

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Update (1:20 pm EST)
The Democratic National Committee's (DNC) decision to suspend Sen. Bernie Sanders's presidential campaign's access to a crucial voter database after a software glitch is an "inappropriate overreaction" that shows "the leadership of the DNC is now actively attempting to undermine our campaign," a top staffer said in a press conference Friday afternoon.
Sanders' campaign manager, Jeff Weaver, said that by freezing the campaign's access to voter data, the national party apparatus is essentially "taking our campaign hostage."
He said it was "impossible to mobilize the kind of grassroots campaign we have without that data."
If the DNC does not restore access immediately, Weaver said the Sanders camp will take the party to federal court on Friday afternoon.
"They are not going to sabotage our campaign," Weaver said.
Earlier...
Critics are angry that the Democratic National Committee (DNC) suspended Sen. Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign's access to a crucial voter database just weeks before the first Democratic caucuses.
The penalty stems from a software error that allowed a Sanders staffer to access confidential voter information gathered by Hillary Clinton's rival campaign, according to the Washington Post, which first reported the incident late Thursday. The Sanders campaign said the staffer has since been fired.
The Post explained:
The DNC maintains the master list and rents it to national and state campaigns, which then add their own, proprietary information gathered by field workers and volunteers. Firewalls are supposed to prevent campaigns from viewing data gathered by their rivals.
NGP VAN, the vendor that handles the master file, said the incident occurred Wednesday while a patch was being applied to the software. The process briefly opened a window into proprietary information from other campaigns, said the company's chief, Stu Trevelyan. He said a full audit will be conducted.
The DNC has reportedly told the Sanders campaign that access to the data will not be allowed again until it provides an explanation for how the breach occurred and assures that all Clinton data has been destroyed.
The timing couldn't be worse. As the Guardian noted, the move "functionally halts [the campaign's] field operation."
Already, a MoveOn.org petition calling on DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz to immediately reinstate the Sanders campaign's access to the 50-state voter file has gathered more than 85,000 signatures. With the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary less than two months away, the petition reads, "Shutting down Sanders' tools to reach voters is an infringement on democracy. "
It also reeks of favoritism, some charged, coming on the heels of a big day for the Sanders campaign, in which it announced two major endorsements and a historic fundraising milestone.
Sanders campaign manager Jeff Weaver told the Post that staffers "never downloaded or printed any of the data, meaning it is no longer in possession of any proprietary information. "
Weaver blamed NGP VAN and criticized the DNC for hiring the company, saying the Sanders campaign had flagged similar problems with the DNC's software in the past.
CNN spoke with the fired staffer--national data director Josh Uretsky--who said the breach was an attempt to "understand how badly the Sanders campaign's data was exposed" by the software error.
"We knew there was a security breach in the data, and we were just trying to understand it and what was happening," Uretsky told CNN.
The incident comes amid criticism that the number and timing of the Democratic primary debates—another of which is taking place this Saturday evening, six days before Christmas—are giving an advantage to establishment candidate Hillary Clinton.
As Frank Bruni wrote of the debate schedule in the New York Times on Friday: "It smacks of special treatment, and Clinton, who set up her own home-brewed email account as secretary of state, can't afford to keep giving voters the impression that normal rules don't apply to her."
The bottom line, columnist Greg Sargent said in an op-ed Friday, is that the DNC should restore Sanders' access to voter data as quickly as possible: "This is no way to maintain confidence in the integrity of the primary process."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Update (1:20 pm EST)
The Democratic National Committee's (DNC) decision to suspend Sen. Bernie Sanders's presidential campaign's access to a crucial voter database after a software glitch is an "inappropriate overreaction" that shows "the leadership of the DNC is now actively attempting to undermine our campaign," a top staffer said in a press conference Friday afternoon.
Sanders' campaign manager, Jeff Weaver, said that by freezing the campaign's access to voter data, the national party apparatus is essentially "taking our campaign hostage."
He said it was "impossible to mobilize the kind of grassroots campaign we have without that data."
If the DNC does not restore access immediately, Weaver said the Sanders camp will take the party to federal court on Friday afternoon.
"They are not going to sabotage our campaign," Weaver said.
Earlier...
Critics are angry that the Democratic National Committee (DNC) suspended Sen. Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign's access to a crucial voter database just weeks before the first Democratic caucuses.
The penalty stems from a software error that allowed a Sanders staffer to access confidential voter information gathered by Hillary Clinton's rival campaign, according to the Washington Post, which first reported the incident late Thursday. The Sanders campaign said the staffer has since been fired.
The Post explained:
The DNC maintains the master list and rents it to national and state campaigns, which then add their own, proprietary information gathered by field workers and volunteers. Firewalls are supposed to prevent campaigns from viewing data gathered by their rivals.
NGP VAN, the vendor that handles the master file, said the incident occurred Wednesday while a patch was being applied to the software. The process briefly opened a window into proprietary information from other campaigns, said the company's chief, Stu Trevelyan. He said a full audit will be conducted.
The DNC has reportedly told the Sanders campaign that access to the data will not be allowed again until it provides an explanation for how the breach occurred and assures that all Clinton data has been destroyed.
