January, 28 2011, 10:41am EDT
Sudan: New Attacks on Civilians in Darfur
South Sudan Referendum Should Not Distract From New Abuses
NEW YORK
Sudanese government and rebel attacks on civilians in Darfur have
dramatically increased in recent weeks without signs of abating, Human
Rights Watch said today. The government of Sudan, its allied forces, and
rebel factions should end abuses against civilians, and concerned
governments - still focused on South Sudan's referendum - should press
for an end to unlawful attacks and accountability for abuses, Human
Rights Watch said.
"While the international community remains focused on South Sudan,
the situation in Darfur has sharply deteriorated," said Daniel Bekele,
Africa director at Human Rights Watch. "We are seeing a return to past
patterns of violence, with both government and rebel forces targeting
civilians and committing other abuses."
On January 25, 2011, Sudanese government air and ground forces fought
rebel troops in and around the town of Tabit, North Darfur. The
fighting reportedly destroyed eight villages and caused thousands of
civilians to flee the area.
At Tabit, and in other clashes in Darfur since early December 2010,
both government and rebel forces carried out targeted attacks on
civilian populations based on their ethnic affiliations, Human Rights
Watch said. The fighting has caused civilian deaths and injuries,
destruction and looting of civilian property, and mass displacement of
tens of thousands of people to displaced persons camps and safe havens.
The renewed fighting began after the Sudanese government severed ties
with the Sudan Liberation Army (SLA) rebel faction loyal to Minni Arko
Minawi, who signed the Darfur Peace Agreement in 2006 and was appointed
special adviser to President Omar al-Bashir and head of the Darfur
Transitional Regional Authority. Relations between the government and
Minawi soured in late 2010, resulting in Minawi's dismissal from
government in early December.
According to the United Nations, the violence in December alone
caused 40,000 people to flee their homes. Many are taking refuge near
African Union/United Nations Mission in Darfur (UNAMID) bases in Khor
Abeche, Shearia, and Shangil Tobayi.
Sudan has continued to restrict UN and humanitarian agencies from
accessing conflict-affected areas, including Tabit, the site of the
January 25 clash. The government also still bars access to much of
eastern Jebel Mara where, since early 2010, government forces and militias have clashed with the SLA faction led by Abdel Wahid al-Nur,
and attacked civilians from the majority Fur ethnicity. Humanitarian
agencies have also been denied access from the Wada'a and Khazan Jedid
areas, between North and South Darfur.
December Clashes and Attacks in North-South Corridor
Fighting in the corridor between North and South Darfur started
on December 8, when rebels from the Minni Minawi faction of the SLA
ambushed a convoy containing the governor of North Darfur at Shangil
Tobayi on the road to El Fasher, North Darfur's capital. Two government
soldiers and three rebel fighters were killed.
The ambush was possibly in retaliation for comments made by the
North Darfur governor, Youssif Kibir, in a speech delivered at the
graduation ceremony of a group of Popular Defense Forces (PDF) - a
government paramilitary force that fought alongside the Sudanese army
during Sudan's long civil war and throughout the Darfur conflict.
The corridor is strategic for its transport route linking the
North and South Darfur state capitals and for its access routes to the
mountainous region of Jebel Mara, a rebel stronghold dominated by the
Fur ethnic group where there was heavy fighting in 2010 between
government and SLA forces loyal to Abdel Wahid.
In response to the ambush, on December 10 the government began
large-scale attacks on the SLA-controlled area of Khor Abeche and
surrounding villages in South Darfur. The attacks included aerial
bombing by Antonov aircraft, followed by ground attacks led by
government soldiers in more than a dozen military vehicles and hundreds
of militia members on camels and horseback. The attacks killed at least
two civilians, injured dozens, and caused massive damage to civilian
property, particularly that of ethnic Zaghawa, who the government treats
as being linked to the SLA.
