

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Only a few months ago, President Barack Obama announced the good news that our combat role in Afghanistan -- the longest war in U.S. history -- would finally end by New Year's Day.
Put away that champagne.
A flock of screeching war hawks brought heavy political pressure on Obama to reverse himself. So our troops will stay in that war-ravaged, corrupt, bankrupted, ethnically divided country for at least another year or two.
Only a few months ago, President Barack Obama announced the good news that our combat role in Afghanistan -- the longest war in U.S. history -- would finally end by New Year's Day.
Put away that champagne.
A flock of screeching war hawks brought heavy political pressure on Obama to reverse himself. So our troops will stay in that war-ravaged, corrupt, bankrupted, ethnically divided country for at least another year or two.
Amazingly, the hawks argued that Obama shouldn't "rush" the timeline for training Afghan security forces to defend their own country.
Rush? Hello: IT'S BEEN 13 YEARS!
"Operation Enduring Freedom," as the government originally dubbed this mess of a military mission, should be renamed "Operation Endless War."
Here we go again -- not merely conducting training exercises, but continuing to mire our courageous but overstretched military forces in the Afghans' civil war, including using U.S. ground troops in combat missions against the Afghan Taliban.
How many more Americans will die or be horribly maimed in that hapless land? How many more billions of our tax dollars will be dumped into Afghanistan's abyss? And why?
Why are we there? Why are we wasting so many lives and so much of the money we desperately need here at home?
And why are We the People not consulted on such a massive and momentous decision?
It's reported that the Pentagon not only wants to keep troops there through 2016, but beyond. How many troops? What are they to achieve? That's a secret.
When Obama announced last May that the United States would have no combat role in Afghanistan after this year, he said, "It's harder to end wars than to start them."
True, but that doesn't mean we can just surrender to those who are turning America into a militaristic state. If Obama won't fight them, we must. To help, go to www.peace-action.org.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Only a few months ago, President Barack Obama announced the good news that our combat role in Afghanistan -- the longest war in U.S. history -- would finally end by New Year's Day.
Put away that champagne.
A flock of screeching war hawks brought heavy political pressure on Obama to reverse himself. So our troops will stay in that war-ravaged, corrupt, bankrupted, ethnically divided country for at least another year or two.
Amazingly, the hawks argued that Obama shouldn't "rush" the timeline for training Afghan security forces to defend their own country.
Rush? Hello: IT'S BEEN 13 YEARS!
"Operation Enduring Freedom," as the government originally dubbed this mess of a military mission, should be renamed "Operation Endless War."
Here we go again -- not merely conducting training exercises, but continuing to mire our courageous but overstretched military forces in the Afghans' civil war, including using U.S. ground troops in combat missions against the Afghan Taliban.
How many more Americans will die or be horribly maimed in that hapless land? How many more billions of our tax dollars will be dumped into Afghanistan's abyss? And why?
Why are we there? Why are we wasting so many lives and so much of the money we desperately need here at home?
And why are We the People not consulted on such a massive and momentous decision?
It's reported that the Pentagon not only wants to keep troops there through 2016, but beyond. How many troops? What are they to achieve? That's a secret.
When Obama announced last May that the United States would have no combat role in Afghanistan after this year, he said, "It's harder to end wars than to start them."
True, but that doesn't mean we can just surrender to those who are turning America into a militaristic state. If Obama won't fight them, we must. To help, go to www.peace-action.org.
Only a few months ago, President Barack Obama announced the good news that our combat role in Afghanistan -- the longest war in U.S. history -- would finally end by New Year's Day.
Put away that champagne.
A flock of screeching war hawks brought heavy political pressure on Obama to reverse himself. So our troops will stay in that war-ravaged, corrupt, bankrupted, ethnically divided country for at least another year or two.
Amazingly, the hawks argued that Obama shouldn't "rush" the timeline for training Afghan security forces to defend their own country.
Rush? Hello: IT'S BEEN 13 YEARS!
"Operation Enduring Freedom," as the government originally dubbed this mess of a military mission, should be renamed "Operation Endless War."
Here we go again -- not merely conducting training exercises, but continuing to mire our courageous but overstretched military forces in the Afghans' civil war, including using U.S. ground troops in combat missions against the Afghan Taliban.
How many more Americans will die or be horribly maimed in that hapless land? How many more billions of our tax dollars will be dumped into Afghanistan's abyss? And why?
Why are we there? Why are we wasting so many lives and so much of the money we desperately need here at home?
And why are We the People not consulted on such a massive and momentous decision?
It's reported that the Pentagon not only wants to keep troops there through 2016, but beyond. How many troops? What are they to achieve? That's a secret.
When Obama announced last May that the United States would have no combat role in Afghanistan after this year, he said, "It's harder to end wars than to start them."
True, but that doesn't mean we can just surrender to those who are turning America into a militaristic state. If Obama won't fight them, we must. To help, go to www.peace-action.org.