October, 10 2008, 06:32pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167
Global Financial Crisis
WASHINGTON
THOMAS FERGUSON
Available for a limited number of interviews, Ferguson is professor of
political science at the University of Massachusetts, Boston. He is the
author of Golden Rule: The Investment Theory of Party Competition and the Logic of Money-Driven Political Systems (University of Chicago Press).
Ferguson noted that the Financial Times reported
in its Thursday print edition: "The Federal Reserve -- while very
supportive of the asset purchase plan -- has believed for at least four
months that recapitalization of the banking system is the most potent
way to fight the credit squeeze. But the Treasury has hitherto been
skeptical about recapitalization, in part because of concern over the
degree of government intervention this would imply. Now the Treasury
seems to have come round to the view that direct recapitalization makes
sense on economic grounds -- though the U.S. is certain to tailor its
approach to its own domestic conditions."
Professor Ferguson commented today: "The disclosure yesterday that
the Federal Reserve has been urging bank recapitalization for four
months, while the Treasury has resisted, is stunning. It should give
everyone pause and attract immediate attention from regulators and
Congress.
"So should the article's reference to market fundamentalism
('concern over the degree of government intervention') as the reason
for Treasury's resistance. What all this gobbledygook really means is
that the Treasury Secretary and his friends in the financial sector
resist sharing any of the upside from government intervention with
taxpayers whose money will be used to save them. They are determined to
preserve existing shareholders from dilution by new preferred stock
issuance.
"The decision to put Paulson's young former special assistant
[Neel Kashkari] in charge of the bailout program only adds to one's
doubts. Gretchen Morgenson of the New York Times and others have raised
serious questions about Secretary Paulson's calculations in previous
bailout episodes. Der Spiegel's report yesterday that Treasury is
thinking that any shares it does take should be non-voting is even more
disturbing. Days after the Treasury rescued AIG, the company was
throwing lavish parties. The government needs voting shares to stop
such nonsense.
"With ... everyone's pensions, 401Ks and other financial reserves
shrinking by the hour, it is high time for Congress to insist
immediately that the bailout program convert itself into a modern
version of Franklin D. Roosevelt's Reconstruction Finance Corporation.
Treasury should not be allowed to 'tailor its approach' -- it just
needs to focus like the proverbial laser on increasing bank capital by
direct injections of equity into banks that can be saved. And the
bailout needs to be run in a completely transparent manner, with
clearly stated, publicly verifiable criteria for making the
investments. It is intolerable that everyone's financial assets
continue to be put at risk for ideological goals and private profits."
More Information
PATRICK BOND The G-7,
International Monetary Fund and World Bank are meeting this weekend. On
a short visit to the U.S., Bond is based in South Africa, where he is
professor of development studies and director of the Center for Civil
Society at the University of KwaZulu-Natal and has long scrutinized
these institutions.
Bond said today: "The global economy's vast financial sector
expansion has occurred in the context of productive sector stagnation
which dates back more than three decades.
"Thus far, since the early 1980s, the management of the crisis has
increased the leading power brokers' capacity to 'devalue' large parts
of the Third World, including major emerging market sites like South
Africa -- as well as to write down selected financially volatile and
vulnerable markets in the North (e.g. dot.com and real estate bubbles).
In contrast to the early 1930s, this set of partial write-downs has not
yet created such generalized panic and crisis contagion as to threaten
the entire system's integrity. Shifting and stalling the crisis over
the past decades has meant allowing idle capital to bubble up into
speculative markets, and has also increased extra-economic coercion
(the way Naomi Klein describes in her book 'The Shock Doctrine').
"The result is a world economy that concentrates wealth and
poverty in more extreme ways, geographically, and brings markets and
the non-market spheres of society and nature together in a manner
adverse to the latter. Reform of the system is long overdue, but is
hampered by severe bias in multilateral financial and development
agencies, amounting to a neoliberal-neoconservative fusion. No 'global
governance' initiatives appear to be succeeding, either with respect to
financial imbalances, trade, United Nations reform, climate control or
other crucial global-scale problems.
