SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Sessions as Attorney General Could Upend All DOJ Progress, Reports Warn
Sessions' regressive stances threaten to out-scandalize the Bush era, Brennan Center says
Jan 06, 2017
Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), the nominee for attorney general, played an instrumental role in killing justice-reform bills and could use Bush-era disenfranchisement policies to shape the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), according to two new analyses released Friday.
The Brennan Center for Justice analyzed Sessions' past statements and actions on criminal justice, including in 2016 personally blocking the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act--which would have reduced prison time for nonviolent crimes and limited the use of solitary confinement on juveniles, among other things--despite a consensus within his own party.
While serving as district attorney from 1981-1993, 40 percent of Sessions' convictions were for drug charges, double the rate of other state prosecutors.
At a time when the Justice Department has acted as a key watchdog of police departments amid racial unrest, Sessions' regressive stances on everything from civil asset forfeiture (he's for it) to recidivism reduction programs (he's against them) threaten to upend the progress the agency has made, the Brennan Center warns.
"Sessions appears to subscribe to outdated ideas about criminal justice policy that conservatives, progressives, and law enforcement leaders agree do not help reduce crime," said Ames C. Grawert, counsel in the Brennan Center's Justice Program. "His views are at odds with Republican leadership, and Sessions even helped kill a modest criminal justice bill last year. The Senate Judiciary Committee should ask Sessions questions about his record, and how he would act as the nation's top law enforcement officer."
In 2007, under then-President George W. Bush, the DOJ replaced some of its top attorneys with "politically loyal" prosecutors and pushed states to crack down on voting rights laws--an effort that ultimately ended in scandal and ousted Bush's top strategist Karl Rove.
Any similar moves by Sessions would undoubtedly erode the DOJ's progress, the center said.
Sessions is also included in a laundry list compiled by advocacy group Public Citizen of Trump appointees who would enter office with potential conflicts of interest. The group also warned this week that he would be soft on corporate crime.
While nearly all of President-elect Donald Trump's cabinet nominees have faced strong backlash from progressive organizations and Democratic lawmakers, Sessions is particularly controversial. Senior members of the NAACP staged a sit-in at Sessions' office last week, leading to the arrest of the group's president Cornell Brooks, and numerous congress members have already indicated they will vote against him.
That includes Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), who released a statement Friday confirming his stance.
"The U.S. Attorney General's job is to enforce laws that protect the rights of every American," Brown said. "I have serious concerns that Senator Sessions' record on civil rights is at direct odds with the task of promoting justice and equality for all, and I cannot support his nomination."
"Now, more than ever, we need leaders who can bring Americans together to improve police-community relations, ensure that all Americans have access to the ballot, and reform our criminal justice system," Brown said.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
#notnormalbrennan center for justicegeorge w. bushjeff sessionspublic citizensherrod browntrumpismus department of justice
Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), the nominee for attorney general, played an instrumental role in killing justice-reform bills and could use Bush-era disenfranchisement policies to shape the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), according to two new analyses released Friday.
The Brennan Center for Justice analyzed Sessions' past statements and actions on criminal justice, including in 2016 personally blocking the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act--which would have reduced prison time for nonviolent crimes and limited the use of solitary confinement on juveniles, among other things--despite a consensus within his own party.
While serving as district attorney from 1981-1993, 40 percent of Sessions' convictions were for drug charges, double the rate of other state prosecutors.
At a time when the Justice Department has acted as a key watchdog of police departments amid racial unrest, Sessions' regressive stances on everything from civil asset forfeiture (he's for it) to recidivism reduction programs (he's against them) threaten to upend the progress the agency has made, the Brennan Center warns.
"Sessions appears to subscribe to outdated ideas about criminal justice policy that conservatives, progressives, and law enforcement leaders agree do not help reduce crime," said Ames C. Grawert, counsel in the Brennan Center's Justice Program. "His views are at odds with Republican leadership, and Sessions even helped kill a modest criminal justice bill last year. The Senate Judiciary Committee should ask Sessions questions about his record, and how he would act as the nation's top law enforcement officer."
In 2007, under then-President George W. Bush, the DOJ replaced some of its top attorneys with "politically loyal" prosecutors and pushed states to crack down on voting rights laws--an effort that ultimately ended in scandal and ousted Bush's top strategist Karl Rove.
Any similar moves by Sessions would undoubtedly erode the DOJ's progress, the center said.
Sessions is also included in a laundry list compiled by advocacy group Public Citizen of Trump appointees who would enter office with potential conflicts of interest. The group also warned this week that he would be soft on corporate crime.
While nearly all of President-elect Donald Trump's cabinet nominees have faced strong backlash from progressive organizations and Democratic lawmakers, Sessions is particularly controversial. Senior members of the NAACP staged a sit-in at Sessions' office last week, leading to the arrest of the group's president Cornell Brooks, and numerous congress members have already indicated they will vote against him.
That includes Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), who released a statement Friday confirming his stance.
"The U.S. Attorney General's job is to enforce laws that protect the rights of every American," Brown said. "I have serious concerns that Senator Sessions' record on civil rights is at direct odds with the task of promoting justice and equality for all, and I cannot support his nomination."
"Now, more than ever, we need leaders who can bring Americans together to improve police-community relations, ensure that all Americans have access to the ballot, and reform our criminal justice system," Brown said.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), the nominee for attorney general, played an instrumental role in killing justice-reform bills and could use Bush-era disenfranchisement policies to shape the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), according to two new analyses released Friday.
The Brennan Center for Justice analyzed Sessions' past statements and actions on criminal justice, including in 2016 personally blocking the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act--which would have reduced prison time for nonviolent crimes and limited the use of solitary confinement on juveniles, among other things--despite a consensus within his own party.
While serving as district attorney from 1981-1993, 40 percent of Sessions' convictions were for drug charges, double the rate of other state prosecutors.
At a time when the Justice Department has acted as a key watchdog of police departments amid racial unrest, Sessions' regressive stances on everything from civil asset forfeiture (he's for it) to recidivism reduction programs (he's against them) threaten to upend the progress the agency has made, the Brennan Center warns.
"Sessions appears to subscribe to outdated ideas about criminal justice policy that conservatives, progressives, and law enforcement leaders agree do not help reduce crime," said Ames C. Grawert, counsel in the Brennan Center's Justice Program. "His views are at odds with Republican leadership, and Sessions even helped kill a modest criminal justice bill last year. The Senate Judiciary Committee should ask Sessions questions about his record, and how he would act as the nation's top law enforcement officer."
In 2007, under then-President George W. Bush, the DOJ replaced some of its top attorneys with "politically loyal" prosecutors and pushed states to crack down on voting rights laws--an effort that ultimately ended in scandal and ousted Bush's top strategist Karl Rove.
Any similar moves by Sessions would undoubtedly erode the DOJ's progress, the center said.
Sessions is also included in a laundry list compiled by advocacy group Public Citizen of Trump appointees who would enter office with potential conflicts of interest. The group also warned this week that he would be soft on corporate crime.
While nearly all of President-elect Donald Trump's cabinet nominees have faced strong backlash from progressive organizations and Democratic lawmakers, Sessions is particularly controversial. Senior members of the NAACP staged a sit-in at Sessions' office last week, leading to the arrest of the group's president Cornell Brooks, and numerous congress members have already indicated they will vote against him.
That includes Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), who released a statement Friday confirming his stance.
"The U.S. Attorney General's job is to enforce laws that protect the rights of every American," Brown said. "I have serious concerns that Senator Sessions' record on civil rights is at direct odds with the task of promoting justice and equality for all, and I cannot support his nomination."
"Now, more than ever, we need leaders who can bring Americans together to improve police-community relations, ensure that all Americans have access to the ballot, and reform our criminal justice system," Brown said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.