"We have known for decades that 2,4-D is harmful to the environment and human health, especially for the farmers and farm workers applying these chemicals to crops," said Mary Ellen Kustin, Environmental Working Group.
WHO Says Widely-Used Dow Herbicide 'Possibly Carcinogenic' to Humans
Advocacy groups warn new classification is latest proof that 'we cannot continue down the path of dousing our fields with ever more toxic chemicals'
The World Health Organization revealed on Tuesday that dichloro phenoxy acetic, a key ingredient of a widely used herbicide produced by Dow, is "possibly carcinogenic" to humans—a classification that public health and environmental advocates say is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the chemical's overall dangers.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer--a Lyon, France-based wing of the WHO--published the findings Tuesday in The Lancet Oncology and also disclosed them in a public statement (pdf).
The agency said there is "strong evidence that 2,4-D induces oxidative stress that can operate in humans and moderate evidence that 2,4-D causes immunosuppression, based on in-vivo and in-vitro studies."
The classification of "possibly carcinogenic" puts 2,4-D two levels above "probably not carcinogenic" but one below "probably carcinogenic."
This development did not come as a shock to public health and environmental advocates.
"We have known for decades that 2,4-D is harmful to the environment and human health, especially for the farmers and farm workers applying these chemicals to crops," said Mary Ellen Kustin, senior policy analyst for the Environmental Working Group, in a press statement.
However, advocacy groups say that the agency's findings come at a particularly critical time.
"Now that farmers are planting 2,4-D-tolerant GMO crops, this herbicide is slated to explode in use much the way glyphosate did with the first generation of GMO crops," said Kustin. "And we know from experience--and basic biology--that weeds will soon grow resistant to these herbicides, making GMO crop growers only more dependent on the next chemical fix."
Marcia Ishii-Eiteman, senior scientist at Pesticide Action Network, said that this dependency underscores the importance of immediate action: "We must heed the warning: we cannot continue down the path of dousing our fields with ever more toxic chemicals as a temporary solution to today's epidemic of herbicide-resistant weeds--a problem greatly exacerbated in recent years by dependence on glyphosate, now classified as a probable carcinogen."
Troublingly, 2,4-D is just one key ingredient in Dow's Enlist Duo herbicide, which the Environmental Protection Agency approved in April for use in 15 states. The other key ingredient is glyphosate, which the WHO said in March is a "probable carcinogen" for humans.
What's unknown, and perhaps even more alarming, is that "when the EPA approved Enlist Duo for use on GMO crops, the agency did not consider the effects the two harmful defoliants may have on human health when mixed," EWG warned Tuesday.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The World Health Organization revealed on Tuesday that dichloro phenoxy acetic, a key ingredient of a widely used herbicide produced by Dow, is "possibly carcinogenic" to humans—a classification that public health and environmental advocates say is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the chemical's overall dangers.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer--a Lyon, France-based wing of the WHO--published the findings Tuesday in The Lancet Oncology and also disclosed them in a public statement (pdf).
The agency said there is "strong evidence that 2,4-D induces oxidative stress that can operate in humans and moderate evidence that 2,4-D causes immunosuppression, based on in-vivo and in-vitro studies."
The classification of "possibly carcinogenic" puts 2,4-D two levels above "probably not carcinogenic" but one below "probably carcinogenic."
This development did not come as a shock to public health and environmental advocates.
"We have known for decades that 2,4-D is harmful to the environment and human health, especially for the farmers and farm workers applying these chemicals to crops," said Mary Ellen Kustin, senior policy analyst for the Environmental Working Group, in a press statement.
However, advocacy groups say that the agency's findings come at a particularly critical time.
"Now that farmers are planting 2,4-D-tolerant GMO crops, this herbicide is slated to explode in use much the way glyphosate did with the first generation of GMO crops," said Kustin. "And we know from experience--and basic biology--that weeds will soon grow resistant to these herbicides, making GMO crop growers only more dependent on the next chemical fix."
Marcia Ishii-Eiteman, senior scientist at Pesticide Action Network, said that this dependency underscores the importance of immediate action: "We must heed the warning: we cannot continue down the path of dousing our fields with ever more toxic chemicals as a temporary solution to today's epidemic of herbicide-resistant weeds--a problem greatly exacerbated in recent years by dependence on glyphosate, now classified as a probable carcinogen."
Troublingly, 2,4-D is just one key ingredient in Dow's Enlist Duo herbicide, which the Environmental Protection Agency approved in April for use in 15 states. The other key ingredient is glyphosate, which the WHO said in March is a "probable carcinogen" for humans.
What's unknown, and perhaps even more alarming, is that "when the EPA approved Enlist Duo for use on GMO crops, the agency did not consider the effects the two harmful defoliants may have on human health when mixed," EWG warned Tuesday.
The World Health Organization revealed on Tuesday that dichloro phenoxy acetic, a key ingredient of a widely used herbicide produced by Dow, is "possibly carcinogenic" to humans—a classification that public health and environmental advocates say is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the chemical's overall dangers.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer--a Lyon, France-based wing of the WHO--published the findings Tuesday in The Lancet Oncology and also disclosed them in a public statement (pdf).
The agency said there is "strong evidence that 2,4-D induces oxidative stress that can operate in humans and moderate evidence that 2,4-D causes immunosuppression, based on in-vivo and in-vitro studies."
The classification of "possibly carcinogenic" puts 2,4-D two levels above "probably not carcinogenic" but one below "probably carcinogenic."
This development did not come as a shock to public health and environmental advocates.
"We have known for decades that 2,4-D is harmful to the environment and human health, especially for the farmers and farm workers applying these chemicals to crops," said Mary Ellen Kustin, senior policy analyst for the Environmental Working Group, in a press statement.
However, advocacy groups say that the agency's findings come at a particularly critical time.
"Now that farmers are planting 2,4-D-tolerant GMO crops, this herbicide is slated to explode in use much the way glyphosate did with the first generation of GMO crops," said Kustin. "And we know from experience--and basic biology--that weeds will soon grow resistant to these herbicides, making GMO crop growers only more dependent on the next chemical fix."
Marcia Ishii-Eiteman, senior scientist at Pesticide Action Network, said that this dependency underscores the importance of immediate action: "We must heed the warning: we cannot continue down the path of dousing our fields with ever more toxic chemicals as a temporary solution to today's epidemic of herbicide-resistant weeds--a problem greatly exacerbated in recent years by dependence on glyphosate, now classified as a probable carcinogen."
Troublingly, 2,4-D is just one key ingredient in Dow's Enlist Duo herbicide, which the Environmental Protection Agency approved in April for use in 15 states. The other key ingredient is glyphosate, which the WHO said in March is a "probable carcinogen" for humans.
What's unknown, and perhaps even more alarming, is that "when the EPA approved Enlist Duo for use on GMO crops, the agency did not consider the effects the two harmful defoliants may have on human health when mixed," EWG warned Tuesday.