SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
US Spy Leaders Won't Brief Electors Even as Poll Shows Majority Want Vote Delay
New poll shows majority public support for delaying Electoral College vote on Monday
Dec 18, 2016
Amid a nationwide protest effort aimed at convincing members of the Electoral College to reject Donald Trump and serious concerns about alleged interference in the U.S. election by Russia's government, a new poll out Sunday reveals majority support for delaying Monday's scheduled vote until electors are given an official intelligence briefing on the matter.
According to a YouGov poll conducted on behalf of the advocacy group Avaaz, 52% percent of respondents either "strongly agree" or "somewhat agree" that Monday's "vote should be delayed until the Electors can be briefed about the allegations of Russian hacking."
Demands for Electors to receive such a briefing have been growing steadily since several high-profile news stories said U.S. intelligence officials have determined with a "high level of confidence" that the Kremlin was involved with obtaining emails from the Democratic National Committee's computer systems as well as emails from John Podesta, the powerful D.C. lobbyist who served as Hillary Clinton's campaign chair. Additional reporting claimed the CIA also believes that Russia specifically intervened to improve the chances of Donald Trump and NBC News used unnamed sources in its reporting that Russian President Vladimir Putin was "personally" involved in the operations.
But despite lingering and serious questions about the actual "evidence" which might support those claims, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) on Friday said it would not brief Electors prior to Monday's vote due to an ongoing review of the alleged Russian interference ordered by President Obama. "This effort is ongoing and involves sensitive classified information," the ODNI said in a statement. "Once the review is complete in the coming weeks, the Intelligence Community stands ready to brief Congress and will make those findings available to the public consistent with protecting intelligence sources and methods."
On Sunday, former CIA director James Woolsey appeared on ABC's 'This Week' and said it will ultimately be up to the National Security Agency (NSA) to determine whether or not Russia was behind the targeting of the DNC and Podesta emails. "This is really an NSA decision," Woolsey said, "...and if NSA is confident that it's the Russians, then it almost certainly is. Depends on them."
Unfortunately, the NSA leadership--and the intelligence community overall--have a mixed record when it comes to releasing relevant information in a timely manner or being honest with the American public.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Amid a nationwide protest effort aimed at convincing members of the Electoral College to reject Donald Trump and serious concerns about alleged interference in the U.S. election by Russia's government, a new poll out Sunday reveals majority support for delaying Monday's scheduled vote until electors are given an official intelligence briefing on the matter.
According to a YouGov poll conducted on behalf of the advocacy group Avaaz, 52% percent of respondents either "strongly agree" or "somewhat agree" that Monday's "vote should be delayed until the Electors can be briefed about the allegations of Russian hacking."
Demands for Electors to receive such a briefing have been growing steadily since several high-profile news stories said U.S. intelligence officials have determined with a "high level of confidence" that the Kremlin was involved with obtaining emails from the Democratic National Committee's computer systems as well as emails from John Podesta, the powerful D.C. lobbyist who served as Hillary Clinton's campaign chair. Additional reporting claimed the CIA also believes that Russia specifically intervened to improve the chances of Donald Trump and NBC News used unnamed sources in its reporting that Russian President Vladimir Putin was "personally" involved in the operations.
But despite lingering and serious questions about the actual "evidence" which might support those claims, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) on Friday said it would not brief Electors prior to Monday's vote due to an ongoing review of the alleged Russian interference ordered by President Obama. "This effort is ongoing and involves sensitive classified information," the ODNI said in a statement. "Once the review is complete in the coming weeks, the Intelligence Community stands ready to brief Congress and will make those findings available to the public consistent with protecting intelligence sources and methods."
On Sunday, former CIA director James Woolsey appeared on ABC's 'This Week' and said it will ultimately be up to the National Security Agency (NSA) to determine whether or not Russia was behind the targeting of the DNC and Podesta emails. "This is really an NSA decision," Woolsey said, "...and if NSA is confident that it's the Russians, then it almost certainly is. Depends on them."
Unfortunately, the NSA leadership--and the intelligence community overall--have a mixed record when it comes to releasing relevant information in a timely manner or being honest with the American public.
Amid a nationwide protest effort aimed at convincing members of the Electoral College to reject Donald Trump and serious concerns about alleged interference in the U.S. election by Russia's government, a new poll out Sunday reveals majority support for delaying Monday's scheduled vote until electors are given an official intelligence briefing on the matter.
According to a YouGov poll conducted on behalf of the advocacy group Avaaz, 52% percent of respondents either "strongly agree" or "somewhat agree" that Monday's "vote should be delayed until the Electors can be briefed about the allegations of Russian hacking."
Demands for Electors to receive such a briefing have been growing steadily since several high-profile news stories said U.S. intelligence officials have determined with a "high level of confidence" that the Kremlin was involved with obtaining emails from the Democratic National Committee's computer systems as well as emails from John Podesta, the powerful D.C. lobbyist who served as Hillary Clinton's campaign chair. Additional reporting claimed the CIA also believes that Russia specifically intervened to improve the chances of Donald Trump and NBC News used unnamed sources in its reporting that Russian President Vladimir Putin was "personally" involved in the operations.
But despite lingering and serious questions about the actual "evidence" which might support those claims, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) on Friday said it would not brief Electors prior to Monday's vote due to an ongoing review of the alleged Russian interference ordered by President Obama. "This effort is ongoing and involves sensitive classified information," the ODNI said in a statement. "Once the review is complete in the coming weeks, the Intelligence Community stands ready to brief Congress and will make those findings available to the public consistent with protecting intelligence sources and methods."
On Sunday, former CIA director James Woolsey appeared on ABC's 'This Week' and said it will ultimately be up to the National Security Agency (NSA) to determine whether or not Russia was behind the targeting of the DNC and Podesta emails. "This is really an NSA decision," Woolsey said, "...and if NSA is confident that it's the Russians, then it almost certainly is. Depends on them."
Unfortunately, the NSA leadership--and the intelligence community overall--have a mixed record when it comes to releasing relevant information in a timely manner or being honest with the American public.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.