

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Every day, it seems, brings more bad news for the fossil fuel industry. The week started badly with the news that they US coal giant Arch Coal, which owns the world's biggest coal-mining complex, was filing for bankruptcy.
This means that that over a quarter of American coal production is now officially bankrupt. The company is trying to somehow shed itself of a massive $4.5 billion of debt.
Every day, it seems, brings more bad news for the fossil fuel industry. The week started badly with the news that they US coal giant Arch Coal, which owns the world's biggest coal-mining complex, was filing for bankruptcy.
This means that that over a quarter of American coal production is now officially bankrupt. The company is trying to somehow shed itself of a massive $4.5 billion of debt.
Yesterday came the news that some $400 billion worth of oil and gas projects had been delayed since the oil price crash. The amount of deferred capital spending has almost doubled since last summer, according to a report by respected consultants Wood Mackenzie.
And then later today the Obama administration is set to announce restrictions and modifications to new coal mining leases on public lands in the US, in a move that is being seen as shoring up Obama's climate legacy.
The announcement could include a total ban on new leases or new strict rules and requirements. Even if there is not a total ban announced, other changes likely to be proposed are making coal companies pay more for the environmental damage of producing the coal.
The President had dropped a large hint in his last State of the Union address on Tuesday night, telling the audience that "Rather than subsidize the past, we should invest in the future -- especially in communities that rely on fossil fuels. I'm going to push to change the way we manage our oil and coal resources so that they better reflect the costs they impose on taxpayers and our planet."
There is no doubt this is a serious blow to the US coal industry, with an estimated 40 per cent of the coal mined on federal land, the majority in Wyoming.
The New York Times calls it a "significant setback" which effectively freezes "new coal production on federal lands and sending a signal to energy markets that could turn investors away from an already flailing industry."
The move is likely to incense Republicans already seething over Obama's executive moves last year to limit emissions of carbon dioxide under the Clean Air Act, and further ignite the extremely polarised debate on Federal control on public lands.
Nowhere is this battle more evident than in eastern Oregon where a self-styled militia have been occupying a government wildlife refuge building since early January.
It goes without saying that the coal industry is not best pleased with the proposed Obama announcement.
Luke Popovich, a spokesman for the National Mining Association said "It appears that they're going after the federal coal leasing program with the intention of keeping coal in the ground."
And keeping fossil fuels in the ground is what environmentalists and many scientists have been calling for, especially coal, the dirtiest of the fossil fuels.
Environmentalists welcomed the move. Billionaire hedge fund manager and clean energy advocate Tom Steyer praised Obama for "levelling the playing field and ending the fossil fuel industry's unfair advantage."
But Obama's announcement comes with the usual political caveats. Coal companies will be able to exploit current leases, which could mean production continues for a further 20 years or so, in which time a new American President could reverse the policy.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Every day, it seems, brings more bad news for the fossil fuel industry. The week started badly with the news that they US coal giant Arch Coal, which owns the world's biggest coal-mining complex, was filing for bankruptcy.
This means that that over a quarter of American coal production is now officially bankrupt. The company is trying to somehow shed itself of a massive $4.5 billion of debt.
Yesterday came the news that some $400 billion worth of oil and gas projects had been delayed since the oil price crash. The amount of deferred capital spending has almost doubled since last summer, according to a report by respected consultants Wood Mackenzie.
And then later today the Obama administration is set to announce restrictions and modifications to new coal mining leases on public lands in the US, in a move that is being seen as shoring up Obama's climate legacy.
The announcement could include a total ban on new leases or new strict rules and requirements. Even if there is not a total ban announced, other changes likely to be proposed are making coal companies pay more for the environmental damage of producing the coal.
The President had dropped a large hint in his last State of the Union address on Tuesday night, telling the audience that "Rather than subsidize the past, we should invest in the future -- especially in communities that rely on fossil fuels. I'm going to push to change the way we manage our oil and coal resources so that they better reflect the costs they impose on taxpayers and our planet."
