SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Informant Provided Bomb-Making Manual to Alleged "ISIS-Inspired" Plotters
Like other recent sensational "terror plots," latest case demonstrates the key role of of an undercover law enforcement informant in both formulating and facilitating the alleged plot.
Apr 03, 2015
In what has been widely described in the media as the break-up of an "ISIS-inspired" plot, on April 2nd the Department of Justice announced that Noelle Velentzas, 28, and Asia Siddiqui, 31, both of New York, had been arrested and charged with conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction. The defendants "plotted to wreak terror by creating explosive devices" for use in New York City, and the two sought "bomb-making instructions and materials" for an attack, the Justice Department statement said.
Like other recent sensational "terror plots," however, the criminal complaint unsealed yesterday demonstrates the key role of of an undercover law enforcement informant in both formulating and facilitating the alleged plot. It doesn't appear that Velentzas or Siddiqui actually planned or attempted to bomb any target, nor is there any evidence of discussions about how to create a bomb before the introduction of the informant into their lives.
It was only after the informant provided the pair with a copy of The Anarchists Cookbook - a manual with instructions on how to create an explosive device -- that their amateurish efforts gained any traction.
According to the complaint, both Velentzas and Siddiqui are alleged to have "espoused jihadist beliefs" for a prolonged period leading up to these allegations. Siddiqui, in particular, is believed to have written letters and poems in support of extremist violence, and may have been under government surveillance since as far back as 2006, when she is said to have made contact with the now-deceased former editor of Al Qaeda's Inspire magazine, Samir Khan. While the exact nature of this contact is not specified, it is alleged that, in 2009, Siddiqui had submitted poems online to the predecessor magazine of Inspire, entitled Jihad Recollections.
One of her poems, detailed in the complaint, appears to draw more on contemporary rap music than Islam, reading in part: "Hit cloud nine with the smell of turpentine, nations wiped clean of filthy shrines".
Years later, in July 2014, FBI agents conducted an interview with Siddiqui when she arrived at LaGuardia Airport in New York, questioning her about her past links to Khan and online jihadist publications. Later that day, after leaving the airport, Siddiqui apparently met with the informant, whom she allegedly told she needed to go online and "delete stuff" from her email accounts.
After that meeting, the informant, Siddiqui and Velentzas began meeting regularly over the course of several months -- those conversations were secretly taped by law enforcement. It is only at this point does any discussion of creating or using a bomb come into existence. In conversation with informant on August 6th, 2014, the two defendants are alleged to have discussed "science" in the context of making a bomb; Siddiqui asking Velentzas whether she was "good at science," a question that Velentzas answered in the negative.
Read the full article at The Intercept.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Murtaza Hussain
Murtaza Hussain is a journalist and political commentator now working for First Look Media. His work focuses on human rights, foreign policy and cultural affairs. Murtaza's work has appeared in The New York Times, The Guardian, The Globe and Mail, Salon and elsewhere.
In what has been widely described in the media as the break-up of an "ISIS-inspired" plot, on April 2nd the Department of Justice announced that Noelle Velentzas, 28, and Asia Siddiqui, 31, both of New York, had been arrested and charged with conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction. The defendants "plotted to wreak terror by creating explosive devices" for use in New York City, and the two sought "bomb-making instructions and materials" for an attack, the Justice Department statement said.
Like other recent sensational "terror plots," however, the criminal complaint unsealed yesterday demonstrates the key role of of an undercover law enforcement informant in both formulating and facilitating the alleged plot. It doesn't appear that Velentzas or Siddiqui actually planned or attempted to bomb any target, nor is there any evidence of discussions about how to create a bomb before the introduction of the informant into their lives.
It was only after the informant provided the pair with a copy of The Anarchists Cookbook - a manual with instructions on how to create an explosive device -- that their amateurish efforts gained any traction.