The timing couldn't be worse. As the Guardian noted, the move "functionally halts [the campaign's] field operation."
Already, a MoveOn.org petition calling on DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz to immediately reinstate the Sanders campaign's access to the 50-state voter file has gathered more than 85,000 signatures. With the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary less than two months away, the petition reads, "Shutting down Sanders' tools to reach voters is an infringement on democracy. "
It also reeks of favoritism, some charged, coming on the heels of a big day for the Sanders campaign, in which it announced two major endorsements and a historic fundraising milestone.
Sanders campaign manager Jeff Weaver told the Post that staffers "never downloaded or printed any of the data, meaning it is no longer in possession of any proprietary information. "
Weaver blamed NGP VAN and criticized the DNC for hiring the company, saying the Sanders campaign had flagged similar problems with the DNC's software in the past.
CNN spoke with the fired staffer--national data director Josh Uretsky--who said the breach was an attempt to "understand how badly the Sanders campaign's data was exposed" by the software error.
"We knew there was a security breach in the data, and we were just trying to understand it and what was happening," Uretsky told CNN.
The incident comes amid criticism that the number and timing of the Democratic primary debates—another of which is taking place this Saturday evening, six days before Christmas—are giving an advantage to establishment candidate Hillary Clinton.
As Frank Bruni wrote of the debate schedule in the New York Times on Friday: "It smacks of special treatment, and Clinton, who set up her own home-brewed email account as secretary of state, can't afford to keep giving voters the impression that normal rules don't apply to her."
The bottom line, columnist Greg Sargent said in an op-ed Friday, is that the DNC should restore Sanders' access to voter data as quickly as possible: "This is no way to maintain confidence in the integrity of the primary process."
Update (1:20 pm EST)
The Democratic National Committee's (DNC) decision to suspend Sen. Bernie Sanders's presidential campaign's access to a crucial voter database after a software glitch is an "inappropriate overreaction" that shows "the leadership of the DNC is now actively attempting to undermine our campaign," a top staffer said in a press conference Friday afternoon.
Sanders' campaign manager, Jeff Weaver, said that by freezing the campaign's access to voter data, the national party apparatus is essentially "taking our campaign hostage."
He said it was "impossible to mobilize the kind of grassroots campaign we have without that data."
If the DNC does not restore access immediately, Weaver said the Sanders camp will take the party to federal court on Friday afternoon.
"They are not going to sabotage our campaign," Weaver said.
Earlier...
Critics are angry that the Democratic National Committee (DNC) suspended Sen. Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign's access to a crucial voter database just weeks before the first Democratic caucuses.
The penalty stems from a software error that allowed a Sanders staffer to access confidential voter information gathered by Hillary Clinton's rival campaign, according to the Washington Post, which first reported the incident late Thursday. The Sanders campaign said the staffer has since been fired.
The Post explained:
The DNC maintains the master list and rents it to national and state campaigns, which then add their own, proprietary information gathered by field workers and volunteers. Firewalls are supposed to prevent campaigns from viewing data gathered by their rivals.
NGP VAN, the vendor that handles the master file, said the incident occurred Wednesday while a patch was being applied to the software. The process briefly opened a window into proprietary information from other campaigns, said the company's chief, Stu Trevelyan. He said a full audit will be conducted.
The DNC has reportedly told the Sanders campaign that access to the data will not be allowed again until it provides an explanation for how the breach occurred and assures that all Clinton data has been destroyed.
The timing couldn't be worse. As the Guardian noted, the move "functionally halts [the campaign's] field operation."
Already, a MoveOn.org petition calling on DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz to immediately reinstate the Sanders campaign's access to the 50-state voter file has gathered more than 85,000 signatures. With the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary less than two months away, the petition reads, "Shutting down Sanders' tools to reach voters is an infringement on democracy. "
It also reeks of favoritism, some charged, coming on the heels of a big day for the Sanders campaign, in which it announced two major endorsements and a historic fundraising milestone.
Sanders campaign manager Jeff Weaver told the Post that staffers "never downloaded or printed any of the data, meaning it is no longer in possession of any proprietary information. "
Weaver blamed NGP VAN and criticized the DNC for hiring the company, saying the Sanders campaign had flagged similar problems with the DNC's software in the past.
CNN spoke with the fired staffer--national data director Josh Uretsky--who said the breach was an attempt to "understand how badly the Sanders campaign's data was exposed" by the software error.
"We knew there was a security breach in the data, and we were just trying to understand it and what was happening," Uretsky told CNN.
The incident comes amid criticism that the number and timing of the Democratic primary debates—another of which is taking place this Saturday evening, six days before Christmas—are giving an advantage to establishment candidate Hillary Clinton.
As Frank Bruni wrote of the debate schedule in the New York Times on Friday: "It smacks of special treatment, and Clinton, who set up her own home-brewed email account as secretary of state, can't afford to keep giving voters the impression that normal rules don't apply to her."
The bottom line, columnist Greg Sargent said in an op-ed Friday, is that the DNC should restore Sanders' access to voter data as quickly as possible: "This is no way to maintain confidence in the integrity of the primary process."