

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Abbas Mousavi attends a press conference in Tehran, Iran on Jan. 5, 2020. (Photo: Xinhua/Ahmad Halabisaz via Getty Images)
The Iranian Foreign Ministry on Monday urged U.S. officials to focus on fixing their own country's "nontransparent" and undemocratic system before calling into question the legitimacy of elections in other nations.
Abbas Mousavi, spokesperson for Iran's Foreign Ministry, told reporters that the U.S. system "ignores the vote of the majority of people" and said "American officials had better address questions" about the country's elections from the U.S. public.
Mousavi appeared to be referring to the Electoral College, the archaic system the U.S. uses to elect its president every four years. Two of the last three presidents--George W. Bush and Donald Trump--have lost the popular vote yet won the presidential election thanks to the Electoral College.
Democratic presidential candidates Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Tom Steyer, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and Pete Buttigieg have all expressed support for abolishing the Electoral College.
Mousavi's remarks came in response to a video released last Friday by the U.S. State Department characterizing Iran's upcoming Feb. 21 parliamentary elections as fraudulent.
"The regime would have you believe that these are free and fair elections," U.S. Special Representative for Iran Brian Hook said in the video. "But the real voting takes place in secret and long before Feb. 21. The clerics pick the winners and losers before the ballots are even cast."
Democratic presidential campaigns and activists in the U.S. are voicing concerns that this week's Nevada caucuses could be plagued by the same issues--from technology failures to lack of preparation--that threw the Iowa caucus into chaos earlier this month.
One Democratic volunteer warned based on training sessions hosted by the Nevada Democratic Party that the caucus could be a "complete disaster," pointing to the iPads the party plans to use to record and submit results.
An anonymous aide to a Democratic presidential campaign told the Washington Post Sunday that "it feels like the [Nevada State Democratic Party is] making it up as they go along."
"That's not how we need to be running an election," the aide said.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The Iranian Foreign Ministry on Monday urged U.S. officials to focus on fixing their own country's "nontransparent" and undemocratic system before calling into question the legitimacy of elections in other nations.
Abbas Mousavi, spokesperson for Iran's Foreign Ministry, told reporters that the U.S. system "ignores the vote of the majority of people" and said "American officials had better address questions" about the country's elections from the U.S. public.
Mousavi appeared to be referring to the Electoral College, the archaic system the U.S. uses to elect its president every four years. Two of the last three presidents--George W. Bush and Donald Trump--have lost the popular vote yet won the presidential election thanks to the Electoral College.
Democratic presidential candidates Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Tom Steyer, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and Pete Buttigieg have all expressed support for abolishing the Electoral College.
Mousavi's remarks came in response to a video released last Friday by the U.S. State Department characterizing Iran's upcoming Feb. 21 parliamentary elections as fraudulent.
"The regime would have you believe that these are free and fair elections," U.S. Special Representative for Iran Brian Hook said in the video. "But the real voting takes place in secret and long before Feb. 21. The clerics pick the winners and losers before the ballots are even cast."
Democratic presidential campaigns and activists in the U.S. are voicing concerns that this week's Nevada caucuses could be plagued by the same issues--from technology failures to lack of preparation--that threw the Iowa caucus into chaos earlier this month.
One Democratic volunteer warned based on training sessions hosted by the Nevada Democratic Party that the caucus could be a "complete disaster," pointing to the iPads the party plans to use to record and submit results.
An anonymous aide to a Democratic presidential campaign told the Washington Post Sunday that "it feels like the [Nevada State Democratic Party is] making it up as they go along."
"That's not how we need to be running an election," the aide said.
The Iranian Foreign Ministry on Monday urged U.S. officials to focus on fixing their own country's "nontransparent" and undemocratic system before calling into question the legitimacy of elections in other nations.
Abbas Mousavi, spokesperson for Iran's Foreign Ministry, told reporters that the U.S. system "ignores the vote of the majority of people" and said "American officials had better address questions" about the country's elections from the U.S. public.
Mousavi appeared to be referring to the Electoral College, the archaic system the U.S. uses to elect its president every four years. Two of the last three presidents--George W. Bush and Donald Trump--have lost the popular vote yet won the presidential election thanks to the Electoral College.
Democratic presidential candidates Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Tom Steyer, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and Pete Buttigieg have all expressed support for abolishing the Electoral College.
Mousavi's remarks came in response to a video released last Friday by the U.S. State Department characterizing Iran's upcoming Feb. 21 parliamentary elections as fraudulent.
"The regime would have you believe that these are free and fair elections," U.S. Special Representative for Iran Brian Hook said in the video. "But the real voting takes place in secret and long before Feb. 21. The clerics pick the winners and losers before the ballots are even cast."
Democratic presidential campaigns and activists in the U.S. are voicing concerns that this week's Nevada caucuses could be plagued by the same issues--from technology failures to lack of preparation--that threw the Iowa caucus into chaos earlier this month.
One Democratic volunteer warned based on training sessions hosted by the Nevada Democratic Party that the caucus could be a "complete disaster," pointing to the iPads the party plans to use to record and submit results.
An anonymous aide to a Democratic presidential campaign told the Washington Post Sunday that "it feels like the [Nevada State Democratic Party is] making it up as they go along."
"That's not how we need to be running an election," the aide said.