivered in a
June 3 report, are not legally binding.
He argues that conventional military forces are
more accountable than intelligence agencies for investigating civilian
casualties.
"With the defence department you've got maybe not perfect but quite
abundant accountability as demonstrated by what happens when a bombing
goes wrong in Afghanistan," Alston said.
"The whole process that follows is very open. Whereas if the CIA is
doing it, by definition they are not going to answer questions, not
provide any information, and not do any follow-up that we know about."
Under international law, soldiers representing conventional
militaries are allowed to kill enemy troops in war zones.
'Lawful combatancy'
The government of George Bush, the previous US president, issued a
policy manual in 2007 which defined "murder in violation of the laws of
war" as killing someone who did not meet "the requirements for lawful
combatancy".
These requirements include being part of a regular army or otherwise
wearing a uniform.
According
to this definition of murder, CIA drone operators, who do not wear the
uniforms of conventional soldiers, could theoretically be considered war
criminals and subject to prosecution in Pakistani courts.
Paul Weiss, a CIA spokeswoman, said that the "agency's operations
take place in a framework of both law and government oversite".
"It would be wrong to suggest the CIA is not accountable," he said,
although she refused to discuss or confirm specific activities.
By some accounts, drone attacks - which reportedly commence at CIA
headquarters in Langley, Virginia - have increased during president
Barack Obama's time in office.
The Long War Journal, a blog that uses open-source information to
track US operations in the Middle East, tallied five US aerial attacks
in Pakistan in 2007 and 36 in 2008.
In 2009, Obama's first year in office, aerial attacks increased 47
per cent to 53, with unmanned drones responsible for most strikes.
Source:
Agencies
A senior United Nations official is planning to
call on the US to end aerial drone attacks by the Central Intelligence
Agency against alleged al-Qaeda targets in Pakistan, according to the New
York Times.
The call is expected to come next week, a report in the US
newspaper's website said on Friday.
Philip Alston, the UN special rapporteur on
extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, said on Thursday that he
will deliver a report to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, arguing
that the "life and death power" of drones should be executed by regular
armed forces rather than intelligence agencies.
Alston's recommendations, which are expected to be delivered in a
June 3 report, are not legally binding.
He argues that conventional military forces are
more accountable than intelligence agencies for investigating civilian
casualties.
"With the defence department you've got maybe not perfect but quite
abundant accountability as demonstrated by what happens when a bombing
goes wrong in Afghanistan," Alston said.
"The whole process that follows is very open. Whereas if the CIA is
doing it, by definition they are not going to answer questions, not
provide any information, and not do any follow-up that we know about."
Under international law, soldiers representing conventional
militaries are allowed to kill enemy troops in war zones.
'Lawful combatancy'
The government of George Bush, the previous US president, issued a
policy manual in 2007 which defined "murder in violation of the laws of
war" as killing someone who did not meet "the requirements for lawful
combatancy".
These requirements include being part of a regular army or otherwise
wearing a uniform.
According
to this definition of murder, CIA drone operators, who do not wear the
uniforms of conventional soldiers, could theoretically be considered war
criminals and subject to prosecution in Pakistani courts.
Paul Weiss, a CIA spokeswoman, said that the "agency's operations
take place in a framework of both law and government oversite".
"It would be wrong to suggest the CIA is not accountable," he said,
although she refused to discuss or confirm specific activities.
By some accounts, drone attacks - which reportedly commence at CIA
headquarters in Langley, Virginia - have increased during president
Barack Obama's time in office.
The Long War Journal, a blog that uses open-source information to
track US operations in the Middle East, tallied five US aerial attacks
in Pakistan in 2007 and 36 in 2008.
In 2009, Obama's first year in office, aerial attacks increased 47
per cent to 53, with unmanned drones responsible for most strikes.
Source:
Agencies
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.