Jul 17, 2010
It's one thing to block Elizabeth Warren from heading the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
It's quite another thing to deny in public, for the record, that any such blocking is going on (e.g., see this report; Michael Barr apparently said something quite similar today).
There is a strong groundswell of opinion on this issue from the left - see the BoldProgressives petition.
But the center also feels strongly that, given everything Treasury has
said and done over the past few months, it would be a complete travesty
not to put the strongest possible regulator in change of protecting
consumers. (See Ted Kaufman on the NYT's DealBook, giving appropriate credit to the SEC, and apply the same points to broader customer issues going forward.)
This can now go only one of two ways.
- Elizabeth Warren gets the job. Bridges are mended and the White
House regains some political capital. Secretary Geithner is weakened
slightly but he'll recover. - Someone else gets the job, despite Treasury's claims that Elizabeth
Warren was not blocked. The deception in this scenario would be
nauseating - and completely blatant. "Everyone was considered on their
merits" and "the best candidate won" will convince who exactly?
Despite the growing public reaction, outcome #2 is the most likely
and the White House needs to understand this, plain and clear - there
will be complete and utter revulsion at its handling of financial
regulatory reform both on this specific issue and much more broadly.
The administration's position in this area is already weak, its
achievements remain minimal, its speaking points are lame, and the
patience of even well-inclined people is wearing thin.
Failing to appoint Elizabeth Warren would be the straw that breaks
the camel's back. It will go down in the history books as a turning
point - downwards - for this administration.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Simon Johnson
Simon Johnson, former chief economist of the International Monetary Fund, is a professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, and a member of the CBO's Panel of Economic Advisers. He is a co-founder of The Baseline Scenario.
It's one thing to block Elizabeth Warren from heading the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
It's quite another thing to deny in public, for the record, that any such blocking is going on (e.g., see this report; Michael Barr apparently said something quite similar today).
There is a strong groundswell of opinion on this issue from the left - see the BoldProgressives petition.
But the center also feels strongly that, given everything Treasury has
said and done over the past few months, it would be a complete travesty
not to put the strongest possible regulator in change of protecting
consumers. (See Ted Kaufman on the NYT's DealBook, giving appropriate credit to the SEC, and apply the same points to broader customer issues going forward.)
This can now go only one of two ways.
- Elizabeth Warren gets the job. Bridges are mended and the White
House regains some political capital. Secretary Geithner is weakened
slightly but he'll recover. - Someone else gets the job, despite Treasury's claims that Elizabeth
Warren was not blocked. The deception in this scenario would be
nauseating - and completely blatant. "Everyone was considered on their
merits" and "the best candidate won" will convince who exactly?
Despite the growing public reaction, outcome #2 is the most likely
and the White House needs to understand this, plain and clear - there
will be complete and utter revulsion at its handling of financial
regulatory reform both on this specific issue and much more broadly.
The administration's position in this area is already weak, its
achievements remain minimal, its speaking points are lame, and the
patience of even well-inclined people is wearing thin.
Failing to appoint Elizabeth Warren would be the straw that breaks
the camel's back. It will go down in the history books as a turning
point - downwards - for this administration.
Simon Johnson
Simon Johnson, former chief economist of the International Monetary Fund, is a professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, and a member of the CBO's Panel of Economic Advisers. He is a co-founder of The Baseline Scenario.
It's one thing to block Elizabeth Warren from heading the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
It's quite another thing to deny in public, for the record, that any such blocking is going on (e.g., see this report; Michael Barr apparently said something quite similar today).
There is a strong groundswell of opinion on this issue from the left - see the BoldProgressives petition.
But the center also feels strongly that, given everything Treasury has
said and done over the past few months, it would be a complete travesty
not to put the strongest possible regulator in change of protecting
consumers. (See Ted Kaufman on the NYT's DealBook, giving appropriate credit to the SEC, and apply the same points to broader customer issues going forward.)
This can now go only one of two ways.
- Elizabeth Warren gets the job. Bridges are mended and the White
House regains some political capital. Secretary Geithner is weakened
slightly but he'll recover. - Someone else gets the job, despite Treasury's claims that Elizabeth
Warren was not blocked. The deception in this scenario would be
nauseating - and completely blatant. "Everyone was considered on their
merits" and "the best candidate won" will convince who exactly?
Despite the growing public reaction, outcome #2 is the most likely
and the White House needs to understand this, plain and clear - there
will be complete and utter revulsion at its handling of financial
regulatory reform both on this specific issue and much more broadly.
The administration's position in this area is already weak, its
achievements remain minimal, its speaking points are lame, and the
patience of even well-inclined people is wearing thin.
Failing to appoint Elizabeth Warren would be the straw that breaks
the camel's back. It will go down in the history books as a turning
point - downwards - for this administration.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.