

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Just hours before Republican presidential candidates gear up for their latest televised debate, a campaign led by kids are demanding they talk about an issue they say has so far gotten the short shrift: climate change.
"Given the many urgent scientific and technological challenges facing America and the rest of the world, the increasing need for accurate scientific information in political decision making, and the vital role scientific innovation plays in spurring economic growth and competitiveness, we call for public debates in which the U.S. presidential and congressional candidates share their views on the issues of science and technology policy, health and medicine, and the environment," the campaign, organized by ScienceDebate.org, stated in a press release earlier this week.
A recent national poll conducted by ScienceDebate.org and medical research advocacy group Research!America found that 87 percent of likely voters think the presidential candidates should be "well versed on science issues."
According to Shawn Otto, chair of ScienceDebate.org, those issues include, among others:
As the campaign's website explains, "We think the candidates for president should be debating science, tech, health and environmental issues on TV, so that voters know where they stand."
Watch ScienceDebate.org's youthful ad below:
Last week, a separate poll by Monmouth University found that a majority of Americans, across all political parties, believe in climate change and want the government to take action on it. Meanwhile, a USA Today/Rock the Vote survey released Monday found that "[p]eople between ages 18 and 34 overwhelmingly (80 percent) favor a rapid transition to clean or renewable energy by 2030 and by a ratio of more than 2-1 say the government should invest in more public transportation."
The year's first Republican debate will air Thursday night. Previous GOP debates have barely touched on the issue of climate change.
While it remains to be seen what questions moderators are preparing, Politico expects that the candidates are less likely to tackle scientific policy and more likely to be "bracing themselves for a circular firing squad" as they vie for frontrunner status.
Politico's Alex Isenstadt writes:
Fox Business's November debate was a wonkfest -- a policy-packed two-hour program full of questions about economic matters and foreign affairs.
Those who've spoken with the network about its plans say they're expecting much the same this time around. (One campaign adviser joked that reporters might even be bored.)
The next Democratic debate is scheduled for January 17. Previous go-rounds have included a focus on climate change, though the debates themselves earned low viewership.
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Just hours before Republican presidential candidates gear up for their latest televised debate, a campaign led by kids are demanding they talk about an issue they say has so far gotten the short shrift: climate change.
"Given the many urgent scientific and technological challenges facing America and the rest of the world, the increasing need for accurate scientific information in political decision making, and the vital role scientific innovation plays in spurring economic growth and competitiveness, we call for public debates in which the U.S. presidential and congressional candidates share their views on the issues of science and technology policy, health and medicine, and the environment," the campaign, organized by ScienceDebate.org, stated in a press release earlier this week.
A recent national poll conducted by ScienceDebate.org and medical research advocacy group Research!America found that 87 percent of likely voters think the presidential candidates should be "well versed on science issues."
According to Shawn Otto, chair of ScienceDebate.org, those issues include, among others:
As the campaign's website explains, "We think the candidates for president should be debating science, tech, health and environmental issues on TV, so that voters know where they stand."
Watch ScienceDebate.org's youthful ad below:
Last week, a separate poll by Monmouth University found that a majority of Americans, across all political parties, believe in climate change and want the government to take action on it. Meanwhile, a USA Today/Rock the Vote survey released Monday found that "[p]eople between ages 18 and 34 overwhelmingly (80 percent) favor a rapid transition to clean or renewable energy by 2030 and by a ratio of more than 2-1 say the government should invest in more public transportation."
The year's first Republican debate will air Thursday night. Previous GOP debates have barely touched on the issue of climate change.
While it remains to be seen what questions moderators are preparing, Politico expects that the candidates are less likely to tackle scientific policy and more likely to be "bracing themselves for a circular firing squad" as they vie for frontrunner status.
Politico's Alex Isenstadt writes:
Fox Business's November debate was a wonkfest -- a policy-packed two-hour program full of questions about economic matters and foreign affairs.
Those who've spoken with the network about its plans say they're expecting much the same this time around. (One campaign adviser joked that reporters might even be bored.)
The next Democratic debate is scheduled for January 17. Previous go-rounds have included a focus on climate change, though the debates themselves earned low viewership.
Just hours before Republican presidential candidates gear up for their latest televised debate, a campaign led by kids are demanding they talk about an issue they say has so far gotten the short shrift: climate change.
"Given the many urgent scientific and technological challenges facing America and the rest of the world, the increasing need for accurate scientific information in political decision making, and the vital role scientific innovation plays in spurring economic growth and competitiveness, we call for public debates in which the U.S. presidential and congressional candidates share their views on the issues of science and technology policy, health and medicine, and the environment," the campaign, organized by ScienceDebate.org, stated in a press release earlier this week.
A recent national poll conducted by ScienceDebate.org and medical research advocacy group Research!America found that 87 percent of likely voters think the presidential candidates should be "well versed on science issues."
According to Shawn Otto, chair of ScienceDebate.org, those issues include, among others:
As the campaign's website explains, "We think the candidates for president should be debating science, tech, health and environmental issues on TV, so that voters know where they stand."
Watch ScienceDebate.org's youthful ad below:
Last week, a separate poll by Monmouth University found that a majority of Americans, across all political parties, believe in climate change and want the government to take action on it. Meanwhile, a USA Today/Rock the Vote survey released Monday found that "[p]eople between ages 18 and 34 overwhelmingly (80 percent) favor a rapid transition to clean or renewable energy by 2030 and by a ratio of more than 2-1 say the government should invest in more public transportation."
The year's first Republican debate will air Thursday night. Previous GOP debates have barely touched on the issue of climate change.
While it remains to be seen what questions moderators are preparing, Politico expects that the candidates are less likely to tackle scientific policy and more likely to be "bracing themselves for a circular firing squad" as they vie for frontrunner status.
Politico's Alex Isenstadt writes:
Fox Business's November debate was a wonkfest -- a policy-packed two-hour program full of questions about economic matters and foreign affairs.
Those who've spoken with the network about its plans say they're expecting much the same this time around. (One campaign adviser joked that reporters might even be bored.)
The next Democratic debate is scheduled for January 17. Previous go-rounds have included a focus on climate change, though the debates themselves earned low viewership.