SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
State AGs Vow to Be "First Line of Defense" to Block Trump's Constitutional Violations
Statements from five states' top legal officers follow ACLU promise to defend against Trump's "one-man constitutional crisis"
Nov 18, 2016
As members of vulnerable communities and their allies gear up for threats the upcoming Donald Trump administration and Republican-controlled Congress could unleash, the top legal officers in at least five states are also preparing, announcing they are ready to be "the first line of defense" to block any constitutional violations.
Reuters reports that the statements come from the state attorneys general in Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Virginia, and Washington. They are all Democrats.
Massachusetts AG Maura Healey, for example, said in a statement that "[i]f the incoming administration chooses to try to act in ways that are unconstitutional, my office will take action to protect the rights and liberties of our residents and our state."
Bob Ferguson, Washington state's AG, told the news agency, "I view my role as being on the first line of defense against a Trump administration if it chooses to act in an unconstitutional fashion." Reuters notes that state attorneys general "generally have legal standing to bring lawsuits challenging federal regulations or executive actions, including those that may infringe upon civil rights, to weaken consumer protection or climate change policies, for example, could lead to conflict between the states and the federal government."
New York AG Eric Schneiderman and Maryland AG Brian E. Frosh (pdf) have already responded to a post-election uptick in reports of abuse, hate speech, and assault against Muslims, people of color, immigrants, Latinos, and the LGBTQ community. Schneiderman said, "As the state's top law enforcement officer, let me assure anyone who is feeling scared or threatened at this time that this office stands behind you and has your back."
Schneiderman also issued a statement Thursday saying that he was "deeply troubled by reports that the Presidential Transition Team is considering ways to eviscerate some of the most basic consumer and investor protection laws in the country."
"Any attempt to gut these consumer and investor protections [known as Blue Sky laws] would severely undercut state police powers and only embolden those who seek to defraud and exploit everyday Americans. At a time of regulatory uncertainty at the federal level, it is essential that we maintain the very laws that have helped state and local law enforcement keep consumers and investors safe for over one hundred years," Schneiderman said.
The AGs have good reason to get ready for potential court battles: In its analysis entitled "The Trump Memos," the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) found that the president-elect's propals "to deport over 11 million undocumented immigrants, to ban Muslims from entering the United States, to surveil American Muslims and their houses of worship, to torture again, and to revise libel laws" would infringe upon the First, Fourth, Fifth, and Eighth Amendments. As such, they "would blatantly violate the inalienable rights guaranteed by the Constitution."
Recognizing these threats, the ACLU said ahead of the election that it was preparing to defend against Trump's "one-man constitutional crisis." The day after his election, the organization said to Trump, "If you do not reverse course and instead endeavor to make these campaign promises a reality, you will have to contend with the full firepower of the ACLU at every step. Our staff of litigators and activists in every state, thousands of volunteers, and millions of card-carrying supporters are ready to fight against any encroachment on our cherished freedoms and rights."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
As members of vulnerable communities and their allies gear up for threats the upcoming Donald Trump administration and Republican-controlled Congress could unleash, the top legal officers in at least five states are also preparing, announcing they are ready to be "the first line of defense" to block any constitutional violations.
Reuters reports that the statements come from the state attorneys general in Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Virginia, and Washington. They are all Democrats.
Massachusetts AG Maura Healey, for example, said in a statement that "[i]f the incoming administration chooses to try to act in ways that are unconstitutional, my office will take action to protect the rights and liberties of our residents and our state."
Bob Ferguson, Washington state's AG, told the news agency, "I view my role as being on the first line of defense against a Trump administration if it chooses to act in an unconstitutional fashion." Reuters notes that state attorneys general "generally have legal standing to bring lawsuits challenging federal regulations or executive actions, including those that may infringe upon civil rights, to weaken consumer protection or climate change policies, for example, could lead to conflict between the states and the federal government."
New York AG Eric Schneiderman and Maryland AG Brian E. Frosh (pdf) have already responded to a post-election uptick in reports of abuse, hate speech, and assault against Muslims, people of color, immigrants, Latinos, and the LGBTQ community. Schneiderman said, "As the state's top law enforcement officer, let me assure anyone who is feeling scared or threatened at this time that this office stands behind you and has your back."
Schneiderman also issued a statement Thursday saying that he was "deeply troubled by reports that the Presidential Transition Team is considering ways to eviscerate some of the most basic consumer and investor protection laws in the country."
"Any attempt to gut these consumer and investor protections [known as Blue Sky laws] would severely undercut state police powers and only embolden those who seek to defraud and exploit everyday Americans. At a time of regulatory uncertainty at the federal level, it is essential that we maintain the very laws that have helped state and local law enforcement keep consumers and investors safe for over one hundred years," Schneiderman said.
The AGs have good reason to get ready for potential court battles: In its analysis entitled "The Trump Memos," the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) found that the president-elect's propals "to deport over 11 million undocumented immigrants, to ban Muslims from entering the United States, to surveil American Muslims and their houses of worship, to torture again, and to revise libel laws" would infringe upon the First, Fourth, Fifth, and Eighth Amendments. As such, they "would blatantly violate the inalienable rights guaranteed by the Constitution."
Recognizing these threats, the ACLU said ahead of the election that it was preparing to defend against Trump's "one-man constitutional crisis." The day after his election, the organization said to Trump, "If you do not reverse course and instead endeavor to make these campaign promises a reality, you will have to contend with the full firepower of the ACLU at every step. Our staff of litigators and activists in every state, thousands of volunteers, and millions of card-carrying supporters are ready to fight against any encroachment on our cherished freedoms and rights."
As members of vulnerable communities and their allies gear up for threats the upcoming Donald Trump administration and Republican-controlled Congress could unleash, the top legal officers in at least five states are also preparing, announcing they are ready to be "the first line of defense" to block any constitutional violations.
Reuters reports that the statements come from the state attorneys general in Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Virginia, and Washington. They are all Democrats.
Massachusetts AG Maura Healey, for example, said in a statement that "[i]f the incoming administration chooses to try to act in ways that are unconstitutional, my office will take action to protect the rights and liberties of our residents and our state."
Bob Ferguson, Washington state's AG, told the news agency, "I view my role as being on the first line of defense against a Trump administration if it chooses to act in an unconstitutional fashion." Reuters notes that state attorneys general "generally have legal standing to bring lawsuits challenging federal regulations or executive actions, including those that may infringe upon civil rights, to weaken consumer protection or climate change policies, for example, could lead to conflict between the states and the federal government."
New York AG Eric Schneiderman and Maryland AG Brian E. Frosh (pdf) have already responded to a post-election uptick in reports of abuse, hate speech, and assault against Muslims, people of color, immigrants, Latinos, and the LGBTQ community. Schneiderman said, "As the state's top law enforcement officer, let me assure anyone who is feeling scared or threatened at this time that this office stands behind you and has your back."
Schneiderman also issued a statement Thursday saying that he was "deeply troubled by reports that the Presidential Transition Team is considering ways to eviscerate some of the most basic consumer and investor protection laws in the country."
"Any attempt to gut these consumer and investor protections [known as Blue Sky laws] would severely undercut state police powers and only embolden those who seek to defraud and exploit everyday Americans. At a time of regulatory uncertainty at the federal level, it is essential that we maintain the very laws that have helped state and local law enforcement keep consumers and investors safe for over one hundred years," Schneiderman said.
The AGs have good reason to get ready for potential court battles: In its analysis entitled "The Trump Memos," the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) found that the president-elect's propals "to deport over 11 million undocumented immigrants, to ban Muslims from entering the United States, to surveil American Muslims and their houses of worship, to torture again, and to revise libel laws" would infringe upon the First, Fourth, Fifth, and Eighth Amendments. As such, they "would blatantly violate the inalienable rights guaranteed by the Constitution."
Recognizing these threats, the ACLU said ahead of the election that it was preparing to defend against Trump's "one-man constitutional crisis." The day after his election, the organization said to Trump, "If you do not reverse course and instead endeavor to make these campaign promises a reality, you will have to contend with the full firepower of the ACLU at every step. Our staff of litigators and activists in every state, thousands of volunteers, and millions of card-carrying supporters are ready to fight against any encroachment on our cherished freedoms and rights."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.