SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The Onslaught of Tyranny: Why Trump Rallies for Trump
A president intent on developing a base of enthusiastic supporters who believe boldface lies poses a clear threat to American democracy
Dec 19, 2016
Donald Trump has just finished the last of his nine post-election "thank you tour" rallies. Why did he do them? And why is he planning further rallies after he becomes president?
One clue is that Trump conducted them only in the states he won. And most attendees appeared to have voted for him - overwhelmingly white, and many wearing Trump hats and T-shirts. When warm-up speakers asked how many had previously attended a Trump rally, most hands went up.
A second clue is that rather than urge followers to bury the hatchet, Trump wound them up. "It's a movement," he said in Mobile, playfully telling the crowd that in the run-up to the election, "You people were vicious, violent, screaming, 'Where's the wall?' 'We want the wall!' Screaming, 'Prison!' 'Prison!' 'Lock her up!' I mean, you were going crazy. You were nasty and mean and vicious." He called his followers "wild beasts."
"The rallies and tweets give Trump an unprecedented platform for telling Big Lies without fear of contradiction - and therefore for advancing whatever agenda he wishes."A third clue: Rather than shift from campaigning to governing, Trump's post-election rallies were almost identical to the rallies he held when he was a candidate - the same format, identical pledges ("We will build a great wall!"), and same condemnations of the "dishonest" media. They also elicited many of the same audience responses, such as "Lock her up! Lock her up!"
And rather than use the rallies to forgive those who criticized him during the campaign, he employed them to settle scores -- criticizing politicians who opposed his candidacy, like Ohio Governor John Kasich; blasting media personalities who predicted he would lose, such as CNN's John King; and mocking opponents, such as Evan McMullin, the Republican who campaigned against him as an independent in Utah.
Trump vows to continue these rallies after he becomes president. As he told the crowd in Mobile, "They're saying, 'As president, he shouldn't be doing rallies.' But I think we should, right? We've done everything else the opposite. This is the way you get an honest word out."
"Get an honest word out?" There's the real tipoff.
Like his non-stop tweets, Trump's purpose in holding these rallies is to connect directly with a large and enthusiastic base of followers who will believe what he says - and thereby reject facts from mainstream media, policy analysts, government agencies that collect data, and the scientific community.
During his just-completed "thank-you tour," Trump repeatedly claimed, for example, that the murder rate in the United States is the largest it's been in 45 years. In fact, it's near a 50-year low, according to the FBI.
He also repeatedly said he won the election by a "landslide," when in fact he lost the popular vote by 2.8 million votes - over five times Al Gore's margin over George W. Bush in 2000.
And he repeatedly asserted that the election was marred by "massive voting fraud," when in fact there has been no evidence of voting fraud at all (unless you consider the possibility that Russia hacked into our voting systems - which Trump dismisses).
A democracy depends on truth. Trump's claims that the murder rate is soaring may elicit support for policies such as harsher policing and sentencing - the opposite of what we need. His assertions that he won by a landslide may give him a mandate he doesn't deserve. His claims of "massive voter fraud" could legitimize further efforts to suppress votes through rigid ID and other requirements.
If repeatedly told Muslims are the enemy, the public may support efforts to monitor them and their places of worship inside America, or even to confine them. If told that tide of undocumented immigrants is rising (in fact, it's been falling), the public could get behind draconian policies to keep them out.
If told to ignore scientific evidence of climate change, the public may reject efforts to reverse it. If told to disregard CIA reports of Russian tampering with our elections, the public could become less vigilant about future tampering.
In short, the rallies and tweets give Trump an unprecedented platform for telling Big Lies without fear of contradiction - and therefore for advancing whatever agenda he wishes.
It's no coincidence that Trump continues to denigrate the media, and hasn't held a news conference since July.
