August, 12 2009, 01:18pm EDT

Amnesty International Asks Afghan Government to Uphold Rule of Law
As Journalists Fear for Their Lives, Human Rights Group Calls for Freedom of Expression in Afghanistan
WASHINGTON
Days before the Afghan presidential
elections, journalists from 13 provinces in Afghanistan have told Amnesty
International that they have recently been threatened by Afghan government
officials because of their critical reporting.
At the same time, the Taliban and other anti-government
groups have also stepped up attacks against journalists and blocked nearly
all reporting from areas under their control.
"Afghans have made government corruption
and failure to implement the rule of law as key aspects of the current
election campaign, but some government officials want to respond to criticism
by silencing the journalists who monitor government conduct and provide
vital information to the voting public," said Sam Zarifi, Amnesty International's
Asia-Pacific director.
In some cases, government officials have
initiated criminal proceedings against journalists for peacefully exercising
their freedom of expression and information. In other cases, government
forces have even directly attacked journalists. For instance, in July 2009,
five journalists were beaten by police officers in Herat for reporting
on a public demonstration and police corruption.
One reporter from Ghazni, who did not want
to be identified for fear of reprisals, told Amnesty International, "People
working on the Karzai election campaign are calling me and other journalists
and threatening us if we report on corruption or anything bad that Karzai's
government is doing. Taliban and other groups contact me and threaten me,
telling me I must stop writing any positive news stories about the elections
because they don't want people to support the elections. I am caught between
these two sides."
Another journalist from southern Afghanistan,
who also didn't want to be named, added, "If government officials are
threatening me, then who do I complain to? I have to self-censor because
otherwise I will be killed."
"Afghan journalists have demonstrated that
they are willing to face tremendous challenges in order to give a voice
to the Afghan people, but instead of being supported by the government,
they are facing increasing pressure from officials," said Zarifi.
There has been little official effort to
investigate murders and physical attacks on journalists. Government institutions-in
particular the National Directorate of Security-have attempted to reduce
the media's independence.
"President Karzai, and all the presidential
candidates, should immediately and publicly commit to defending Afghan
journalists, both from the Taliban, but more importantly, from the government
itself," said Zarifi. "It's vital that the Afghan government upholds
the rule of law and its commitment to media freedom by urgently investigating
these cases."
Amnesty International has produced a ten-point
action plan calling on the government of Afghanistan to fulfill its international
human rights obligations, including upholding the right to freedom
of expression and media expression. Amnesty International said that at
a time when Afghans are facing increasing insecurity, prioritizing human
rights and the rule of law can serve to strengthen stability and security
throughout the country.
Specifically, Amnesty International called
on the Afghan government to: fully and effectively investigate and prosecute
all those responsible for attacks on journalists, human rights defenders
and others exercising their right to freedom of expression; commit to ensuring
that no government agencies, the NDS in particular, violate freedom of
expression; and to introduce legislation facilitating public access to
information from governmental institutions.
To view the full ten point action plan click
here: https://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/ASA11/010/2009
Background
Freedom of expression, which flourished after
the fall of the Taliban in 2001, has eroded as a result of increasing threats
and attacks by the government and anti-government forces.
The government has improperly prosecuted
several journalists on charges of violating religious sensibilities under
pressure from the unofficial but highly influential Ulema Council (council
of religious scholars). Sayed Parwiz Kambakhsh, Ahmad Ghous Zalmai-a journalist
and former spokesman for the Attorney General-and Mullah Qari Mushtaq
were each sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment for publishing a Dari translation
of the Quran without the Arabic text.
Since 2007, Taliban and other anti-government
groups have increased attacks against Afghan journalists. The most recent
victim was Jawed Ahmad, an Afghan journalist who was gunned down in the
southern city of Kandahar in March 2009. On June 7, 2008, Abdul Samad
Rohani, an Afghan journalist working for the BBC in Helmand province, was
abducted, then shot dead the next day, possibly as a result of his investigation
of the narcotics trade. In May 2008, Afghan television journalist Nilofar
Habibi was stabbed at the doorstep of her home in Herat, apparently for
not wearing a burqa. In June 2007, unknown gunmen shot and killed
Zakia Zami, director of the private radio station Radio Peace in
Parwan province. She had been critical of local warlords, who had warned
her to close the station. In March 2007, the Taliban beheaded journalist
Ajmal Naqshbandi and killed his driver Sayed Agha in Helmand province.