"Moreover, there is constrained space and political will at
national level in most states, requiring much more aggressive civil
society activism, such as the email/phone swarm that intimidated the
U.S. House of Representatives from approving Paulson's initial bailout.
"In short, what this means is an urgent need for U.S. citizens to:
a) transcend U.S.-centric understandings of the financial meltdown,
especially those based on superficial epiphenomena (corruption,
deregulation, greed, fraud, consumer overindebtedness);
b) think more deeply about the problems building in the U.S.-led world markets, going back several decades;
c) look realistically at the limited ability of world institutions --
e.g. the Bretton Woods Institutions [such as the IMF and World Bank]
having their annual meetings in Washington this weekend -- to solve
problems, given the adverse power balance and self-interested
leadership;
d) consider whether any national state -- even the U.S. under an Obama
administration -- will have the scope to generate solutions given how
deep and wide the crisis has become; and
e) instead support various creative initiatives of civil society groups
across the U.S. and the world, who have made history under similar
circumstances of crisis and renewed social activism."
Bond is author of the recent paper "The
U.S. financial meltdown: What really happened? Roots of the economic
crisis in overaccumulation, financialization and 'global apartheid.'" A Power Point presentation of his work is available here.
Bond was formerly a Pacifica Radio economics correspondent and
Washington correspondent for American Public Media's "Marketplace." He
studied at Swarthmore, the Wharton School of Finance and Johns Hopkins
and wrote more than a dozen public policies for Nelson Mandela's first
democratic South African government.
Bond's recently authored and edited books include "Looting Africa:
The Economics of Exploitation," "Talk Left, Walk Right" and "Against
Global Apartheid: South Africa meets the World Bank, IMF and
International Finance."
More Information
A nationwide consortium, the Institute for Public Accuracy (IPA) represents an unprecedented effort to bring other voices to the mass-media table often dominated by a few major think tanks. IPA works to broaden public discourse in mainstream media, while building communication with alternative media outlets and grassroots activists.
LATEST NEWS
'Their Blood Is on Gene Block': UCLA Students Injured in Violent Police Raid
Officers in military gear fired flash-bang munitions and used batons to clear a nonviolent encampment calling for an end to Israel's U.S.-backed war on Gaza.
May 02, 2024
Los Angeles police wearing riot gear launched a violent attack on a pro-Palestinian encampment at UCLA early Thursday, using flash bangs and firing impact munitions at students demanding an end to their university's complicity in Israel's war on Gaza.
Video footage posted to social media by reporters present at the scene shows officers firing multiple "less lethal" munitions and sound-concussive devices at student demonstrators as they closed in on the encampment, which UCLA's leadership has declared unlawful.
Police reportedly arrested dozens of students as they advanced on the encampment.
"They'd rather shoot kids than stop this genocide," said one observer.
Police fire multiple impact munitions at protestors. 4:38am pic.twitter.com/960I4iVMtt
— Sergio Olmos (@MrOlmos) May 2, 2024
Graeme Blair, an associate professor of political science and member of Faculty for Justice in Palestine at UCLA, told the university's student newspaper early Thursday that police officers "violently dragged" students from the Gaza solidarity encampment and that some demonstrators were "visibly injured."
"Their blood is on Gene Block and the UC administration's hands for a series of catastrophic decisions over the last two days," said Blair, referring to UCLA's chancellor. "It did not need to be this way."
Blair said UCLA professors inside the encampment "plan to be arrested alongside students who have done nothing but talk about a genocide taking place in Palestine."
Matt Barreto, a professor of Chicano studies and political science, told the Los Angeles Times that "our job is to stand up for their First Amendment rights, their rights on their own campus."
Police arrest protestor 4:55am pic.twitter.com/udgS0Terc9
— Sergio Olmos (@MrOlmos) May 2, 2024
The police raid came 24 hours after Los Angeles officers and campus security stood by as a pro-Israel mob violently attacked pro-Palestinian demonstrators. Dozens of students were reportedly taken to hospitals for treatment following the assault.
The Daily Bruin, whose student journalists were on the scene, reported Thursday that police "continued to detain protesters in the encampment as the clock struck 4:00 am, marking one week since the initial erection of the solidarity encampment by the UC Divest Coalition and Students for Justice in Palestine at UCLA."
