

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

AIUSA media office, 202-544-0200
x302
Days before the Afghan presidential
elections, journalists from 13 provinces in Afghanistan have told Amnesty
International that they have recently been threatened by Afghan government
officials because of their critical reporting.
At the same time, the Taliban and other anti-government
groups have also stepped up attacks against journalists and blocked nearly
all reporting from areas under their control.
"Afghans have made government corruption
and failure to implement the rule of law as key aspects of the current
election campaign, but some government officials want to respond to criticism
by silencing the journalists who monitor government conduct and provide
vital information to the voting public," said Sam Zarifi, Amnesty International's
Asia-Pacific director.
In some cases, government officials have
initiated criminal proceedings against journalists for peacefully exercising
their freedom of expression and information. In other cases, government
forces have even directly attacked journalists. For instance, in July 2009,
five journalists were beaten by police officers in Herat for reporting
on a public demonstration and police corruption.
One reporter from Ghazni, who did not want
to be identified for fear of reprisals, told Amnesty International, "People
working on the Karzai election campaign are calling me and other journalists
and threatening us if we report on corruption or anything bad that Karzai's
government is doing. Taliban and other groups contact me and threaten me,
telling me I must stop writing any positive news stories about the elections
because they don't want people to support the elections. I am caught between
these two sides."
Another journalist from southern Afghanistan,
who also didn't want to be named, added, "If government officials are
threatening me, then who do I complain to? I have to self-censor because
otherwise I will be killed."
"Afghan journalists have demonstrated that
they are willing to face tremendous challenges in order to give a voice
to the Afghan people, but instead of being supported by the government,
they are facing increasing pressure from officials," said Zarifi.
There has been little official effort to
investigate murders and physical attacks on journalists. Government institutions-in
particular the National Directorate of Security-have attempted to reduce
the media's independence.
"President Karzai, and all the presidential
candidates, should immediately and publicly commit to defending Afghan
journalists, both from the Taliban, but more importantly, from the government
itself," said Zarifi. "It's vital that the Afghan government upholds
the rule of law and its commitment to media freedom by urgently investigating
these cases."
Amnesty International has produced a ten-point
action plan calling on the government of Afghanistan to fulfill its international
human rights obligations, including upholding the right to freedom
of expression and media expression. Amnesty International said that at
a time when Afghans are facing increasing insecurity, prioritizing human
rights and the rule of law can serve to strengthen stability and security
throughout the country.
Specifically, Amnesty International called
on the Afghan government to: fully and effectively investigate and prosecute
all those responsible for attacks on journalists, human rights defenders
and others exercising their right to freedom of expression; commit to ensuring
that no government agencies, the NDS in particular, violate freedom of
expression; and to introduce legislation facilitating public access to
information from governmental institutions.
To view the full ten point action plan click
here: https://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/ASA11/010/2009
Background
Freedom of expression, which flourished after
the fall of the Taliban in 2001, has eroded as a result of increasing threats
and attacks by the government and anti-government forces.
The government has improperly prosecuted
several journalists on charges of violating religious sensibilities under
pressure from the unofficial but highly influential Ulema Council (council
of religious scholars). Sayed Parwiz Kambakhsh, Ahmad Ghous Zalmai-a journalist
and former spokesman for the Attorney General-and Mullah Qari Mushtaq
were each sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment for publishing a Dari translation
of the Quran without the Arabic text.
Since 2007, Taliban and other anti-government
groups have increased attacks against Afghan journalists. The most recent
victim was Jawed Ahmad, an Afghan journalist who was gunned down in the
southern city of Kandahar in March 2009. On June 7, 2008, Abdul Samad
Rohani, an Afghan journalist working for the BBC in Helmand province, was
abducted, then shot dead the next day, possibly as a result of his investigation
of the narcotics trade. In May 2008, Afghan television journalist Nilofar
Habibi was stabbed at the doorstep of her home in Herat, apparently for
not wearing a burqa. In June 2007, unknown gunmen shot and killed
Zakia Zami, director of the private radio station Radio Peace in
Parwan province. She had been critical of local warlords, who had warned
her to close the station. In March 2007, the Taliban beheaded journalist
Ajmal Naqshbandi and killed his driver Sayed Agha in Helmand province.