Amnesty International is a global movement of millions of people demanding human rights for all people - no matter who they are or where they are. We are the world's largest grassroots human rights organization.
(212) 807-8400LATEST NEWS
Critics Shred JD Vance as He Shrugs Off Millions of Americans Losing Medicaid as 'Minutiae'
"What happened to you J.D. Vance—author of Hillbilly Elegy—now shrugging off Medicaid cuts that will close rural hospitals and kick millions off healthcare as 'minutiae?'" asked Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.).
Jul 01, 2025
Vice President J.D. Vance took heat from critics this week when he downplayed legislation that would result in millions of Americans losing Medicaid coverage as mere "minutiae."
Writing on X, Vance defended the budget megabill that's currently being pushed through the United States Senate by arguing that it will massively increase funding to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which he deemed to be a necessary component of carrying out the Trump administration's mass deportation operation.
"The thing that will bankrupt this country more than any other policy is flooding the country with illegal immigration and then giving those migrants generous benefits," wrote Vance. "The [One Big Beautiful Bill] fixes this problem. And therefore it must pass."
He then added that "everything else—the CBO score, the proper baseline, the minutiae of the Medicaid policy—is immaterial compared to the ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions."
It was this line that drew the ire of many critics, as the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the Senate version of the budget bill would slash spending on Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program by more than $1 trillion over a ten-year-period, which would result in more than 10 million people losing their coverage. Additionally, Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) has proposed an amendment that would roll back the expansion of Medicaid under the 2010 Affordable Care Act, which would likely kick millions more off of the program.
Many congressional Democrats were quick to pounce on Vance for what they said were callous comments about a vital government program.
"So if the only thing that matters is immigration... why didn't you support the bipartisan Lankford-Murphy bill that tackled immigration far better than your Ugly Bill?" asked Rep. Daniel Goldman (D-N.Y.). "And it didn't have 'minutiae' that will kick 12m+ Americans off healthcare or raise the debt by $4tn."
"What happened to you J.D. Vance—author of Hillbilly Elegy—now shrugging off Medicaid cuts that will close rural hospitals and kick millions off healthcare as 'minutiae?'" asked Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.).
Veteran healthcare reporter Jonathan Cohn put some numbers behind the policies that are being minimized by the vice president.
"11.8M projected to lose health insurance," he wrote. "Clinics and hospitals taking a hit, especially in rural areas. Low-income seniors facing higher costs. 'Minutiae.'"
Activist Leah Greenberg, the co-chair of progressive organizing group Indivisible, zeroed in on Vance's emphasis on ramping up ICE's funding as particularly problematic.
"They are just coming right out and saying they want an exponential increase in $$$ so they can build their own personal Gestapo," she warned.
Washington Post global affairs columnist Ishaan Tharoor also found himself disturbed by the sheer size of the funding increase for ICE that Vance is demanding and he observed that "nothing matters more apparently than giving ICE a bigger budget than the militaries of virtually every European country."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Heinrich Should Be Ashamed': Lone Senate Dem Helps GOP Deliver Big Pharma Win
The provision, part of the Senate budget bill, was described as "a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients while draining $5 billion in taxpayer dollars."
Jul 01, 2025
The deep-pocketed and powerful pharmaceutical industry notched a significant victory on Monday when the Senate parliamentarian ruled that a bill described by critics as a handout to drug corporations can be included in the Republican reconciliation package, which could become law as soon as this week.
The legislation, titled the Optimizing Research Progress Hope and New (ORPHAN) Cures Act, would exempt drugs that treat more than one rare disease from Medicare's drug-price negotiation program, allowing pharmaceutical companies to charge exorbitant prices for life-saving medications in a purported effort to encourage innovation. (Medications developed to treat rare diseases are known as "orphan drugs.")
The consumer advocacy group Public Citizen observed that if the legislation were already in effect, Medicare "would have been barred from negotiating lower prices for important treatments like cancer drugs Imbruvica, Calquence, and Pomalyst."
Among the bill's leading supporters is Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), whose spokesperson announced the parliamentarian's decision to allow the measure in the reconciliation package after previously advising that it be excluded. Heinrich is listed as the legislation's only co-sponsor in the Senate, alongside lead sponsor Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.).