"At 4:05 am, a slew of loud noises presumed to be flash bangs went off," the newspaper added. "Dozens of protesters exited the encampment by climbing through the bushes near Powell Library onto the Janss Steps lawn. Protesters chanted, 'Gene Block, you can't hide, we charge you with genocide' and, 'We are students' as smoke from the presumed flash bangs thickened above Dickson Plaza."
The police crackdown at UCLA is part of a broader wave of police repression on campuses nationwide as universities refuse to grant their student's calls for divestment from companies profiting off Israel's assault on Gaza. More than 1,000 student demonstrators have reportedly been arrested across the U.S. so far.
"It is no accident that this indefensible police crackdown comes in service of an indefensible war," The Intercept's Natasha Lennard wrote in a column Wednesday following the violent police raid at Columbia University in New York. "The very extremity of protest repression speaks to desperation on the part of institutions of the American establishment."
"Israel's decimation of Gaza has—at least for millions more people—given lie to the redemptive myths of the post-World War II political liberal order," Lennard added. "Young people, even the children of the elite, even children of Zionists, are standing with Palestine. Their peaceful acts of protest count as disruptive because they count as un-American—which should be a badge of honor amid a U.S.-backed genocide."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Tragic and Unjust': Trump Judges Grant Biden DOJ Request to Toss Youth Climate Case
"We will keep fighting for climate justice," said one plaintiff, "but this is another dark day for protecting young people from climate harm imposed by their government."
May 02, 2024
A panel of three Trump-appointed judges on Wednesday granted the Biden Justice Department's request to have a landmark youth climate case dismissed, another setback for a long-running effort to hold the U.S. government accountable for damaging the planet and violating the rights of younger generations.
The order handed down by a 9th Circuit Court of Appeals panel instructs an Oregon district court to toss Juliana v. United States for lack of standing, siding with the Justice Department's emergency petition for a writ of mandamus—which the DOJ itself describes as "an extraordinary remedy" that "should only be used in exceptional circumstances of peculiar emergency or public importance."
Julia Olson, co-executive director of Our Children's Trust, a public interest law firm backing the youth plaintiffs, said in a statement Wednesday that "the Biden administration was wrong to use an emergency measure to stop youth plaintiffs from having their day in court."
"The real emergency is the climate emergency," said Olson. "This emergency was not created by these young people, who have just been stripped of their fundamental constitutional rights by one of the highest courts in our country. Children deserve access to justice."
Calling the 9th Circuit decision "tragic and unjust" and "wrong on the law," Olson said the legal fight is "not over" and stressed that President Joe Biden "can still make this right by coming to the settlement table."
"We will keep fighting for climate justice, but this is another dark day for protecting young people from climate harm imposed by their government."
Juliana v. United States was brought in 2015 by 21 young Americans who argued the federal government has violated their "fundamental constitutional rights to life, liberty, and property" by continuing to allow the extraction of fossil fuels despite knowing their central role in destructive planetary heating.
Three consecutive administrations have worked aggressively to prevent a trial, deploying emergency legal tactics to delay and derail the youth-led case even as climate impacts became increasingly devastating in the U.S. and around the world.
Mat dos Santos, general counsel of Our Children's Trust, warned last month that "it's a mistake" for the Biden administration to "take this position in an election year, especially when young voters continue to be more and more disenchanted with the current administration and the permitting of big fossil fuel projects."
"This is an opportunity for the administration to do right by young people," he added.
Earlier this year, just before parties to the case were set to receive trial dates from a federal judge in Oregon, the Biden Justice Department filed a motion to stay the case and then another to have it tossed, drawing outrage from the youth plaintiffs. Dozens of members of Congress have weighed in on the side of the plaintiffs, arguing they should be allowed a trial to present their arguments and evidence.
Avery McRae, one of the plaintiffs, said in response to the 9th Circuit order on Wednesday that "every time we get a decision as devastating as this one, I lose more and more hope that my country is as democratic as it says it is."
"I have been pleading for my government to hear our case since I was 10 years old, and I am now nearly 19," said McRae. "A functioning democracy would not make a child beg for their rights to be protected in the courts, just to be ignored nearly a decade later. I am fed up with the continuous attempts to squash this case and silence our voices."
Another plaintiff, Nathan Baring, said that "we will keep fighting for climate justice, but this is another dark day for protecting young people from climate harm imposed by their government."
Keep ReadingShow Less
57 House Dems Call On Biden to Prevent Israeli Assault on Rafah
"An offensive invasion into Rafah by Israel in the upcoming days is wholly unacceptable."
May 01, 2024
Dozens of U.S. House Democrats on Wednesday joined Congresswomen Pramila Jayapal and Madeleine Dean in pressuring President Joe Biden to prevent a full-scale Israeli assault on Rafah, a city in the southern Gaza Strip that's now full of over a million displaced Palestinians.
"We write with urgency to say: an offensive invasion into Rafah by Israel in the upcoming days is wholly unacceptable," states the letter from Jayapal (D-Wash.), Dean (D-Pa.), and 55 other members of Congress. "We welcome your administration's efforts to dissuade the Israeli government from this military operation, which would deepen both the humanitarian catastrophe for people in Gaza and the strategic challenges that regional and global stakeholders face in this conflict."
"We now urge you to enforce U.S. law and policy by withholding certain offensive weaponry or other military support that can be used for an assault on Rafah, including the offensive weaponry and aid already signed into law," the letter continues.
The Democrats highlighted how Israel's retaliation for the Hamas-led October 7 attack has impacted the city:
Rafah has become one of the most overcrowded places in the world. With shelters too full and insufficient, many families now live on the streets. The collapsed health infrastructure, in addition to sewage overflow and the scarcity of food, water, and medicine, has accelerated the onset of severe malnutrition and the spread of communicable diseases. Acute food insecurity is endemic in Rafah, even as the international community circulates credible reports that famine is setting in elsewhere in Gaza—all as a result of six months of military operations that you have described as "indiscriminate." In addition, we know in fact that Israeli strikes on Rafah have already occurred, including one on April 20th that killed 18 people, including 14 children.
Across the Gaza Strip, Israeli forces have killed 34,568 people and wounded another 77,765—mostly women and children—while leaving thousands more missing in the rubble of bombed buildings, including homes, hospitals, schools, and mosques.
Biden has resisted mounting global pressure to limit or fully cut off military aid to Israel, which the International Court of Justice in January concluded is "plausibly" committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. That case is ongoing.
"In addition to the catastrophic civilian toll—and risk to as many as 130 hostages, including as many as six or more Americans—an offensive in Rafah would ultimately undermine the Israeli and U.S. governments' strategic interests," the Democrats argued. "Israeli and U.S. military bases in the region have recently been the targets of repeated drone and missile attacks—a dangerous indication of how unstable the Middle East has become as a result of the Gaza war."
"An Israeli offensive in Rafah risks the start of yet another escalatory spiral, immediately putting the region back on the brink of a broader war that neither Israel nor the United States can afford," they warned. Along with calling on the president to withhold aid to Israel to protect civilians in Rafah, the lawmakers urged Biden to keep working "toward achieving a lasting cease-fire that will bring hostages home and build a path toward safety and security for all."
They also said that "it is of the utmost importance that both Hamas and Israel immediately come to the table with the international community for a mutually agreed ceasefire deal that can secure the safe return of hostages, full resumption of humanitarian aid, and the space for a negotiated, long-term peace in the region."
The letter comes a week after Biden signed a foreign aid package that included $26 billion for Israel and passed both chambers of Congress with bipartisan support. Jayapal and three dozen other Democrats opposed the Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, which ultimately passed.
In a joint statement last month, the Washington Democrat and 18 of her colleagues said that "our votes against H.R. 8034 are votes against supplying more offensive weapons that could result in more killings of civilians in Rafah and elsewhere."
Israeli Prime Minister "Benjamin Netanyahu appears willing to sacrifice the hostages while inflicting extraordinary suffering on the people of Gaza. He is willing to expand this conflict to preserve his power at the expense of Israel's safety," they continued, noting concerns about an invasion of Rafah. "When faced with the question of whether to provide offensive aid to further this conflict, we believe there is a moral imperative to find another path."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular