

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
In what could be a huge gain for environmental justice, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed on Friday a ban on an agricultural pesticide linked to brain damage problems in children as well as harm to workers and communities.
The announcement on the pesticide, chlorpyrifos, comes a day ahead of the Oct. 31 deadline issued (pdf) by a federal court of appeals directing the EPA to act on a 2007 petition from Pesticide Action Network (PAN) and Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) to ban the chemical, and comes 15 years after the agency banned its residential use.
"This is what we have been seeking for years," said Patti Goldman, the Earthjustice attorney handling the case.
As PAN explains, "chlorpyrifos is an organophosphate pesticide known for its damaging effects on the human nervous system."
"[U]sed in the production of fruits and vegetables throughout the U.S., chlorpyrifos has been widely studied for its neurodevelopmental effects on children," PAN adds.
Jennifer Sass previously wrote at NRDC's Switchboard blog:
Organophosphate pesticides like chlorpyrifos were developed as nerve agents in World War II and adapted for use as insecticides after the war. It should come as no surprise that a chemical developed as a nerve agents would have deleterious effects on people who come into contact with it when it is used as an insecticide.
"EPA's own findings show that chlorpyrifos causes brain damage to children and poisons workers and bystanders," Goldman's statement adds, while Virginia Ruiz of Farmworker Justice hailed the proposal as "a step forward on the path to environmental justice."
"Farmworkers and their families, who are predominantly poor and majority people of color, bear the brunt of poisonings from pesticides and pesticide drift," Ruiz noted.
The Associated Press reports that the EPA will take public comment on the proposal for two months, and is expected to issue a final rule in 2016.
Veena Singla Blog writes at Switchboard Friday, "If the proposal becomes a reality, it would be a huge victory, and provide agricultural communities the protections they deserve and have been denied for too long."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In what could be a huge gain for environmental justice, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed on Friday a ban on an agricultural pesticide linked to brain damage problems in children as well as harm to workers and communities.
The announcement on the pesticide, chlorpyrifos, comes a day ahead of the Oct. 31 deadline issued (pdf) by a federal court of appeals directing the EPA to act on a 2007 petition from Pesticide Action Network (PAN) and Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) to ban the chemical, and comes 15 years after the agency banned its residential use.
"This is what we have been seeking for years," said Patti Goldman, the Earthjustice attorney handling the case.
As PAN explains, "chlorpyrifos is an organophosphate pesticide known for its damaging effects on the human nervous system."
"[U]sed in the production of fruits and vegetables throughout the U.S., chlorpyrifos has been widely studied for its neurodevelopmental effects on children," PAN adds.
Jennifer Sass previously wrote at NRDC's Switchboard blog:
Organophosphate pesticides like chlorpyrifos were developed as nerve agents in World War II and adapted for use as insecticides after the war. It should come as no surprise that a chemical developed as a nerve agents would have deleterious effects on people who come into contact with it when it is used as an insecticide.
"EPA's own findings show that chlorpyrifos causes brain damage to children and poisons workers and bystanders," Goldman's statement adds, while Virginia Ruiz of Farmworker Justice hailed the proposal as "a step forward on the path to environmental justice."
"Farmworkers and their families, who are predominantly poor and majority people of color, bear the brunt of poisonings from pesticides and pesticide drift," Ruiz noted.
The Associated Press reports that the EPA will take public comment on the proposal for two months, and is expected to issue a final rule in 2016.
Veena Singla Blog writes at Switchboard Friday, "If the proposal becomes a reality, it would be a huge victory, and provide agricultural communities the protections they deserve and have been denied for too long."
In what could be a huge gain for environmental justice, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed on Friday a ban on an agricultural pesticide linked to brain damage problems in children as well as harm to workers and communities.
The announcement on the pesticide, chlorpyrifos, comes a day ahead of the Oct. 31 deadline issued (pdf) by a federal court of appeals directing the EPA to act on a 2007 petition from Pesticide Action Network (PAN) and Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) to ban the chemical, and comes 15 years after the agency banned its residential use.
"This is what we have been seeking for years," said Patti Goldman, the Earthjustice attorney handling the case.
As PAN explains, "chlorpyrifos is an organophosphate pesticide known for its damaging effects on the human nervous system."
"[U]sed in the production of fruits and vegetables throughout the U.S., chlorpyrifos has been widely studied for its neurodevelopmental effects on children," PAN adds.
Jennifer Sass previously wrote at NRDC's Switchboard blog:
Organophosphate pesticides like chlorpyrifos were developed as nerve agents in World War II and adapted for use as insecticides after the war. It should come as no surprise that a chemical developed as a nerve agents would have deleterious effects on people who come into contact with it when it is used as an insecticide.
"EPA's own findings show that chlorpyrifos causes brain damage to children and poisons workers and bystanders," Goldman's statement adds, while Virginia Ruiz of Farmworker Justice hailed the proposal as "a step forward on the path to environmental justice."
"Farmworkers and their families, who are predominantly poor and majority people of color, bear the brunt of poisonings from pesticides and pesticide drift," Ruiz noted.
The Associated Press reports that the EPA will take public comment on the proposal for two months, and is expected to issue a final rule in 2016.
Veena Singla Blog writes at Switchboard Friday, "If the proposal becomes a reality, it would be a huge victory, and provide agricultural communities the protections they deserve and have been denied for too long."