SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
NY Sen. Gillibrand Assures Voters Clinton Will Release Wall St. Transcripts 'At the Appropriate Time'
Senator and campaign surrogate says Clinton 'cares deeply about openness and transparency'
Apr 15, 2016
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) said Friday that she believes Hillary Clinton will release the transcripts of her paid speeches to Wall Street firms "at the appropriate time."
As it did during Thursday evening's presidential debate, the content of the speeches Clinton has given--including three to Goldman Sachs totaling $675,000--has come under scrutiny during the campaign, with rival Bernie Sanders pointing to them to say she's too closely aligned with the big banks to be able to enact true Wall Street reform. Clinton, for her part, once laughed after being asked if she'd release the transcripts and has defended the amount, saying, "That's what [Goldman Sachs] offered," and said she'd release them if her Republican rivals did as well.
Gillibrand, a staunch Clinton supporter, gave a different message in speaking to CNN's Chris Cuomo.
Asked if she would release them if she were in the same position and if Clinton should release the transcripts, Gillibrand said, "I think she will. I think she's been clear that she's going to, and yes, I would." She added, "I like transparency and accountability, and I know Hillary does as well."
"I think she cares deeply about openness and transparency, and I think she will release those speeches at the appropriate time," Gillibrand said.
That wasn't how Clinton addressed the issue Thursday.
Pressed by debate moderator CNN's Dana Bash why the former secretary of state wouldn't just "put the issue to bed" by releasing the transcripts, Clinton responded, "There are certain expectations when you run for president. This is a new one, and I've said, if everybody agrees to do it--because there are speeches for money on the other side, I know that."
"When everybody does it, OK, I will do it," she said.
However, the Wall Street Journal reported, Sanders did not point to a specific example of Wall Street money corrupting Clinton's politics, something his campaign sought to address in media appearances on Friday. As Politico reported:
The Sanders campaign, meanwhile, conceded that its candidate could have been more direct in addressing whether money from Wall Street and other interests has tainted Clinton's judgment and credibility.
"Well, I suppose he could have," senior adviser Tad Devine told MSNBC's "Andrea Mitchell Reports." "There's a lot of issues he hasn't really gone nearly as hard as he could."
In particular, Devine pointed to Clinton's 2001 vote as a senator for the Bankruptcy Reform Act as one possible instance, after she opposed it as first lady.
Clinton has explained the vote as one she changed at the insistence of then-Sen. Joe Biden. When Mitchell made that point, Devine mused, "She also received enormous contributions from the financial industry, too."
Also on Friday, the Sanders campaign released a new campaign ad, with the narrator saying, "Wall Street banks shower Washington politicians with campaign contributions and speaking fees. And what do they get for it? A rigged economy, tax breaks and bailouts."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) said Friday that she believes Hillary Clinton will release the transcripts of her paid speeches to Wall Street firms "at the appropriate time."
As it did during Thursday evening's presidential debate, the content of the speeches Clinton has given--including three to Goldman Sachs totaling $675,000--has come under scrutiny during the campaign, with rival Bernie Sanders pointing to them to say she's too closely aligned with the big banks to be able to enact true Wall Street reform. Clinton, for her part, once laughed after being asked if she'd release the transcripts and has defended the amount, saying, "That's what [Goldman Sachs] offered," and said she'd release them if her Republican rivals did as well.
Gillibrand, a staunch Clinton supporter, gave a different message in speaking to CNN's Chris Cuomo.
Asked if she would release them if she were in the same position and if Clinton should release the transcripts, Gillibrand said, "I think she will. I think she's been clear that she's going to, and yes, I would." She added, "I like transparency and accountability, and I know Hillary does as well."
"I think she cares deeply about openness and transparency, and I think she will release those speeches at the appropriate time," Gillibrand said.
That wasn't how Clinton addressed the issue Thursday.
Pressed by debate moderator CNN's Dana Bash why the former secretary of state wouldn't just "put the issue to bed" by releasing the transcripts, Clinton responded, "There are certain expectations when you run for president. This is a new one, and I've said, if everybody agrees to do it--because there are speeches for money on the other side, I know that."
"When everybody does it, OK, I will do it," she said.
However, the Wall Street Journal reported, Sanders did not point to a specific example of Wall Street money corrupting Clinton's politics, something his campaign sought to address in media appearances on Friday. As Politico reported:
The Sanders campaign, meanwhile, conceded that its candidate could have been more direct in addressing whether money from Wall Street and other interests has tainted Clinton's judgment and credibility.
"Well, I suppose he could have," senior adviser Tad Devine told MSNBC's "Andrea Mitchell Reports." "There's a lot of issues he hasn't really gone nearly as hard as he could."
In particular, Devine pointed to Clinton's 2001 vote as a senator for the Bankruptcy Reform Act as one possible instance, after she opposed it as first lady.
Clinton has explained the vote as one she changed at the insistence of then-Sen. Joe Biden. When Mitchell made that point, Devine mused, "She also received enormous contributions from the financial industry, too."
Also on Friday, the Sanders campaign released a new campaign ad, with the narrator saying, "Wall Street banks shower Washington politicians with campaign contributions and speaking fees. And what do they get for it? A rigged economy, tax breaks and bailouts."
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) said Friday that she believes Hillary Clinton will release the transcripts of her paid speeches to Wall Street firms "at the appropriate time."
As it did during Thursday evening's presidential debate, the content of the speeches Clinton has given--including three to Goldman Sachs totaling $675,000--has come under scrutiny during the campaign, with rival Bernie Sanders pointing to them to say she's too closely aligned with the big banks to be able to enact true Wall Street reform. Clinton, for her part, once laughed after being asked if she'd release the transcripts and has defended the amount, saying, "That's what [Goldman Sachs] offered," and said she'd release them if her Republican rivals did as well.
Gillibrand, a staunch Clinton supporter, gave a different message in speaking to CNN's Chris Cuomo.
Asked if she would release them if she were in the same position and if Clinton should release the transcripts, Gillibrand said, "I think she will. I think she's been clear that she's going to, and yes, I would." She added, "I like transparency and accountability, and I know Hillary does as well."
"I think she cares deeply about openness and transparency, and I think she will release those speeches at the appropriate time," Gillibrand said.
That wasn't how Clinton addressed the issue Thursday.
Pressed by debate moderator CNN's Dana Bash why the former secretary of state wouldn't just "put the issue to bed" by releasing the transcripts, Clinton responded, "There are certain expectations when you run for president. This is a new one, and I've said, if everybody agrees to do it--because there are speeches for money on the other side, I know that."
"When everybody does it, OK, I will do it," she said.
However, the Wall Street Journal reported, Sanders did not point to a specific example of Wall Street money corrupting Clinton's politics, something his campaign sought to address in media appearances on Friday. As Politico reported:
The Sanders campaign, meanwhile, conceded that its candidate could have been more direct in addressing whether money from Wall Street and other interests has tainted Clinton's judgment and credibility.
"Well, I suppose he could have," senior adviser Tad Devine told MSNBC's "Andrea Mitchell Reports." "There's a lot of issues he hasn't really gone nearly as hard as he could."
In particular, Devine pointed to Clinton's 2001 vote as a senator for the Bankruptcy Reform Act as one possible instance, after she opposed it as first lady.
Clinton has explained the vote as one she changed at the insistence of then-Sen. Joe Biden. When Mitchell made that point, Devine mused, "She also received enormous contributions from the financial industry, too."
Also on Friday, the Sanders campaign released a new campaign ad, with the narrator saying, "Wall Street banks shower Washington politicians with campaign contributions and speaking fees. And what do they get for it? A rigged economy, tax breaks and bailouts."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.