A president intent on developing a base of enthusiastic supporters who believe boldface lies poses a clear threat to American democracy. This is how tyranny begins.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
Robert Reich
Robert Reich is professor emeritus of public policy at Berkeley and former US secretary of labor. His latest book is the No. 1 New York Times best-seller, "Coming Up Short."
Donald Trump has just finished the last of his nine post-election "thank you tour" rallies. Why did he do them? And why is he planning further rallies after he becomes president?
One clue is that Trump conducted them only in the states he won. And most attendees appeared to have voted for him - overwhelmingly white, and many wearing Trump hats and T-shirts. When warm-up speakers asked how many had previously attended a Trump rally, most hands went up.
A second clue is that rather than urge followers to bury the hatchet, Trump wound them up. "It's a movement," he said in Mobile, playfully telling the crowd that in the run-up to the election, "You people were vicious, violent, screaming, 'Where's the wall?' 'We want the wall!' Screaming, 'Prison!' 'Prison!' 'Lock her up!' I mean, you were going crazy. You were nasty and mean and vicious." He called his followers "wild beasts."
"The rallies and tweets give Trump an unprecedented platform for telling Big Lies without fear of contradiction - and therefore for advancing whatever agenda he wishes."A third clue: Rather than shift from campaigning to governing, Trump's post-election rallies were almost identical to the rallies he held when he was a candidate - the same format, identical pledges ("We will build a great wall!"), and same condemnations of the "dishonest" media. They also elicited many of the same audience responses, such as "Lock her up! Lock her up!"
And rather than use the rallies to forgive those who criticized him during the campaign, he employed them to settle scores -- criticizing politicians who opposed his candidacy, like Ohio Governor John Kasich; blasting media personalities who predicted he would lose, such as CNN's John King; and mocking opponents, such as Evan McMullin, the Republican who campaigned against him as an independent in Utah.
Trump vows to continue these rallies after he becomes president. As he told the crowd in Mobile, "They're saying, 'As president, he shouldn't be doing rallies.' But I think we should, right? We've done everything else the opposite. This is the way you get an honest word out."
"Get an honest word out?" There's the real tipoff.
Like his non-stop tweets, Trump's purpose in holding these rallies is to connect directly with a large and enthusiastic base of followers who will believe what he says - and thereby reject facts from mainstream media, policy analysts, government agencies that collect data, and the scientific community.
During his just-completed "thank-you tour," Trump repeatedly claimed, for example, that the murder rate in the United States is the largest it's been in 45 years. In fact, it's near a 50-year low, according to the FBI.
He also repeatedly said he won the election by a "landslide," when in fact he lost the popular vote by 2.8 million votes - over five times Al Gore's margin over George W. Bush in 2000.
And he repeatedly asserted that the election was marred by "massive voting fraud," when in fact there has been no evidence of voting fraud at all (unless you consider the possibility that Russia hacked into our voting systems - which Trump dismisses).
A democracy depends on truth. Trump's claims that the murder rate is soaring may elicit support for policies such as harsher policing and sentencing - the opposite of what we need. His assertions that he won by a landslide may give him a mandate he doesn't deserve. His claims of "massive voter fraud" could legitimize further efforts to suppress votes through rigid ID and other requirements.
If repeatedly told Muslims are the enemy, the public may support efforts to monitor them and their places of worship inside America, or even to confine them. If told that tide of undocumented immigrants is rising (in fact, it's been falling), the public could get behind draconian policies to keep them out.
If told to ignore scientific evidence of climate change, the public may reject efforts to reverse it. If told to disregard CIA reports of Russian tampering with our elections, the public could become less vigilant about future tampering.
In short, the rallies and tweets give Trump an unprecedented platform for telling Big Lies without fear of contradiction - and therefore for advancing whatever agenda he wishes.
It's no coincidence that Trump continues to denigrate the media, and hasn't held a news conference since July.
A president intent on developing a base of enthusiastic supporters who believe boldface lies poses a clear threat to American democracy. This is how tyranny begins.