Amnesty International is a global movement of millions of people demanding human rights for all people - no matter who they are or where they are. We are the world's largest grassroots human rights organization.
(212) 807-8400Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey said "bare due diligence" would have exposed ICE officers' falsehoods.
Video footage obtained by The New York Times has exposed lies told by two federal immigration enforcement agents about the circumstances leading up to a non-fatal shooting in Minneapolis that occurred on January 14.
According to a Monday report from the Times, the video directly contradicts claims made by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials that they were attacked by assailants armed with a shovel and a broom for around three minutes before the agents opened fire and wounded one of the attackers.
"Instead, the confrontation depicted in the video lasts about 12 seconds and shows two men struggling with the agent," reported the Times. "It shows no sustained attack with a shovel."
Federal prosecutors had initially pursued assault charges against Venezuelan national Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis, who was shot in the leg by the ICE officers during the January confrontation, and fellow Venezuelan national Alfredo Aljorna.
However, the government abruptly dropped charges against the two men in February, and ICE Acting Director Todd Lyons acknowledged that two federal officers appear “to have made untruthful statements” about the incident.
The Times noted that the government had access to the video of the shooting hours after it took place.
However, one source told the paper that prosecutors didn't watch the video until three weeks after they filed charges against Sosa-Celis and Aljorna, and instead relied on "the ICE agent’s statement and an FBI agent’s affidavit describing the footage."
This revelation prompted a rebuke from Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, who told the Times that "bare due diligence would have shown that the agents were lying."
Trump administration officials have come under fire in recent weeks for lying about shootings involving federal immigration officials, such as when former US Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem falsely claimed that slain Minneapolis intensive care nurse Alex Pretti was aiming “to inflict maximum damage on individuals and to kill law enforcement."
In reality, video footage showed Pretti never drew his handgun during his confrontation with federal immigration officers, while also clearly showing that officers disarmed him before they opened fire.
Noem also falsely claimed that slain ICE observer Renee Good had attempted "an act of domestic terrorism" by trying to run over a federal immigration officer with her car, even though footage clearly showed Good turning her vehicle away from the officer in an attempt to get away from the scene.
"This is an express public incitement for war crimes and crimes against humanity—and, I would say, for genocide," said a spokesperson for Iran's Foreign Ministry.
Iranian officials on Monday warned US President Donald Trump that his name will be "etched in history as a supreme war criminal" if he follows through with his threat to wage total war on Iran's civilian infrastructure, including bridges and power plants.
Kazem Gharibabadi, Iran's deputy foreign minister, wrote on social media following Trump's Easter-morning outburst that "threats to attack power plants and bridges (civilian infrastructure) constitute war crimes under Article 8(2)(b) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions of 1977 (Article 52)."
"The president of the United States, in his capacity as the highest-ranking official of his country, has openly threatened to commit war crimes—an act that entails his individual criminal responsibility before the International Criminal Court and any competent national court," Gharibabadi added, vowing that Iran "will deliver a decisive, immediate, and regret-inducing response" to any attack.
Esmail Baghaei, a spokesperson for Iran's Foreign Ministry, said Trump's threats are "an indication of a criminal mindset."
"This is an express public incitement for war crimes and crimes against humanity—and, I would say, for genocide," Baghaei said in an interview on Sunday. "Threatening to attack a country's critical infrastructure, energy sector, it would mean that you want to put at risk the whole population."
Absolute bombshell. Iran's Spokesperson Esmail Baghaei accuses the Trump administration of a criminal mindset and public incitement for genocide. Threatening a nation's critical infrastructure puts the entire population at risk. The White House has completely abandoned morality. pic.twitter.com/HcBZGZho5p
— Furkan Gözükara (@FurkanGozukara) April 5, 2026
The US and Israel have already done significant damage to Iran's civilian infrastructure. The country's deputy health minister said Monday that more than 360 healthcare, education, and research centers have been hit by US-Israeli strikes, and dozens of medics have been killed since the bombing began on February 28.
But Trump on Sunday threatened an indiscriminate assault, telling Fox News that if the Iranians "don't make a deal and fast," he is "considering blowing everything up and taking the oil."
