'Unspeakably Sad': Colombia Voters Narrowly Reject Landmark Peace Deal
The areas most affected by the conflict overwhelmingly voted "Yes" for peace
In an outcome described as "shocking," "painful," and "unspeakably sad," Colombian voters on Sunday rejected a landmark peace deal that would have ended a deadly 52-year war between the government and FARC guerillas.
Turnout was reportedly low, and the win was narrow, with the "No" vote leading by less than one percentage point, 50.2 percent to 49.8 percent.
"Today will be remembered by history as the moment Colombia turned its back on what could have been the end of a war that for more than 50 years devastated millions of lives," said Erika Guevara-Rosas, Americas director for rights group Amnesty International. "Even though it was imperfect, the accord was a sure path to peace and justice."
According to TeleSUR:
The surprising results--which went against all exit polls that had the "Yes" vote winning easily--are showing that the areas most affected by the conflict have overwhelmingly voted "Yes" for peace. For example in the heavily affected area of Choco, with 95 percent of the vote counted, 79 percent voted "Yes." The Caribbean provinces have also voted "Yes."
In the capital of Bogota, the "Yes" vote won by 56 percent to 44 percent for the "No" vote.
[...] The "No" vote was led by former president Alvaro Uribe and big landowners who have run the country with impunity for decades. The fear-mongering campaign launched by these forces, with the support ofright-wing media, proved too much for the forces for peace.
On Twitter, journalist and commentator Vijay Prashad also made note of the geographic breakdown:
CNN reported:
Likened to the fallout from the United Kingdom's "Brexit" referendum, the vote's unexpected failure has left the Colombian political classes reeling and unsure how to respond in order to save four years of hard negotiation with the Marxist militia.
Indeed, Reuters quoted one "No" voter who said: "We never thought this could happen. Now I just hope the government, the opposition, and the FARC come up with something intelligent that includes us all."
The BBC reported that "Most of those who voted 'no' said they thought the peace agreement was letting the rebels 'get away with murder'."
But others said that a campaign of fear won the day:
Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos, "[p]utting on a brave face after a major political defeat," as Reuters put it, said Monday that he "won't give up." He sent government negotiators back to Cuba on Monday morning to meet with FARC leaders, and "said he would meet with Colombia's opposition, led by former president and senator Alvaro Uribe, a mortal enemy of the FARC who has gained powerful new leverage over any potential attempt to rewrite the peace deal," the Washington Post reported.
FARC leader Rodrigo Londono (known as "Timochenko") also reiterated a commitment to peace, saying on Sunday: "The FARC reiterates its disposition to use only words as a weapon to build toward the future. To the Colombian people who dream of peace, count on us, peace will triumph."
Both sides said the historic ceasefire, reached in June, would remain in place.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In an outcome described as "shocking," "painful," and "unspeakably sad," Colombian voters on Sunday rejected a landmark peace deal that would have ended a deadly 52-year war between the government and FARC guerillas.
Turnout was reportedly low, and the win was narrow, with the "No" vote leading by less than one percentage point, 50.2 percent to 49.8 percent.
"Today will be remembered by history as the moment Colombia turned its back on what could have been the end of a war that for more than 50 years devastated millions of lives," said Erika Guevara-Rosas, Americas director for rights group Amnesty International. "Even though it was imperfect, the accord was a sure path to peace and justice."
According to TeleSUR:
The surprising results--which went against all exit polls that had the "Yes" vote winning easily--are showing that the areas most affected by the conflict have overwhelmingly voted "Yes" for peace. For example in the heavily affected area of Choco, with 95 percent of the vote counted, 79 percent voted "Yes." The Caribbean provinces have also voted "Yes."
In the capital of Bogota, the "Yes" vote won by 56 percent to 44 percent for the "No" vote.
[...] The "No" vote was led by former president Alvaro Uribe and big landowners who have run the country with impunity for decades. The fear-mongering campaign launched by these forces, with the support ofright-wing media, proved too much for the forces for peace.
On Twitter, journalist and commentator Vijay Prashad also made note of the geographic breakdown:
CNN reported:
Likened to the fallout from the United Kingdom's "Brexit" referendum, the vote's unexpected failure has left the Colombian political classes reeling and unsure how to respond in order to save four years of hard negotiation with the Marxist militia.
Indeed, Reuters quoted one "No" voter who said: "We never thought this could happen. Now I just hope the government, the opposition, and the FARC come up with something intelligent that includes us all."
The BBC reported that "Most of those who voted 'no' said they thought the peace agreement was letting the rebels 'get away with murder'."
But others said that a campaign of fear won the day:
Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos, "[p]utting on a brave face after a major political defeat," as Reuters put it, said Monday that he "won't give up." He sent government negotiators back to Cuba on Monday morning to meet with FARC leaders, and "said he would meet with Colombia's opposition, led by former president and senator Alvaro Uribe, a mortal enemy of the FARC who has gained powerful new leverage over any potential attempt to rewrite the peace deal," the Washington Post reported.
FARC leader Rodrigo Londono (known as "Timochenko") also reiterated a commitment to peace, saying on Sunday: "The FARC reiterates its disposition to use only words as a weapon to build toward the future. To the Colombian people who dream of peace, count on us, peace will triumph."
Both sides said the historic ceasefire, reached in June, would remain in place.
In an outcome described as "shocking," "painful," and "unspeakably sad," Colombian voters on Sunday rejected a landmark peace deal that would have ended a deadly 52-year war between the government and FARC guerillas.
Turnout was reportedly low, and the win was narrow, with the "No" vote leading by less than one percentage point, 50.2 percent to 49.8 percent.
"Today will be remembered by history as the moment Colombia turned its back on what could have been the end of a war that for more than 50 years devastated millions of lives," said Erika Guevara-Rosas, Americas director for rights group Amnesty International. "Even though it was imperfect, the accord was a sure path to peace and justice."
According to TeleSUR:
The surprising results--which went against all exit polls that had the "Yes" vote winning easily--are showing that the areas most affected by the conflict have overwhelmingly voted "Yes" for peace. For example in the heavily affected area of Choco, with 95 percent of the vote counted, 79 percent voted "Yes." The Caribbean provinces have also voted "Yes."
In the capital of Bogota, the "Yes" vote won by 56 percent to 44 percent for the "No" vote.
[...] The "No" vote was led by former president Alvaro Uribe and big landowners who have run the country with impunity for decades. The fear-mongering campaign launched by these forces, with the support ofright-wing media, proved too much for the forces for peace.
On Twitter, journalist and commentator Vijay Prashad also made note of the geographic breakdown:
CNN reported:
Likened to the fallout from the United Kingdom's "Brexit" referendum, the vote's unexpected failure has left the Colombian political classes reeling and unsure how to respond in order to save four years of hard negotiation with the Marxist militia.
Indeed, Reuters quoted one "No" voter who said: "We never thought this could happen. Now I just hope the government, the opposition, and the FARC come up with something intelligent that includes us all."
The BBC reported that "Most of those who voted 'no' said they thought the peace agreement was letting the rebels 'get away with murder'."
But others said that a campaign of fear won the day:
Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos, "[p]utting on a brave face after a major political defeat," as Reuters put it, said Monday that he "won't give up." He sent government negotiators back to Cuba on Monday morning to meet with FARC leaders, and "said he would meet with Colombia's opposition, led by former president and senator Alvaro Uribe, a mortal enemy of the FARC who has gained powerful new leverage over any potential attempt to rewrite the peace deal," the Washington Post reported.
FARC leader Rodrigo Londono (known as "Timochenko") also reiterated a commitment to peace, saying on Sunday: "The FARC reiterates its disposition to use only words as a weapon to build toward the future. To the Colombian people who dream of peace, count on us, peace will triumph."
Both sides said the historic ceasefire, reached in June, would remain in place.