

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
As the partisan attack on Planned Parenthood heats up on Capitol Hill this week, a new study published Tuesday found that the women's healthcare provider is in many cases the only source of contraceptive care for minority and low-income women across the country.
The analysis (pdf) was conducted by the Guttmacher Institute, a New York-based reproductive health research organization, in response to a Congressional Budget Office request.
After examining the most recent data available, Guttmacher found that, "unequivocally that for women in many areas of the country, losing Planned Parenthood would mean losing their chosen provider--and the only safety-net provider around." Safety-net providers are institutions that provide care and services in low-income, medically underserved, immigrant, and communities of color.
The study, published at the Health Affairs blog, found that in one-fifth of the 491 counties in which Planned Parenthood sites are located, they are the sole safety-net family planning center. Further, in two-thirds of those counties, Planned Parenthood serves at least half of all women obtaining contraceptive care from safety-net health centers.
These findings debunk the myth, spread by conservative detractors of Planned Parenthood, that the care provided by the group could be easily supplanted by a publicly-funded safety-net centers, such as federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) or county health departments. In fact, the study found that the average Planned Parenthood health center serves "significantly more contraceptive clients each year" than FQHCs, or similar providers.
Further, such community health centers are already chronically underfunded and would be unable to "pick up the slack" if Planned Parenthood's funding were to be slashed, as health policy expert Sara Rosenbaum recently noted. Such cuts, Rosenbaum added, would have a significant impact on the "millions of poor women" dependent on safety-net care.
"Community health centers operate on modest budgets and repeatedly have been shown to be highly efficient," Rosenbaum writes. "But no amount of efficiency can give them the means to ramp up quickly enough to replace the loss of preventive women's health services of the magnitude that would result were Planned Parenthood clinics to close."
"Unable to access the contraceptive care they need, women would be left to pay the price, as more unintended pregnancies and abortions result," she adds.
On Wednesday, conservative lawmakers are holding the first in a series of congressional committee hearings on Planned Parenthood, pivoting off claims made in the latest smear campaign against the group. Also, a growing number of Republican lawmakers are pledging to oppose any legislation to fund the government that also continues to fund Planned Parenthood.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
As the partisan attack on Planned Parenthood heats up on Capitol Hill this week, a new study published Tuesday found that the women's healthcare provider is in many cases the only source of contraceptive care for minority and low-income women across the country.
The analysis (pdf) was conducted by the Guttmacher Institute, a New York-based reproductive health research organization, in response to a Congressional Budget Office request.
After examining the most recent data available, Guttmacher found that, "unequivocally that for women in many areas of the country, losing Planned Parenthood would mean losing their chosen provider--and the only safety-net provider around." Safety-net providers are institutions that provide care and services in low-income, medically underserved, immigrant, and communities of color.
The study, published at the Health Affairs blog, found that in one-fifth of the 491 counties in which Planned Parenthood sites are located, they are the sole safety-net family planning center. Further, in two-thirds of those counties, Planned Parenthood serves at least half of all women obtaining contraceptive care from safety-net health centers.
These findings debunk the myth, spread by conservative detractors of Planned Parenthood, that the care provided by the group could be easily supplanted by a publicly-funded safety-net centers, such as federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) or county health departments. In fact, the study found that the average Planned Parenthood health center serves "significantly more contraceptive clients each year" than FQHCs, or similar providers.
Further, such community health centers are already chronically underfunded and would be unable to "pick up the slack" if Planned Parenthood's funding were to be slashed, as health policy expert Sara Rosenbaum recently noted. Such cuts, Rosenbaum added, would have a significant impact on the "millions of poor women" dependent on safety-net care.
"Community health centers operate on modest budgets and repeatedly have been shown to be highly efficient," Rosenbaum writes. "But no amount of efficiency can give them the means to ramp up quickly enough to replace the loss of preventive women's health services of the magnitude that would result were Planned Parenthood clinics to close."
"Unable to access the contraceptive care they need, women would be left to pay the price, as more unintended pregnancies and abortions result," she adds.
On Wednesday, conservative lawmakers are holding the first in a series of congressional committee hearings on Planned Parenthood, pivoting off claims made in the latest smear campaign against the group. Also, a growing number of Republican lawmakers are pledging to oppose any legislation to fund the government that also continues to fund Planned Parenthood.
As the partisan attack on Planned Parenthood heats up on Capitol Hill this week, a new study published Tuesday found that the women's healthcare provider is in many cases the only source of contraceptive care for minority and low-income women across the country.
The analysis (pdf) was conducted by the Guttmacher Institute, a New York-based reproductive health research organization, in response to a Congressional Budget Office request.
After examining the most recent data available, Guttmacher found that, "unequivocally that for women in many areas of the country, losing Planned Parenthood would mean losing their chosen provider--and the only safety-net provider around." Safety-net providers are institutions that provide care and services in low-income, medically underserved, immigrant, and communities of color.
The study, published at the Health Affairs blog, found that in one-fifth of the 491 counties in which Planned Parenthood sites are located, they are the sole safety-net family planning center. Further, in two-thirds of those counties, Planned Parenthood serves at least half of all women obtaining contraceptive care from safety-net health centers.
These findings debunk the myth, spread by conservative detractors of Planned Parenthood, that the care provided by the group could be easily supplanted by a publicly-funded safety-net centers, such as federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) or county health departments. In fact, the study found that the average Planned Parenthood health center serves "significantly more contraceptive clients each year" than FQHCs, or similar providers.
Further, such community health centers are already chronically underfunded and would be unable to "pick up the slack" if Planned Parenthood's funding were to be slashed, as health policy expert Sara Rosenbaum recently noted. Such cuts, Rosenbaum added, would have a significant impact on the "millions of poor women" dependent on safety-net care.
"Community health centers operate on modest budgets and repeatedly have been shown to be highly efficient," Rosenbaum writes. "But no amount of efficiency can give them the means to ramp up quickly enough to replace the loss of preventive women's health services of the magnitude that would result were Planned Parenthood clinics to close."
"Unable to access the contraceptive care they need, women would be left to pay the price, as more unintended pregnancies and abortions result," she adds.
On Wednesday, conservative lawmakers are holding the first in a series of congressional committee hearings on Planned Parenthood, pivoting off claims made in the latest smear campaign against the group. Also, a growing number of Republican lawmakers are pledging to oppose any legislation to fund the government that also continues to fund Planned Parenthood.