According to the complaint, both Velentzas and Siddiqui are alleged to have "espoused jihadist beliefs" for a prolonged period leading up to these allegations. Siddiqui, in particular, is believed to have written letters and poems in support of extremist violence, and may have been under government surveillance since as far back as 2006, when she is said to have made contact with the now-deceased former editor of Al Qaeda's Inspire magazine, Samir Khan. While the exact nature of this contact is not specified, it is alleged that, in 2009, Siddiqui had submitted poems online to the predecessor magazine of Inspire, entitled Jihad Recollections.
One of her poems, detailed in the complaint, appears to draw more on contemporary rap music than Islam, reading in part: "Hit cloud nine with the smell of turpentine, nations wiped clean of filthy shrines".
Years later, in July 2014, FBI agents conducted an interview with Siddiqui when she arrived at LaGuardia Airport in New York, questioning her about her past links to Khan and online jihadist publications. Later that day, after leaving the airport, Siddiqui apparently met with the informant, whom she allegedly told she needed to go online and "delete stuff" from her email accounts.
After that meeting, the informant, Siddiqui and Velentzas began meeting regularly over the course of several months -- those conversations were secretly taped by law enforcement. It is only at this point does any discussion of creating or using a bomb come into existence. In conversation with informant on August 6th, 2014, the two defendants are alleged to have discussed "science" in the context of making a bomb; Siddiqui asking Velentzas whether she was "good at science," a question that Velentzas answered in the negative.
Read the full article at The Intercept.
Murtaza Hussain
Murtaza Hussain is a journalist and political commentator now working for First Look Media. His work focuses on human rights, foreign policy and cultural affairs. Murtaza's work has appeared in The New York Times, The Guardian, The Globe and Mail, Salon and elsewhere.
In what has been widely described in the media as the break-up of an "ISIS-inspired" plot, on April 2nd the Department of Justice announced that Noelle Velentzas, 28, and Asia Siddiqui, 31, both of New York, had been arrested and charged with conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction. The defendants "plotted to wreak terror by creating explosive devices" for use in New York City, and the two sought "bomb-making instructions and materials" for an attack, the Justice Department statement said.
Like other recent sensational "terror plots," however, the criminal complaint unsealed yesterday demonstrates the key role of of an undercover law enforcement informant in both formulating and facilitating the alleged plot. It doesn't appear that Velentzas or Siddiqui actually planned or attempted to bomb any target, nor is there any evidence of discussions about how to create a bomb before the introduction of the informant into their lives.
It was only after the informant provided the pair with a copy of The Anarchists Cookbook - a manual with instructions on how to create an explosive device -- that their amateurish efforts gained any traction.
According to the complaint, both Velentzas and Siddiqui are alleged to have "espoused jihadist beliefs" for a prolonged period leading up to these allegations. Siddiqui, in particular, is believed to have written letters and poems in support of extremist violence, and may have been under government surveillance since as far back as 2006, when she is said to have made contact with the now-deceased former editor of Al Qaeda's Inspire magazine, Samir Khan. While the exact nature of this contact is not specified, it is alleged that, in 2009, Siddiqui had submitted poems online to the predecessor magazine of Inspire, entitled Jihad Recollections.
One of her poems, detailed in the complaint, appears to draw more on contemporary rap music than Islam, reading in part: "Hit cloud nine with the smell of turpentine, nations wiped clean of filthy shrines".
Years later, in July 2014, FBI agents conducted an interview with Siddiqui when she arrived at LaGuardia Airport in New York, questioning her about her past links to Khan and online jihadist publications. Later that day, after leaving the airport, Siddiqui apparently met with the informant, whom she allegedly told she needed to go online and "delete stuff" from her email accounts.
After that meeting, the informant, Siddiqui and Velentzas began meeting regularly over the course of several months -- those conversations were secretly taped by law enforcement. It is only at this point does any discussion of creating or using a bomb come into existence. In conversation with informant on August 6th, 2014, the two defendants are alleged to have discussed "science" in the context of making a bomb; Siddiqui asking Velentzas whether she was "good at science," a question that Velentzas answered in the negative.
Read the full article at The Intercept.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.