"You're going to see bridges and power plants dropping all over their country," the president said, setting a new deadline of 8 pm ET for the complete reopening of the Strait of Hormuz.
Trump's remarks came after he published a deranged post on his Truth Social platform demanding that Iran "open the Fuckin' Strait, you crazy bastards, or you'll be living in Hell."
Analysts and lawmakers in the US echoed Iranian officials' warnings that Trump's threatened attacks would constitute war crimes.
"Trump's advisers are telling him to hit civilian sites because it will cause unrest and potentially topple the regime. But just think about the insanity of this plan: kill tens of thousands of civilians in order to cause a national panic," US Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) wrote. "Bombing to induce political panic IS A WAR CRIME."
Dylan Williams, vice president for government affairs at the Center for International Policy, said that "any lawmaker who votes for supplemental funding for the war on Iran or against war powers resolutions to end it will be fully complicit in the war crimes threatened here, as well as those already committed by this unhinged and unfit Commander in Chief."
The US president's renewed threats came amid reports of a diplomatic effort, mediated in part by Pakistan, to enact a 45-day ceasefire to provide space for a lasting resolution to the war.
Axios reported that the talks are seen as "the only chance to prevent a dramatic escalation in the war that will include massive strikes on Iranian civilian infrastructure and a retaliation against energy and water facilities in the Gulf states."
“She was so long in there," said the child's father. "I just think that if they would have moved faster, nothing like that would have happened.”
President Donald Trump's Department of Health and Human Services and its office in charge of providing care for unaccompanied immigrant children have been named in a civil lawsuit alleging that a three-year-old was sexually abused after immigration officials separated her from her mother at the US border, while her father waited for months to be reunited with the child.
The girl crossed the border with her mother last September but was separated from her mother after the woman was charged with making false statements, according to The Associated Press. She was sent to the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), which operates under HHS and places children in foster or shelter settings.
When Trump took office for his second term in January 2025, the average time a child was under ORR's care was 37 days, but as of February children were remaining in shelter or foster settings for an average of 200 days.
The process through which ORR releases children to the care of their parents or sponsors has grown more arduous under the Trump administration, and in the case of the three-year-old, she waited for five months in foster care while the government repeatedly told her father it couldn't make an appointment for him to be fingerprinted.
Court documents state that during that time, the girl reported being sexually abused by an older child who was living in the same foster setting in Harlingen, Texas. She told a caregiver that she had been abused multiple times and had suffered bleeding as a result.
ORR only told her father that there had been an "accident" in foster care. Officials did not tell him the result of a forensic exam and interview of his child, but the older child accused of the abuse was removed from the foster setting.
“I asked them, ‘What happened? I want to know. I’m her father. I want to know what’s going on,’ and they just told me that they couldn’t give me more information, that it was under investigation,” said the father, who is a legal permanent US resident and spoke to the AP anonymously to protect his daughter's identity. “She was so long in there... I just think that if they would have moved faster, nothing like that would have happened.”
The Trump administration has claimed its new restrictions for sponsors and family members seeking custody of their children who are in ORR's care have prevented traffickers from illegally bringing children into the US and have kept unaccompanied minors safe.
Family members like the three-year-old's father are required to submit to income verification, home inspections, and DNA testing.
The new procedures were immediately followed by a drastic jump in child detention times, according to the AP.
Legal advocates have filed lawsuits challenging the new restrictions on the grounds that they can cause prolonged detention for children. Lauren Fisher Flores, the legal director of the American Bar Association’s ProBar project and the attorney representing the girl's family, told the AP that the organization has worked on eight habeas corpus petitions on behalf of children who have been detained for an average of 255 days.
In the girl's case, the government finally allowed the father to be fingerprinted after attorneys sent a letter to ORR, but still did not provide a timeline for his daughter's release. His lawyers then filed a habeas petition, prompting the government to release the child to her father.
During the legal challenge, the father learned the details of what ORR had called an "accident" that happened in the foster setting.
“To have your child abused while in the government’s care, to not understand what has happened or how to protect them, to not even be told about the abuse, it is unimaginable,” Fisher Flores told the AP. “Children deserve safety and they belong with their parents.”