Villagers told Human Rights Watch that SLA forces were not in the
area during the government attacks. Under international humanitarian
law, which is applicable in Darfur, armed forces must take all feasible
precautions to ensure that targets of attack are military objectives and
not civilians. Civilians and civilian property may never be
deliberately attacked - those responsible are committing war crimes,
Human Rights Watch said.
A Khor Abeche resident told Human Rights Watch that he saw
government soldiers looting the town's market and beating civilians with
sticks. Among the victims were the man's wife, who sustained injuries
to her head, as well as many other women and children. He said that on
December 11, he saw soldiers shooting into populated areas with mounted
machine guns, injuring more than a dozen civilians and killing two.
A 30-year-old mother of four gave a similar account: "The
soldiers went to the market and started beating the people, including
women and old men, with sticks and the butts of their guns. I was able
to take my children and some clothes and flee. All our remaining things
were completely burned."
The government's looting of the town resulted in more than 60
homes being burned and caused thousands of people to flee the area. Many
sought refuge at the United Nations/African Union mission's compound,
and government forces shot at civilians moving toward the compound,
presumably to prevent them from entering. Government troops positioned
themselves in front of the camp, also in an apparent effort to block
civilians seeking safety.
Attacking civilians and preventing them from seeking safe haven
are serious violations of international humanitarian law. Blocking
civilians from entering the UNAMID compound is also a violation of the
Status of Forces Agreement between the Sudanese government and the UN.
Human Rights Watch urged UNAMID to press Sudan to guarantee the security
of peacekeepers and the civilians who seek their assistance.
Following the attacks on Khor Abeche, the government and various
rebel factions clashed throughout December in numerous areas, causing
further civilian displacement. In mid-December, government forces began a
series of attacks on the town of Shangil Tobayi, which is host to large
displaced populations, and surrounding villages, displacing thousands
more. On December 26, government forces in Land Cruisers and on camels
and horses attacked the ethnic Zaghawa section of the town, killing at
least two civilians. The soldiers also harassed civilians and raped one
16-year-old girl, which required her to seek medical treatment.
At the same time, SLA forces carried out attacks on the ethnic
Birgid communities, whose members are in the Sudanese army and PDF
paramilitary, and are seen as pro-government. Rebel attacks on Jaghara
and surrounding villages caused numerous civilian casualties, said
Birgid and government sources interviewed by Human Rights Watch. In one
incident on December 18, rebel fighters attacked Nigaa and Jaghara,
killing at least eight civilians.
Attack on Displaced Persons Camp
On January 23, heavily armed government forces surrounded and
entered the Zamzam displaced persons camp in North Darfur. They rounded
up and detained 37 people; at least 27 men remain in detention
facilities. Human Rights Watch received reports that the government
forces entered civilian homes, looted properties and beat several
people, killing one man.
The government publicly stated that the operation aimed to
retrieve arms and drugs, and arrest "criminal elements." It did not give
notice to the UN mission, despite requirements in the Status of Forces
Agreement between Sudan and the peacekeeping mission that require
consultation on actions related to displaced persons camps.
Background
The peace process for Darfur has stalled, with government and
rebel factions unable to agree on key terms. In early December 2010, the
SLA's Minawi, who signed the Darfur Peace Agreement in 2006, formally
broke ties with the government after the federal minister of defense,
Ibrahim Mohammed Hussein, said that SLA fighters were "a legitimate
military target." Government forces arrested several of Minawi's cadres
in North and South Darfur, and President al-Bashir dismissed Minawi from
his position in government.
Meanwhile, the government has pursued a new strategy for Darfur,
calling for "domestication" of the peace process, development and
reconstruction, accelerated returns of displaced persons, and
government-provided security across the region. Rebel movements and the
vast majority of displaced communities oppose the plan based on the
continued conflict and lack of security on the ground.
Despite the recent surge in fighting and attacks on civilians,
the head of the UN humanitarian operation in Sudan, Georg Charpentier,
on January 23 said that the security situation in Darfur was improving.
