SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Pope Francis' Call to be Ecologically 'Pro-Life'
Jun 17, 2015
Abortion is a polarizing issue in America, with half the country believing individuals should be free to choose and 44 percent believing we must safeguard life. But "pro-life" can encompass far more than life in the womb; in fact, life on Earth is threatened -- and we are the ones aborting the ecosystems on which we rely. We're being called to be ecologically pro-life.
Thursday, Pope Francis releases his much-anticipated encyclical on the environment, which Catholic News Service predicts will present ecology "as the ultimate pro-life, pro-poor, pro-family issue."
The Catechism of the Catholic Church, a summary of the principles of Catholicism, states that God has entrusted to us "the noble mission of safeguarding life." Yet our way of life -- high consumption, low responsibility, fossil-fuel driven -- has pushed ecosystems into collapse. We live in an ecologically pro-choice culture, where most of us make choices without thinking of its effects on ecosystems, and the lives -- humans, other animals, plants -- that depend on them. As a matter of good business, we encourage corporations to pursue profit regardless of ecological repercussions. The results? Pretty much every scientist, notes NASA, is in agreement: the Earth is in unprecedented, human-induced trouble. We've pumped enough carbon into the atmosphere to raise Earth's temperature by 1 degree Celsius, and we're on track for more. We're already witnessing the results.
Sea level rise, super-storms, water scarcity, unpredictable weather; for animals and plants, extinction rates are rapidly rising. For humans, it's linked to natural disasters, droughts, political instability. Our food supply already has been affected, says the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
When taking a stance on abortion, poverty, public health, national security and other hot-button issues that address safeguarding life, I find myself redirected to the challenges of climate change. If my daughter announces she's considering abortion while the house is burning, I first focus on extinguishing the fire that threatens us all -- fetus included. Climate change is a double-whammy, magnifying poverty, migration, international conflict -- you name it. It is the defining moral issue of our time that determines our future as a species, and, as the pope's encyclical hopefully will note, we need to come together -- 100 percent of us -- to address it, first.
Reframing pro-life brings the issue into everyday decisions: The average American may never face unwanted pregnancy, but he or she might decide whether to buy a car or bike to work; buy beef or go vegetarian; divest his or her portfolio from fossil fuels or do nothing. He or she can also step up pressure for governments to limit further development of fossil fuels. This is safeguarding life.
Pope Francis has implored us to see "the link between the natural environment and the dignity of the human person." Our care for the environment -- and our connection to it -- are fundamentally what make us human. It's time to step up to our mission, to prioritize ecological pro-life
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 San Franciso Chronicle
Claire Hutkins Seda
Claire Hutkins Seda of Chico, California writes on social justice and environmental issues.
abortioncatholic churchclimate changecorporationsecosystemsenvironmentfossil fuelspope francissea level riseecological crisis
Abortion is a polarizing issue in America, with half the country believing individuals should be free to choose and 44 percent believing we must safeguard life. But "pro-life" can encompass far more than life in the womb; in fact, life on Earth is threatened -- and we are the ones aborting the ecosystems on which we rely. We're being called to be ecologically pro-life.
Thursday, Pope Francis releases his much-anticipated encyclical on the environment, which Catholic News Service predicts will present ecology "as the ultimate pro-life, pro-poor, pro-family issue."
The Catechism of the Catholic Church, a summary of the principles of Catholicism, states that God has entrusted to us "the noble mission of safeguarding life." Yet our way of life -- high consumption, low responsibility, fossil-fuel driven -- has pushed ecosystems into collapse. We live in an ecologically pro-choice culture, where most of us make choices without thinking of its effects on ecosystems, and the lives -- humans, other animals, plants -- that depend on them. As a matter of good business, we encourage corporations to pursue profit regardless of ecological repercussions. The results? Pretty much every scientist, notes NASA, is in agreement: the Earth is in unprecedented, human-induced trouble. We've pumped enough carbon into the atmosphere to raise Earth's temperature by 1 degree Celsius, and we're on track for more. We're already witnessing the results.
