SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Treasury Makes A Mistake - Claiming They Are Not Blocking Elizabeth Warren
Jul 17, 2010
It's one thing to block Elizabeth Warren from heading the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
It's quite another thing to deny in public, for the record, that any such blocking is going on (e.g., see this report; Michael Barr apparently said something quite similar today).
There is a strong groundswell of opinion on this issue from the left - see the BoldProgressives petition.
But the center also feels strongly that, given everything Treasury has
said and done over the past few months, it would be a complete travesty
not to put the strongest possible regulator in change of protecting
consumers. (See Ted Kaufman on the NYT's DealBook, giving appropriate credit to the SEC, and apply the same points to broader customer issues going forward.)
This can now go only one of two ways.
- Elizabeth Warren gets the job. Bridges are mended and the White
House regains some political capital. Secretary Geithner is weakened
slightly but he'll recover. - Someone else gets the job, despite Treasury's claims that Elizabeth
Warren was not blocked. The deception in this scenario would be
nauseating - and completely blatant. "Everyone was considered on their
merits" and "the best candidate won" will convince who exactly?
Despite the growing public reaction, outcome #2 is the most likely
and the White House needs to understand this, plain and clear - there
will be complete and utter revulsion at its handling of financial
regulatory reform both on this specific issue and much more broadly.
The administration's position in this area is already weak, its
achievements remain minimal, its speaking points are lame, and the
patience of even well-inclined people is wearing thin.
Failing to appoint Elizabeth Warren would be the straw that breaks
the camel's back. It will go down in the history books as a turning
point - downwards - for this administration.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Simon Johnson
Simon Johnson, former chief economist of the International Monetary Fund, is a professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, and a member of the CBO's Panel of Economic Advisers. He is a co-founder of The Baseline Scenario.
It's one thing to block Elizabeth Warren from heading the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
It's quite another thing to deny in public, for the record, that any such blocking is going on (e.g., see this report; Michael Barr apparently said something quite similar today).
There is a strong groundswell of opinion on this issue from the left - see the BoldProgressives petition.
But the center also feels strongly that, given everything Treasury has
said and done over the past few months, it would be a complete travesty
not to put the strongest possible regulator in change of protecting
consumers. (See Ted Kaufman on the NYT's DealBook, giving appropriate credit to the SEC, and apply the same points to broader customer issues going forward.)
This can now go only one of two ways.
- Elizabeth Warren gets the job. Bridges are mended and the White
House regains some political capital. Secretary Geithner is weakened
slightly but he'll recover. - Someone else gets the job, despite Treasury's claims that Elizabeth
Warren was not blocked. The deception in this scenario would be
nauseating - and completely blatant. "Everyone was considered on their
merits" and "the best candidate won" will convince who exactly?
Despite the growing public reaction, outcome #2 is the most likely
and the White House needs to understand this, plain and clear - there
will be complete and utter revulsion at its handling of financial
regulatory reform both on this specific issue and much more broadly.
The administration's position in this area is already weak, its
achievements remain minimal, its speaking points are lame, and the
patience of even well-inclined people is wearing thin.
Failing to appoint Elizabeth Warren would be the straw that breaks
the camel's back. It will go down in the history books as a turning
point - downwards - for this administration.
Simon Johnson
Simon Johnson, former chief economist of the International Monetary Fund, is a professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, and a member of the CBO's Panel of Economic Advisers. He is a co-founder of The Baseline Scenario.
It's one thing to block Elizabeth Warren from heading the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
It's quite another thing to deny in public, for the record, that any such blocking is going on (e.g., see this report; Michael Barr apparently said something quite similar today).
There is a strong groundswell of opinion on this issue from the left - see the BoldProgressives petition.
But the center also feels strongly that, given everything Treasury has
said and done over the past few months, it would be a complete travesty
not to put the strongest possible regulator in change of protecting
consumers. (See Ted Kaufman on the NYT's DealBook, giving appropriate credit to the SEC, and apply the same points to broader customer issues going forward.)
This can now go only one of two ways.
- Elizabeth Warren gets the job. Bridges are mended and the White
House regains some political capital. Secretary Geithner is weakened
slightly but he'll recover. - Someone else gets the job, despite Treasury's claims that Elizabeth
Warren was not blocked. The deception in this scenario would be
nauseating - and completely blatant. "Everyone was considered on their
merits" and "the best candidate won" will convince who exactly?
Despite the growing public reaction, outcome #2 is the most likely
and the White House needs to understand this, plain and clear - there
will be complete and utter revulsion at its handling of financial
regulatory reform both on this specific issue and much more broadly.
The administration's position in this area is already weak, its
achievements remain minimal, its speaking points are lame, and the
patience of even well-inclined people is wearing thin.
Failing to appoint Elizabeth Warren would be the straw that breaks
the camel's back. It will go down in the history books as a turning
point - downwards - for this administration.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.