Robert Reich
Robert Reich is professor emeritus of public policy at Berkeley and former US secretary of labor. His latest book is the No. 1 New York Times best-seller, "Coming Up Short."
Donald Trump has just finished the last of his nine post-election "thank you tour" rallies. Why did he do them? And why is he planning further rallies after he becomes president?
One clue is that Trump conducted them only in the states he won. And most attendees appeared to have voted for him - overwhelmingly white, and many wearing Trump hats and T-shirts. When warm-up speakers asked how many had previously attended a Trump rally, most hands went up.
A second clue is that rather than urge followers to bury the hatchet, Trump wound them up. "It's a movement," he said in Mobile, playfully telling the crowd that in the run-up to the election, "You people were vicious, violent, screaming, 'Where's the wall?' 'We want the wall!' Screaming, 'Prison!' 'Prison!' 'Lock her up!' I mean, you were going crazy. You were nasty and mean and vicious." He called his followers "wild beasts."
"The rallies and tweets give Trump an unprecedented platform for telling Big Lies without fear of contradiction - and therefore for advancing whatever agenda he wishes."A third clue: Rather than shift from campaigning to governing, Trump's post-election rallies were almost identical to the rallies he held when he was a candidate - the same format, identical pledges ("We will build a great wall!"), and same condemnations of the "dishonest" media. They also elicited many of the same audience responses, such as "Lock her up! Lock her up!"
And rather than use the rallies to forgive those who criticized him during the campaign, he employed them to settle scores -- criticizing politicians who opposed his candidacy, like Ohio Governor John Kasich; blasting media personalities who predicted he would lose, such as CNN's John King; and mocking opponents, such as Evan McMullin, the Republican who campaigned against him as an independent in Utah.
Trump vows to continue these rallies after he becomes president. As he told the crowd in Mobile, "They're saying, 'As president, he shouldn't be doing rallies.' But I think we should, right? We've done everything else the opposite. This is the way you get an honest word out."
"Get an honest word out?" There's the real tipoff.
Like his non-stop tweets, Trump's purpose in holding these rallies is to connect directly with a large and enthusiastic base of followers who will believe what he says - and thereby reject facts from mainstream media, policy analysts, government agencies that collect data, and the scientific community.
During his just-completed "thank-you tour," Trump repeatedly claimed, for example, that the murder rate in the United States is the largest it's been in 45 years. In fact, it's near a 50-year low, according to the FBI.
He also repeatedly said he won the election by a "landslide," when in fact he lost the popular vote by 2.8 million votes - over five times Al Gore's margin over George W. Bush in 2000.
And he repeatedly asserted that the election was marred by "massive voting fraud," when in fact there has been no evidence of voting fraud at all (unless you consider the possibility that Russia hacked into our voting systems - which Trump dismisses).
A democracy depends on truth. Trump's claims that the murder rate is soaring may elicit support for policies such as harsher policing and sentencing - the opposite of what we need. His assertions that he won by a landslide may give him a mandate he doesn't deserve. His claims of "massive voter fraud" could legitimize further efforts to suppress votes through rigid ID and other requirements.
If repeatedly told Muslims are the enemy, the public may support efforts to monitor them and their places of worship inside America, or even to confine them. If told that tide of undocumented immigrants is rising (in fact, it's been falling), the public could get behind draconian policies to keep them out.
If told to ignore scientific evidence of climate change, the public may reject efforts to reverse it. If told to disregard CIA reports of Russian tampering with our elections, the public could become less vigilant about future tampering.
In short, the rallies and tweets give Trump an unprecedented platform for telling Big Lies without fear of contradiction - and therefore for advancing whatever agenda he wishes.
It's no coincidence that Trump continues to denigrate the media, and hasn't held a news conference since July.
A president intent on developing a base of enthusiastic supporters who believe boldface lies poses a clear threat to American democracy. This is how tyranny begins.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.