There is no doubt this is a serious blow to the US coal industry, with an estimated 40 per cent of the coal mined on federal land, the majority in Wyoming.
The New York Times calls it a "significant setback" which effectively freezes "new coal production on federal lands and sending a signal to energy markets that could turn investors away from an already flailing industry."
The move is likely to incense Republicans already seething over Obama's executive moves last year to limit emissions of carbon dioxide under the Clean Air Act, and further ignite the extremely polarised debate on Federal control on public lands.
Nowhere is this battle more evident than in eastern Oregon where a self-styled militia have been occupying a government wildlife refuge building since early January.
It goes without saying that the coal industry is not best pleased with the proposed Obama announcement.
Luke Popovich, a spokesman for the National Mining Association said "It appears that they're going after the federal coal leasing program with the intention of keeping coal in the ground."
And keeping fossil fuels in the ground is what environmentalists and many scientists have been calling for, especially coal, the dirtiest of the fossil fuels.
Environmentalists welcomed the move. Billionaire hedge fund manager and clean energy advocate Tom Steyer praised Obama for "levelling the playing field and ending the fossil fuel industry's unfair advantage."
But Obama's announcement comes with the usual political caveats. Coal companies will be able to exploit current leases, which could mean production continues for a further 20 years or so, in which time a new American President could reverse the policy.
Every day, it seems, brings more bad news for the fossil fuel industry. The week started badly with the news that they US coal giant Arch Coal, which owns the world's biggest coal-mining complex, was filing for bankruptcy.
This means that that over a quarter of American coal production is now officially bankrupt. The company is trying to somehow shed itself of a massive $4.5 billion of debt.
Yesterday came the news that some $400 billion worth of oil and gas projects had been delayed since the oil price crash. The amount of deferred capital spending has almost doubled since last summer, according to a report by respected consultants Wood Mackenzie.
And then later today the Obama administration is set to announce restrictions and modifications to new coal mining leases on public lands in the US, in a move that is being seen as shoring up Obama's climate legacy.
The announcement could include a total ban on new leases or new strict rules and requirements. Even if there is not a total ban announced, other changes likely to be proposed are making coal companies pay more for the environmental damage of producing the coal.
The President had dropped a large hint in his last State of the Union address on Tuesday night, telling the audience that "Rather than subsidize the past, we should invest in the future -- especially in communities that rely on fossil fuels. I'm going to push to change the way we manage our oil and coal resources so that they better reflect the costs they impose on taxpayers and our planet."
There is no doubt this is a serious blow to the US coal industry, with an estimated 40 per cent of the coal mined on federal land, the majority in Wyoming.
The New York Times calls it a "significant setback" which effectively freezes "new coal production on federal lands and sending a signal to energy markets that could turn investors away from an already flailing industry."
The move is likely to incense Republicans already seething over Obama's executive moves last year to limit emissions of carbon dioxide under the Clean Air Act, and further ignite the extremely polarised debate on Federal control on public lands.
Nowhere is this battle more evident than in eastern Oregon where a self-styled militia have been occupying a government wildlife refuge building since early January.
It goes without saying that the coal industry is not best pleased with the proposed Obama announcement.
Luke Popovich, a spokesman for the National Mining Association said "It appears that they're going after the federal coal leasing program with the intention of keeping coal in the ground."
And keeping fossil fuels in the ground is what environmentalists and many scientists have been calling for, especially coal, the dirtiest of the fossil fuels.
Environmentalists welcomed the move. Billionaire hedge fund manager and clean energy advocate Tom Steyer praised Obama for "levelling the playing field and ending the fossil fuel industry's unfair advantage."
But Obama's announcement comes with the usual political caveats. Coal companies will be able to exploit current leases, which could mean production continues for a further 20 years or so, in which time a new American President could reverse the policy.