Attorney General Jeff Sessions is known to be against marijuana legalization and in favor of "tough on crime" policies. (Photo: Gage Skidmore/flickr/cc)
May 09, 2017
Attorney General Jeff Sessions is considering scrapping Obama-era rules that banned harsh punishments for low-level drug crimes and could direct prosecutors to resume charging severe penalties, according to U.S. officials who spoke to the Washington Post on Tuesday.
The change would overturn a 2013 memo by former Attorney General Eric Holder that instructed prosecutors to avoid issuing charges that would trigger mandatory minimum sentences for low-level defendants.
If the new instructions are implemented, it will mark another major pivot by the Trump administration away from recent federal efforts to address mass incarceration, which is now widely seen as ineffective and harmful.
It's also less than surprising.
Prior to Sessions' confirmation in February, the Brennan Center for Justice released two analyses warning that the former Alabama senator could upend all the progress the Justice Department has made in addressing everything from prison reform to voting rights.
"Sessions appears to subscribe to outdated ideas about criminal justice policy that conservatives, progressives, and law enforcement leaders agree do not help reduce crime," Ames C. Grawert, counsel in the Brennan Center's Justice Program, said at the time.
As prominent journalist Wesley Lowery tweeted Tuesday in response to the news, "Jeff Sessions seems determined to disprove a decade of 'GOP really the leaders on criminal justice reform' pieces."
Indeed, while serving as district attorney from 1981-1993, 40 percent of Sessions' convictions were for drug charges, double the rate of other state prosecutors. He is also known to be against marijuana legalization, an issue that has gained public support in recent years, and has a history of favoring "tough on crime" policies, including blocking limits on the use of juvenile solitary confinement.
Moreover, many of his opponents noted before his confirmation that Sessions was rejected for a federal judgeship in 1986 on the grounds that he was "too racist."
That detail was not lost on observers who responded to Tuesday's news. Holder's former spokesperson Matthew Miller added to the Post that the Trump administration "couldn't be making it more clear who it cares about and who it doesn't."
"If you are addicted to opiates, you'll get White House attention and increased treatment options," Miller said. "If you get picked up with crack in your pocket, you'll get jail time and a mandatory minimum."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions is considering scrapping Obama-era rules that banned harsh punishments for low-level drug crimes and could direct prosecutors to resume charging severe penalties, according to U.S. officials who spoke to the Washington Post on Tuesday.
The change would overturn a 2013 memo by former Attorney General Eric Holder that instructed prosecutors to avoid issuing charges that would trigger mandatory minimum sentences for low-level defendants.
If the new instructions are implemented, it will mark another major pivot by the Trump administration away from recent federal efforts to address mass incarceration, which is now widely seen as ineffective and harmful.
It's also less than surprising.
Prior to Sessions' confirmation in February, the Brennan Center for Justice released two analyses warning that the former Alabama senator could upend all the progress the Justice Department has made in addressing everything from prison reform to voting rights.
"Sessions appears to subscribe to outdated ideas about criminal justice policy that conservatives, progressives, and law enforcement leaders agree do not help reduce crime," Ames C. Grawert, counsel in the Brennan Center's Justice Program, said at the time.
As prominent journalist Wesley Lowery tweeted Tuesday in response to the news, "Jeff Sessions seems determined to disprove a decade of 'GOP really the leaders on criminal justice reform' pieces."
Indeed, while serving as district attorney from 1981-1993, 40 percent of Sessions' convictions were for drug charges, double the rate of other state prosecutors. He is also known to be against marijuana legalization, an issue that has gained public support in recent years, and has a history of favoring "tough on crime" policies, including blocking limits on the use of juvenile solitary confinement.
Moreover, many of his opponents noted before his confirmation that Sessions was rejected for a federal judgeship in 1986 on the grounds that he was "too racist."
That detail was not lost on observers who responded to Tuesday's news. Holder's former spokesperson Matthew Miller added to the Post that the Trump administration "couldn't be making it more clear who it cares about and who it doesn't."
"If you are addicted to opiates, you'll get White House attention and increased treatment options," Miller said. "If you get picked up with crack in your pocket, you'll get jail time and a mandatory minimum."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions is considering scrapping Obama-era rules that banned harsh punishments for low-level drug crimes and could direct prosecutors to resume charging severe penalties, according to U.S. officials who spoke to the Washington Post on Tuesday.
The change would overturn a 2013 memo by former Attorney General Eric Holder that instructed prosecutors to avoid issuing charges that would trigger mandatory minimum sentences for low-level defendants.
If the new instructions are implemented, it will mark another major pivot by the Trump administration away from recent federal efforts to address mass incarceration, which is now widely seen as ineffective and harmful.
It's also less than surprising.
Prior to Sessions' confirmation in February, the Brennan Center for Justice released two analyses warning that the former Alabama senator could upend all the progress the Justice Department has made in addressing everything from prison reform to voting rights.
"Sessions appears to subscribe to outdated ideas about criminal justice policy that conservatives, progressives, and law enforcement leaders agree do not help reduce crime," Ames C. Grawert, counsel in the Brennan Center's Justice Program, said at the time.
As prominent journalist Wesley Lowery tweeted Tuesday in response to the news, "Jeff Sessions seems determined to disprove a decade of 'GOP really the leaders on criminal justice reform' pieces."
Indeed, while serving as district attorney from 1981-1993, 40 percent of Sessions' convictions were for drug charges, double the rate of other state prosecutors. He is also known to be against marijuana legalization, an issue that has gained public support in recent years, and has a history of favoring "tough on crime" policies, including blocking limits on the use of juvenile solitary confinement.
Moreover, many of his opponents noted before his confirmation that Sessions was rejected for a federal judgeship in 1986 on the grounds that he was "too racist."
That detail was not lost on observers who responded to Tuesday's news. Holder's former spokesperson Matthew Miller added to the Post that the Trump administration "couldn't be making it more clear who it cares about and who it doesn't."
"If you are addicted to opiates, you'll get White House attention and increased treatment options," Miller said. "If you get picked up with crack in your pocket, you'll get jail time and a mandatory minimum."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.