SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"We have known for decades that 2,4-D is harmful to the environment and human health, especially for the farmers and farm workers applying these chemicals to crops," said Mary Ellen Kustin, Environmental Working Group.
(Photo: Chafer Machinery/flickr/cc)
WHO Says Widely-Used Dow Herbicide 'Possibly Carcinogenic' to Humans
Advocacy groups warn new classification is latest proof that 'we cannot continue down the path of dousing our fields with ever more toxic chemicals'
Jun 23, 2015
The World Health Organization revealed on Tuesday that dichloro phenoxy acetic, a key ingredient of a widely used herbicide produced by Dow, is "possibly carcinogenic" to humans—a classification that public health and environmental advocates say is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the chemical's overall dangers.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer--a Lyon, France-based wing of the WHO--published the findings Tuesday in The Lancet Oncology and also disclosed them in a public statement (pdf).
The agency said there is "strong evidence that 2,4-D induces oxidative stress that can operate in humans and moderate evidence that 2,4-D causes immunosuppression, based on in-vivo and in-vitro studies."
The classification of "possibly carcinogenic" puts 2,4-D two levels above "probably not carcinogenic" but one below "probably carcinogenic."
This development did not come as a shock to public health and environmental advocates.
"We have known for decades that 2,4-D is harmful to the environment and human health, especially for the farmers and farm workers applying these chemicals to crops," said Mary Ellen Kustin, senior policy analyst for the Environmental Working Group, in a press statement.
However, advocacy groups say that the agency's findings come at a particularly critical time.
"Now that farmers are planting 2,4-D-tolerant GMO crops, this herbicide is slated to explode in use much the way glyphosate did with the first generation of GMO crops," said Kustin. "And we know from experience--and basic biology--that weeds will soon grow resistant to these herbicides, making GMO crop growers only more dependent on the next chemical fix."
Marcia Ishii-Eiteman, senior scientist at Pesticide Action Network, said that this dependency underscores the importance of immediate action: "We must heed the warning: we cannot continue down the path of dousing our fields with ever more toxic chemicals as a temporary solution to today's epidemic of herbicide-resistant weeds--a problem greatly exacerbated in recent years by dependence on glyphosate, now classified as a probable carcinogen."
Troublingly, 2,4-D is just one key ingredient in Dow's Enlist Duo herbicide, which the Environmental Protection Agency approved in April for use in 15 states. The other key ingredient is glyphosate, which the WHO said in March is a "probable carcinogen" for humans.
What's unknown, and perhaps even more alarming, is that "when the EPA approved Enlist Duo for use on GMO crops, the agency did not consider the effects the two harmful defoliants may have on human health when mixed," EWG warned Tuesday.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
agriculturecarcinogensenvironmentenvironmental protection agencyglyphosategmopesticide action networkworld health organizationdow chemical
The World Health Organization revealed on Tuesday that dichloro phenoxy acetic, a key ingredient of a widely used herbicide produced by Dow, is "possibly carcinogenic" to humans—a classification that public health and environmental advocates say is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the chemical's overall dangers.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer--a Lyon, France-based wing of the WHO--published the findings Tuesday in The Lancet Oncology and also disclosed them in a public statement (pdf).
The agency said there is "strong evidence that 2,4-D induces oxidative stress that can operate in humans and moderate evidence that 2,4-D causes immunosuppression, based on in-vivo and in-vitro studies."
The classification of "possibly carcinogenic" puts 2,4-D two levels above "probably not carcinogenic" but one below "probably carcinogenic."
This development did not come as a shock to public health and environmental advocates.
"We have known for decades that 2,4-D is harmful to the environment and human health, especially for the farmers and farm workers applying these chemicals to crops," said Mary Ellen Kustin, senior policy analyst for the Environmental Working Group, in a press statement.
However, advocacy groups say that the agency's findings come at a particularly critical time.
"Now that farmers are planting 2,4-D-tolerant GMO crops, this herbicide is slated to explode in use much the way glyphosate did with the first generation of GMO crops," said Kustin. "And we know from experience--and basic biology--that weeds will soon grow resistant to these herbicides, making GMO crop growers only more dependent on the next chemical fix."
Marcia Ishii-Eiteman, senior scientist at Pesticide Action Network, said that this dependency underscores the importance of immediate action: "We must heed the warning: we cannot continue down the path of dousing our fields with ever more toxic chemicals as a temporary solution to today's epidemic of herbicide-resistant weeds--a problem greatly exacerbated in recent years by dependence on glyphosate, now classified as a probable carcinogen."
Troublingly, 2,4-D is just one key ingredient in Dow's Enlist Duo herbicide, which the Environmental Protection Agency approved in April for use in 15 states. The other key ingredient is glyphosate, which the WHO said in March is a "probable carcinogen" for humans.
What's unknown, and perhaps even more alarming, is that "when the EPA approved Enlist Duo for use on GMO crops, the agency did not consider the effects the two harmful defoliants may have on human health when mixed," EWG warned Tuesday.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
The World Health Organization revealed on Tuesday that dichloro phenoxy acetic, a key ingredient of a widely used herbicide produced by Dow, is "possibly carcinogenic" to humans—a classification that public health and environmental advocates say is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the chemical's overall dangers.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer--a Lyon, France-based wing of the WHO--published the findings Tuesday in The Lancet Oncology and also disclosed them in a public statement (pdf).
The agency said there is "strong evidence that 2,4-D induces oxidative stress that can operate in humans and moderate evidence that 2,4-D causes immunosuppression, based on in-vivo and in-vitro studies."
The classification of "possibly carcinogenic" puts 2,4-D two levels above "probably not carcinogenic" but one below "probably carcinogenic."
This development did not come as a shock to public health and environmental advocates.
"We have known for decades that 2,4-D is harmful to the environment and human health, especially for the farmers and farm workers applying these chemicals to crops," said Mary Ellen Kustin, senior policy analyst for the Environmental Working Group, in a press statement.
However, advocacy groups say that the agency's findings come at a particularly critical time.
"Now that farmers are planting 2,4-D-tolerant GMO crops, this herbicide is slated to explode in use much the way glyphosate did with the first generation of GMO crops," said Kustin. "And we know from experience--and basic biology--that weeds will soon grow resistant to these herbicides, making GMO crop growers only more dependent on the next chemical fix."
Marcia Ishii-Eiteman, senior scientist at Pesticide Action Network, said that this dependency underscores the importance of immediate action: "We must heed the warning: we cannot continue down the path of dousing our fields with ever more toxic chemicals as a temporary solution to today's epidemic of herbicide-resistant weeds--a problem greatly exacerbated in recent years by dependence on glyphosate, now classified as a probable carcinogen."
Troublingly, 2,4-D is just one key ingredient in Dow's Enlist Duo herbicide, which the Environmental Protection Agency approved in April for use in 15 states. The other key ingredient is glyphosate, which the WHO said in March is a "probable carcinogen" for humans.
What's unknown, and perhaps even more alarming, is that "when the EPA approved Enlist Duo for use on GMO crops, the agency did not consider the effects the two harmful defoliants may have on human health when mixed," EWG warned Tuesday.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.