SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Bernie Sanders Just Made Presidential Campaign Contribution History
Sanders campaign just beat record held by President Barack Obama in 2011 in his bid for re-election.
Dec 20, 2015
The Bernie Sanders campaign announced Sunday that it "reached a major milestone in grassroots financial support" during the third Democratic presidential debate.
A statement on the campaign's website says the campaign has received over 2.3 million contributions. That means Sanders now holds the record for the highest number of contributions for a White House bid, breaking the record held by President Barack Obama in 2011.
The statement adds that "grassroots supporters flooded" the campaign site during the debate, with the average contribution amount below $25.
Last week, when his campaign surpassed the 2 million contribution mark, the Vermont senator praised the "People Power" supporting it, saying, "You can't level the playing field with Wall Street banks and billionaires by taking their money."
The campaign also claimed victory for "winning social media" during the debate against his rivals, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and former Gov. Martin O'Malley of Maryland.
Sanders' performance also got a nod from NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, who tweeted during the debate:
Some observers pointed to the absence of climate change from the debate. 350.org co-founder Bill McKibben tweeted:
While climate change wasn't mentioned, as one Huffington Post reporter points out, the debate moderators did make time to ask the candidates what role their spouses would play in the White House.
In addition to facing criticism for placing "its thumb on the scales in support of Hillary Clinton's campaign," the Democratic National Committee (DNC) has faced criticism over the number and timing of the Democratic debates--an issue stressed after this latest square-off by The Nation's John Nichols:
The DNC needs to schedule more debates on more nights when more Americans are watching.
That's good for Democrats. And that's good for democracy--especially in what is shaping up as an entirely unpredictable and frequently volatile political season that ought not be dominated by one party. As Lis Smith says, "It's clear we need to open up the process, have more debates, and engage more voters in this process."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
350.orgbarack obamabernie sanderscampaign financedemocratic national committeeelection 2016hillary clintonjohn nicholsmartin omalleynsapeople power
The Bernie Sanders campaign announced Sunday that it "reached a major milestone in grassroots financial support" during the third Democratic presidential debate.
A statement on the campaign's website says the campaign has received over 2.3 million contributions. That means Sanders now holds the record for the highest number of contributions for a White House bid, breaking the record held by President Barack Obama in 2011.
The statement adds that "grassroots supporters flooded" the campaign site during the debate, with the average contribution amount below $25.
Last week, when his campaign surpassed the 2 million contribution mark, the Vermont senator praised the "People Power" supporting it, saying, "You can't level the playing field with Wall Street banks and billionaires by taking their money."
The campaign also claimed victory for "winning social media" during the debate against his rivals, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and former Gov. Martin O'Malley of Maryland.
Sanders' performance also got a nod from NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, who tweeted during the debate:
Some observers pointed to the absence of climate change from the debate. 350.org co-founder Bill McKibben tweeted:
While climate change wasn't mentioned, as one Huffington Post reporter points out, the debate moderators did make time to ask the candidates what role their spouses would play in the White House.
In addition to facing criticism for placing "its thumb on the scales in support of Hillary Clinton's campaign," the Democratic National Committee (DNC) has faced criticism over the number and timing of the Democratic debates--an issue stressed after this latest square-off by The Nation's John Nichols:
The DNC needs to schedule more debates on more nights when more Americans are watching.
That's good for Democrats. And that's good for democracy--especially in what is shaping up as an entirely unpredictable and frequently volatile political season that ought not be dominated by one party. As Lis Smith says, "It's clear we need to open up the process, have more debates, and engage more voters in this process."
The Bernie Sanders campaign announced Sunday that it "reached a major milestone in grassroots financial support" during the third Democratic presidential debate.
A statement on the campaign's website says the campaign has received over 2.3 million contributions. That means Sanders now holds the record for the highest number of contributions for a White House bid, breaking the record held by President Barack Obama in 2011.
The statement adds that "grassroots supporters flooded" the campaign site during the debate, with the average contribution amount below $25.
Last week, when his campaign surpassed the 2 million contribution mark, the Vermont senator praised the "People Power" supporting it, saying, "You can't level the playing field with Wall Street banks and billionaires by taking their money."
The campaign also claimed victory for "winning social media" during the debate against his rivals, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and former Gov. Martin O'Malley of Maryland.
Sanders' performance also got a nod from NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, who tweeted during the debate:
Some observers pointed to the absence of climate change from the debate. 350.org co-founder Bill McKibben tweeted:
While climate change wasn't mentioned, as one Huffington Post reporter points out, the debate moderators did make time to ask the candidates what role their spouses would play in the White House.
In addition to facing criticism for placing "its thumb on the scales in support of Hillary Clinton's campaign," the Democratic National Committee (DNC) has faced criticism over the number and timing of the Democratic debates--an issue stressed after this latest square-off by The Nation's John Nichols:
The DNC needs to schedule more debates on more nights when more Americans are watching.
That's good for Democrats. And that's good for democracy--especially in what is shaping up as an entirely unpredictable and frequently volatile political season that ought not be dominated by one party. As Lis Smith says, "It's clear we need to open up the process, have more debates, and engage more voters in this process."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy