

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
In a blow to environmentalists calling on the Obama administration to keep fossil fuels in the ground, a judge on Tuesday struck down as unlawful the new rule meant to regulate fracking on federal lands.
The decision from Judge Scott Skavdahl of the District Court of Wyoming "is a major loss for the administration, which worked for years to update its oil and natural gas drilling regulations to account for dramatic increases and innovations in fracking," The Hill reports.
The rules released in March 2015 were blasted at the time as "toothless" and "nothing more than a giveaway to the oil and gas industry." But Skavdahl, siding with industry groups and some western states, said the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)—which resides within the federal Department of the Interior—lacked the authority to implement even these loophole-ridden rules.
"Congress has not delegated to the Department of Interior the authority to regulate hydraulic fracturing," Skavdahl wrote in his opinion (pdf), which was published late Tuesday. "The BLM's effort to do so through the Fracking Rule is in excess of its statutory authority and contrary to law."
Previously, Skavdahl placed a temporary injunction on the fracking rule, which remains under the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals review.
And that is where Bill Snape, senior counsel at the Center for Biological Diversity, believes the final determination will be made. Describing Skavdahl's ruling as "illogical" and "absurd," Snape told Common Dreams the fracking rule "will prevail" before the three judges of the 10th Circuit.
"How could it not?" he wondered. "We're just supposed to allow this detrimental act to sully our public lands?"
Lena Moffitt, director of the Sierra Club's Beyond Dirty Fuels campaign, agreed.
"It has been clear all along that the Bureau of Land Management has the authority to safeguard our health and our environment from the dangers of fracking," she said in a statement on Wednesday. "Our hope remains that the full 10th Circuit will continue its review of the case and uphold this rule."
Indeed, in a brief filed to the 10th Circuit just this week, BLM lawyers and their environmental allies argued (pdf) that both "the plain language and history" of federal law grant the agency power over development and environmental protection on federal lands.
Far from being "an unlawful federal power grab," as opponents have argued, the fracking regulations are "simply a long-overdue update of BLM's rules to address the recent hydraulic fracturing boom," the brief states.
The government could appeal Tuesday's ruling.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In a blow to environmentalists calling on the Obama administration to keep fossil fuels in the ground, a judge on Tuesday struck down as unlawful the new rule meant to regulate fracking on federal lands.
The decision from Judge Scott Skavdahl of the District Court of Wyoming "is a major loss for the administration, which worked for years to update its oil and natural gas drilling regulations to account for dramatic increases and innovations in fracking," The Hill reports.
The rules released in March 2015 were blasted at the time as "toothless" and "nothing more than a giveaway to the oil and gas industry." But Skavdahl, siding with industry groups and some western states, said the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)—which resides within the federal Department of the Interior—lacked the authority to implement even these loophole-ridden rules.
"Congress has not delegated to the Department of Interior the authority to regulate hydraulic fracturing," Skavdahl wrote in his opinion (pdf), which was published late Tuesday. "The BLM's effort to do so through the Fracking Rule is in excess of its statutory authority and contrary to law."
Previously, Skavdahl placed a temporary injunction on the fracking rule, which remains under the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals review.
And that is where Bill Snape, senior counsel at the Center for Biological Diversity, believes the final determination will be made. Describing Skavdahl's ruling as "illogical" and "absurd," Snape told Common Dreams the fracking rule "will prevail" before the three judges of the 10th Circuit.
"How could it not?" he wondered. "We're just supposed to allow this detrimental act to sully our public lands?"
Lena Moffitt, director of the Sierra Club's Beyond Dirty Fuels campaign, agreed.
"It has been clear all along that the Bureau of Land Management has the authority to safeguard our health and our environment from the dangers of fracking," she said in a statement on Wednesday. "Our hope remains that the full 10th Circuit will continue its review of the case and uphold this rule."
Indeed, in a brief filed to the 10th Circuit just this week, BLM lawyers and their environmental allies argued (pdf) that both "the plain language and history" of federal law grant the agency power over development and environmental protection on federal lands.
Far from being "an unlawful federal power grab," as opponents have argued, the fracking regulations are "simply a long-overdue update of BLM's rules to address the recent hydraulic fracturing boom," the brief states.
The government could appeal Tuesday's ruling.
In a blow to environmentalists calling on the Obama administration to keep fossil fuels in the ground, a judge on Tuesday struck down as unlawful the new rule meant to regulate fracking on federal lands.
The decision from Judge Scott Skavdahl of the District Court of Wyoming "is a major loss for the administration, which worked for years to update its oil and natural gas drilling regulations to account for dramatic increases and innovations in fracking," The Hill reports.
The rules released in March 2015 were blasted at the time as "toothless" and "nothing more than a giveaway to the oil and gas industry." But Skavdahl, siding with industry groups and some western states, said the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)—which resides within the federal Department of the Interior—lacked the authority to implement even these loophole-ridden rules.
"Congress has not delegated to the Department of Interior the authority to regulate hydraulic fracturing," Skavdahl wrote in his opinion (pdf), which was published late Tuesday. "The BLM's effort to do so through the Fracking Rule is in excess of its statutory authority and contrary to law."
Previously, Skavdahl placed a temporary injunction on the fracking rule, which remains under the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals review.
And that is where Bill Snape, senior counsel at the Center for Biological Diversity, believes the final determination will be made. Describing Skavdahl's ruling as "illogical" and "absurd," Snape told Common Dreams the fracking rule "will prevail" before the three judges of the 10th Circuit.
"How could it not?" he wondered. "We're just supposed to allow this detrimental act to sully our public lands?"
Lena Moffitt, director of the Sierra Club's Beyond Dirty Fuels campaign, agreed.
"It has been clear all along that the Bureau of Land Management has the authority to safeguard our health and our environment from the dangers of fracking," she said in a statement on Wednesday. "Our hope remains that the full 10th Circuit will continue its review of the case and uphold this rule."
Indeed, in a brief filed to the 10th Circuit just this week, BLM lawyers and their environmental allies argued (pdf) that both "the plain language and history" of federal law grant the agency power over development and environmental protection on federal lands.
Far from being "an unlawful federal power grab," as opponents have argued, the fracking regulations are "simply a long-overdue update of BLM's rules to address the recent hydraulic fracturing boom," the brief states.
The government could appeal Tuesday's ruling.