

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
It's ironic but not surprising that the European Central Bank decided Sunday to limit its credit to Greece by enough to force the Greek banking system to close.
This has pushed Greece closer to a more serious financial crisis than the country has had in the past five years of austerity-induced depression. Why did the ECB decide to take this harsh, unnecessary and dangerous measure now?
It's ironic but not surprising that the European Central Bank decided Sunday to limit its credit to Greece by enough to force the Greek banking system to close.
This has pushed Greece closer to a more serious financial crisis than the country has had in the past five years of austerity-induced depression. Why did the ECB decide to take this harsh, unnecessary and dangerous measure now?
It seems clear that the move is in response to the Greek government's decision to hold a referendum on whether to accept the last offer from the European authorities outlining conditions for continuing official lending to Greece. The financial problems and inconveniences of this week, caused by the bank holiday, are the European authorities' way of saying, "Vote as we'll tell you to, or we can make your lives even more miserable than we have been making them."
This offer included further cuts to Greek pensions, as well as regressive tax increases. As economist Paul Krugman has noted, these are conditions that Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras can't accept. "The purpose must therefore be to drive him from office," Mr. Krugman concluded.
There is considerable evidence that this has been the European authorities' strategy since the anti-austerity Syriza party was elected in January. Just 10 days after the election, the ECB cut off its main line of credit to Greek banks, even though there was no obvious reason to do so. Shortly thereafter, the ECB put a limit on how much Greek banks could lend to the government - a limit that the previous government did not have.
From the European authorities' point of view, "regime change" is the only logical strategy. They do have a nuclear weapon, which is to cut credit to Greece entirely - thus precipitating a financial meltdown that would force the country out of the euro. But German Chancellor Angela Merkel doesn't want this, and neither does her ally, U.S. President Barack Obama. So European authorities continue to take steps to undermine the Greek economy and government, hoping to get rid of the government and get a new one that will do what they want.
These European authorities had already succeeded in pushing the Greek economy - which was projected to grow by 2.5 per cent this year - back into recession. This is owing to their credit restrictions and the damaging effect of their brinkmanship game with the Greek government. Now they have gone further in order to intimidate Greek voters into voting Yes.
Officials such as European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker have tried to convince Greeks that a No vote would be a vote to leave the euro zone. But this is not true. It could well be that a No would strengthen the hand of the government to get a better deal, given that the most powerful people in the world don't want to see an economic collapse that forces Greece out of the euro.
The European authorities are offering no future to Greece - no light at the end of the tunnel, especially for the 60 per cent of young people who are already unemployed because of their failed policies. But there are always alternatives to years of economic recession, stagnation and mass unemployment.
These alternatives aren't radical, but mostly nothing more than the stimulus policies that dozens of countries, including the United States, implemented in response to the world financial crisis and recession of 2008 and 2009. But European authorities will not allow the Greek economy to recover. The first step for Greece must therefore begin with saying No.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
It's ironic but not surprising that the European Central Bank decided Sunday to limit its credit to Greece by enough to force the Greek banking system to close.
This has pushed Greece closer to a more serious financial crisis than the country has had in the past five years of austerity-induced depression. Why did the ECB decide to take this harsh, unnecessary and dangerous measure now?
It seems clear that the move is in response to the Greek government's decision to hold a referendum on whether to accept the last offer from the European authorities outlining conditions for continuing official lending to Greece. The financial problems and inconveniences of this week, caused by the bank holiday, are the European authorities' way of saying, "Vote as we'll tell you to, or we can make your lives even more miserable than we have been making them."
This offer included further cuts to Greek pensions, as well as regressive tax increases. As economist Paul Krugman has noted, these are conditions that Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras can't accept. "The purpose must therefore be to drive him from office," Mr. Krugman concluded.
There is considerable evidence that this has been the European authorities' strategy since the anti-austerity Syriza party was elected in January. Just 10 days after the election, the ECB cut off its main line of credit to Greek banks, even though there was no obvious reason to do so. Shortly thereafter, the ECB put a limit on how much Greek banks could lend to the government - a limit that the previous government did not have.
From the European authorities' point of view, "regime change" is the only logical strategy. They do have a nuclear weapon, which is to cut credit to Greece entirely - thus precipitating a financial meltdown that would force the country out of the euro. But German Chancellor Angela Merkel doesn't want this, and neither does her ally, U.S. President Barack Obama. So European authorities continue to take steps to undermine the Greek economy and government, hoping to get rid of the government and get a new one that will do what they want.
These European authorities had already succeeded in pushing the Greek economy - which was projected to grow by 2.5 per cent this year - back into recession. This is owing to their credit restrictions and the damaging effect of their brinkmanship game with the Greek government. Now they have gone further in order to intimidate Greek voters into voting Yes.
Officials such as European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker have tried to convince Greeks that a No vote would be a vote to leave the euro zone. But this is not true. It could well be that a No would strengthen the hand of the government to get a better deal, given that the most powerful people in the world don't want to see an economic collapse that forces Greece out of the euro.
The European authorities are offering no future to Greece - no light at the end of the tunnel, especially for the 60 per cent of young people who are already unemployed because of their failed policies. But there are always alternatives to years of economic recession, stagnation and mass unemployment.
These alternatives aren't radical, but mostly nothing more than the stimulus policies that dozens of countries, including the United States, implemented in response to the world financial crisis and recession of 2008 and 2009. But European authorities will not allow the Greek economy to recover. The first step for Greece must therefore begin with saying No.
It's ironic but not surprising that the European Central Bank decided Sunday to limit its credit to Greece by enough to force the Greek banking system to close.
This has pushed Greece closer to a more serious financial crisis than the country has had in the past five years of austerity-induced depression. Why did the ECB decide to take this harsh, unnecessary and dangerous measure now?
It seems clear that the move is in response to the Greek government's decision to hold a referendum on whether to accept the last offer from the European authorities outlining conditions for continuing official lending to Greece. The financial problems and inconveniences of this week, caused by the bank holiday, are the European authorities' way of saying, "Vote as we'll tell you to, or we can make your lives even more miserable than we have been making them."
This offer included further cuts to Greek pensions, as well as regressive tax increases. As economist Paul Krugman has noted, these are conditions that Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras can't accept. "The purpose must therefore be to drive him from office," Mr. Krugman concluded.
There is considerable evidence that this has been the European authorities' strategy since the anti-austerity Syriza party was elected in January. Just 10 days after the election, the ECB cut off its main line of credit to Greek banks, even though there was no obvious reason to do so. Shortly thereafter, the ECB put a limit on how much Greek banks could lend to the government - a limit that the previous government did not have.
From the European authorities' point of view, "regime change" is the only logical strategy. They do have a nuclear weapon, which is to cut credit to Greece entirely - thus precipitating a financial meltdown that would force the country out of the euro. But German Chancellor Angela Merkel doesn't want this, and neither does her ally, U.S. President Barack Obama. So European authorities continue to take steps to undermine the Greek economy and government, hoping to get rid of the government and get a new one that will do what they want.
These European authorities had already succeeded in pushing the Greek economy - which was projected to grow by 2.5 per cent this year - back into recession. This is owing to their credit restrictions and the damaging effect of their brinkmanship game with the Greek government. Now they have gone further in order to intimidate Greek voters into voting Yes.
Officials such as European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker have tried to convince Greeks that a No vote would be a vote to leave the euro zone. But this is not true. It could well be that a No would strengthen the hand of the government to get a better deal, given that the most powerful people in the world don't want to see an economic collapse that forces Greece out of the euro.
The European authorities are offering no future to Greece - no light at the end of the tunnel, especially for the 60 per cent of young people who are already unemployed because of their failed policies. But there are always alternatives to years of economic recession, stagnation and mass unemployment.
These alternatives aren't radical, but mostly nothing more than the stimulus policies that dozens of countries, including the United States, implemented in response to the world financial crisis and recession of 2008 and 2009. But European authorities will not allow the Greek economy to recover. The first step for Greece must therefore begin with saying No.