Sea level rise, super-storms, water scarcity, unpredictable weather; for animals and plants, extinction rates are rapidly rising. For humans, it's linked to natural disasters, droughts, political instability. Our food supply already has been affected, says the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
When taking a stance on abortion, poverty, public health, national security and other hot-button issues that address safeguarding life, I find myself redirected to the challenges of climate change. If my daughter announces she's considering abortion while the house is burning, I first focus on extinguishing the fire that threatens us all -- fetus included. Climate change is a double-whammy, magnifying poverty, migration, international conflict -- you name it. It is the defining moral issue of our time that determines our future as a species, and, as the pope's encyclical hopefully will note, we need to come together -- 100 percent of us -- to address it, first.
Reframing pro-life brings the issue into everyday decisions: The average American may never face unwanted pregnancy, but he or she might decide whether to buy a car or bike to work; buy beef or go vegetarian; divest his or her portfolio from fossil fuels or do nothing. He or she can also step up pressure for governments to limit further development of fossil fuels. This is safeguarding life.
Pope Francis has implored us to see "the link between the natural environment and the dignity of the human person." Our care for the environment -- and our connection to it -- are fundamentally what make us human. It's time to step up to our mission, to prioritize ecological pro-life
Claire Hutkins Seda
Claire Hutkins Seda of Chico, California writes on social justice and environmental issues.
Abortion is a polarizing issue in America, with half the country believing individuals should be free to choose and 44 percent believing we must safeguard life. But "pro-life" can encompass far more than life in the womb; in fact, life on Earth is threatened -- and we are the ones aborting the ecosystems on which we rely. We're being called to be ecologically pro-life.
Thursday, Pope Francis releases his much-anticipated encyclical on the environment, which Catholic News Service predicts will present ecology "as the ultimate pro-life, pro-poor, pro-family issue."
The Catechism of the Catholic Church, a summary of the principles of Catholicism, states that God has entrusted to us "the noble mission of safeguarding life." Yet our way of life -- high consumption, low responsibility, fossil-fuel driven -- has pushed ecosystems into collapse. We live in an ecologically pro-choice culture, where most of us make choices without thinking of its effects on ecosystems, and the lives -- humans, other animals, plants -- that depend on them. As a matter of good business, we encourage corporations to pursue profit regardless of ecological repercussions. The results? Pretty much every scientist, notes NASA, is in agreement: the Earth is in unprecedented, human-induced trouble. We've pumped enough carbon into the atmosphere to raise Earth's temperature by 1 degree Celsius, and we're on track for more. We're already witnessing the results.
Sea level rise, super-storms, water scarcity, unpredictable weather; for animals and plants, extinction rates are rapidly rising. For humans, it's linked to natural disasters, droughts, political instability. Our food supply already has been affected, says the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
When taking a stance on abortion, poverty, public health, national security and other hot-button issues that address safeguarding life, I find myself redirected to the challenges of climate change. If my daughter announces she's considering abortion while the house is burning, I first focus on extinguishing the fire that threatens us all -- fetus included. Climate change is a double-whammy, magnifying poverty, migration, international conflict -- you name it. It is the defining moral issue of our time that determines our future as a species, and, as the pope's encyclical hopefully will note, we need to come together -- 100 percent of us -- to address it, first.
Reframing pro-life brings the issue into everyday decisions: The average American may never face unwanted pregnancy, but he or she might decide whether to buy a car or bike to work; buy beef or go vegetarian; divest his or her portfolio from fossil fuels or do nothing. He or she can also step up pressure for governments to limit further development of fossil fuels. This is safeguarding life.
Pope Francis has implored us to see "the link between the natural environment and the dignity of the human person." Our care for the environment -- and our connection to it -- are fundamentally what make us human. It's time to step up to our mission, to prioritize ecological pro-life
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.