

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
On the eve of a once-in-a-decade White House Conference on Aging (WHCOA)--and in the face of what they describe as the "impending retirement savings crisis facing this nation"--a group of 70 Democratic lawmakers led by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) on Sunday called on President Barack Obama to expand Social Security benefits.
"We write today to request your help in ensuring that Americans continue to have sufficient resources to maintain their standard of living in old age," said 69 U.S. House members, plus Sens. Sanders, Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), in a letter (pdf) sent to the White House Sunday evening.
Citing widespread and bipartisan support among the American public, the letter urges Obama to "include proposals to expand Social Security benefits for millions of Americans in your policy brief at the upcoming Conference."
In fact, the lawmakers continue, "[a]s Social Security is affordable, universal, efficient, secure, portable, distributionally fair, and popular, expanding its modest benefits should be the number one retirement security recommendation of the White House Conference on Aging."
A coalition of progressive civil society groups echoed that call on Monday, when they delivered more than 2.5 million petition signatures also demanding that the Obama Administration prioritize Social Security expansion when crafting aging policy.
The Hill reports:
Social Security has divided Obama and his liberal allies on Capitol Hill. The president infuriated many Democrats in 2013 when he unveiled a 2014 budget package that would calculate future cost-of-living increases in Social Security using the chained consumer price index (CPI), which would reduce benefits over time.
The move was largely political: Obama had included the provision as an olive branch to Republicans, who have long championed benefit cuts under Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid in the name of reducing spending and shrinking government. But the provision did nothing to bring GOP leaders to the budget negotiating table.
Although Obama had emphasized that he would consider the chained-CPI provision only as part of a package deal that included tax hikes, many liberal Democrats were nonetheless outraged that he would open the door to cutting seniors benefits.
As Eric Kingson, co-director of Social Security Works and co-author of the new book Social Security Works! Why Social Security Isn't Going Broke and How Expanding It Will Help Us All, wrote at the Huffington Post last week: "Most American workers face a personal retirement income crisis. Absent expanding Social Security, they will be unable to maintain their standards of living when they grow old."
Kingson urged WHCOA delegates to support expansion provisions including:
"If the goal is to strengthen economic security, WHCOA delegates should make clear that the richest nation at the richest time in the world's history should make a down payment to provide greater retirement income security for today's and tomorrow's seniors," Kingson wrote in a post co-authored with former Social Security Works legislative director Molly Checksfield. "Addressing the retirement income crisis and significant income problems of today's retirees in a way that supports the expansion of the nation's most successful and popular domestic policy will resonate most effectively with the American people."
Last month, Democratic presidential candidate Sanders lashed out in response to Republican rival Jeb Bush's suggestion that the U.S. raise the retirement age--which economists have said amounts to a benefit cut.
"I have a hard time understanding what world Gov. Bush and his billionaire backers live in," Sanders, founder of the Senate Defending Social Security Caucus, said in early June. "When the average Social Security benefit is just $1,328 a month, and more than one-third of our senior citizens rely on Social Security for virtually all of their income, our job must be to expand benefits, not cut them."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
On the eve of a once-in-a-decade White House Conference on Aging (WHCOA)--and in the face of what they describe as the "impending retirement savings crisis facing this nation"--a group of 70 Democratic lawmakers led by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) on Sunday called on President Barack Obama to expand Social Security benefits.
"We write today to request your help in ensuring that Americans continue to have sufficient resources to maintain their standard of living in old age," said 69 U.S. House members, plus Sens. Sanders, Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), in a letter (pdf) sent to the White House Sunday evening.
Citing widespread and bipartisan support among the American public, the letter urges Obama to "include proposals to expand Social Security benefits for millions of Americans in your policy brief at the upcoming Conference."
In fact, the lawmakers continue, "[a]s Social Security is affordable, universal, efficient, secure, portable, distributionally fair, and popular, expanding its modest benefits should be the number one retirement security recommendation of the White House Conference on Aging."
A coalition of progressive civil society groups echoed that call on Monday, when they delivered more than 2.5 million petition signatures also demanding that the Obama Administration prioritize Social Security expansion when crafting aging policy.
The Hill reports:
Social Security has divided Obama and his liberal allies on Capitol Hill. The president infuriated many Democrats in 2013 when he unveiled a 2014 budget package that would calculate future cost-of-living increases in Social Security using the chained consumer price index (CPI), which would reduce benefits over time.
The move was largely political: Obama had included the provision as an olive branch to Republicans, who have long championed benefit cuts under Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid in the name of reducing spending and shrinking government. But the provision did nothing to bring GOP leaders to the budget negotiating table.
Although Obama had emphasized that he would consider the chained-CPI provision only as part of a package deal that included tax hikes, many liberal Democrats were nonetheless outraged that he would open the door to cutting seniors benefits.
As Eric Kingson, co-director of Social Security Works and co-author of the new book Social Security Works! Why Social Security Isn't Going Broke and How Expanding It Will Help Us All, wrote at the Huffington Post last week: "Most American workers face a personal retirement income crisis. Absent expanding Social Security, they will be unable to maintain their standards of living when they grow old."
Kingson urged WHCOA delegates to support expansion provisions including:
"If the goal is to strengthen economic security, WHCOA delegates should make clear that the richest nation at the richest time in the world's history should make a down payment to provide greater retirement income security for today's and tomorrow's seniors," Kingson wrote in a post co-authored with former Social Security Works legislative director Molly Checksfield. "Addressing the retirement income crisis and significant income problems of today's retirees in a way that supports the expansion of the nation's most successful and popular domestic policy will resonate most effectively with the American people."
Last month, Democratic presidential candidate Sanders lashed out in response to Republican rival Jeb Bush's suggestion that the U.S. raise the retirement age--which economists have said amounts to a benefit cut.
"I have a hard time understanding what world Gov. Bush and his billionaire backers live in," Sanders, founder of the Senate Defending Social Security Caucus, said in early June. "When the average Social Security benefit is just $1,328 a month, and more than one-third of our senior citizens rely on Social Security for virtually all of their income, our job must be to expand benefits, not cut them."
On the eve of a once-in-a-decade White House Conference on Aging (WHCOA)--and in the face of what they describe as the "impending retirement savings crisis facing this nation"--a group of 70 Democratic lawmakers led by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) on Sunday called on President Barack Obama to expand Social Security benefits.
"We write today to request your help in ensuring that Americans continue to have sufficient resources to maintain their standard of living in old age," said 69 U.S. House members, plus Sens. Sanders, Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), in a letter (pdf) sent to the White House Sunday evening.
Citing widespread and bipartisan support among the American public, the letter urges Obama to "include proposals to expand Social Security benefits for millions of Americans in your policy brief at the upcoming Conference."
In fact, the lawmakers continue, "[a]s Social Security is affordable, universal, efficient, secure, portable, distributionally fair, and popular, expanding its modest benefits should be the number one retirement security recommendation of the White House Conference on Aging."
A coalition of progressive civil society groups echoed that call on Monday, when they delivered more than 2.5 million petition signatures also demanding that the Obama Administration prioritize Social Security expansion when crafting aging policy.
The Hill reports:
Social Security has divided Obama and his liberal allies on Capitol Hill. The president infuriated many Democrats in 2013 when he unveiled a 2014 budget package that would calculate future cost-of-living increases in Social Security using the chained consumer price index (CPI), which would reduce benefits over time.
The move was largely political: Obama had included the provision as an olive branch to Republicans, who have long championed benefit cuts under Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid in the name of reducing spending and shrinking government. But the provision did nothing to bring GOP leaders to the budget negotiating table.
Although Obama had emphasized that he would consider the chained-CPI provision only as part of a package deal that included tax hikes, many liberal Democrats were nonetheless outraged that he would open the door to cutting seniors benefits.
As Eric Kingson, co-director of Social Security Works and co-author of the new book Social Security Works! Why Social Security Isn't Going Broke and How Expanding It Will Help Us All, wrote at the Huffington Post last week: "Most American workers face a personal retirement income crisis. Absent expanding Social Security, they will be unable to maintain their standards of living when they grow old."
Kingson urged WHCOA delegates to support expansion provisions including:
"If the goal is to strengthen economic security, WHCOA delegates should make clear that the richest nation at the richest time in the world's history should make a down payment to provide greater retirement income security for today's and tomorrow's seniors," Kingson wrote in a post co-authored with former Social Security Works legislative director Molly Checksfield. "Addressing the retirement income crisis and significant income problems of today's retirees in a way that supports the expansion of the nation's most successful and popular domestic policy will resonate most effectively with the American people."
Last month, Democratic presidential candidate Sanders lashed out in response to Republican rival Jeb Bush's suggestion that the U.S. raise the retirement age--which economists have said amounts to a benefit cut.
"I have a hard time understanding what world Gov. Bush and his billionaire backers live in," Sanders, founder of the Senate Defending Social Security Caucus, said in early June. "When the average Social Security benefit is just $1,328 a month, and more than one-third of our senior citizens rely on Social Security for virtually all of their income, our job must be to expand benefits, not cut them."