The UN Security Council met on January 26 to discuss peace and security
in Sudan.
The Sudanese government has not carried out its commitments to
disarm militias or improve accountability for past and ongoing human
rights violations. It has yet to prosecute anyone who participated in a
brutal attack on Tabrat, North Darfur in early September that killed
more than 37 civilians. The government has also not taken concrete steps
to carry out the justice recommendations of High-Level Panel of the African Union on Darfur
- the so-called Mbeki panel - which recommended the establishment of
hybrid courts and promoted legal reforms to bring justice to this
troubled region of Sudan.
"President Bashir and the people of Sudan should be congratulated
for holding a peaceful referendum on southern secession, but that
smooth process does not exonerate Sudan's leaders for ongoing abuses in
Darfur," Bekele said. "Concerned governments should urgently and
forcefully press both Khartoum and rebel movements to end their abuses
of civilians in Darfur, grant humanitarian access to affected areas, and
ensure accountability for war crimes."
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Plastics Summit 'Die-In' Highlights Need to Cut Production
"This week governments have a choice: Stand up to this slash-and-burn approach by agreeing to radically reduce plastic output, or let the world be held to ransom by a dying industry."
Apr 23, 2024
As the fourth round of talks for a global plastics treaty kicked off in the Canadian capital on Tuesday, campaigners with the corporate accountability group Ekō staged a die-in at Ottawa's Shaw Centre to demand an ambitious plan to reduce production.
"Plastic pollution has reached the snows of Antarctica, the deepest oceans, even the clouds in the sky—and still fossil fuel corporations are trying to ramp up production," explained Ekō campaign director Vicky Wyatt. "This week governments have a choice: Stand up to this slash-and-burn approach by agreeing to radically reduce plastic output, or let the world be held to ransom by a dying industry. It's very clear to people across the planet which way they need to go."
Demonstrators—some wearing fish masks to highlight how plastic pollution impacts marine biodiversity—gathered in front of a 28-foot banner that used plastic trash bags to spell out: "Plastic is poisoning us. Cut production now."
(Photo: Ben Powless/Survival Media Agency)
Participants in the die-in—which followed the weekend's "March to End the Plastic Era" through the Canadian city—held smaller signs with similar messages, demanding that governments and industry "stop fueling climate chaos."
As Common Dreamsreported last week, new research from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California shows that planet-heating pollution from the plastics industry is equivalent to that of about 600 coal-fired power plants, and 75% of the greenhouse gas emissions from plastic production are released before the plastic compounds are even created.
The protesters also highlighted that more than 180,000 Ekō members have signed a petition urging action on plastic pollution. The petition specifically calls for banning all plastic waste exports from the European Union and fully implementing the Basel Convention within the bloc, while the summit has a global focus and the plan is to have a treaty by the end of this year.
After countries agreed to draft a treaty two years ago, the latest talks in Kenya last year were flooded by fossil fuel and chemical lobbyists and ended with little progress, increasing attention on the Canadian meeting that began Tuesday and is scheduled to run through Monday.
"It's a crucial moment of this process," Andrés Gómez Carrión, chair of the negotiations and an Ecuadorian diplomat in the United Kingdom, toldReuters on Monday. "One of the biggest challenges is to define where the plastics lifecycle starts and define what sustainable production and consumption is."
Petrochemical-producing countries including China, Iran, and Saudi Arabia "have opposed mentioning production limits" while E.U. members, island nations, and Japan aim to "end plastic pollution by 2040," the news agency reported. The United States supports that timeline but "wants countries to set their own plans for doing so" and submit pledges to the United Nations.
"We are facing a global plastics crisis that requires urgent, global action. Reducing plastic production needs to be a core component of the solution," Christy Leavitt, campaign director at Oceana in the United States, said in a statement. "Countries must act now to stop the flood of plastic pollution that is harming our oceans, climate, health, and communities by starting at the source to reduce its production."
"The U.S. should support a strong, legally binding plastics treaty that addresses the full life cycle of this persistent pollutant from extraction and production to use and disposal," Leavitt added. "Now is the time for the United States to show its support to reduce plastic production, eliminate unnecessary single-use plastics, prohibit hazardous chemicals in plastics, and establish mandatory targets for reuse and refill systems. The United States and the world must act before it's too late."
Greenpeace last month installed a 15-foot monument outside the U.S. Capitol to send President Joe Biden a message.
"He can be the president who put an end to the plastic pollution crisis, or he can be the one who let it spiral out of control," Greenpeace oceans director John Hocevar said of Biden. "We're calling on him to stand up to plastic polluters like Exxon and Dow and put us on a greener and healthier path."
The petrochemical industry, Reuters noted, "argues that production caps would lead to higher prices for consumers, and that the treaty should address plastics only after they are made."
Sam Cossar-Gilbert of Friends of the Earth International emphasized the need to resist corporate pressure in a statement Tuesday.
"A people-powered movement and some governments are proposing ambitious steps to address the plastic problem, like regulating the harmful waste trade, single-use bans, and reducing global plastic production," said Cossar-Gilbert. "But multinational corporations will also be lobbying with their false solutions, distractions, and delays. Only by stamping out corporate capture can we deliver a new global treaty to end plastic pollution."
Mageswari Sangaralingam from the green group's Malaysian arm, Sahabat Alam Malaysia, stressed the need for strong waste management policies, given that Global South countries have become dumping grounds for richer nations' discarded plastic.
"Waste colonialism, whether in the form of trade in plastic waste and other hidden plastics, perpetuates social and environmental injustice," said Sangaralingam. "However, ending the plastic waste trade without reducing plastic production will likely trigger more dumping, cause toxic pollution, and contribute to the climate crisis. The global plastics treaty is an opportunity to plug loopholes and address policy gaps to end plastic pollution."
Keep ReadingShow Less
South Korean Court Hears First Asian Youth Climate Case
"Carbon emission reduction keeps getting pushed back as if it is homework that can be done later," said one plaintiff's mother. "But that burden will be what our children have to bear eventually."
Apr 23, 2024
One of South Korea's two highest courts on Tuesday began hearing Asia's first-ever youth-led climate lawsuit, which accuses the country's government of failing to protect citizens from the effects of the worsening, human-caused planetary emergency.
Nineteen members of the advocacy group Youth4ClimateAction filed a constitutional complaint in March 2020 accusing the South Korean government of violating their rights to life, the "pursuit of happiness," a "healthy and pleasant environment," and to "resist against human extinction."
The lawsuit also notes "the inequality between the adult generation who can enjoy the relatively pleasant environment and the youth generation who must face a potential disaster from climate change," as well as the government's obligation to prevent and protect citizens from environmental disasters.
"South Korea's current climate plans are not sufficient to keep the temperature increase within 1.5°C, thus violating the state's obligation to protect fundamental rights," the plaintiffs said in a statement.
South Korea's Constitutional Court began hearing a case that accuses the government of having failed to protect 200 people, including dozens of young environmental activists and children, by not tackling climate change https://t.co/XRIGE23KGM pic.twitter.com/snvqBaGGe9
— Reuters (@Reuters) April 23, 2024
Signatories to the 2015 Paris agreement committed to "holding the increase in global average temperature to well below 2°C above preindustrial levels and pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C."
According to the United Nations Environment Program's (UNEP) most recent Emissions Gap Report, the world must slash greenhouse gas emissions by 28% before 2030 to limit warming to 2°C above preindustrial levels and 42% to halt warming at 1.5°C. UNEP said that based on current policies and practices, the world is on track for 2.9°C of warming by the end of the century.
A summary of the lawsuit notes that South Korea is the fifth-largest greenhouse gas (GHG) emitter among Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development nations, and that the government is constitutionally obligated to protect Koreans from the climate emergency.
Instead, the plaintiffs argue, the Korean Parliament "gave the government total discretion to set the GHG reduction target without providing any specific guidelines." Furthermore, they contend that the government's downgraded reduction targets fall "far short of what is necessary to satisfy the temperature rise threshold acknowledged by the global community."
Lee Donghyun, the mother of one of the plaintiffs, toldReuters: "Carbon emission reduction keeps getting pushed back as if it is homework that can be done later. But that burden will be what our children have to bear eventually."
The South Korean case comes on the heels of a landmark ruling by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), which found that Switzerland's government violated senior citizens' human rights by refusing to heed scientists' warnings to swiftly phase out fossil fuel production.
The ECHR ruled on the same day that climate cases brought by a former French mayor and a group of Portuguese youth were inadmissible.
Courts in Australia, Brazil, and Peru also have human rights-based climate cases on their dockets.
In the United States, a state judge in Montana ruled last year in favor of 16 young residents who argued that fossil fuel extraction violated their constitutional right to "a clean and healthful environment."
Meanwhile, the Biden administration is trying to derail a historic youth-led climate lawsuit against the U.S. government.
Keep ReadingShow Less
UN Rights Chief Demands International Probe of Mass Graves Near Gaza Hospitals
"Hospitals are entitled to very special protection under international humanitarian law," said Volker Türk, the United Nations high commissioner for human rights.
Apr 23, 2024
The United Nations' human rights chief on Tuesday called for an international investigation into mass graves discovered at two Gaza hospitals that Israeli forces recently assailed and destroyed, further imperiling the enclave's barely functioning healthcare system.
Volker Türk, the U.N. high commissioner for human rights, said in a statement that he was "horrified" by the discovery of mass graves at the Nasser and al-Shifa medical complexes, which the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) reduced to ruins.
More than 300 bodies were reportedly discovered in the mass grave near the Nasser facility in Khan Younis, Gaza, and eyewitnesses said Israeli soldiers executed civilians during their two-week-long raid of al-Shifa last month.
Türk demanded an "independent, effective, and transparent" probe into the killings and mass graves, adding that "given the prevailing climate of impunity, this should include international investigators."
"Hospitals are entitled to very special protection under international humanitarian law," he added. "And the intentional killing of civilians, detainees, and others who are hors de combat is a war crime."
"Every 10 minutes a child is killed or wounded. They are protected under the laws of war, and yet they are ones who are disproportionately paying the ultimate price."
The IDF's destructive attacks on Nasser and al-Shifa were part of a broader Israeli assault on Gaza's healthcare system. An analysis released Monday by Save the Children found that the rate of monthly Israeli attacks on healthcare in Gaza since October has exceeded that of any other conflict around the world since 2018.
The group estimated that Israel has launched an average of 73 attacks per month on healthcare in Gaza—and at least 435 attacks total since October.
"After six months of unimaginable horror, the healthcare system in Gaza has been brought to its knees," said Xavier Joubert, Save the Children's country director in the occupied Palestinian territory. "Healthcare workers are risking their lives daily to give Palestinian children a chance at survival. The constant attacks on healthcare are simply unjustifiable and must stop. Palestinian children must have unimpeded access to services, including healthcare and education."
Türk also used his statement Tuesday to condemn Israeli forces' killing of women and children in airstrikes on the southern Gaza city of Rafah in recent days. The human rights official noted that Gaza doctors rescued a baby from the womb of her mother as the latter succumbed to head injuries from an Israeli strike.
"The latest images of a premature child taken from the womb of her dying mother, of the adjacent two houses where 15 children and five women were killed—this is beyond warfare," said Türk. "Every 10 minutes a child is killed or wounded. They are protected under the laws of war, and yet they are ones who are disproportionately paying the ultimate price in this war."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular