SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Waivers and Pardons? Mounting Ethics Concerns for Trump's Ultra-Wealthy Cabinet
President-elect could present a waiver, to the tune of $150 million, if Secretary of State nominee Rex Tillerson balks at selling stock
Dec 20, 2016
One hundred million dollar waivers? Presidential pardons? With yet another billionaire appointed to a key position within the Donald Trump administration this week, speculations abound about what the president-elect intends to do about his cabinet's unprecedented wealth--and their unprecedented conflicts.
Monday's appointment of former infantry officer and Wall Street executive Vincent Viola to secretary of the Army makes him the fourth billionaire nominated by Trump to join what is clearly now the wealthiest administration in modern history.
One of the more blatant conflicts to date is the nomination of ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson to lead the State Department.
Ethics lawyers say the oil tycoon will likely have to sell his substantial Exxon holdings and put his assets into a blind trust. But, as it stands, an estimated $151 million in Exxon shares won't be vested for several years.
One possible solution would effectively present itself as a $150 million gift from the president-elect to his secretary of state.
"There is a statute that gives Trump an option of issuing a waiver and allowing Tillerson to keep his shares if the president determines that the interest is not so substantial that it would affect Tillerson's services," Washington University Law Professor Kathleen Clark told The Street's Ronald Orol.
"It would be hard, I think, to say with a straight face that $150 million in stock options is not substantial," Clark added, but nothing is outside the realm of possibility in this #NotNormal administration.
Tillerson is just one example in a cabinet chock full of similar entanglements. Fast-food CEO Andrew Pudzer, tapped to lead the Department of Labor, and international bankruptcy mogul Wilbur Ross, nominated to Secretary of Commerce, will also likely have their holdings scrutinized.
Unlike the president, cabinet members are subject to federal ethics laws that will force appointees to eliminate conflicts before taking office.
Even so, as NPR observed on Tuesday, "If a nominee does have to sell investments to comply with federal ethics rules, he or she may be allowed to put off any capital-gains tax," which the outlet noted is a tax break "designed to help new nominees avoid conflicts of interest without paying a personal price."
Former speaker of the House and Trump ally Newt Gingrich on Monday offered another possible avenue for the president-elect to take in addressing these conflicts: Presidential pardons.
"I think in the case of the president, he has a broad ability to organize the White House the way he wants to," Gingrich told NPR's Diane Rehm. "He also has, frankly, the power of the pardon. I mean, it is a totally open power, and he could simply say look, I want them to be my advisors, I pardon them if anybody finds them to have behaved against the rules, period. And technically under the Constitution he has that level of authority."
As for Trump and the myriad conflicts of interest he will hold if he continues to refuse to divest from his company, Gingrich suggested that Congress should consider changing the rules.
"[W]e have not really dealt with this relative scale of wealth in the White House in some ways since George Washington, who may have been the wealthiest man in the colonies. So historically this is an unusual amount of economic interest and virtually impossible to isolate," he said. Thus, he continued, "traditional rules don't work, and we're going to have to think up, you know, a whole new approach."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Lauren McCauley
Lauren McCauley is a former senior editor for Common Dreams covering national and international politics and progressive news. She is now the Editor of Maine Morning Star. Lauren also helped produce a number of documentary films, including the award-winning Soundtrack for a Revolution and The Hollywood Complex, as well as one currently in production about civil rights icon James Meredith. Her writing has been featured on Newsweek, BillMoyers.com, TruthDig, Truthout, In These Times, and Extra! the newsletter of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. She currently lives in Kennebunk, Maine with her husband, two children, a dog, and several chickens.
One hundred million dollar waivers? Presidential pardons? With yet another billionaire appointed to a key position within the Donald Trump administration this week, speculations abound about what the president-elect intends to do about his cabinet's unprecedented wealth--and their unprecedented conflicts.
Monday's appointment of former infantry officer and Wall Street executive Vincent Viola to secretary of the Army makes him the fourth billionaire nominated by Trump to join what is clearly now the wealthiest administration in modern history.
One of the more blatant conflicts to date is the nomination of ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson to lead the State Department.
Ethics lawyers say the oil tycoon will likely have to sell his substantial Exxon holdings and put his assets into a blind trust. But, as it stands, an estimated $151 million in Exxon shares won't be vested for several years.
One possible solution would effectively present itself as a $150 million gift from the president-elect to his secretary of state.
"There is a statute that gives Trump an option of issuing a waiver and allowing Tillerson to keep his shares if the president determines that the interest is not so substantial that it would affect Tillerson's services," Washington University Law Professor Kathleen Clark told The Street's Ronald Orol.
"It would be hard, I think, to say with a straight face that $150 million in stock options is not substantial," Clark added, but nothing is outside the realm of possibility in this #NotNormal administration.
Tillerson is just one example in a cabinet chock full of similar entanglements. Fast-food CEO Andrew Pudzer, tapped to lead the Department of Labor, and international bankruptcy mogul Wilbur Ross, nominated to Secretary of Commerce, will also likely have their holdings scrutinized.
Unlike the president, cabinet members are subject to federal ethics laws that will force appointees to eliminate conflicts before taking office.
Even so, as NPR observed on Tuesday, "If a nominee does have to sell investments to comply with federal ethics rules, he or she may be allowed to put off any capital-gains tax," which the outlet noted is a tax break "designed to help new nominees avoid conflicts of interest without paying a personal price."
Former speaker of the House and Trump ally Newt Gingrich on Monday offered another possible avenue for the president-elect to take in addressing these conflicts: Presidential pardons.
"I think in the case of the president, he has a broad ability to organize the White House the way he wants to," Gingrich told NPR's Diane Rehm. "He also has, frankly, the power of the pardon. I mean, it is a totally open power, and he could simply say look, I want them to be my advisors, I pardon them if anybody finds them to have behaved against the rules, period. And technically under the Constitution he has that level of authority."
As for Trump and the myriad conflicts of interest he will hold if he continues to refuse to divest from his company, Gingrich suggested that Congress should consider changing the rules.
"[W]e have not really dealt with this relative scale of wealth in the White House in some ways since George Washington, who may have been the wealthiest man in the colonies. So historically this is an unusual amount of economic interest and virtually impossible to isolate," he said. Thus, he continued, "traditional rules don't work, and we're going to have to think up, you know, a whole new approach."
Lauren McCauley
Lauren McCauley is a former senior editor for Common Dreams covering national and international politics and progressive news. She is now the Editor of Maine Morning Star. Lauren also helped produce a number of documentary films, including the award-winning Soundtrack for a Revolution and The Hollywood Complex, as well as one currently in production about civil rights icon James Meredith. Her writing has been featured on Newsweek, BillMoyers.com, TruthDig, Truthout, In These Times, and Extra! the newsletter of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. She currently lives in Kennebunk, Maine with her husband, two children, a dog, and several chickens.
One hundred million dollar waivers? Presidential pardons? With yet another billionaire appointed to a key position within the Donald Trump administration this week, speculations abound about what the president-elect intends to do about his cabinet's unprecedented wealth--and their unprecedented conflicts.
Monday's appointment of former infantry officer and Wall Street executive Vincent Viola to secretary of the Army makes him the fourth billionaire nominated by Trump to join what is clearly now the wealthiest administration in modern history.
One of the more blatant conflicts to date is the nomination of ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson to lead the State Department.
Ethics lawyers say the oil tycoon will likely have to sell his substantial Exxon holdings and put his assets into a blind trust. But, as it stands, an estimated $151 million in Exxon shares won't be vested for several years.
One possible solution would effectively present itself as a $150 million gift from the president-elect to his secretary of state.
"There is a statute that gives Trump an option of issuing a waiver and allowing Tillerson to keep his shares if the president determines that the interest is not so substantial that it would affect Tillerson's services," Washington University Law Professor Kathleen Clark told The Street's Ronald Orol.
"It would be hard, I think, to say with a straight face that $150 million in stock options is not substantial," Clark added, but nothing is outside the realm of possibility in this #NotNormal administration.
Tillerson is just one example in a cabinet chock full of similar entanglements. Fast-food CEO Andrew Pudzer, tapped to lead the Department of Labor, and international bankruptcy mogul Wilbur Ross, nominated to Secretary of Commerce, will also likely have their holdings scrutinized.
Unlike the president, cabinet members are subject to federal ethics laws that will force appointees to eliminate conflicts before taking office.
Even so, as NPR observed on Tuesday, "If a nominee does have to sell investments to comply with federal ethics rules, he or she may be allowed to put off any capital-gains tax," which the outlet noted is a tax break "designed to help new nominees avoid conflicts of interest without paying a personal price."
Former speaker of the House and Trump ally Newt Gingrich on Monday offered another possible avenue for the president-elect to take in addressing these conflicts: Presidential pardons.
"I think in the case of the president, he has a broad ability to organize the White House the way he wants to," Gingrich told NPR's Diane Rehm. "He also has, frankly, the power of the pardon. I mean, it is a totally open power, and he could simply say look, I want them to be my advisors, I pardon them if anybody finds them to have behaved against the rules, period. And technically under the Constitution he has that level of authority."
As for Trump and the myriad conflicts of interest he will hold if he continues to refuse to divest from his company, Gingrich suggested that Congress should consider changing the rules.
"[W]e have not really dealt with this relative scale of wealth in the White House in some ways since George Washington, who may have been the wealthiest man in the colonies. So historically this is an unusual amount of economic interest and virtually impossible to isolate," he said. Thus, he continued, "traditional rules don't work, and we're going to have to think up, you know, a whole new approach."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.