"Sen. Heinrich should be ashamed of prioritizing drug corporation profits over lower medicine prices for seniors and people with disabilities," Steve Knievel, access to medicines advocate at Public Citizen, said in a statement Monday. "Patients and consumers breathed a sigh of relief when the Senate parliamentarian stripped the proposal from Republicans' Big Ugly Betrayal, so it comes as a gut punch to hear that Sen. Heinrich welcomed the reversal and continued to champion a proposal that will transfer billions from taxpayers to Big Pharma."
"People across the country are demanding lower drug prices and for Medicare drug price negotiations to be expanded, not restricted," Knievel added. "Sen. Heinrich should apologize to his constituents and start listening to them instead of drug corporation lobbyists."
The Biotechnology Innovation Organization, a lobbying group whose members include pharmaceutical companies, has publicly endorsed and promoted the legislation, urging lawmakers to pass it "as soon as possible."
"This is a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients."
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the ORPHAN Cures Act would cost U.S. taxpayers around $5 billion over the next decade.
Merith Basey, executive director of Patients For Affordable Drugs Now, said that "patients are infuriated to see the Senate cave to Big Pharma by reviving the ORPHAN Cures Act at the eleventh hour."
"This is a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients while draining $5 billion in taxpayer dollars," said Basey. "We call on lawmakers to remove this unnecessary provision immediately and stand with an overwhelming majority of Americans who want the Medicare Negotiation program to go further. Medicare negotiation will deliver huge savings for seniors and taxpayers; this bill would undermine that progress."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump-Musk Gutting of USAID Could Lead to More Than 14 Million Deaths Over Five Years: Study
"For many low and middle income countries, the resulting shock would be comparable in scale to a global pandemic or a major armed conflict," said the coordinator behind the study.
Jul 01, 2025
A study published Monday by the medical journal The Lancet found that deep funding cuts to the U.S. Agency for International Development, a main target of the Department of Government Efficiency's government-slashing efforts, could result in more than 14 million additional deaths by the year 2030.
For months, humanitarian programs and experts have sounded the alarm on the impact of cutting funding for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which is the largest funding agency for humanitarian and development aid around the globe, according to the study.
"Our analysis shows that USAID funding has been an essential force in saving lives and improving health outcomes in some of the world's most vulnerable regions over the past two decades," said Daniella Cavalcanti, postdoctoral researcher at the Institute of Collective Health and an author of the study, according to a statement published Tuesday. Between 2001 and 2021, an estimated 91 million deaths were prevented in low and middle income countries thanks programs supported by USAID, according to the study.
The study was coordinated by researchers from the Barcelona Institute for Global Health with the help of the Institute of Collective Health of the Federal University of Bahia, the University of California Los Angeles, and the Manhiça Centre for Health Research, as well as others.
To project the future consequences of USAID funding cuts and arrive at the 14 million figure, the researchers used forecasting models to simulate the impact of two scenarios, continuing USAID funding at 2023 levels versus implementing the reductions announced earlier this year, and then comparing the two.
Those estimated 14 million additional deaths include 4.5 million deaths among children younger than five, according to the researchers.
The journalist Jeff Jarvis shared reporting about the study and wrote "murder" on X on Tuesday.
In March, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the 83% of the programs at USAID were being canceled. In the same post on X, he praised the Department of Government Efficiency, which at that point had already infiltrated the agency. "Thank you to DOGE and our hardworking staff who worked very long hours to achieve this overdue and historic reform," he wrote.
Davide Rasella, research professor at Barcelona Institute for Global Health and coordinator of the study, said in a statement Tuesday that "our projections indicate that these cuts could lead to a sharp increase in preventable deaths, particularly in the most fragile countries. They risk abruptly halting—and even reversing—two decades of progress in health among vulnerable populations. For many low- and middle-income countries, the resulting shock would be comparable in scale to a global pandemic or a major armed conflict."
One country where USAID cuts have had a particularly deadly impact is Sudan, according to The Washington Post, which reported on Monday that funding shortages have led to lack of medical supplies and food in the war-torn nation.
"There's a largely unspoken and growing death toll of non-American lives thanks to MAGA," wrote Ishaan Tharoor, a Post columnist, of the paper's reporting on Sudan.
In reference to the reporting on Sudan, others laid blame on billionaire Elon Musk, the billionaire and GOP mega-donor who was initially tapped to lead the Department of Government Efficiency.
"In a less imperfect world, Musk and [President Donald] Trump would be forever cast as killers of children, and this would be front-page news for months and the subject of Sunday sermons in every church," wrote the journalist David Corn.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular