Kids to Candidates: Debate Climate Science!
'We think the candidates for president should be debating science, tech, health and environmental issues on TV, so that voters know where they stand.'
Just hours before Republican presidential candidates gear up for their latest televised debate, a campaign led by kids are demanding they talk about an issue they say has so far gotten the short shrift: climate change.
"Given the many urgent scientific and technological challenges facing America and the rest of the world, the increasing need for accurate scientific information in political decision making, and the vital role scientific innovation plays in spurring economic growth and competitiveness, we call for public debates in which the U.S. presidential and congressional candidates share their views on the issues of science and technology policy, health and medicine, and the environment," the campaign, organized by ScienceDebate.org, stated in a press release earlier this week.
A recent national poll conducted by ScienceDebate.org and medical research advocacy group Research!America found that 87 percent of likely voters think the presidential candidates should be "well versed on science issues."
According to Shawn Otto, chair of ScienceDebate.org, those issues include, among others:
- Do you support recent efforts to prosecute energy companies for funding denial of climate science?
- What steps will you take to stop pollinator die-offs?
- What will you do to slow the sixth mass extinction?
- How should we balance privacy with freedom and security on the Internet?
- Should we deploy artificially intelligent robots in war zones?
As the campaign's website explains, "We think the candidates for president should be debating science, tech, health and environmental issues on TV, so that voters know where they stand."
Watch ScienceDebate.org's youthful ad below:
Last week, a separate poll by Monmouth University found that a majority of Americans, across all political parties, believe in climate change and want the government to take action on it. Meanwhile, a USA Today/Rock the Vote survey released Monday found that "[p]eople between ages 18 and 34 overwhelmingly (80 percent) favor a rapid transition to clean or renewable energy by 2030 and by a ratio of more than 2-1 say the government should invest in more public transportation."
The year's first Republican debate will air Thursday night. Previous GOP debates have barely touched on the issue of climate change.
While it remains to be seen what questions moderators are preparing, Politico expects that the candidates are less likely to tackle scientific policy and more likely to be "bracing themselves for a circular firing squad" as they vie for frontrunner status.
Politico's Alex Isenstadt writes:
Fox Business's November debate was a wonkfest -- a policy-packed two-hour program full of questions about economic matters and foreign affairs.
Those who've spoken with the network about its plans say they're expecting much the same this time around. (One campaign adviser joked that reporters might even be bored.)
The next Democratic debate is scheduled for January 17. Previous go-rounds have included a focus on climate change, though the debates themselves earned low viewership.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Just hours before Republican presidential candidates gear up for their latest televised debate, a campaign led by kids are demanding they talk about an issue they say has so far gotten the short shrift: climate change.
"Given the many urgent scientific and technological challenges facing America and the rest of the world, the increasing need for accurate scientific information in political decision making, and the vital role scientific innovation plays in spurring economic growth and competitiveness, we call for public debates in which the U.S. presidential and congressional candidates share their views on the issues of science and technology policy, health and medicine, and the environment," the campaign, organized by ScienceDebate.org, stated in a press release earlier this week.
A recent national poll conducted by ScienceDebate.org and medical research advocacy group Research!America found that 87 percent of likely voters think the presidential candidates should be "well versed on science issues."
According to Shawn Otto, chair of ScienceDebate.org, those issues include, among others:
- Do you support recent efforts to prosecute energy companies for funding denial of climate science?
- What steps will you take to stop pollinator die-offs?
- What will you do to slow the sixth mass extinction?
- How should we balance privacy with freedom and security on the Internet?
- Should we deploy artificially intelligent robots in war zones?
As the campaign's website explains, "We think the candidates for president should be debating science, tech, health and environmental issues on TV, so that voters know where they stand."
Watch ScienceDebate.org's youthful ad below:
Last week, a separate poll by Monmouth University found that a majority of Americans, across all political parties, believe in climate change and want the government to take action on it. Meanwhile, a USA Today/Rock the Vote survey released Monday found that "[p]eople between ages 18 and 34 overwhelmingly (80 percent) favor a rapid transition to clean or renewable energy by 2030 and by a ratio of more than 2-1 say the government should invest in more public transportation."
The year's first Republican debate will air Thursday night. Previous GOP debates have barely touched on the issue of climate change.
While it remains to be seen what questions moderators are preparing, Politico expects that the candidates are less likely to tackle scientific policy and more likely to be "bracing themselves for a circular firing squad" as they vie for frontrunner status.
Politico's Alex Isenstadt writes:
Fox Business's November debate was a wonkfest -- a policy-packed two-hour program full of questions about economic matters and foreign affairs.
Those who've spoken with the network about its plans say they're expecting much the same this time around. (One campaign adviser joked that reporters might even be bored.)
The next Democratic debate is scheduled for January 17. Previous go-rounds have included a focus on climate change, though the debates themselves earned low viewership.
Just hours before Republican presidential candidates gear up for their latest televised debate, a campaign led by kids are demanding they talk about an issue they say has so far gotten the short shrift: climate change.
"Given the many urgent scientific and technological challenges facing America and the rest of the world, the increasing need for accurate scientific information in political decision making, and the vital role scientific innovation plays in spurring economic growth and competitiveness, we call for public debates in which the U.S. presidential and congressional candidates share their views on the issues of science and technology policy, health and medicine, and the environment," the campaign, organized by ScienceDebate.org, stated in a press release earlier this week.
A recent national poll conducted by ScienceDebate.org and medical research advocacy group Research!America found that 87 percent of likely voters think the presidential candidates should be "well versed on science issues."
According to Shawn Otto, chair of ScienceDebate.org, those issues include, among others:
- Do you support recent efforts to prosecute energy companies for funding denial of climate science?
- What steps will you take to stop pollinator die-offs?
- What will you do to slow the sixth mass extinction?
- How should we balance privacy with freedom and security on the Internet?
- Should we deploy artificially intelligent robots in war zones?
As the campaign's website explains, "We think the candidates for president should be debating science, tech, health and environmental issues on TV, so that voters know where they stand."
Watch ScienceDebate.org's youthful ad below:
Last week, a separate poll by Monmouth University found that a majority of Americans, across all political parties, believe in climate change and want the government to take action on it. Meanwhile, a USA Today/Rock the Vote survey released Monday found that "[p]eople between ages 18 and 34 overwhelmingly (80 percent) favor a rapid transition to clean or renewable energy by 2030 and by a ratio of more than 2-1 say the government should invest in more public transportation."
The year's first Republican debate will air Thursday night. Previous GOP debates have barely touched on the issue of climate change.
While it remains to be seen what questions moderators are preparing, Politico expects that the candidates are less likely to tackle scientific policy and more likely to be "bracing themselves for a circular firing squad" as they vie for frontrunner status.
Politico's Alex Isenstadt writes:
Fox Business's November debate was a wonkfest -- a policy-packed two-hour program full of questions about economic matters and foreign affairs.
Those who've spoken with the network about its plans say they're expecting much the same this time around. (One campaign adviser joked that reporters might even be bored.)
The next Democratic debate is scheduled for January 17. Previous go-rounds have included a focus on climate change, though the debates themselves earned low viewership.